Search

Background: We previously demonstrated the applicability of the concept of "platinum sensitivity" in recurrent endometrial cancer. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors have been widely incorporated into endometrial cancer treatment, the debate continues regarding treatment options in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer who have previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. In this study, we assessed the duration of response to secondary platinum-based treatment using pooled data from the SGSG-012/GOTIC-004/Intergroup study., Methods: Among the 279 participants in the SGSG-012/GOTIC-004/Intergroup study wherein platinum-based chemotherapy was re-administered for managing recurrent endometrial cancer between January 2005 and December 2009, 130 (47%) responded to chemotherapy. We compared the relationship between platinum-free interval and duration of secondary platinum-based treatment using pooled data., Results: In 40 patients (31%), the duration of response to secondary platinum-based treatment exceeded the platinum-free interval. The duration of response to secondary platinum-based treatment exceeded 12 months in 51 patients (39%) [platinum-free interval: < 12 months, 14/48 (29%); 12-23 months, 18/43 (42%); 24-35 months, 8/19 (42%); ≥ 36 months, 11/20 (55%)]. In particular, in eight patients (6%), the duration of response to secondary platinum-based treatment exceeded 36 months [platinum-free interval: < 12 months, 3/48 (6%); 12-23 months, 0/19 (0%); 24-35 months, 2/19 (11%); ≥ 36 months, 3/20 (15%)]., Conclusions: Re-administration of platinum-based chemotherapy for recurrent endometrial cancer may result in a long-term response exceeding the platinum-free interval in some patients. Even in the current situation, where immune checkpoint inhibitors have been introduced, re-administration of platinum-based chemotherapy is worth considering., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Bevacizumab (Bev) plays the central role of the adjuvant therapy for patients with ovarian carcinoma. The aim of our study was to examine whether differences in the administration of Bev influence the prognosis of patients., Methods: Patients with ovarian carcinoma who received treatment at two hospitals between 1999 and 2020 were identified. Patients treated with weekly low-dose administration of Bev (100 mg Bev on days 1 and 8 and 200 mg Bev on day 15, monthly) at one hospital (group A) and those with monthly high-dose administration of Bev (15 mg/kg of Bev on day 1, monthly) at another hospital (group B) were retrospectively compared., Results: Among the total patients, 44 were assigned to group A and 33 were assigned to group B. More patients in group A had advanced disease (p = 0.03) and a lower dose of Bev at the first time during the first cycle administration (p < 0.01) than in group B. Progression-free survival (PFS) was better in group A than in group B (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that group A was a better prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio 0.53, p = 0.03). Stable duration was longer in group A than in group B (p < 0.01). The incidences of adverse effects, including hematological toxicities such as neutropenia (p = 0.01) and nonhematological toxicities such as hypertension (p < 0.01), intestinal obstruction (p < 0.01), and thromboembolic events (p < 0.01), were lower in group A than in group B., Conclusions: Weekly low-dose administration of Bev might improve prognosis and decrease the frequency of adverse effects associated with this drug although the prospective study was needed to get corroboration., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Aquaporins (AQPs) are a family of transmembrane water channel proteins distributed in various human tissues. Recent studies revealed that AQPs play important roles in cancer biology. Few studies have documented the relationship between the prognosis, stage, and histological grade of uterine endometrioid carcinoma, with AQP expression. Hence, the present study aimed to investigate this relationship between uterine endometrioid carcinoma and AQP expression. We retrospectively reviewed records of the patients who underwent surgery for uterine body cancer between 1990 and 2010 at the National Defense Medical College Hospital, Saitama, Japan. In 241 cases of endometrioid carcinoma, we immunohistochemically examined the expression of AQP 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, and their relationship with clinicopathological parameters and the patients' prognosis. We investigated the relationship between the clinicopathological parameters and AQP3 expression, and found that as the FIGO stage and histological grade progressed, the percentage of AQP3 expression tends to decrease. Furthermore, we analyzed progression-free survival/overall survival (PFS/OS) using the log-rank test, and found that the AQP3-positive group had a better prognosis than AQP3-negative group (PFS: P < 0.001, OS: P = 0.002, respectively). Using Cox's univariate proportional hazard model, we revealed that AQP3 had a low hazard ratio. However, according to Cox's multivariate proportional hazard model, AQP3 was not an independent prognostic factor. Among the endometrioid carcinoma patients, the AQP3-positive group was associated with early stage and lower grade compared to the AQP3-negative group. Therefore, AQP3 has the potential to serve as a predictor of prognosis, although further investigation is necessary to elucidate the biological mechanism of AQP3 in endometrioid carcinoma.

