Search

Background: Glofitamab monotherapy induces durable remission in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after two or more previous therapies, but has not previously been assessed as a second-line therapy. We investigated the efficacy and safety of glofitamab plus gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (Glofit-GemOx) versus rituximab (R)-GemOx in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma., Methods: The phase 3, randomised, open-label STARGLO trial was done at 62 centres in 13 countries in Asia and Australia, Europe, and North America. We recruited transplant-ineligible patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after one or more previous therapies. Patients were randomly assigned in permuted blocks (block size of six) via an interactive voice or web response system (2:1; stratified by 1 vs ≥2 previous lines of therapy and relapsed vs refractory status) to Glofit-GemOx (intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m 2 plus glofitamab step-up dosing to 30 mg; for a total of eight cycles, plus four additional cycles of glofitamab monotherapy) or R-GemOx (intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m 2 plus rituximab 375 mg/m 2 ; for a total of eight cycles). The trial independent review committee, which evaluated all response-based endpoints, was masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat in all randomly assigned patients. We present results from both the primary analysis (cutoff: March 29, 2023) and updated analysis after all patients had completed study therapy (cutoff: Feb 16, 2024). Safety analyses included all patients who received any study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04408638, and is ongoing (closed to recruitment)., Findings: From Feb 23, 2021, to March 14, 2023, 274 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive Glofit-GemOx (n=183) or R-GemOx (n=91). 158 (58%) patients were male and 116 (42%) were female; median age was 68 years (IQR 58-74). At the primary analysis after a median follow-up of 11·3 months (95% CI 9·6-12·7), overall survival was significantly improved with Glofit-GemOx versus R-GemOx (median not estimable [NE; 95% CI 13·8 months-NE] vs 9·0 months [7·3-14·4]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·59 [95% CI 0·40-0·89]; p=0·011). At the updated analysis after a median follow-up of 20·7 months (19·9-23·3), a consistent improvement in overall survival was observed with Glofit-GemOx versus R-GemOx (median 25·5 months [18·3-NE] vs 12·9 months [7·9-18·5]; HR 0·62 [0·43-0·88]). In the safety sets, 180 (100%) patients in the Glofit-GemOx group and 84 (96%) of 88 patients in the R-GemOx group had at least one adverse event during the study period. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 76 (44%) of 172 glofitamab-exposed patients and was predominantly low grade. Deaths related to glofitamab or rituximab occurred in five (3%) patients in the Glofit-GemOx group and in one (1%) patient in the R-GemOx group., Interpretation: Glofit-GemOx had a significant overall survival benefit compared with R-GemOx, supporting its use in transplant-ineligible patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after one or more previous lines of therapy., Funding: F Hoffmann-La Roche., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JSA has received grants or contracts from BMS, Cellectis, Merck, Mustang Bio, Regeneron, and Seagen; consulting fees from AbbVie, ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS, Celgene, Cellectar, Caribou Biosciences, Century Therapeutics, Celgene, Epizyme, Foresight Diagnostics, Genentech, Gilead, Interius, Lilly, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Seagen, and Takeda; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Incyte, Janssen, MorphoSys, Novartis, and Regeneron. MKu has received grants or contracts and consulting fees from and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for F Hoffmann-La Roche; a grant from BeiGene; and consulting fees from AbbVie. MH has received grants from Janssen and F Hoffmann-La Roche; consulting fees from Takeda, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Otsuka, AbbVie, and Gilead; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Takeda, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Otsuka, AbbVie, Gilead, and Pfizer; and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Takeda, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Otsuka, AbbVie, and Gilead. CPF has received grants or contracts from BeiGene, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Genmab, and AbbVie; consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Atarabio, BMS, Genmab, Gilead, Kite, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, Morphosys, Ono, F Hoffmann-La Roche, SERB, and SOBI; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Atarabio, BMS, GenMab, Gilead, Kite, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, Morphosys, Ono, F Hoffmann-La Roche, SERB, SOBI, and Takeda; and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Atarabio, BMS, GenMab, Gilead, Kite, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, Morphosys, Ono, F Hoffmann-La Roche, SERB, and SOBI. DHY has received grants or contracts from AbbVie, BeiGene, Boryung, Celltrion, Kyowa Kirin, Janssen, Samyang, and Sanofi; consulting fees from Abclon, BeiGene, BMS, GI Cell, GC Cell, Verismo, Janssen, Novartis, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and Pharos Bio; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Amgen, Antengene, BMS, Boryung, GSK, Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Takeda, and Janssen; and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Abclon, BeiGene, BMS, GI Cell, GC Cell, Verismo, Janssen, Novartis, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and Pharos Bio. HA has received grants or contracts from Morphosys, Genentech, Novartis, BMS, Epizyme, and Pfizer; consulting fees from Amgen, Genentech, Morphosys, Novartis, BMS, AstraZeneca, Acrotech, ADC Therapeutics, and AbbVie; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Genentech; and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Amgen, Genentech, Morphosys, Novartis, BMS, AstraZeneca, Acrotech, ADC Therapeutics, and AbbVie. WT has received grants or contracts and support for attending meetings or travel from F Hoffmann-La Roche; consulting fees from and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for F Hoffmann-La Roche, Takeda, AbbVie, Sobi, and Gilead; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from F Hoffmann-La Roche, Takeda, Gilead, and AbbVie; and is grateful for and acknowledges funding and support from the University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Biomedical Research Centre. CH has received grants or contracts from Takeda; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from F Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie, and Gilead; and support for attending meetings or travel from Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie, and F Hoffmann-La Roche. JMZ has received consulting fees from and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Pierre Fabre, Takeda, BMS, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, F Hoffmann-La Roche, AstraZeneca, and AbbVie; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Takeda, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and AbbVie; and support for attending meetings or travel from F Hoffmann-La Roche and AbbVie. CYC has received grants or contracts from BMS, F Hoffmann-La Roche, AbbVie, MSD, and Lilly; consulting fees from F Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Lilly, BeiGene, Menarini, Dizal, AbbVie, Genmab, and BMS; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from F Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Lilly, BeiGene, Menarini, Dizal, AbbVie, Genmab, and BMS; and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for F Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Lilly, BeiGene, Menarini, Dizal, AbbVie, Genmab, and BMS. HG has received consulting fees from F Hoffmann-La Roche, BMS, and Takeda; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Gilead, F Hoffmann-La Roche, BMS, AbbVie, and Takeda. SS is an employee of and has received grants or contracts from Genentech; and has stock or stock options with F Hoffmann-La Roche. VO-N is an employee of Genentech and has provided all support for the present manuscript for Genentech and F Hoffmann-La Roche. RT is an employee of Genentech and has provided all support for the present manuscript for, has received support for attending meetings or travel from, and has stock or stock options with Genentech and F Hoffmann-La Roche. JR is an employee of and has received grants or contracts from F Hoffmann-La Roche, and has stock or stock options with F Hoffmann-La Roche. MD is an employee of, has provided all support for the present manuscript for, and has stock or stock options with F Hoffmann-La Roche. MKa is an employee of F Hoffmann-La Roche, and has received grants or contracts from Roche Diagnostics International and F Hoffmann-La Roche. EM is an employee of, has received grants or contracts from, has received support for attending meetings or travel from, and has stock or stock options with F Hoffmann-La Roche. HH is an employee of F Hoffmann-La Roche. LL is an employee of, has received grants or contracts from, has received royalties or licences from, has patents planned, issued or pending with, and has stock or stock options with F Hoffmann-La Roche. GPG has received grants or contracts from BeiGene and Merck; consulting fees from Merck, Gilead, Novartis, BMS, Clinigen, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and Prelude Therapeutics; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Gilead and F Hoffmann-La Roche; and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Merck, Gilead, Novartis, BMS, Clinigen, F Hoffmann-La Roche and Prelude Therapeutics. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) combination therapy improves the survival of patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Nonetheless, evidence on the use of KRd in Asian populations remains scarce. Accordingly, this study aimed to investigate this regimen's efficacy in a large group of patients. This retrospective study included patients with RRMM who were treated with KRd at 21 centers between February 2018 and October 2020. Overall, 364 patients were included (median age, 63 years). The overall response rate was 90% in response-evaluable patients, including 69% who achieved a very good partial response or deeper responses. With a median follow-up duration of 34.8 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 23.4 months and overall survival (OS) was 59.5 months. Among adverse factors affecting PFS, high-risk cytogenetics, extramedullary disease, and doubling of monoclonal protein within 2-3 months prior to start of KRd treatment significantly decreased PFS and OS in multivariate analyses. Patients who underwent post-KRd stem cell transplantation (i.e., delayed transplant) showed prolonged PFS and OS. Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AE) were observed in 56% of the patients, and non-fatal or fatal AE that resulted in discontinuation of KRd were reported in 7% and 2% of patients, respectively. Cardiovascular toxicity was comparable to that reported in the ASPIRE study. In summary, KRd was effective in a large, real-world cohort of patients with RRMM with long-term follow-up. These findings may further inform treatment choices in the treatment of patients with RRMM.

