Search

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a new virus discovered in December 2019 that causes coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) and various vaccinations have been developed. The extent to which COVID-19 infections and/or COVID-19 vaccinations alter antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in patients with thromboembolic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) remains unclear. Eighty-two patients with confirmed thromboembolic APS were included in this prospective non-interventional trial. Blood parameters including lupus anticoagulants, anticardiolipin IgG- and IgM-antibodies, and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I IgG- and IgM-antibodies were assessed prior to and after COVID-19 vaccination and/or COVID-19 infection. No increases in aPL in the total study population were detected. In fact, low but significant decreases were observed for anticardiolipin IgG- and anti-β2-glycoprotein I IgG-antibodies, while anticardiolipin IgM- and anti-b2-glycoprotein I IgM-antibodies slightly increased only in patients with COVID-19 infection and vaccination. Although the investigated patient group is known to have a high risk of recurrent thrombosis, only one arterial thrombotic event was diagnosed (1.2%, 1/82). This low recurrence rate was probably due to the high vaccination rates prior to infections and a high rate of effective anticoagulation. Our data show that COVID-19 infections and/or vaccinations do not deteriorate the clinical course of anticoagulated thromboembolic APS patients.

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired autoimmune disorder associated with arterial, venous, or microvascular thrombosis and/or pregnancy complications mainly in young age. The diagnosis is made by the persistent detection of anticardiolipin antibodies, β2-glycoprotein I antibodies (β2GPIA), and/or lupus anticoagulants (LAs) for at least 12 weeks. Patients should present with at least one clinical and one laboratory criterion. Patients presenting with all three types of antibodies and vascular events are high-risk patients and should receive vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) as long as the antibodies persist. In patients with prior arterial thrombosis, VKA with or without low-dose aspirin is the current treatment of choice. The international normalized ratio (INR) should be between 2 and 3 although in some cases keeping the target INR above 3 may be necessary. Patients with venous thrombosis and negative LA may alternatively be treated with direct oral anticoagulants although more data are needed. Minimizing vascular risk factors is always necessary in APS patients. Aspirin can be given as primary prevention in asymptomatic patients with positive antiphospholipid antibodies without thrombosis or pregnancy complications especially when additional vascular risk factors are present. Catastrophic APS occurs in less than 1% of APS patients and presents as a thrombotic storm. Early use of a combined triple therapy such as anticoagulation, plasma exchange, and steroids with either or not addition of immunoglobulins is important to reduce mortality., Competing Interests: Edelgard Lindhoff-Last has received lecture honoraria and advisory fees from Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo and Werfen and institutional research support from Bayer AG, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo and Werfen., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

The antiphospholipid-syndrome (APS) is one of the most severe forms of thrombophilia, which may not only lead to recurrent venous but also to arterial thromboembolic events (TE), and to severe pregnancy complications, respectively. APS is defined by clinical symptoms and specific laboratory findings: 1. Lupus anticoagulant (LA), 2. anticardiolipin-antibodies (ACA), and 3. β2-Glycoprotein I-antibodies (β2GPI-Ab). All test results have to be confirmed after at least 12 weeks. The thrombotic risk is highest, if all 3 test groups are positive. It must be pointed out that the presence of UFH, VKA or DOACs may lead to false positive LA-test results; the addition of a specific absorber after blood sampling may provide reliable results in the presence of DOACs. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing warfarin and rivaroxaban (TRAPS-trial) including only high-risk patients with triple positive APS was terminated early because of an increased rate of TE in patients treated with rivaroxaban [19 %, mostly arterial, compared to 3 % with warfarin (HR 7.4;1.7-32.9)]. Subsequently, a warning letter was issued by the pharmaceutical manufacturers of DOACs, including a warning of DOAC use in APS-patients, particularly in triple-positive high-risk patients. Conclusions: 1. Clinical suspicion of APS requires careful diagnostic testing. Because of inadequate diagnostic workup, many patients may not even have an APS, and these patients could be adequately treated with a DOAC. 2. Patients with single or double positive antiphospholipid antibodies but without positive LA may have a comparably low thrombotic risk and may also be treated with a DOAC in venous TE - sufficient evidence for that conclusion is not yet available but is suggested by the results of meta-analyses. 3. Triple positive patients or those with APS who suffered from arterial thromboembolism have a very high recurrence risk of thrombosis; the TRAPS-Study shows that these patients should be treated with VKA instead of a DOAC.

Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Background: Persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) constitute the serological hallmark of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Recently, various new assay technologies for the detection of aPL better suited to multiplex reaction environments than ELISAs emerged. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of such a novel line immunoassay (LIA) for the simultaneous detection of 10 different aPL., Methods: Fifty-three APS patients and 34 healthy controls were investigated for criteria (antibodies against cardiolipin [aCL], β2-glycoprotein I [aβ2-GPI]) and non-criteria aPL (antibodies against phosphatidic acid [aPA], phosphatidyl-choline [aPC], -ethanolamine [aPE], -glycerol [aPG], -inositol [aPI], -serine [aPS], annexin V [aAnnV], prothrombin [aPT]) IgG and IgM by LIA. Criteria aPL were additionally determined with the established Alegria (ALE), AcuStar (ACU), UniCap (UNI), and AESKULISA (AES) systems and non-criteria aPL with the AES system. Diagnostic performance was evaluated with a gold standard for criteria aPL derived from the results of the four established assays via latent class analysis and with the clinical diagnosis as gold standard for non-criteria aPL., Results: Assay performance of the LIA for criteria aPL was comparable to that of ALE, ACU, UNI, and AES. For non-criteria aPL, sensitivities of the LIA for aPA-, aPI-, aPS-IgG and aPA-IgM were significantly higher and for aPC-, aPE-, aAnnV-IgG and aPC- and aPE-IgM significantly lower than AES. Specificities did not differ significantly., Conclusions: The LIA constitutes a valuable diagnostic tool for aPL profiling. It offers increased sensitivity for the detection of aPL against anionic phospholipids. In contrast, ELISAs exhibit strengths for the sensitive detection of aPL against neutral phospholipids., Competing Interests: Dirk Roggenbuck has a management role and is a shareholder of GA Generic Assays GmbH. Thomas Büttner is an employee of GA Generic Assays GmbH. GA Generic Assays manufactures and distributes the LIA described in the manuscript. GA Generic Assays provided the LIA kits for the study and as such constitutes a commercial funder of the study. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Introduction: The dRVVT test for detecting lupus anticoagulants (LA) is difficult to interpret when patients are treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA)., Methods: We performed LA testing in 33 VKA-treated patients with definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and compared the results with 100 controls subjects not receiving VKA and 110 APL-negative patients anticoagulated for reasons other than APS., Results: Compared with the dRVVT ratio before the initiation of VKA therapy, a higher cutoff value, defined as the 99th percentile, was established for VKA-treated patients with INR values between 2.0 and 3.5. A dRVVT ratio of >1.7 yielded a sensitivity of 81.3%, specificity of 99.1%, and positive and negative predictive values of 98.7% and 85.8%, respectively, for detecting LA. Cohen's kappa coefficient indicated good agreement for the dRVVT ratio obtained from testing with and without VKA treatment (κ = 0.813; 95% CI: 0.773-0.853), which was higher (κ = 0.941; 95% CI: 0.917-0.965) when the LA diagnosis was based on the results of both the dRVVT and a second test system (i.e., Mixcon-LA assay)., Conclusions: Lupus anticoagulants testing in VKA-treated patients with APS according to current guidelines appears to be possible for the majority of patients without discontinuing anticoagulant therapy., (© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Because of the possible interference of antiphospholipid antibodies (APL) with the phospholipid component of thromboplastin reagents, concerns have been raised about the validity of international normalized ratio (INR) testing to monitor anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). To investigate the reliability of the INR, we determined the INR using various prothrombin time (PT) assays and compared the results with those of a chromogenic factor X (CFX) assay. The study cohort consisted of 40 APS patients and 100 APL-negative patients who were on anticoagulant therapy for reasons other than APS. The agreement (i.e. the percentage of patients with a difference ≤0.5 INR units) between the PT-derived INR and CFX-derived INR equivalents was only moderate in both patient groups. The best agreement with CFX-derived INR equivalents was observed for the Thromborel S reagent in APS patients (69.1 %) and for Neoplastin Plus in APL-negative patients (72.0 %). Regarding the results for the point-of-care system CoaguChek XS, an agreement between the INR and the CFX-derived INR equivalent was less frequently observed in the APS patients (55.6 vs. 67.8 %; p = 0.050). When considering all 3058 pairs of INR tests within the international sensitivity index (ISI)-calibrated range of 1.5 to 4.5 s, we did not observe a higher variability of INR values in either the APS patient group or the subgroup of APS patients positive for lupus coagulants compared with the APL-negative controls. In conclusion, monitoring vitamin K antagonists (VKA) therapy with laboratory INR measurements seems to be suitable for the majority of APS patients.

Background: The HemosIL AcuStar antiphospholipid assay (Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA, USA) is a fully automated assay using chemiluminescent technology for the detection of anticardiolipin and anti-beta2 glycoprotein-1 antibodies. This assay showed excellent agreement between results of different laboratories. The cutoff values to define positivity were calculated in 250 healthy blood bank donors but were associated with large confidence intervals (CIs)., Objective: The objective of this study was to more precisely determine the cutoff values of the HemosIL AcuStar antiphospholipid assay by increasing the number of healthy blood bank donors through a multicenter study and by applying a normalization procedure of the distribution of each antibody., Methods: Five laboratories participated to this study, allowing the inclusion of 626 samples. We used a Box-Cox power transformation method to normalize the distribution and calculate the 99th percentile and the corresponding 95%CI for each antibody., Results: The revised cutoff values were overall lower than those initially calculated with more stringent CIs and yielded a 4.2% increase in sensitivity with a 2.7% decrease in specificity regarding thrombotic events or obstetric complications., Conclusions: We provide refined cutoff values for the detection of anticardiolipin and anti-beta2 glycoprotein-1 antibodies with the HemosIL AcuStar Antiphospholipid assay that should be preferred for routine use., (© 2014 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)