Objective: To analyze the clinical behavior of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the uterine cervix, we conducted a multicenter, retrospective study of 193 patients., Methods: We evaluated the prognosis of NETs according to the new International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system, compared the clinical response to different chemotherapy regimens, and compared different histological subtypes of NETS., Results: Diagnoses of the subjects were atypical carcinoid tumor (ACT, n = 37), small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC, n = 126), large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC, n = 22), and NET, not elsewhere classified (n = 8), according to central pathological review. According to FIGO 2018, 69, 17, 74, and 33 patients were at stage I, II, III, or IV, respectively. Five-year survival was 64.5%, 50.1%, 30.2%, and 3.4% for patients at stage I, II, III and IV. About 40% of patients with stage IIIC1 survived >5 years. On multivariate analyses, locally-advanced disease, para-aortic node metastasis, distant metastasis, and <4 cycles of chemotherapy were associated with poor survival. Histological subtype and pelvic node metastasis had no prognostic significance. Response rates to etoposide-platinum (EP) or irinotecan-platinum (CPT-P) regimens were 43.8% (28/64), but only 12.9% to a taxane-platinum (TC) regimen (4/31). The response rate for ACT was 8.7% (2/23), significantly less than the 36.6% for high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (HGNEC: both SCNEC and LCNEC, 41/111)., Conclusions: Locally-advanced, extra-pelvic disease and insufficient chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for cervical NET. HGNEC showed good responses to EP or CPT-P but not TC. Chemotherapy was less effective for ACT, which had a prognosis identical to HGNEC., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability profiles of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin (PLDC) with those of gemcitabine and carboplatin (GC) for the treatment of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer., Methods: Ovarian cancer patients with recurrence > 6 months after first-line platinum and taxane-based therapies were randomly assigned to PLDC [pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m 2 plus carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 mg/mL/min on day 1] every 4 weeks or GC (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin AUC 4 mg/mL/min on day 1) every 3 weeks for at least 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, and overall response rate, overall survival, toxicity, and dose administration were secondary endpoints., Results: One-hundred patients (49 PLDC; 51 GC) were randomly assigned. Over a median follow-up of 24 months, the median progression-free survival was 12.0 months (95% CI 9.2-15.0) for PLDC and 9.8 months (8.9-12.3) for GC [HR 0.69 (0.455-1.047)] with a difference of 2.2 months. The response rate was 57.1% (41.0-72.3) for PLDC and 56.4% (39.6-72.2) for GC. No obvious differences in toxicity (G3/4) were noted between arms. The median relative dose intensity of planned dose per week was 88.9% for pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and 53.1% for gemcitabine (p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: PLDC and GC are both good treatment candidates for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients; however, the dose intensity was lower for GC than for PLDC. PLDC had a more favorable risk-benefit profile than that of GC for patients.

Objective: Recently, we established new histopathological subtypes of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) that include the mesenchymal transition (MT) type, the immune reactive (IR) type, the solid and proliferative (SP) type and the papillo-glandular (PG) type. Furthermore, we identified that the mesenchymal transcriptome subtype might be sensitive to taxane. We investigated whether these different histopathological subtypes of HGSOC require individualized chemotherapy for optimal treatment., Methods: We conducted the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) 3016A1 study, wherein we collected hematoxylin and eosin slides (total n = 201) and performed a histopathological analysis of patients with HGSOC registered in the JGOG3016 study, which compared the efficacy of conventional paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) and dose-dense TC (ddTC). We analyzed the differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among the four histopathological subtypes. We then compared the PFS between the TC group and the ddTC group for each histopathological subtype., Results: There were significant differences in both PFS and OS among the four histopathological subtypes (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Overall, the MT subtype had the shortest PFS (median 1.4 y) and OS (median 3.6 y). In addition, the MT subtype had a longer PFS in the ddTC group (median 1.8 y) than in the TC group (median 1.2 y) (p = 0.01). Conversely, the other types had no significant difference in PFS when the two regimens were compared., Conclusions: The MT type of HGSOC is sensitive to taxane; therefore, the ddTC regimen is recommended for this histopathological subtype., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare a cohort of patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PROC) treated with bevacizumab and gemcitabine (Bev-Gem) to that of patients treated only with gemcitabine (Gem)., Methods: Between 2011 and 2017, we identified the Bev-Gem and Gem PROC groups. The regimen included 1000 mg/m 2 of Gem on days 1, 8, and 15, and 15 mg/m 2 of Bev on day 1, every 4 weeks. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the date of the administration of Bev-Gem or Gem until disease progression or death., Results: The Bev-Gem and Gem groups included 18 and 29 patients, respectively. More patients had advanced stage disease in the Bev-Gem group (p = 0.048); no other characteristics differed between the groups. The response rates [ratio of complete remission (CR) to partial remission (PR)] of Bev-Gem and Gem were 38.9 and 3.4%, respectively (p < 0.01). The clinical benefit rates [combined percentages of CR, PR, and stable disease] of the Bev-Gem and Gem groups were 88.9 and 41.4%, respectively (p = 0.04). PFS and OS of the Bev-Gem group were superior (p < 0.01, p = 0.03, respectively). Bev-Gem was the better prognostic factor of both PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.17, p < 0.01] and OS (HR 0.31, p = 0.01). The frequency of hematologic and non-hematologic adverse effects was similar in each group., Conclusion: Bev-Gem regimens improved PFS and OS for PROC. Furthermore, the adverse effects of Bev-Gem were tolerable. Thus, Bev-Gem could be a candidate treatment strategy for PROC.