Up to 40% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are refractory to or relapse after first-line therapy, highlighting the need for better treatments. Mosunetuzumab is a CD20 × CD3 bispecific antibody that engages and redirects T cells to eliminate malignant B cells. In this phase 2, open-label study (NCT03677141), 40 patients (52.5% with international prognostic index ≥3) with previously untreated DLBCL initiated 6 cycles of IV mosunetuzumab with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) chemotherapy. Mosunetuzumab was administered in cycle 1 as step-up doses to mitigate cytokine release syndrome [CRS], and a dose of 30 mg was given on day 1 of cycles 2-6. Efficacy end points included objective and complete response rates, as determined by the investigator, via positron emission tomography-computed tomography, using Lugano 2014 criteria (87.5% and 85.0%, respectively). At a median follow-up of 32.0 months, the estimated 2-year progression-free survival and event-free survival rates were 65.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.5-81.4) and 60.4% (95% CI, 44.7-76.1), respectively. CRS occurred in 60.0% of patients; all events were grade 1 (45.0%) or grade 2 (15.0%) and occurred primarily in cycle 1. Mosunetuzumab-related grade ≥3 neurologic adverse events (AEs) potentially consistent with immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome occurred in 1 patient (2.5%). Grade 5 AEs were reported in 2 patients. Neutropenia occurred in 70.0% of patients, mostly during cycle 1 and was of short duration. These findings demonstrate promising activity and a manageable safety profile for mosunetuzumab-CHOP and warrant further investigation of mosunetuzumab in first-line combination regimens for DLBCL., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Purpose: In RE-MIND2 (NCT04697160), patient-level outcomes from the L-MIND study (NCT02399085) of tafasitamab plus lenalidomide were retrospectively compared with patient-level matched observational cohorts treated with National Cancer Care Network (NCCN)/European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)-listed systemic therapies for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)., Patients and Methods: Data were collected from health records of eligible patients aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed DLBCL who had received ≥2 systemic therapies for DLBCL (including ≥1 anti-CD20 therapy). Patients from L-MIND were matched with patients from the RE-MIND2 observational cohort using estimated propensity score-based 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching, balanced for nine covariates. The primary analysis compared tafasitamab plus lenalidomide with patients who received any systemic therapy for R/R DLBCL (pooled in one cohort) or bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) or rituximab plus gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (R-GemOx; as two distinct cohorts). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included treatment response and time-to-event outcomes., Results: In RE-MIND2, 3,454 patients were enrolled from 200 sites in North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. Strictly matched pairs of patients consisted of tafasitamab plus lenalidomide versus systemic therapies pooled (n = 76 pairs), versus BR (n = 75 pairs), and versus R-GemOx (n = 74 pairs). Significantly prolonged OS was reported with tafasitamab plus lenalidomide versus systemic pooled therapies [hazard ratios (HR): 0.55; P = 0.0068], BR (HR: 0.42; P < 0.0001), and R-GemOx (HR: 0.47; P = 0.0003)., Conclusions: RE-MIND2, a retrospective observational study, met its primary endpoint, demonstrating prolonged OS with tafasitamab plus lenalidomide versus BR and R-GemOx. See related commentary by Cherng and Westin, p. 3908., (©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of serum β2-microglobulin for patients with Burkitt lymphoma (BL) and to propose a risk-stratifying classification system., Materials and Methods: A prospective registry-based cohort study of BL patients treated with dose-intensive or effective dose-adjusted chemotherapies (n=81) was conducted. Survival outcomes were compared based on previously reported risk groups and/or serum β2-microglobulin levels. A risk-stratifying classification system incorporating serum β2-microglobulin levels was proposed and validated in an independent validation cohort (n=60)., Results: The median age was 47 years, and 57 patients (70.4%) were male. Patients with high serum β2-microglobulin levels (> 2 mg/L) had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (p < 0.01 for both). Serum β2-microglobulin levels further stratified patients in the low-risk and high-risk groups in terms of PFS (p=0.010 and p=0.044, respectively) and OS (p=0.014 and p=0.026, respectively). Multivariate analyses revealed that a high serum β2-microglobulin level (> 2 mg/L) was independently associated with a shorter PFS (hazards ratio [HR], 3.56; p=0.047) and OS (HR, 4.66; p=0.043). The new classification system incorporating the serum β2-microglobulin level allowed the stratification of patients into three distinct risk subgroups with 5-year OS rates of 100%, 89.5%, and 62.5%. In an independent cohort of BL, the system was validated by stratifying patients with different survival outcomes., Conclusion: Serum β2-microglobulin level is an independent prognostic factor for BL patients. The proposed β2-microglobulin-based classification system could stratify patients with distinct survival outcomes, which may help define appropriate treatment approaches for individual patients.

Purpose: Patients with the activated B-cell-like (ABC) subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) historically showed inferior survival with standard rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). Phase II studies demonstrated that adding the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide to R-CHOP improved outcomes in ABC-type DLBCL. The goal of the global, phase III ROBUST study was to compare lenalidomide plus R-CHOP (R2-CHOP) with placebo/R-CHOP in previously untreated, ABC-type DLBCL., Methods: Histology and cell-of-origin type were prospectively analyzed by central pathology prior to random assignment and study treatment. Patients with ABC-DLBCL received lenalidomide oral 15 mg/d, days 1-14/21 plus standard R-CHOP21 versus placebo/R-CHOP21 for six cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) per independent central radiology review., Results: A total of 570 patients with ABC-DLBCL (n = 285 per arm) were stratified by International Prognostic Index score, age, and bulky disease, and randomly assigned to R2-CHOP or placebo/R-CHOP. Baseline demographics were similar between arms. Most patients completed six cycles of treatment: 74% R2-CHOP and 84% placebo/R-CHOP. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events for R2-CHOP versus placebo/R-CHOP were neutropenia (60% v 48%), anemia (22% v 14%), thrombocytopenia (17% v 11%), and leukopenia (14% v 15%). The primary end point of PFS was not met, with a hazard ratio of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.14) and P = .29; median PFS has not been reached for either arm. PFS trends favoring R2-CHOP over placebo/R-CHOP were seen in patients with higher-risk disease., Conclusion: ROBUST is the first DLBCL phase III study to integrate biomarker-driven identification of eligible ABC patients. Although the ROBUST trial did not meet the primary end point of PFS in all patients, the safety profile of R2-CHOP was consistent with individual treatments with no new safety signals., Competing Interests: Grzegorz S. NowakowskiConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, MorphoSys, Genentech, Selvita, Debiopharm Group, Kite/GileadResearch Funding: Celgene, NanoString Technologies, MorphoSys Annalisa ChiappellaHonoraria: Celgene, Gilead-Kite, Janssen Oncology, Roche, ServierConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Gilead-Kite, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, iQone David W. ScottConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Janssen, Abbvie, AstraZenecaResearch Funding: Janssen, Roche/Genentech, NanoString TechnologiesPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Named inventor on a pending patent describing gene expression profiling in prognostication in classical Hodgkin lymphoma. As a member of the LLMPP I am potentially a named inventor on a pending patent on the use of gene expression profiling to assign cell-of-origin in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. I am a named inventor on a pending patent on the use of gene expression profiling to determine the proliferation signature in mantle cell lymphoma. Named inventor on a pending patent describing using gene expression profiling to identify molecular subtypes of GCB-DLBCL. Wojciech JurczakResearch Funding: Janssen-Cilag, Acerta Pharma/AstraZeneca, Merck, Loxo, TG Therapeutics, BeiGene Muhit ÖzcanHonoraria: TakedaResearch Funding: Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Bayer, Merck, Archigen Biotech, Roche, Pharmacyclics, AbbvieTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Takeda, Sanofi, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Abdi Ibrahim, Amgen, Janssen David BeladaConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, MorphoSys, Debiopharm GroupResearch Funding: Roche, Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, MorphoSys, Pharmacyclics, Archigen BiotechTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Gilead Sciences, Takeda, Roche Juan Miguel BerguaConsulting or Advisory Role: Daiichi SankyoTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genentech Dok Hyun YoonHonoraria: Celltrion, Roche, Janssen, Amgen, Celgene, Samyang, Kirin PharmaceuticalsConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Janssen, Amgen¸Celgene, Green CrossResearch Funding: Samyang, Abclone, Roche/Genentech, Janssen Oncology, Amgen, Genmab, Boryung Federica CavalloHonoraria: Takeda, Janssen-Cilag, Gilead SciencesConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen-Cilag, Gilead SciencesTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Celgene Kazuhito YamamotoHonoraria: Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Takeda, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Sumitomo Dainippon, Ono Pharmacuetical, Chugai Pharma, Novartis, Otsuka, Mundipharma, Eisai, MSD, Meiji Seika Kaisha, Sanofi, Nippon Shinyaku, Abbvie, GlaxoSmithKlineConsulting or Advisory Role: Ono Pharmaceutical, Meiji Seika Kaisha, Chugai Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Takeda, Celgene, HUYA Bioscience International, Stemline Therapeutics, Eisai, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, AbbvieResearch Funding: Chugai Pharma, Novartis, ARIAD, Takeda, Gilead Sciences, Abbvie, Ono Pharmaceutical, Celgene, Solasia Pharma, MSD, Eisai, Zenyaku Kogyo, Bayer, SymBio Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Incyte, Mundipharma, Yakult Pharmaceutical Koji IzutsuHonoraria: Takeda, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, Janssen, Abbvie, Novartis, MSD, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Mundipharma, HUYA Bioscience International, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Fujifilm, CelgeneConsulting or Advisory Role: Bayer, Celgene, AstraZenecaResearch Funding: Eisai, Chugai Pharma Koji KatoHonoraria: Takeda, MSD, Kyowa-Kirin, Janssen, Celgene, Ono, Mundi, Dainippon-Sumitomo, Bristol-Myers SquibbConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Chugai, Eisai, Janssen, Novartis, Daiichi SankyoResearch Funding: Chugai, Takeda, Kyowa Kirin, AbbVie, Novartis, Eisai, Janssen, Celgene, Ono, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo Myron CzuczmanEmployment: CelgeneStock and Other Ownership Interests: Celgene Sarah HerseyStock and Other Ownership Interests: Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, Bristol-Myers SquibbOther Relationship: Bristol-Myers Squibb Adrian KilcoyneEmployment: CelgeneStock and Other Ownership Interests: Celgene Jacqueline RussoEmployment: Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kite PharmaStock and Other Ownership Interests: Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kite Pharma Krista HudakEmployment: Bristol-Myers Squibb, NovartisStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis Jingshan ZhangEmployment: Celgene, Bristol-Myers SquibbStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol-Myers SquibbTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Celgene Steve WadeEmployment: Bristol-Myers SquibbStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol-Myers Squibb Thomas E. WitzigConsulting or Advisory Role: Karyopharm Therapeutics, Abbvie/Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Celgene, Incyte, Epizyme, Cellectar, Tessa Therapeutics, Portola Pharmaceuticals, MorphoSys, ADC TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Celgene, Acerta Pharma, Kura Oncology, Acrotech Biopharma, Karyopharm TherapeuticsPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: I am co-inventor on a patent application filed by Mayo Clinic and pending on the combination of CRM1 inhibitors with salicylates. Please note—simply filed—not even close to being granted. Umberto VitoloConsulting or Advisory Role: Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Celgene, RegeneronSpeakers' Bureau: Gilead Sciences, Celgene, Abbvie, Roche, Janssen OncologyTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Celgene, Gilead Sciences, RocheNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