Purpose: We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of an irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT) and nedaplatin (N) combination therapy for recurrent and refractory endometrial carcinoma, administered based on UGT1A1 genotype., Methods: Between 2009 and 2017, 21 patients who received CPT-N therapy for recurrent endometrial carcinoma as second- or third-line chemotherapy at our hospital were identified. The CPT-N regimen included 40-70 mg/m 2 of CPT-11 on days 1, 8, and 15, and 50 mg/m 2 of nedaplatin on day 1, q4 weeks., Results: The median patient age was 63 years. The number of prior chemotherapeutic regimens ranged from 1 to 2. Two patients had prior pelvic irradiation. The response rate [ratio of complete remission (CR) to partial remission (PR)] of CPT-N therapy was 3 of 21 (14.3%), and clinical benefit rate (CBR) [the combined percentages of CR, PR, and stable disease (SD)] was 9 of 21 (42.8%). Toxicities included grade 3 neutropenia [4 (19.0%) cases], grade 3 febrile neutropenia [2 (9.5%) cases], and grade 3 diarrhea [3 (14.3%) cases]; all resolved with conservative treatment. Patients with a wild-type UGT1A1 status received higher doses of CPT-11 (p = 0.048) and had similar RR and CBR compared to those with a UGT1A1*6 and *28 status. There were no significant differences in frequencies of hematological or non-hematological toxicities, regardless of UGT1A1 status., Conclusions: The CPT-N regimen for recurrent and refractory endometrial carcinoma had tolerable side effects and significant efficacy. This regimen is a viable treatment option for endometrial carcinoma.

Purpose: Low skeletal muscle mass (sarcopenia) has been reported to have an influence on survival and toxicities of chemotherapy in several solid tumors. The impact of sarcopenia on the treatment of ovarian cancers has not been determined. The present study aimed to evaluate correlation between sarcopenia and toxicities of chemotherapy in ovarian cancers., Methods: Medical charts of the ovarian cancer patients that received chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin at our hospital between 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Muscle areas of bilateral psoas major muscles at the fifth lumbar vertebra were measured using images obtained by computed tomography. The volume of muscle and clinicopathological factors were evaluated for toxicities of chemotherapy. The protocol of the present study was approved by the institutional review board of our institution., Results: A total of 76 patients with ovarian cancers were identified, and enrolled in the present study. Median psoas index (PI, the psoas muscle major cross-sectional area divided by the height squared) was 583 mm 2 /m 2 (range 326-999). The patients with low PI developed peripheral neuropathy more frequently compared with those with high PI (32 vs. 11%; P = 0.047). PI value was not associated with other toxicities such as neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. PI value was associated with grade 2 or higher peripheral neuropathy in univariate analysis (OR = 3.92; 95% CI 1.21-15.32; P = 0.02) and multivariate analysis (OR = 3.93; 95% CI 1.17-15.87; P = 0.03)., Conclusions: PI value was significantly associated with peripheral neuropathy induced by combination therapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin in ovarian cancer patients. Although further studies are needed to confirm the results, the volume of skeletal muscle mass could be a potential biomarker to predict toxicities in ovarian cancer patients.