The standard of treatment for completely resected limited-stage diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in patients without residual lesions has not yet been established. Previously, we designed a phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of three cycles of abbreviated R-CHOP in patients with completely resected limited-stage DLBCL and reported favorable survival outcomes. We present the long-term follow-up results to taking into account the importance of delayed relapse in patients with limited-stage DLBCL. With a median follow-up duration of 62.7 months (range, 60.2-75.5 months), the 5-year OS and DFS rates were both 95.0% (95% confidence interval, 85.59-104.11%). Only one patient experienced disease progression which was confirmed at 12.3 months, and one patient with primary intestinal DLBCL developed non-small cell lung cancer 6 years after treatment. The long-term results of our data support the use of three cycles of abbreviated R-CHOP for patients with completely resected limited-stage DLBCL. The study was reviewed and approved by the review boards of the participating institutes and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01279902, in August 3, 2010.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positivity in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) provokes a critical oncogenic mechanism to activate intracellular signaling by LMP1. LMP1 specifically mimics the role of BTK-dependent B cell receptor. Therefore, a trial considering RCHOP therapy along with ibrutinib (I-RCHOP) in combination was conducted among patients with EBV-positive DLBCL. This study was an open-label, single-arm, prospective multicenter phase II clinical trial. Patients received 560 mg of ibrutinib with RCHOP every 3 weeks until 6 cycles were completed or progression or unacceptable toxicity was observed. The primary endpoint was objective response, while secondary endpoints included toxicity, progression-free survival, and overall survival. A matched case-control analysis was completed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of I-RCHOP and RCHOP, respectively, in EBV-positive DLBCL patients. From September 2016 to August 2019, 24 patients proven to have EBV-positive DLBCL in the tissue were enrolled and received I-RCHOP. Their median age was 58 years (range, 28-84 years). The objective overall response was 66.7%, including 16 patients who achieved complete response after 6 cycles. Patients aged younger than 65 years presented a superior OR (87.5%) as compared with those older than 65 years (25.0%; p = 0.01). In a matched case-control study, I-RCHOP therapy provoked a more favorable complete response rate (87.3%) than did RCHOP (68.8%) in those younger than 65 years. Treatment-related mortality was linked most frequently with I-RCHOP therapy (four patients presented with unusual infection without Gr3/4 neutropenia) in the older age group (age ≥ 65 years). In conclusion, in this phase II trial for EBV-positive DLBCL, I-RCHOP was effective but did not show a significant improvement in response and survival in comparison with RCHOP. Also, I-RCHOP promoted serious toxicity and treatment-related death in older patients.

The distinct clinical characteristics of patients at diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), who experience a late relapse compared with those who relapse early, require reappraisal in the era of R-CHOP. Data from the lymphoma registry of the Asan Medical Center between 2002 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Among 846 DLBCL patients treated with first-line R-CHOP and achieved complete response, 169 (20%) relapsed, occurring late (>2 years) in 51 (6%). Compared with early relapses, late relapses were associated with a lower International Prognostic Index score ( p =.001), lower incidence of B-symptoms ( p =.004), lower lactate dehydrogenase ( p =.001), lower stage (I-II; p =.001), and the median overall survival from relapse was significantly longer (2.4 vs. 1.0 years, p =.001). Patients with a late relapse who responded to salvage chemotherapy and received autologous stem-cell transplantation, had higher 5-year survival rate (55.4% vs. 20.2%). Time of relapse and LDH level were independent prognostic factors affecting survival.

Patients with transplant-ineligible relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) have a short life expectancy, especially when they have failed both the proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulator therapies. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (PCd) in elderly patients with RRMM. This phase 2 clinical trial recruited 55 elderly patients with RRMM. The patients underwent a 28-day treatment cycle: pomalidomide (4 mg/day on days 1-21, administered orally) and cyclophosphamide (400 mg/day on days 1, 8, and 15; administered orally) plus dexamethasone. The median (range) age of the patients was 73.3 (64-86) years, and 8 (14.5%) patients who were ≥ 80 years old. Eight (14.5%) and 31 (56.4%) patients exhibited stage III (revised international staging system) and frail status (simplified frailty scale), respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) of PCd therapy were 58.2% and 72.7%, respectively. The median PFS and median overall survival (OS) were 6.90 months (95% CI, 4.7-9.0) and 18.48 months (95% CI, 9.4-27.6), respectively. The incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 non-hematological toxicities was 70.8%. In particular, the incidence rate of primary infection was 45.4%, including 21.8% for pneumonia, 9.0% for sepsis, and 14.6% for febrile neutropenia. In conclusion, PCd is an effective regimen for elderly patients with RRMM who had failed both bortezomib and lenalidomide treatments, but in whom the treatment-associated infection is the main cause of morbidity and mortality., (© 2020 The Authors. American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Although lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (RD) is a therapeutic option for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), limited real-world clinical data exist. The purpose of this study was to estimate efficacy and safety of RD in RRMM patients of the clinical practice. Data from patients at 25 university hospitals in South Korea between October 2009 and December 2016 were collected retrospectively. We report the effectiveness and safety of RD in 546 RRMM patients in routine clinical practice in South Korea. Patients (median age, 65 years) typically received median 7 cycles of RD, and 184 (33.7%) patients were treated with 10 or more cycles of RD. Patients with renal impairment (CLCr < 40 mL/min; 10.4%), comorbid conditions (≥ 2; 12.0%), and poor performance status (≥ 2; 25.1%) were included. The overall response rate was 64.2%: complete response (13.1%), very good partial response (VGPR 19.9%). With median follow-up duration of 18.6 months, median PFS and OS were 11.2 months and 25.2 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, less than 2 comorbid conditions, normal LDH, failed one chemotherapy prior to RD, and ≥ 10 cycles of RD therapy had significantly prolonged PFS (P = 0.007, P = 0.011, P = 0.007, and P < 0.001, respectively). Adverse events were acceptable. RD is effective and safe in real-life clinical practice, including patients with comorbidities. RD is an effective and safe treatment in a real clinical setting which includes patients with comorbidities. Early and continual use of RD treatment may improve RRMM survival outcomes.