Background: We conducted a phase III, non-inferiority trial comparing upfront primary debulking surgery (PDS) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers (JCOG0602). Two earlier studies, EORTC55971 and CHORUS, demonstrated non-inferior survival of patients treated with NAC. However, they could not evaluate true treatment invasiveness because of adding diagnostic laparotomy or laparoscopy before treatment in over 30% of both arms of EORTC55971 and in 16% of NAC arm of CHORUS., Methods: Patients were randomised into the standard arm (PDS followed by eight cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin [TC]) and NAC arm (four cycles of TC, IDS, and four cycles of TC). In the standard arm, IDS was optional for patients who had undergone suboptimal or incomplete PDS. Treatment invasiveness was compared between arms (UMIN000000523)., Results: Between November 2006 and October 2011, 301 patients were randomised. In the standard arm, 147/149 underwent PDS and 49 underwent IDS. In the NAC arm, 130/152 underwent IDS. The NAC arm required fewer surgeries (mean 0.86 versus 1.32, p < 0.001) and shorter total operation time (median 273 min versus 341 min, p < 0.001) than the standard arm and required a lower frequency of abdominal organ resection (23.7% versus 37.6%, p = 0.012) or distant metastases resection (3.9% versus 10.7%, p = 0.027). In the NAC arm IDS, blood/ascites loss was smaller (median 787 ml versus 3235 ml, p < 0.001) and albumin transfusion and G3/4 adverse events after surgery in total were less frequent (26.2% versus 58.5%, p < 0.001; 4.6% versus 15.0%, p = 0.005, respectively)., Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that NAC treatment is less invasive than standard treatment. NAC treatment may become the new standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer when non-inferior survival is confirmed in the planned primary analysis in 2017., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Irinotecan-induced severe toxicities are possibly related to UGT1A1*6 and *28 genotypes. However, the correlation between UGT1A1 polymorphisms and the risk of toxicities induced by low-dose irinotecan plus platinum combination therapy still remains controversial. This prospective observational study aimed to examine the correlation between UGT1A1 genotypes and clinical outcomes of low-dose irinotecan (median 60 mg/m(2) , range 25-115 mg/m(2) ) plus platinum in Japanese patients with solid tumors., Methods: Toxicity profiles were compared between UGT1A1 SNP heterozygotes (hetero-group) and patients with homozygous SNP profile (*6/*6, *28/*28 and *6/*28). Logistic regression models were used to identify independent risk factors for these toxicities., Results: A total of 331 patients were enrolled: 84% with hetero-group and 16% with homo-group. Although the initial irinotecan dose was similar, the dose intensities during the three cycles were significantly lower in the homo-group (P < 0.01). Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were significantly more frequent in the homo-group. Multivariable analysis identified UGT1A1 genotype (P < 0.01) as an independent factor for grade 4 hematological toxicity in the first treatment cycle., Conclusion: UGT1A1 genotype has a major impact on the increased risk of severe hematological toxicities, even in low-dose irinotecan regimens. UGT1A1 genotypes are useful biomarkers for predicting severe hematological toxicities in patients treated with irinotecan plus platinum analog., (© 2016 The Authors. Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology Published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Purpose: We previously reported that the concept of "platinum sensitivity" could be applied to recurrent endometrial cancer. We conducted an ancillary analysis to determine an appropriate second-line regimen for patients who received a platinum agent as first-line chemotherapy., Methods: We extracted and reanalyzed data of patients treated with doxorubicin and cisplatin (AP), paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC), or docetaxel and carboplatin (DC) as first- and second-line chemotherapies from the SGSG012/GOTIC004/Intergroup study., Results: We identified 216 patients: 38 received AP as first-line chemotherapy, of which 36 received TC or DC (Tax-C) as second-line chemotherapy; and 178 received Tax-C as first-line chemotherapy, of which 51 received AP and 127 received Tax-C as second-line chemotherapy. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after second-line chemotherapy decreased in the order of Tax-C followed by Tax-C (10 and 48 months, respectively), AP followed by Tax-C (9 and 23 months, respectively), and Tax-C followed by AP (3 and 12 months, respectively). Median PFS and OS after second-line chemotherapy for platinum-resistant patients receiving Tax-C as first-line chemotherapy were longer in Tax-C than in AP (7 and 23 vs. 3 and 10 months, respectively) as second-line chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 3.255, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.908-5.555, p < 0.0001; HR 3.179, 95 % CI 1.835-5.507, p < 0.0001, respectively]. Median PFS and OS after second-line chemotherapy for platinum-sensitive patients receiving Tax-C as first-line chemotherapy were almost equivalent to those receiving Tax-C or AP as second-line chemotherapy., Conclusions: For platinum-resistant recurrent endometrial cancer patients, Tax-C may be preferred over AP as second-line chemotherapy.