We assessed the efficacy and toxicity of etoposide, methylprednisolone, high-dose cytarabine, and oxaliplatin (ESHAOx) combination chemotherapy in patients with refractory or relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). This was an open-label, non-randomized, multi-center phase II study. The ESHAOx regimen consisted of intravenous (i.v.) etoposide 40 mg/m 2 on days 1 to 4, i.v. methylprednisolone 500 mg on days 1 to 5, i.v. cytarabine 2 g/m 2 on day 5, and i.v. oxaliplatin 130 mg/m 2 on day 1. Cycles (up to six) were repeated every 3 weeks. In an effort to identify prognostic markers, the serum levels of cytokines including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), C-reactive protein (CRP), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were measured at the time of study entry. A total of 37 patients were enrolled, and 36 were available for evaluation of tumor response. The overall response rate was 72.2% (26/36) (complete response, 33.3% [12/36]; partial response, 38.9% [14/36]). The median time to progression was 34.9 months (95% confidence interval, 23.1-46.7 months). The most common grade 3 or 4 hematological adverse events were neutropenia (16/37, 43.2%), followed by thrombocytopenia (10/37, 27.0%). Grade 3 or 4 non-hematological adverse events were nausea (3/37, 8.1%), anorexia (2/37, 5.4%), mucositis (1/37, 2.7%), and skin rash (1/37, 2.7%). There were no treatment-related deaths. High levels of TNF-α and CRP were significantly associated with poorer overall survival (p = 0.00005 for TNF-α, p = 0.0004 for CRP, respectively). The ESHAOx regimen exhibited antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in patients with refractory or relapsed HL. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov. Registered February 21, 2011, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01300156.

Background: The response rate and survival improvement for rituximab, a CD20-targeting monoclonal antibody, have been demonstrated in marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapeutic regimens, yet relapses still occur despite treatment completion. Thus, extending the period of remission in MZL patients remains an essential goal. This multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase II study evaluated the survival efficacy of 2 years of rituximab-maintenance therapy in patients with stage III-IV CD20-positive MZL who had responded to first-line R-CVP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone). The objective of this study was to determine whether rituximab maintenance following R-CVP warrants further investigation., Methods: Prior to rituximab-maintenance therapy, patients received 6-8 cycles of first-line R-CVP therapy for stage III-IV MZL. Rituximab (375 mg/m 2 ), cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m 2 ), and vincristine (1.4 mg/m 2 ; maximum 2 mg) were administered via an intravenous infusion on day 1 of each 3-week cycle, while oral prednisolone (100 mg) was given on days 1-5 of each 3-week cycle. The patients who achieved complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) to R-CVP treatment, were prescribed rituximab-maintenance therapy which was administered intravenously at a dose of 375 mg/m 2 every 8 weeks for up to 12 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and treatment safety., Results: 47 patients were enrolled, of whom, 45 (96%) received rituximab-maintenance treatment. Fifteen (33%) patients had nodal MZL. Following R-CVP first-line therapy, 20 (44%), 22 (49%), and 3 (7%) patients achieved CR, PR, and SD, respectively. After a median follow-up of 38.2 months, their observed 3-year PFS rate was 81%. During the rituximab-maintenance, 6 PR and 1 SD patients achieved CR following the administration of R-CVP. Elevated LDH and the presence of B symptoms were found to be significant prognostic factors for PFS (P = 0.003) and demonstrated a 3-year OS rate of 90%. Rituximab-maintenance therapy was well tolerated, and the common treatment-emergent adverse events were sensory neuropathy (18%), myalgia (13%), fatigue (9%), and neutropenia (9%)., Conclusion: Rituximab-maintenance therapy following first-line R-CVP demonstrated good PFS in patients with stage III-IV MZL, in addition to a favorable toxicity profile. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01213095.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma for which standard treatment has yet to be established. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a suitable consolidation strategy for patients who respond to induction chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome and toxicity profile of the combination of busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (BuCyE) with that of the combination of thiotepa, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide (TBC) as conditioning regimens of upfront ASCT for consolidation therapy in PCNSL. The PCNSL registry data set, prospectively collected from March 1993 to May 2017 at Asan Medical Center, was reviewed retrospectively. Patients with objective response to induction chemotherapy who received BuCyE or TBC as conditioning regimen for ASCT were included in the analysis. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Among 241 patients with a diagnosis of PCNSL, 53 received ASCT as upfront consolidation therapy with TBC (28 patients) or BuCyE (25 patients) as conditioning regimen. No median OS or PFS was reached in the TBC group, while the BuCyE group reached a median OS of 4.9 years (p = 0.02) and median PFS of 1.1 years (p = 0.007). The incidence of oral mucositis, nausea, and vomiting was higher with TBC than BuCyE. The median admission duration and days to engraftment were similar between the two groups. Despite the greater incidence of adverse events, TBC showed better outcomes than BuCyE in terms of survival.

Both-side synchronous involvement has been reported to account for 7-24% of ocular adnexal marginal zone lymphoma (OAML). We conducted a retrospective analysis to identify the clinical features and treatment outcomes of synchronous bilateral OAML (SB-OAML) by treatment modality. We analyzed patients with a histologic diagnosis of SB-OAML, excluding metachronous bilateral involved OAML. We enrolled a total of 95 patients for this analysis, 36 males and 59 females; the median patient age was 42 years (range 16-77 years). Eleven (11.6%) patients had been treated with chemotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy (eight R-CVP, two CVP, and one R-CHOP). The median number of treatments was 6 (range 6-8); there were 9 complete responses (CRs; 81.8%) and 2 partial responses (PRs; 18.2%). Nearly all patients (88.4%) received radiotherapy in both eyes, and the median radiation dose was 27 Gy (range 20-40 Gy) to each eye; 68 CRs (80.9%) and 14 PRs (16.7%) were achieved. Ten-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 79.8 and 91.1%, respectively. Radiotherapy continued to be an independent prognostic marker, with the hazard of progression (P = 0.036). Eleven patients (13.1%) had surgery for cataract treatment during follow-up, and patients who received low-dose radiation (< 30.3 Gy) experienced fewer cataract operations. SB-OAML was predominantly observed in young females, and they had good response and prognosis regardless of treatment modalities. Low-dose radiotherapy to both eyes showed a tendency of longer PFS than did chemotherapy and could decrease cataract operations.

Bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) showed efficacy and safety in indolent lymphomas and mantle cell lymphoma. However, there were limited experiences of real-world practice of BR in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). In this study, we report the Korean experiences with BR in relapsed or refractory DLBCL who are not eligible for intensive chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. This is an observational, multicenter, retrospective analysis. Between December 2011 and December 2015, a total of 58 patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL were treated with BR in 11 tertiary hospitals in Korea. Patients received an intravenous (IV) infusion of rituximab at a dose of 375 mg/m 2 on day 1. On days 2 and 3, patients received an IV infusion of bendamustine at doses of 120 or 90 mg/m 2 . Median age was 69 (range 18-86), 74.1% had stage III or IV disease, and 67.2% showed high-intermediate or high International Prognostic Index scores at diagnosis. In an intention-to-treat analysis, 18 patients (31.0%) showed a complete response and 14 (24.1%) showed a partial response, resulting in an overall response rate of 55.1%. The median duration of the response was 3.7 months (range 1.0-47.2 months). The median progression-free survival was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-5.4 months), and the median overall survival was 6.7 months (95% CI, 4.7-8.7 months). The most common grade 3/4 adverse event was neutropenia (n = 40; 68.9%). Febrile neutropenia was observed in 11 patients (18.9%). Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 34 patients (58.6%). Our study confirmed the high efficacy and acceptable toxicity profile of BR in relapsed or refractory DLBCL patients. However, we need to closely observe the higher tendency of grade 3/4 hematological toxicities in Korean patients.

Recent studies have reported the associations between programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) or PD-L2/PD-1 pathways and pro-angiogenic genes including hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in several malignancies. However, no study has examined the relationship or prognostic implication of PD-L1, PD-L2, PD-1, VEGF expression, and microvessel density (MVD) in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) patients. Diagnostic tissues from 109 patients with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine-treated cHL were evaluated retrospectively by immunohistochemical analysis for PD-L1, PD-L2, PD-1, VEGF expression, and for CD31 expression as a measure of MVD. There was a positive correlation between PD-L1 and VEGF expression (P = 0.008) and additionally between PD-L2 and VEGF expression (P = 0.001). The mean MVD in tumors positive for both PD-L1 and VEGF was significantly (P = 0.022) higher than the mean MVD in tumors negative for both markers. High PD-1 expression group had lower (P = 0.019) 5-year overall survival rate than low PD-1 expression group. Multivariate analysis revealed that PD-1 was an independent prognostic factor for cHL with significance (P = 0.026). However, PD-L1, PD-L2, and VEGF expression had no prognostic impact. Our data confirmed the positive correlations between PD-L1, VEGF, or MVD. Our findings provided evidence supporting new therapeutic approaches including combinations of anti-PD-L1/PD-1 and anti-VEGF therapy in addition to the current standard regimen for cHL.

18 F-fluoro-2-dexoy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is a useful imaging technique for monitoring the treatment response in lymphoma cases. We investigated the value of interim brain PET/CT (I-PET/CT) for monitoring the response to intensive methotrexate-based chemotherapy in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Of the 76 PCNSL patients treated with intensive methotrexate and cytarabine chemotherapy between September 2006 and December 2012, 66 patients with DLBCL were included in this study. The patient cohort of 66 individuals comprised 43 men and 23 women with a median age of 59 years (range, 17-75 years). During chemotherapy, 36 patients (54.5%) showed a negative metabolism on I-PET/CT, and 47 (71.2%) were negative on final (F) PET/CT. The baseline characteristics were similar between I-PET/CT-negative (n = 36) and I-PET/CT-positive patients (n = 30) except ECOG performance status. After a median follow-up of 27.5 months, there was no difference in the progression-free survival (PFS; P = 0.701) or overall survival (OS; P = 0.620) between the I-PET/CT-negative and I-PET/CT-positive groups. However, PFS in the F-PET/CT-negative group was significantly longer than that in the F-PET/CT-positive group (P < 0.001) without a significant difference in OS (P = 0.892). I-PET/CT may not predict the survival outcome of PCNSL patients with DLBCL treated with intensive methotrexate and cytarabine chemotherapy. Prospective trials are required to fully evaluate the role of I-PET/CT.

Background: The appropriate number of chemotherapy cycles for limited stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients without gross residual lesions after complete resection, has not been specifically questioned. We performed a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study to investigate the feasibility of 3 cycles of abbreviated R-CHOP chemotherapy in low-risk patients with completely resected localized CD20+ DLBCL., Results: Between December 2010 and May 2013, we recruited 23 patients. One was excluded due to ineligibility, and hence, 22 were included in the final analysis. The primary sites comprised the intestine (n = 15), cervical lymph nodes (n = 4), stomach (n = 1), tonsil (n = 1), and spleen (n = 1). All patients successfully completed the 3 cycles of planned R-CHOP chemotherapy. Over a median follow-up of 39.5 months (95% confidence interval, 29.9-47.1 months), both the estimated 2-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates was 95% confidence interval, 85.9-104.1%. Only one patient with an international prognostic index of 2 experienced relapse and died. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicity condition included neutropenia (n = 8, 36.4%). Three patients experienced grade 3 febrile neutropenia, but no grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity was observed., Materials and Methods: DLBCL patients without residual lesions after resection were enrolled and R-CHOP chemotherapy was repeated at 3-week-intervals over 3 cycles. The primary endpoint was 2-year disease-free survival., Conclusions: Three cycles of abbreviated R-CHOP immunochemotherapy is feasible for completely resected low risk localized DLBCL.

We analyzed the treatment responses, toxicities, and survival outcomes of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who received daily thalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (CTD) or daily thalidomide, melphalan, and prednisolone (MTP) at 17 medical centers in Korea. Three-hundred and seventy-six patients were enrolled. The combined chemotherapy of thalidomide, corticosteroid, and an alkylating agent (TAS) was second-line chemotherapy in 142 (37.8%) patients, and third-line chemotherapy in 135 (35.9%) patients. The response rate overall was 69.4%. Patients who were not treated with bortezomib and lenalidomide before TAS showed a higher response rate compared to those who were exposed to these agents. The estimated median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 10.4 months and 28.0 months, respectively. The adverse events during TAS were generally tolerable, but 39 (10.4%) patients experienced severe infectious complications. There were no differences in terms of efficacy between CTD and MTP, but infectious complications were more common in CTD group. TAS is an effective treatment regimen which induces a high response rate in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients. Due to the high incidence of grade 3 or 4 infection, proper management of infection is necessary during the TAS treatment, especially the CTD., (© 2016 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

We designed a new treatment protocol incorporating concurrent administration of L-asparaginase (to reduce the probability of systemic progression during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT)) plus high-dose methotrexate to consolidation chemotherapy to intensify the regimen for treating localized extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKTL). CCRT comprised radiation (36-44 Gy) with weekly cisplatin (30 mg/m2) and tri-weekly L-asparaginase (4 000 IU). Chemotherapy-MIDLE (methotrexate 3 g/m2 on day 1, etoposide 100 mg/m2 and Ifosfamide 1 000 mg/m2 on days 2-3, dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, and L-asparaginase 6 000 IU/m2 on days 4, 6, 8, 10)-was repeated every 28 days for two cycles. One of the 28 patients developed distant lesions after CCRT. The final complete response rate was 82.1%. Four patients dropped out during or after their first MIDLE cycle due to toxicities (recurrent G3 hyperbilirubinemia [n = 1], G3-5 increased creatinine [n = 2], and G5 infection [n = 1]). With a median follow-up of 46 months (95% CI: 39-47 months), the estimated 3-year progression-free survival rate and overall survival rate were 74.1% and 81.5%, respectively. This MIDLE protocol may be effective for localized ENKTL. However, concurrent administration of L-asparaginase during CCRT does not seem to provide additional benefits.

The prognostic value of serum beta-2 microglobulin for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is not well known in the rituximab era. A retrospective registry data analysis of 833 patients with de novo DLBCL treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) was conducted to establish the prognostic significance of serum beta-2 microglobulin at a ≥2.5 mg/L cutoff. Five-year progression-free survival (PFS, 76.1% vs. 41.0%; p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS, 83.8% vs. 49.2%; p < 0.001) were significantly worse in patients with elevated serum beta-2 microglobulin (n = 290, 34.8%). Furthermore, the five parameters of the International Prognostic Index, accompanying B symptoms, bone marrow involvement and impaired renal function were associated with worse PFS and OS. In multivariate analysis, elevated beta-2 microglobulin was a significant poor prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-2.24; p < 0.001) and OS (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.47-2.75; p < 0.001). In an independent validation cohort of 258 R-CHOP treated patients with de novo DLBCL, elevated beta-2 microglobulin levels remained a significant poor prognostic factor for PFS (HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.23-3.32; p = 0.005) and exhibited a strong trend of association with worse OS (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.98-2.75; p = 0.062). The significance of serum beta-2 microglobulin levels as an independent prognostic factor for patients with DLBCL receiving R-CHOP is confirmed.

Central nervous system involvement remains a challenging issue in the treatment of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. We conducted a prospective cohort study with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients receiving rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone to identify incidence and risk factors for central nervous system involvement. Among 595 patients, 279 patients received pre-treatment central nervous system evaluation, and 14 patients had central nervous system involvement at diagnosis (2.3% out of entire patients and 5.0% out of the 279 patients). For those patients, median follow-up duration was 38.2 months and some of them achieved long-term survival. Out of 581 patients who did not have central nervous system involvement at diagnosis, 26 patients underwent secondary central nervous system relapse with a median follow-up of 35 months, and the median time to central nervous system involvement was 10.4 months (range: 3.4-29.2). Serum lactate dehydrogenase > ×3 upper limit of normal range, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥ 2, and involvement of sinonasal tract or testis, were independent risk factors for central nervous system relapse in multivariate analysis. Our study suggests that enhanced stratification of serum lactate dehydrogenase according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-International Prognostic Index may contribute to better prediction for central nervous system relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 01202448.

Extranodal involvement is a well-known prognostic factor in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL). Nevertheless, the prognostic impact of the extranodal scoring system included in the conventional international prognostic index (IPI) has been questioned in an era where rituximab treatment has become widespread. We investigated the prognostic impacts of individual sites of extranodal involvement in 761 patients with DLBCL who received rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy. Subsequently, we established a new extranodal scoring system based on extranodal sites, showing significant prognostic correlation, and compared this system with conventional scoring systems, such as the IPI and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-IPI (NCCN-IPI). An internal validation procedure, using bootstrapped samples, was also performed for both univariate and multivariate models. Using multivariate analysis with a backward variable selection, we found nine extranodal sites (the liver, lung, spleen, central nervous system, bone marrow, kidney, skin, adrenal glands, and peritoneum) that remained significant for use in the final model. Our newly established extranodal scoring system, based on these sites, was better correlated with patient survival than standard scoring systems, such as the IPI and the NCCN-IPI. Internal validation by bootstrapping demonstrated an improvement in model performance of our modified extranodal scoring system. Our new extranodal scoring system, based on the prognostically relevant sites, may improve the performance of conventional prognostic models of DLBCL in the rituximab era and warrants further external validation using large study populations.

Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor may be therapeutic in patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL). This study examined the prognostic significance of PD-1 and two PD-1 ligands (PD-L1 and PD-L2) in uniformly treated cHL. Diagnostic tissues from 109 cHL patients treated with a doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine regimen were evaluated retrospectively by immunohistochemical analysis of PD-L1, PD-L2, and PD-1 expressions. The median follow-up time was 4.91 years (range, 0.17-17.33 years). Thirteen patients (11 %) expressed PD-1 protein in the peritumoral microenvironment, which was associated with poor overall survival (OS) (P = 0.017). PD-L1 or PD-L2 expression was not associated with OS. There was no correlation between PD-L1 and PD-1 expression or between PD-L2 and PD-1 expression. Multivariate analysis identified PD-1 protein as an independent prognostic factor for OS (P = 0.019). Subgroup analysis according to the Ann Arbor stage of cHL showed that PD-1 protein expression had a prognostic value in limited-stage cHL (P = 0.048). PD-1 is an independent prognostic factor in cHL and may allow the identification of a subgroup of patients with limited-stage cHL who require more intensive therapy and who may benefit from anti-PD-1 agents.