Purpose: In metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer, cisplatin-based chemotherapy is standard. The JCOG0505 randomized phase III trial evaluated the clinical benefits of carboplatin-based regimen., Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer and had ≤ one platinum-containing treatment and no prior taxane. Patients were randomly assigned either to conventional paclitaxel plus cisplatin (TP; paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) over 24 hours on day 1 and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 2, repeated every 3 weeks) or paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC; paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) over 3 hours and carboplatin area under curve 5 mg/mL/min on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks). Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Planned sample size was 250 patients to confirm the noninferiority of TC versus TP with the threshold hazard ratio (HR) of 1.29., Results: Between February 2006 and November 2009, 253 patients were enrolled. The HR of OS was 0.994 (90% CI, 0.79 to 1.25; noninferiority P = .032 by stratified Cox regression). Median OS was 18.3 months with TP versus 17.5 months with TC. Among patients who had not received prior cisplatin, OS was shorter with TC (13.0 v 23.2 months; HR, 1.571; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.32). One treatment-related death occurred with TC. Proportion of nonhospitalization periods was significantly longer with TC (P < .001)., Conclusion: TC was noninferior to TP and should be a standard treatment option for metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer. However, cisplatin is still the key drug for patients who have not received platinum agents., (© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Fertility-sparing treatment has been accepted as a standard treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer in stage IA non-clear cell histology grade 1/grade 2. In order to expand an indication of fertility-sparing treatment, we have started a non-randomized confirmatory trial for stage IA clear cell histology and stage IC unilateral non-clear cell histology grade 1/grade 2. The protocol-defined fertility-sparing surgery is optimal staging laparotomy including unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, peritoneal cytology and pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection or biopsy. After fertility-sparing surgery, four to six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin are administered. We plan to enroll 250 patients with an indication of fertility-sparing surgery, and then the primary analysis is to be conducted for 63 operated patients with pathologically confirmed stage IA clear cell histology and stage IC unilateral non-clear cell histology grade 1/grade 2. The primary endpoint is 5-year overall survival. Secondary endpoints are other survival endpoints and factors related to reproduction. This trial has been registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000013380., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate prognostic factors, including postoperative chemotherapy regimen, for the treatment of ovarian yolk sac tumour (YST), and resulting fertility outcome., Methods: A multi-institutional retrospective investigation was undertaken to identify patients with ovarian pure or mixed YST who were treated between 1980 and 2007. Postoperative chemotherapy regimen and other variables were assessed in univariate and multivariate analyses. Additionally, the reproductive safety of the BEP (bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) regimen was evaluated., Results: There were 211 patients enrolled from 43 institutions. The BEP regimen and a non-BEP regimen were administered to 112 and 99 patients as postoperative chemotherapy, respectively. In univariate and multivariate analyses, age⩾22, alpha-fetoprotein⩾33,000 ng/ml, residual tumours after surgery and non-BEP regimen were independently and significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS). BEP was significantly superior to non-BEP in 5-year OS (93.6% versus 74.6%, P=0.0004). Reduced-dose BEP (<75% standard-dose bleomycin and<50% etoposide dose) was significantly associated with poorer 5-year OS compared with standard-dose BEP (89.4% versus 100%, P=0.02 and 62.5% versus 96.9%, P=0.0002). All patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery recovered their menstrual cycles. Sixteen of 23 patients receiving BEP (70.0%) and 13 of 17 patients receiving non-BEP (76.5%) who were nulliparous at fertility-sparing surgery and married at the time of investigation gave birth to 21 and 19 healthy children, respectively., Conclusions: The results of the present study suggest that standard-dose BEP should be administered for ovarian YST. BEP is as safe as non-BEP for preserving reproductive function., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is crucial for maintaining the quality of life of cancer patients. Female patients have been underrepresented in previous clinical studies of aprepitant or palonosetron. We performed a prospective multicenter study to investigate the efficacy and safety of triple therapy comprising these two agents and dexamethasone in female cancer patients receiving chemotherapy that included cisplatin (≥ 50 mg/m(2))., Methods: Aprepitant was administered at a dose of 125 mg before chemotherapy on day 1 and at 80 mg on days 2 and 3. Palonosetron (0.75 mg) was given before chemotherapy on day 1. Dexamethasone was administered at a dose of 9.9 mg before chemotherapy on day 1 and at 6.6 mg on days 2-4. The primary endpoint was the the proportion of patients with a complete response (CR no vomiting and no use of rescue medication) throughout the overall period (0-120 h post-chemotherapy)., Results: Ninety-six women (median age 55 years) were enrolled. The overall CR rate was 54.2 %. CR was obtained during the acute phase (0-24 h post-chemotherapy) and the delayed phase (24-120 h post-chemotherapy) in 87.5 and 56.3 % of the patients, respectively. The most common adverse reactions were constipation and fatigue (reported by three patients each)., Conclusions: Exhibition of a favorable overall CR rate over existing two-drug combinations suggests that the triple therapy regimen used in the present study is effective and tolerable in patients with gynecological malignancies receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Female patients may have a higher risk of developing CINV.

Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary has shown an exceedingly chemo-resistant phenotype, especially in cases that are recurrent or refractory to previous therapy. Also, progression-free survival was less than 6 months, even in the patients that achieved response when they were treated with conventional anti-cancer cytotoxic agents. We present a case with recurrent and refractory ovarian clear cell carcinoma that achieved complete remission using a combination of bevacizumab, trabectedin and oxaliplatin. The progression-free interval of the patient is over 30 months, and she is still receiving the combination therapy without toxicities of more than grade 2., (© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research © 2012 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.)