Purpose: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a disease that frequently relapses and primarily affects elderly people. We performed an open-label, multi-center, phase II study to investigate the effect and quality of life (QoL) of treatment with vorinostat in combination with fludarabine, mitoxantrone and dexamethasone (V-FND) for relapsed or refractory MCL., Methods: The treatment schedule was composed of four cycles of induction treatment with V-FND and subsequent consolidation therapy involving autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or six cycles of vorinostat maintenance. QoL was assessed using EORTC Core Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) every 2 cycles., Results: Data from a total of 20 patients were collected for an interim analysis. The median age was 67 years (range 49-75), and 14 or the patients (70 %) were male. The full course of V-FND induction treatment was completed in 11 patients, but only three completed all six cycles of maintenance therapy. Response to V-FND was not available in two patients. Among the other 18 patients, the objective response rate was 77.8 % (complete response in five patients + partial response in nine patients). Median progression-free survival was 9.3 months [95 % confidence interval (CI) 4.0-12.3]. Fifteen patients (75 %) experienced grade 3/4 toxicities. Analysis of QoL demonstrated significant deterioration of social functioning (p = 0.01), and significant aggravation of fatigue and nausea/vomiting (p = 0.04 and 0.01, respectively) after two cycles of V-FND induction., Conclusions: V-FND is effective in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL. However, significant toxicities were hurdles to sustained V-FND therapy.

Overall, more than 50% of marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) patients experience a relapse within 10 years. This phase II trial was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin-prednisone (Ox-P) chemotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory MZL. Patients received oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1 and prednisone 100 mg/day on days 1-5 of each cycle. A total of 38 patients were enrolled. The median age of the 34 (16 males, 18 females) evaluated patients was 53 (range = 27-74) years. There were seven complete responses (20.6%) and 15 partial responses (44.1%) (Overall response rate = 64.7%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. The median progression-free survival was 14.2 months (95% CI = 2.1-26.3 months); 3-year overall survival rate was 77.7%. Thus, salvage Ox-P chemotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory MZL at the stated dosage and schedule showed moderate clinical activity and was considerable in very few selected patients (NCT01068392).

We compared the outcomes of patients with higher-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who were treated with either up-front autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or salvage chemotherapy followed by delayed ASCT after relapse. Data for 122 DLBCL patients who underwent ASCT as up-front or salvage treatment were analyzed. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate in DLBCL patients who underwent up-front ASCT was 76.6%, and the rate for those who underwent delayed ASCT was 60.9% (p = 0.017). In a subgroup analysis of patients with a high-intermediate/high-risk age-adjusted International Prognostic Index, achievement of complete remission translated into improved OS in the up-front ASCT group, whereas patients who achieved partial remission had similar OS rates in both groups. The up-front ASCT group had improved OS in patients aged <50 years or with good performance status, whereas the OS rates of both groups were similar in patients aged ≥ 60 years or with poor performance status. When the OS outcome is analyzed by the number of factors (no complete remission during R-CHOP induction chemotherapy, age ≥ 50 years, and performance status ≥ 2), the 3-year OS rates of patients with zero or one, two, and three clinical factors were 80.2%, 51.6%, and 0%, respectively (p < 0.001). In conclusion, in higher-risk DLBCL patients, induction chemotherapy followed by up-front ASCT may have a survival benefit compared with induction chemotherapy alone in highly selected patients who have achieved a complete remission, who are aged <50 years, and who have a good performance status at diagnosis., (Copyright © 2016 ISEH - International Society for Experimental Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Obesity was recently reported to confer a survival advantage in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) among Western populations. Given ethnic differences, previous studies recommended a revision of the WHO classification of obesity for Asians. We investigated the prognostic impact of body mass index (BMI) using modified WHO criteria in a retrospective cohort of 562 Korean patients with DLBCL. Patients were categorized into five groups according to BMI: 26 (4.6 %) as underweight (<18.5 kg/m(2)), 230 (40.9 %) as normal weight (18.5-22.9 kg/m(2)), 129 (23.0 %) as overweight (23.0-24.9 kg/m(2)), 160 (28.5 %) as obese (25.0-29.9 kg/m(2)), and 17 (3.0 %) as severely obese (≥30 kg/m(2)). As BMI increased, the relative hazard ratio (HR) decreased sharply, reaching the lowest value in the overweight group, and then rose again in the obese and severely obese. On univariate analysis, both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were best in the overweight group, followed by normal > obese > severely obese > underweight groups. Multivariate analysis showed a significantly shorter survival in the underweight (OS: HR 2.90, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.35-6.19, P = 0.006; PFS: HR 3.08, 95 % CI 1.55-6.09, P = 0.001) and severely obese groups (OS: HR 2.93, 95 % CI 1.08-7.95, P = 0.035; PFS: HR 2.59, 95 % CI 1.06-6.36, P = 0.038). We show that being underweight or, contrary to findings in Western patients, being severely obese has a deleterious prognostic impact in DLBCL in Koreans. Revising the BMI criterion that defines obesity according to the patient's ethnic differences could therefore better delineate DLBCL risk groups in Asian patients.

Background: We investigated the efficacy of cetuximab when added to induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma., Methods: Patients were randomized to receive three cycles of docetaxel and cisplatin (TP regimen) with or without cetuximab (TP plus cetuximab [CTP] vs. TP) as induction chemotherapy. Patients in the CTP arm received CCRT with cetuximab and cisplatin, whereas patients in the TP arm received cisplatin alone. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) after induction chemotherapy., Results: Overall, 92 patients were enrolled. The ORRs for induction chemotherapy in the CTP and TP arms were not different (81% vs. 82%). Adding cetuximab lowered the completion rate of induction chemotherapy and CCRT and resulted in more frequent dose reductions of the induction chemotherapy, although this did not reach statistical significance. In the CTP and TP arms, respectively, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 70% and 56% (p = .359), and the overall survival (OS) rates were 88% and 74% (p = .313). When limited to patients who completed induction chemotherapy, 3-year PFS rates of 78% and 59% (p = .085) and OS rates of 94% and 73% (p = .045) were observed in the CTP and TP arms, respectively., Conclusion: Adding cetuximab to sequential treatment did not increase the treatment efficacy and resulted in greater toxicity. In the intent-to-treat population, neither PFS nor OS was improved by the addition of cetuximab to sequential treatment; however, a suggestion of improved survival outcomes was observed in patients completing cetuximab-containing induction chemotherapy., (©AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary is the property of the authors.)

Purpose: To assess, in a randomized, phase 2 trial, the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy with or without induction chemotherapy (ICT) of S1 and oxaliplatin for esophageal cancer., Patients and Methods: Patients with stage II, III, or IVA esophageal cancer were randomly allocated to either 2 cycles of ICT (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1 and S1 at 40 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14, every 3 weeks) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) (46 Gy, 2 Gy/d with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 21 and S1 30 mg/m(2) twice daily, 5 days per week during radiation therapy) and esophagectomy (arm A), or the same CCRT followed by esophagectomy without ICT (arm B). The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate., Results: A total of 97 patients were randomized (arm A/B, 47/50), 70 of whom underwent esophagectomy (arm A/B, 34/36). The intention-to-treat pCR rate was 23.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.2-35.6%) in arm A and 38% (95% CI 24.5% to 51.5%) in arm B. With a median follow-up duration of 30.3 months, the 2-year progression-free survival rate was 58.4% in arm A and 58.6% in arm B, whereas the 2-year overall survival rate was 60.7% and 63.7%, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia during CCRT was more common in arm A than in arm B (35.4% vs 4.1%). The relative dose intensity of S1 (89.5% ± 20.6% vs 98.3% ± 5.2%, P=.005) and oxaliplatin (91.4% ± 16.8% vs 99.0% ± 4.2%, P=.007) during CCRT was lower in arm A compared with arm B. Three patients in arm A, compared with none in arm B, died within 90 days after surgery., Conclusions: Combination chemotherapy of S1 and oxaliplatin is an effective chemoradiotherapy regimen to treat esophageal cancer. However, we failed to show that the addition of ICT to the regimen can improve the pCR rate., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This study evaluated the effect of age and cell of origin on the prognostic significance of Ki-67 labeling index (Ki-67 LI) on overall survival (OS) of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in a cohort of 697 patients treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP). Multivariate analysis revealed no prognostic significance of high Ki-67 LI (≥ 85%) for OS. However, on subgroup analysis, high Ki-67 LI was significantly associated with poor OS in late-elderly patients (aged ≥ 70 years) (p = 0.021) and non-germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) subtype (p = 0.015). In particular, high Ki-67 LI was associated with a poor prognosis in late-elderly patients with non-GCB subtype. No correlation was observed in young adults (aged < 60 years) or early-elderly (aged 60-70 years) patients or GCB subtype. The present study shows that high Ki-67 LI is a risk factor for poor OS in the late-elderly age group and non-GCB subtype in patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP.

We conducted a phase II trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by 2 cycles of L-asparaginase-containing chemotherapy for patients who were newly diagnosed with stages IE and IIE nasal extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma (ENKTL). CCRT consisted of 40-44 Gy of radiotherapy with weekly administration of 30 mg/m(2) of cisplatin for 4 weeks. Two cycles of VIDL (etoposide (100 mg/m(2)), ifosfamide (1,200 mg/m(2)), and dexamethasone (40 mg) from days 1 to 3, and L-asparaginase (4,000 IU/m(2)) every other day from days 8 to 20) were administered sequentially. CCRT yielded a 90 % overall response rate without significant side effects in 30 patients, including 20 patients with complete response (CR); however, two patients showed distant disease progression. After CCRT, VIDL chemotherapy showed an 87 % final CR rate (26/30). Although grade III or IV hematologic toxicity was frequent during VIDL chemotherapy, no treatment-related mortality was observed, and L-asparaginase-associated toxicity was manageable. With a median follow-up of 44 months, 11 patients showed local (n = 4) and distant (n = 7) relapse or progression. The estimated 5-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 73 and 60 %, respectively. In conclusion, CCRT followed by L-asparaginase-containing chemotherapy is a feasible treatment for newly diagnosed stages IE/IIE nasal ENKTL.

Receptor tyrosine kinases MET and RON (MST1R) form non-covalent complexes on the cell surface, a critical step in tumor progression. A recent study suggested a prognostic role for MET expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The aim of this study was to examine the impact of MET and RON expression in uniformly treated DLBCL patients. The expression of MET and RON was retrospectively examined by immunohistochemistry in 120 DLBCL patients treated with rituximab combined with a CHOP regimen (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). The median follow-up time was 42.5 months (range, 1-89 months). Thirty-two (26%) and 30 patients (25%) expressed MET or RON, respectively. Seventy-five patients (62.5%) were negative for both MET and RON (MET(-) RON(-) ). MET negativity was associated with worse overall survival (P = 0.029). In multivariate analysis, negativity for both MET and RON (MET(-) RON(-) ) was strongly associated with inferior overall survival (P = 0.008). Interestingly, the MET(-) RON(-) phenotype retained its prognostic impact after subgroup analysis according to the international prognostic index or by the cell of origin by immunohistochemical algorithm by Choi et al. This study suggests that the MET(-) RON(-) phenotype is an independent prognostic factor in DLBCL patients receiving R-CHOP, and may identify a subgroup of DLBCL patients who require more intensive therapy., (© 2013 Japanese Cancer Association.)

Purpose: We conducted a prospective observational study for premenopausal women receiving adjuvant adriamycin and cyclophosphamide-containing regimens to define the pattern of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea (CIA), the menopause-specific quality of life (MENQOL), and the hormone profiles., Methods: From October 2003 to July 2007, 387 patients with breast cancer who underwent curative surgery were prospectively included. Patient self-assessment by MENQOL questionnaires and blood samples for hormone assays were taken before chemotherapy, and 1, 6, and 12 months after chemotherapy was completed., Results: Patients were categorized into three groups according to their duration and reversibility of amenorrhea, with 312 eligible patients split into long-term CIA (n = 180, 57.7 %), temporary CIA (n = 113, 36.2 %), and menstrual irregularity (n = 19, 6.1 %) groups. Risk factors for long-term CIA were identified as age ≥40 years (p < 0.001), the addition of taxane (p = 0.01), and tamoxifen use (p = 0.03). MENQOL was worst immediately after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy, and this was not fully recovered even 12 months after chemotherapy had finished. Age ≥40 years and tamoxifen exposure were inversely associated with MENQOL. In long-term CIA patients, the level of follicle-stimulating hormone increased after chemotherapy; this level, however, was reduced in patients who received tamoxifen, but remained high and stable in those who did not (p < 0.001 at 6 months; p < 0.001 at 12 months)., Conclusion: This study showed that most premenopausal breast cancer patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy experienced clinically significant CIA, followed by impaired MENQOL. Our findings may be relevant in the decision-making processes for premenopausal women with breast cancer.

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDCT-ASCT) is a standard therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). However, its efficacy in Asian patients has not been well investigated. A retrospective analysis of outcomes in 10 consecutive patients who underwent ASCT for HL in a single Korean centre from August 2005 to September 2010 was conducted. The median age was 34.5 years (range 17-64 years) and seven patients were male. Six patients were of stage III-IV at presentation. B symptoms were present in six patients. International Prognostic Score (IPS) was as follows: IPS = 1 (n = 5), IPS = 2 (n = 1), IPS = 4 (n = 2), and IPS = 5 (n = 2). The analysis included nine patients with relapsed HL and one primary refractory case. Four patients were in second complete response and the others were in partial response after salvage chemotherapy. With a median follow-up duration of 58.0 months, 3-year progression-free survival rate and overall survival rate from ASCT were 40 and 76 %, respectively. The results suggest that the efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy followed by ASCT in Korean patients with refractory or relapsed HL is comparable to that in Western patients.

R-CHOP chemotherapy composed of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, and prednisolone which might increase the risk of Pneumocystis pneumonia in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. We estimated the point prevalence of Pneumocystis pneumonia in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients according to the number of R-CHOP cycles and investigated whether cytoreduction by chemotherapy is associated with Pneumocystis pneumonia development. We retrospectively established a cohort of patients who received R-CHOP for non-Hodgkin lymphoma in our institution. Using this cohort, we estimated the incidence rate and point prevalence of definite and probable Pneumocystis pneumonia. To assess factors associated with Pneumocystis pneumonia development several clinical variables, including absolute neutrophil and lymphocyte count at the time of non-Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosis and when the last R-CHOP cycle was administered, were compared between patients with and without Pneumocystis pneumonia. Of 713 patients in the cohort, 14 and 18 patients were diagnosed with definite and probable Pneumocystis pneumonia, respectively. The overall incidence of definite and definite plus probable PCP in NHL patients receiving R-CHOP were 2.0 % (14/713; 95 % CI, 1.1-3.3 %) and 4.5 % (32/713; 95 % CI, 3.2-6.4 %), respectively. This corresponded to 3.8 (95 % CI, 2.2-6.4) and 8.4 (95 % CI, 5.9-11.9) per 1000 persons. Many cases of Pneumocystis pneumonia (22/32, 68.7 %) developed after administration of the fourth R-CHOP cycle. However, there was no statistical difference in Pneumocystis pneumonia prevalence between patients receiving four or more cycles of R-CHOP and fewer than. Higher absolute neutrophil count (4,742/mm(3) vs. 2,627/mm(3); p < 0.01) was associated with Pneumocystis pneumonia development at the last R-CHOP cycle, while absolute lymphocyte count at the time of NHL diagnosis was not. Contrary to expectations, Pneumocystis pneumonia is not a frequent complication of R-CHOP treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cytoreduction of R-CHOP might not be a risk factor of Pneumocystis pneumonia development. Universal prophylaxis against Pneumocystis pneumonia during R-CHOP treatment could not be strongly recommended.

The combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP) plus rituximab is the standard treatment for patients with primary gastric diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, a few trials comparing CHOP plus rituximab (R-CHOP) with CHOP have been conducted in primary gastric DLBCL. Among 93 consecutive patients receiving CHOP or R-CHOP as a first-line chemotherapy at our institution, 38 patients received CHOP and 55 patients received R-CHOP. With a median follow-up time of 48 months, the complete response (CR) rate, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) did not differ between two treatment groups (P = 1.000, P = 0.744, and P = 0.213, respectively). The CR rates were 93.9% for patients receiving CHOP and 92.5% for patients receiving R-CHOP. The 3-year EFS rates were 86.0% for patients receiving CHOP and 81.7% for patients receiving R-CHOP; the 3-year OS rates were 94.7 and 84.7%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, The CR rate was affected by the number of extranodal involvements (P = 0.011). The EFS and OS rates were affected by the Lugano stage (P = 0.067 and P = 0.008, respectively). High serum level of β₂-microglobulin was associated with worse EFS and OS in patients receiving R-CHOP (P = 0.018 and P = 0.015, respectively). In conclusion, the addition of rituximab was not found to have an impact on patients' outcomes with primary gastric DLBCL. The β₂-microglobulin in primary gastric DLBCL might be able to discriminate the patients' prognosis who are treated with R-CHOP chemotherapy.