Objective: Combination therapy using gemcitabine with oxaliplatin (GEMOX) showed moderate activity in recurrent ovarian cancers. However, severe toxicities have been observed in patients who received full-dose therapy of GEMOX. On the other hand, bevacizumab enhances chemotherapeutic efficacy in various cancers. Here, we evaluated the effect of weekly low-dose administration of GEMOX in combination with bevacizumab (B-GEMOX) for patients with recurrent and refractory ovarian cancers (ROCs)., Methods: A total of 19 patients with ROC were treated with B-GEMOX: 2 mg/kg of bevacizumab, 300 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine, and 30 mg/m(2) of oxaliplatin, 3 weeks on and 1 week off, q4weeks. The treatment was continued until development of severe toxicities or progressive disease. Tumor responses were assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup criteria., Results: Median number of the B-GEMOX therapy was 5 cycles. Response was observed in 4 (34%) cases by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and in 2 (29%) cases by Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup criteria, resulting in overall response rate of 32%. Clinical benefit excluding progressive disease was obtained in 79% of the patients. Median progression-free survival was 4.5 months (range, 2-16+ months). Toxicities were mild and mainly consisted of hematologic, gastrointestinal, and neuropathy; however, there were no nonhematologic toxicities more than grade 1., Conclusions: Weekly administration of B-GEMOX was active for patients with ROC and showed mild toxicities. These results warrant further prospective studies for patients with ROC.

Several clinical trials to establish standard treatment modality for ovarian cancers included a high abundance of patients with serous histologic tumors, which were quite sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy. On the other hand, ovarian tumor with rare histologic subtypes such as clear cell or mucinous tumors have been recognized to show chemo-resistant phenotype, leading to poorer prognosis. Especially, clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (CCC) is a distinctive tumor, deriving from endometriosis or clear cell adenofibroma, and response rate to platinum-based therapy is extremely low. It was implied that complete surgical staging enabled us to distinguish a high risk group of recurrence in CCC patients whose disease was confined to the ovary (pT1M0); however, complete surgical staging procedures could not lead to improved survival. Moreover, the status of peritoneal cytology was recognized as an independent prognostic factor in early-staged CCC patients, even after complete surgical staging. In advanced cases with CCC, the patients with no residual tumor had significantly better survival than those with the tumor less than 1 cm or those with tumor diameter more than 1 cm. Therefore, the importance of achieving no macroscopic residual disease at primary surgery is so important compared with other histologic subtypes. On the other hand, many studies have shown that conventional platinum-based chemotherapy regimens yielded a poorer prognosis in patients with CCC than in patients with serous subtypes. The response rate by paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) was slightly higher, ranging from 22% to 56%, which was not satisfactory enough. Another regimen for CCC tumors is now being explored: irinotecan plus cisplatin, and molecular targeting agents. In this review article, we discuss the surgical issues for early-staged and advanced CCC including possibility of fertility-sparing surgery, and the chemotherapy for CCC disease.

Objectives: Currently, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is regarded as one of the standard treatment options in recurrent ovarian cancers (ROC). Bevacizumab has shown significant antitumor activity for ROC in single-agent or in combination with cytotoxic agents. We have conducted a preliminary study to investigate effects of combination of bevacizumab and PLD for heavily pretreated patients with ROC., Methods: Thirty patients with ROC were treated with combination therapy with weekly bevacizumab and PLD, 2 mg/kg of continuous weekly bevacizumab and 10 mg/m(2) of PLD (3 weeks on, 1 week off). The treatment was continued until development of disease progression, or unmanageable adverse effects. Response evaluation was based upon Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0, and Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) CA125 response criteria. Adverse effects were analyzed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0., Results: Overall response rate was 33%, and clinical benefit rate (CR+PD+SD) was 73%. Median progression-free survival was 6 months (range: 2-20 months), and a 6-months progression-free survival was 47%. Any hematological toxicities more than grade 3 were not observed. Two cases developed non-hematologic toxicities more than grade 2; a case with grade 3 hand-foot syndrome, another with grade 3 gastrointestinal perforation (GIP). The case with GIP was conservatively treated and recovered after 2 months, and there was no case with treatment-related death., Conclusion: The present investigation suggested that combination therapy with bevacizumab and PLD was active and well tolerated for patients with ROC. We recommend the regimen be evaluated in further clinical studies., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) is regarded as grade 3 tumor, and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines recommend adjuvant chemotherapy for the tumor even at stage IA. However, CCC often showed chemo-resistant phenotype, and the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy still remained uncertain., Methods: Clear cell carcinoma cases treated at collaborating institutions during the period 1992-2005 were retrospectively identified. After a central pathological review, survival analysis was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors were evaluated using a Cox regression model., Results: Among 219 patients with stage I CCC, 195 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (C+) and 24 patients (C-) did not. The C+ group had 77 pT1a and 118 pT1c cases, and the C- group included 18 pT1a and 6 pT1c tumors (P < 0.001). The median age was 52 years in the C+ group and 57 years in C- group (P = 0.04). During the median follow-up period of 48 months (range, 7-160 years), relapse was observed in one patient (4%) in the C- group and in 35 patients (18%) in the C+ group. There were no statistical differences of progression-free survival and overall survival between the C+ and the C- groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that peritoneal cytology status (P = 0.02) and pT status (P = 0.04) were independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival; however, adjuvant chemotherapy was not a prognostic factor (P = 0.80)., Conclusions: Although the present study was a limited retrospective investigation, it suggested that adjuvant chemotherapy had little impact on the survival of stage I CCC patients. Further strategy, such as a molecular targeting agent, is needed to improve survival of CCC, especially in cases with positive peritoneal washing.

Introduction: Paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) is generally considered to be the "gold standard" regimen for treatment of epithelial ovarian carcinomas. Little data are available, however, on the use of this regimen in patients with clear cell adenocarcinoma of the ovary (CCC). Combination chemotherapy with irinotecan hydrochloride plus cisplatin has been reported to be effective for primary and recurrent or resistant CCC. We compared these 2 combinations in patients with CCC., Methods: Patients (n = 99) with CCC were randomly assigned to receive either 180 mg/m2 paclitaxel on day 1 plus AUC 6 mg/mL x minute carboplatin on day 1 every 21 days (TC arm) or 60 mg/m2 irinotecan hydrochloride on days 1, 8, 15 plus 60 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1 every 28 days (CPT-P arm)., Results: Percentages of patients receiving the scheduled 6 cycles of chemotherapy in the TC and CPT-P arms were 70.8% and 72.0%, respectively. Although toxicity was well tolerated in both arms, the toxicity profile of each arm differed. Progression-free survival (PFS) showed no significant difference between the 2 treatment groups. Because there were more patients with large residual disease in the CPT-P arm, we performed a subset analysis by removing those patients, and then compared the PFS with that of patients without residual disease or with residual disease less than 2 cm. The PFS tended to be longer in the CPT-P group, although the difference was not statistically significant., Conclusions: A phase III randomized trial is required to elucidate the effectiveness of CPT-P combination chemotherapy for CCC.

Background: Palliative therapy is usually employed for the treatment of metastatic or relapsed cervical cancer. Many agents including cisplatin have been used for fighting the tumor; however, the gold standard therapy has not yet been confirmed., Case Report: Two cases of recurrent metastatic or refractory cervical cancer successfully treated with weekly administration of bevacizumab (2 mg/kg), paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)), and carboplatin (area under the curve (AUC) = 2.0) are presented. 1 course of the therapy consisted of weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin on days 1, 8, and 15 and weekly bevacizumab on days 1, 8, 15, and 21, q28 days. Complete remission was observed after 3-4 courses of the therapy. Hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities higher than grade 3 were not observed during the chemotherapy. In both cases, there was no evidence of disease more than 10 months after the therapy., Conclusions: Weekly administration of bevacizumab and paclitaxel/carboplatin has potential activity in recurrent, metastatic, and refractory cervical carcinomas. These findings warrant further trials in such clinical settings., (Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: To investigate the effects of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) *28, *6 and *27 in patients with gynecologic cancer who received chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin., Methods: Patients eligible for this study had cervical or ovarian cancer treated with chemotherapy; a course of the regimen consisted of 60 mg/m(2) of irinotecan on days 1, 8 and 15, and 60 mg/m(2) of cisplatin on day 1 every 4 weeks. UGT1A1 polymorphisms and toxicities were analyzed., Results: From March 2007 to December 2007, 30 Japanese patients were enrolled; 24 ovarian carcinoma patients and 6 cervical cancer patients. The following genotypes of UGT1A1 were found: wild type in 17 patients (57%), *28 in 4 patients (13%), *6 in 8 patients (27%), *28*6 in 1 case (3%) and no case of *27 (0%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and diarrhea were significantly more frequent in *6 patients compared with wild-type patients. Also, in *6 patients irinotecan administration on days 8 or 15 was significantly more often omitted due to toxicities. In patients with *28 or *28*6, side effects were similar to those in patients with *6., Conclusion: In addition to UGT1A1*28, UGT1A1*6 might also be a key candidate to determine the dose of combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin., (Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Irinotecan hydrochloride, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, has been preliminarily recognized as an effective agent against clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (CCC), but there are few clinical data. Our aim was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) between patients treated with irinotecan hydrochloride and cisplatin (CPT-P) and those with treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC)., Methods: One hundred and seventeen patients at International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages Ic (ascites/malignant washing) - IV were identified by scanning the medical records of ten Japanese hospitals. After complete surgical staging procedures including lymphadenectomy, 35 patients received CPT-P and 82 patients received TC. The PFS and overall survival of the two groups were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: There was no significant difference in median age, performance status, FIGO stage, rate of optimal cytoreduction, or follow-up period between the CPT-P and TC groups. Two-year and 5-year PFS was 48% and 40%, respectively, in the TC group and 55% and 55%, respectively, in the CPT-P group (P = 0.31). Multiple regression analysis revealed that only residual tumor was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (P < 0.01)., Conclusion: CPT-P showed a potential therapeutic effect, at least no less than that of TC therapy. Although there was no significant survival benefit in the present retrospective analysis, we recommend that the CPT-P regimen be evaluated in a larger, prospective, clinical trial.