Background: We performed a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of bortezomib in combination with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) as first-line treatment for patients with stage III/IV peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) based on our phase I study results., Methods: Patients received bortezomib on days 1 and 8 at a dose of 1.6 mg/m(2) in addition to CHOP every 3 weeks for a total of six cycles., Results: Forty-six patients were enrolled: PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS, n=16), extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKTL, n=10), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL, n=8), ALK-negative anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL, n=6), cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL, n=5) and hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (n=1). Thirty patients achieved complete response (CR, 65%) and the overall response rate was 76% (35/46). Although the CR rate of ENKTL was only 30% (3/10), three subtypes of PTCLs (PTCL-NOS, AITL and ALCL) showed 87% of overall response rate (ORR) (26/30) and 73% of CR rate (22/30). However, the 3-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 47% and 35%, respectively due to frequent relapse after remission. Grade 3/4 leucopenia was the most frequent toxicity whereas neurotoxicity was tolerable: grade 1 or 2 of peripheral neuropathy., Conclusions: The combined treatment of bortezomib and CHOP is an effective and feasible regimen for advanced-stage PTCLs other than ENKTL, with acceptable toxicity. However, future studies exploring new drug combinations are warranted to overcome relapse after remission., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Inter-individual variability of pharmacokinetics may account for unpredictable toxicities of docetaxel., Methods: From March 2007 to June 2008, female patients with operable lymph node-positive breast cancer receiving docetaxel-containing adjuvant chemotherapy were included in this study. The 4 cycles of planned dose of docetaxel (100 mg/m(2)) was performed as adjuvant chemotherapy, following 4 cycles of adriamycin and cyclophosphamide. We evaluated toxicity profile of docetaxel and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of CYP3A5 gene, ABCB1 gene, ABCC2 gene and SCLO1B3 gene. Toxicities during treatment of docetaxel were evaluated and defined according to the NCI CTCAE version 3.0., Results: Pharmacogenetic analysis was performed in 218 Korean women who had received the uniformly planned chemotherapy. With regard to ABCB1 3435 C>T, ABCB1 3435 T/T had significantly higher risks of neutropenia (P = 0.015). Meanwhile, allele frequencies for CYP3A5 6986 G and ABCB1 3435 T revealed a trend for neutropenia (P = 0.107 and 0.068). We could not find any other association between genotypes and other toxicities., Discussion: Although ABCB1 3435 T/T was significantly associated with docetaxel-related neutropenia in our study population, polymorphism of pharmacogenetic genes related to docetaxel metabolism did not appear to be evidently associated with docetaxel-related adverse events.

Purpose: This phase II study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of one cycle of induction chemotherapy, followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) featuring capecitabine/cisplatin, followed in turn by surgery, in the treatment of patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma., Methods: Between March 2003 and April 2005, 54 patients with stage II or III esophageal cancer were treated with induction chemotherapy (cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1; capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) bid on days 1-14) followed by concurrent radiotherapy (46 Gy in 23 fractions) and chemotherapy (cisplatin 30 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; capecitabine 800 mg/m(2) bid 5 days/week). Surgery was performed within 8 weeks of the end of radiotherapy., Results: Median age of the patients was 64.5 years (range, 45-74 years). After CRT, 52 patients (96%) showed a clinical response, including 26 (48%) who exhibited a complete response (CR). Surgery was performed on 41 patients (76%), with 20 (37%) achieving pathologic CR and 3 (6%) dying of postoperative pneumonia. At a median follow-up time of 74.2 months (range, 64.3-84.8 months), 16 patients (30%) had experienced tumor recurrence and 36 (67%) had died. Of the 41 patients who underwent esophagectomy, 5 (12%) had exclusively locoregional disease and 7 (17%) had distant metastasis, whereas no one had both. The 5-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 30.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.0-42.4%) and 37.0% (95% CI, 24.1-50.0%), respectively., Conclusions: A trimodal approach, consisting of a single cycle of induction chemotherapy, CRT containing capecitabine and cisplatin, and surgery, was feasible and effective in patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Positron emission tomography (PET) has been found useful in monitoring response to treatment of malignant lymphoma. We investigated the ability of interim PET to monitor response to standard dose R-CHOP chemotherapy in chemotherapy-naïve patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Between March 2004 and April 2009, 155 DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP and available for interim and post-treatment PET/CT were identified and included in this analysis. Response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between interim PET/CT-negative and positive group, and among three patient groups which were categorized based on their interim and post-treatment PET/CT: those with early metabolic complete response (mCR), delayed mCR, and never mCR. Interim PET/CT-negative patients (n=100) showed superior CR rates to interim PET/CT-positive patients (n=55; 93% vs 62%, P<0.001). However, there was no difference in PFS (P=0.07) and OS (P=0.24) between interim PET/CT-negative and positive group. We categorized patients into three groups, with 100 (64%) in the early mCR group, 35 (23%) in the delayed mCR group, and 20 (13%) in the never mCR group. Early mCR and delayed mCR group did not differ significantly in PFS (P=0.84) or OS (P=0.20). However, the survival outcome in the never mCR group was significantly inferior to the combined early and delayed mCR group. The result from this study suggests that interim PET/CT might be an inappropriate tool for designing risk-adaptive therapy in chemotherapy-naïve DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP. Prospective trials should be performed to clearly determine the role of interim PET/CT.

Background/aims: Rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone chemotherapy (R-CHOP) has improved survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and weakened the prognostic power of the international prognostic index (IPI). We evaluated the efficacy of the IPI and revised IPI (R-IPI) in patients with DLBCL who were treated with R-CHOP, focusing on extranodal site number (ENS) because extranodal involvement occurs frequently in Koreans., Methods: A total of 126 R-CHOP-treated patients with stage III/IV DLBCL were analyzed. We performed a retrospective analysis of the clinicopathologic factors and verified the predictive power of the standard IPI and R-IPI. Various numbers of extranodal sites were analyzed for further stratification, and we set the extranodal site-modified IPI (E-IPI) as the IPI when the number of extranodal sites was stratified as < 3 vs. ≥ 3., Results: A univariate analysis showed that ENS was associated with complete response (CR, p = 0.04), event-free survival (EFS, p = 0.01), and overall survival (OS, p < 0.001) when the ENS cut-off was set at ≥ 3. A multivariate analysis revealed that an ENS ≥ 3 remained associated with EFS (p < 0.01; hazard ratio [HR], 2.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29 to 5.26) and OS (p < 0.01; HR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.68 to 7.35). The IPI was effective for determining prognosis in terms of OS (p = 0.04) but not EFS (p = 0.17). The R-IPI was effective in terms of both variables (p = 0.02 and 0.04, respectively), as was the E-IPI (p = 0.01 and 0.001, respectively)., Conclusions: An ENS < 3 vs. ≥ 3, rather than the original < 2 vs. ≥ 2, was the most significant prognostic factor for EFS and OS. All three indices were predictive, but only the E-IPI identified the high-risk group of R-CHOP-treated Korean patients with disseminated DLBCL.

Background: Assessment of tumor cell proliferation based on Ki-67 expression yielded conflicting prognostic predictions of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The introduction of rituximab to the DLBCL treatment regime has led to alterations in the significance of previous prognostic factors., Methods: We analyzed Ki-67 expression and its correlation with prognosis in 144 patients with DLBCL treated with rituximab plus CHOP (R-CHOP) between July 2003 and January 2008., Results: The complete response (CR) rates following R-CHOP administration were not significantly different, based on Ki-67 expression status (P = 0.104). However, higher rates of relapse were observed in the high Ki-67 expression group (Ki-67 >or= 85%, n = 46) with 25.0%, compared to 10.0% in the low Ki-67 expression group (Ki-67 < 85%, n = 88) (P = 0.040). The 2-yr event-free survival (EFS) rates were 44.3% and 74.1% in the high and low Ki-67 expression groups, respectively (P = 0.011). The 2-yr overall survival (OS) rate was 66.4% in the high Ki-67 expression group and 82.2% in the low Ki-67 expression group (P = 0.016). In multivariate analysis, Ki-67 expression was a significant prognostic factor for EFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.909; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.261-6.708; P = 0.012]. Ki-67 was associated with OS but with borderline significance (HR = 2.876; 95% CI, 0.972-8.508; P = 0.056)., Conclusion: Elevated Ki-67 expression seems to be associated with higher relapse after CR and inferior EFS in patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP.

Evaluation of: Fujii M, Tomita K, Nishijima W et al. Phase I/II study of S-1 plus cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced/recurrent head and neck cancer. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 40(3), 214-221 (2010). A combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin is the most commonly used chemotherapy regimen in patients with advanced head and neck cancer (HNC). Japanese investigators replaced 5-FU with the oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 (40 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 every 4 weeks) to treat patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic HNC; and determined that the dose of cisplatin on day 8 should be 70 mg/m(2). The authors also studied the efficacy and safety of this regimen in a continuing Phase II trial. Treatment with S-1 plus cisplatin resulted in a confirmed response rate of 44.1% and a median overall survival duration of 16.7 months. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events included anorexia (26.5%), nausea (14.7%), and neutropenia/thrombocytopenia (11.8%). Despite inclusion of patients heterogeneous in disease status and incomplete response evaluation, this study demonstrated that S-1 in combination with cisplatin is feasible for treatment of advanced/recurrent HNC.

Primary adrenal lymphoma is a very rare extranodal lymphoma; its clinical features consist of a high incidence of bilateral adrenal involvement and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. We report a patient with primary bilateral adrenal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who achieved complete remission with R-CHOP (rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) chemotherapy. A 52-yr-old man presented with fever and progressive fatigue for 3 months. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the abdomen and pelvis demonstrated large bilateral adrenal masses, and a needle biopsy of the left adrenal mass revealed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. After 6 cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy, CT scans showed no residual disease. To our knowledge, this is the second report to date of a patient with primary bilateral adrenal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who achieved complete remission using R-CHOP chemotherapy.