Clear cell carcinoma (CCC) of the ovary has distinct characteristics showing resistance to conventional platinum-based regimen. Our aim was to evaluate the effects of combination therapy with irinotecan hydrochloride and cisplatin (CPT-P), comparing to regimen with paclitaxel and platinum (TP). We retrospective reviewed 172 patients with complete surgical staging procedures including lymphadenenctomy. Forty-six patients received CPT-P and 126 patients were treated with TP. Survival of the two groups was compared. Between CPT-P group and TP group, there was no significant difference in median age, performance status, FIGO stage, rate of optimal cytoreduction, and follow-up period. There was no significant difference in progression-free survival of patients with stage I tumors (p=0.95) and suboptimally debulked stage II-IV tumors (p=0.92). Although there was no significant difference of overall survival, progression-free survival of CPT-P group was significantly better than that of TP group in optimally debulked stage II-IV (p=0.03). Multiple regression survival analysis revealed CPT-P regimen (p=0.02) and residual tumor diameter (p<0.01) were both independent prognostic factors in stage II-IV tumors. The combination of CPT-P was shown to have a potential therapeutic benefit for advanced CCC of the ovary, especially for cases with optimal debulking surgery. However, this is a limited retrospective study, therefore we recommend that the CPT-P regimen be evaluated in a larger prospective study.

Shakuyaku-Kanzo-to was first medicated for muscular pain which was called Komuragaeri, and it has been reported that it is effective for peripheral nerve dysfunction such as arthralgia and numbness. Recently, Paclitaxel (T) and Carboplatin (J) combination chemotherapy (TJ chemotherapy) has been a standard first-line chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian carcinoma. For the arthralgia and muscular pain occurring in TJ chemotherapy, non-steroid-anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), Vitamin B12 (VB12) and Shakuyaku-Kanzo-to are the major medications. In this study, we examined twenty-one cases in which arthralgia and muscular pain occurred in TJ chemotherapy (including 16 cases as first-line chemotherapy). In all cases, patients took 7.5 g of Shakuyaku-Kanzo-to orally per day for eight days. We investigated the efficacy of Shakuyaku-Kanzo-to retrospectively with the following results. In nine cases (43%), Shakuyaku-Kanzo-to was effective in reducing pain. Especially in TJ chemotherapy as first-line chemotherapy, Shakuyaku-Kanzo-to was even more effective in reducing pain. We suggested that Paclitaxel combination chemotherapy with Shakuyaku-Kanzo-to taken orally is a more safe and tolerable way to reduce pain in epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Objective: We performed a phase I clinical study to evaluate combination chemotherapy with irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) and nedaplatin (CPT-11/nedaplatin) for cervical cancer., Methods: This study included patients with primary or recurrent cervical cancer. The regimen for CPT-11/nedaplatin therapy consisted of CPT-11 administered 3 times over 2 weeks (days 1, 8 and 15) and nedaplatin infused intravenously as a single dose (day 1). This course was repeated at 4-week intervals. The step 1 doses of the two agents were 50 mg/m(2), respectively. Dose escalation was performed in tandem. Plasma CPT-11, SN-38, total platinum, and filterable platinum levels were measured., Results: In step 3 (CPT-11, 60 mg/m(2); nedaplatin, 60 mg/m(2)), dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 2 of 3 patients. The step 3 doses were regarded as the maximum tolerated doses. The incidences of grade 3/4 adverse events in the first courses (n = 12) [and all courses (n = 45)] were: leukopenia 33% (22%), neutropenia 42% (31%), anemia 17% (20%), nausea 8% (7%), and diarrhea 8% (7%). Following CPT-11 administration, the mean areas under the curve (AUC; ng.h/ml) of SN-38 were 0.11 at 50 mg/m(2) and 0.17 at 60 mg/m(2). Following nedaplatin administration, the mean AUCs (microg x h/ml) of filterable platinum were 6.0 at 50 mg/m(2), and 6.0 at 60 mg/m(2). The response rate was 50% (2 complete responses and 2 partial responses)., Conclusion: The recommended doses of CPT-11 and nedaplatin for a phase II clinical study were established as 50 and 60 mg/m(2), respectively., (Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel)