Search

Purpose: This randomized trial evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of sequential gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) and standard chemotherapy in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML)., Patients and Methods: Patients (n = 472) age 61 to 75 years were randomly assigned to induction chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, cytarabine, and etoposide preceded, or not, by a course of GO (6 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15). In remission, patients received two consolidation courses with or without GO (3 mg/m(2) on day 0). The primary end point was overall survival (OS)., Results: The overall response rate was comparable between the two arms (GO, 45%; no GO, 49%), but induction and 60-day mortality rates were higher in the GO arm (17% v 12% and 22% v 18%, respectively). With median follow-up of 5.2 years, median OS was 7.1 months in the GO arm and 10 months in the no-GO arm (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.45; P = .07). Other survival end points were similar in both arms. Grade 3 to 4 hematologic and liver toxicities were greater in the GO arm. Treatment with GO provided no benefit in any prognostic subgroup, with the possible exception of patients age < 70 years with secondary AML, but outcomes were significantly worse in the oldest age subgroup because of a higher risk of early mortality., Conclusion: As used in this trial, the sequential combination of GO and standard chemotherapy provides no benefit for older patients with AML and is too toxic for those age ≥ 70 years.

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signalling pathway has emerged as an important therapeutic target for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). This study assessed the combination of temsirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, and lower-dose clofarabine as salvage therapy in older patients with AML. Induction consisted of clofarabine 20mg/m(2) on days 1-5 and temsirolimus 25mg (flat dose) on days 1, 8 and 15. Patients achieving complete remission with (CR) or without (CRi) full haematological recovery could receive monthly temsirolimus maintenance. In 53 evaluable patients, the overall remission rate (ORR) was 21% (8% CR, 13% CRi). Median disease-free survival was 3·5months, and median overall survival was 4months (9·1months for responders). The most common non-haematological severe adverse events included infection (48%), febrile neutropenia (34%) and transaminitis (11%). The 30-d all-cause induction mortality was 13%. Laboratory data from 25 patients demonstrated that a >50%in vivo inhibition of S6 ribosomal protein phosphorylation was highly correlated with response rate (75% with inhibition versus 0% without inhibition; P=0·0001), suggesting that targeting the mTOR pathway is clinically relevant. The acceptable safety profile and the predictive value of target inhibition encourage further investigation of this novel regimen., (© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Purpose: To compare the antitumor efficacy of three different anthracyclines in combination with cytarabine and etoposide in adult patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML)., Patients and Methods: We randomly assigned 2,157 patients (age range, 15 to 60 years) to receive intensive induction-consolidation chemotherapy containing either daunorubicin, idarubicin, or mitoxantrone. After achieving complete remission (CR), patients were assigned to undergo either allogeneic or autologous stem-cell transplantation (SCT), depending on the availability of a sibling donor., Results: The overall CR rate (69%) was similar in the three groups. Autologous SCT was performed in 37% of cases in the daunorubicin arm versus only 29% and 31% in mitoxantrone and idarubicin, respectively (P < .001). However, the disease-free survival (DFS) and survival from CR were significantly shorter in the daunorubicin arm: the 5-year DFS was 29% versus 37% and 37% in mitoxantrone and idarubicin, respectively. The proportion of patients who underwent allogeneic SCT (22%) was equivalent in the three treatment groups, and the outcome was similar as well. The [corrected] 5-year overall survival rates were 31%, 34%, and 34%, [corrected] respectively., Conclusion: In adult patients with AML who do not receive an allogeneic SCT, the use of mitoxantrone or idarubicin instead of daunorubicin enhances the long-term efficacy of chemotherapy.

Background: Gemtuzumab ozogamicin consists of a semisynthetic derivative of calicheamicin, a potent cytotoxic antibiotic, linked to a humanized anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody., Objectives: To describe the pharmacology of gemtuzumab ozogamicin and to provide an overview of clinical trials in acute myeloid leukaemia., Methods: Review and summary of publications on gemtuzumab ozogamicin indexed in the PubMed electronic database., Results/conclusions: Gemtuzumab ozogamicin has shown moderate activity as a single agent in patients with CD33-positive refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia, with more promising results in acute promyelocytic leukaemia. The side effect profile may be an improvement on conventional chemotherapy, except for a higher frequency of veno-occlusive disease or sinusoidal obstructive syndrome, especially after a subsequent haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Because of the different mechanisms of action and non-overlapping toxicities, the integration of this immunoconjugate with standard chemotherapy is a rational approach, and Phase III trials are ongoing both in the induction and in the post-remission settings.

The outcome of a cohort of 218 consecutive patients who failed to respond to a single course of standard daunorubicin plus ARAC (three + seven) induction regimen has been retrospectively evaluated to assess the characteristics of this group of AML patients and the effectiveness of second-line induction programs. Seventy-four of the 218 patients (33.9%) attained complete remission with salvage chemotherapies. The multivariate analysis of pretherapy characteristics of the patients showed that peroxidase positivity and age were the most important factors in determining whether or not the patient would have a favorable response to second-line induction regimen. In addition, comparison of marrow characteristics at diagnosis with those of marrow after the first-line therapy (marrow leukemic index, MLI) provided the greatest differences between second-line CR and resistant patients. Finally, peroxidase positivity and MLI predicted for remission duration and overall survival. Allogeneic BMT, however, appeared the most important factor for survival and event-free survival of remitting patients. These results are of importance when considering that better defined prognostic factors provide an objective rationale for selecting appropriate strategies for the treatment of patients who do not respond to a single course of induction regimen.

Preclinical studies and retrospective evaluations of clinical trials of a number of cytotoxic drugs have provided a rationale for the use of high doses of chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). To maximize cure and remission rates at an acceptable cost in toxicity, many schedules and combinations of dose-intensive chemotherapy have been tested in recent years in patients with de novo disease, cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) being the most extensively evaluated drug. In this article we review the principal results of both randomized and non-controlled studies. Our analysis indicates that high-dose Ara-C (HIDAC) used during induction results is no substantial benefit relative to conventional doses of drug. On the other hand, consolidation with HIDAC is a major advance in the treatment of this disease. In fact, in individuals less than 60 years of age and a favorable or intermediate-risk karyotype, HIDAC-based regimens have resulted in survival estimates comparable to those of autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Yet, the role of HIDAC is irrelevant in younger individuals with an unfavorable cytogenetic pattern and detrimental in patients greater than 60 years of age. Since recently new cytotoxic agents have expanded the armamentarium of antileukemic drugs, well conducted randomized trials of dose intensive chemotherapy still need to be performed to optimize schedules and combinations of drugs in patients with AML.

Thirty-three patients with 'poor prognosis' acute myeloid leukemia, no longer suitable for aggressive chemotherapy, were treated with daily oral all-trans retinoic acid (45 mg/m2) daily and subcutaneous cytosine arabinoside (20 mg standard dose twice a day, day 1 to 10, every 4 weeks). Seventeen patients were males and 16 females, the median age was 67 (range 39-82 years). Eleven patients were at onset of disease, 15 were refractory to previous conventional therapies, three were in first relapse and three in second relapse and one patient had a secondary AML. Seventeen patients had a bone marrow blast infiltration < 50% and 16 > or = 50%. A total of 16 (48%) patients entered complete remission; the rate of complete remission increased to 88% in those patients (n = 17) with < 50% blast infiltration at the time of entering the study. Seventeen patients (52%) were resistant. The difference in response to therapy, according to bone marrow blast percentage (< or > or = 50%), was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Median duration of complete remission was 34.4 weeks (range 6.4-62.8). Mild to moderate hematologic toxicity was the most common side-effect. In conclusion all-trans retinoic acid and low-dose cytosine arabinoside appears to be an effective regimen for inducing complete remission in 'poor prognosis' acute myeloid leukemia and patients with < 50% bone marrow infiltration are likely to represent the ideal target to receive this combination therapy.

Reports of treatment of patients with minimally differentiated acute myeloid leukemia (AML-M0) are limited, heterogeneous, and controversial. We verified the prognosis of this subtype by analyzing the results of 189 consecutive patients with de novo AML. Fifteen cases fitting the criteria of AML-M0 were identified. No clinical features distinguished them from other patients with AML. The median age was 61 years (range 27 to 70), with a leukocyte count ranging from 0.6 to 185 x 10(9)/L. In all cases the leukemic cells expressed CD34 and reacted with at least one of the antibodies to early myeloid antigens, ie, CD13, CD33, or myeloperoxidase. Immunophenotypic analysis also showed positivity for CD7 in seven samples and the multidrug-resistance P-glycoprotein (P-170) in six. Cytogenetic analysis was abnormal in 12 of the 13 patients in whom an adequate number of mitoses could be evaluated. No single abnormality prevailed, the most common findings being trisomy 8 (three cases) and aberrations of chromosome 7 (two cases). Antileukemic treatment differed according to age, but for remission induction, all patients received a combination of cytosine arabinoside and an anthracycline or mitoxantrone. The prognosis of patients with AML-M0 was remarkably poor as compared with the other French-American-British subtypes. Whereas the overall rate of complete remission (CR) was 58% with a median survival of 63 weeks, only 6 of the 15 patients with AML-M0 achieved a CR, and the median survival of this group was 16 weeks (range 3 to 39). The major determinant of treatment failure was unresponsiveness to chemotherapy, as only one patient died of infection during the hypoplastic phase. The CR duration of responders was short, ranging from 3 to 22 weeks, and no second remissions were observed. We conclude that conventional combination chemotherapy yields disappointing results in AML-M0. The reason for this may be the convergence of various unfavorable prognostic factors, such as (1) the high incidence of cytogenetic abnormalities; (2) the lack of differentiation features and the expression of immaturity markers such as CD34 and CD7; and (3) the frequent expression of P-170. Nonconventional therapeutic approaches should be developed to alter the prognosis of this form of leukemia.

Thirteen refractory/resistant AML patients no suitable for additional aggressive chemotherapy, were treated with a combination including all-trans retinoic acid (45 mg/m2 sine die) and low doses of Ara-C (20 mg/m2 subcutaneously, twice in a day, days 1-10, every 28 days). Ten patients were evaluable; 8 of them achieved a complete remission, two patients with an important tumor burden, failed to achieve a response. One complete remission patient relapsed after 7 months but is still receiving the same therapy and is now in partial remission. We believe this combination effective as inducer of complete remission in those AML patients which cannot tolerate additional heavy treatments. The role of tumor burden in affecting response to therapy remains to be still evaluated.

Ninety-seven patients with refractory or relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), median age 37 years, received as salvage therapy a single course of idarubicin 6 mg/m2 as an intravenous (i.v.) bolus daily for 5 days, cytarabine (Ara-C) 600 mg/m2 i.v. for a period of 2 hours daily for 5 days and etoposide (VP-16) 150 mg/m2 for a period of 2 hours daily for 3 days (ICE protocol). Thirty-six patients were primarily resistant to standard inductive therapy with daunorubicin and Ara-C; 50 patients were in first relapse, three patients in second or third relapse, and eight patients in relapse after transplants. Forty-two (43%) out of 97 patients achieved complete remission, 11 patients died of infection or hemorrhage during induction, and 44 patients (45%) had resistant disease. Of the various variables examined, only disease status (i.e. refractory versus relapsed AML) was predictive for a significantly lower response rate. The median remission duration was 16 weeks; the overall median survival was 10 weeks. Nausea, vomiting, and oral mucositis were common but were rarely severe. No patient experienced treatment-related cardiac toxicity. In conclusion, the ICE protocol is a tolerable regimen providing effective antileukemic activity in patients with advanced AML. The evolution of this protocol in previously untreated patients with AML appears indicated.

Background: The proved effectiveness and relatively low extrahematological toxicity of Mitoxantrone, Ara-C and Etoposide as single agents and in combination in the treatment of acute non lymphoid leukemia (ANLL) are well established. In a phase II study the efficacy and toxicity of an induction combination regimen with Mitoxantrone, Ara-C and Etoposide were evaluated for treatment of poor risk ANLL patients., Methods: Twenty-seven poor prognosis ANLL patients were treated with Mitoxantrone, 7 mg/sm days 1-3; VP16, 150 mg/sm days 1-3; Ara-C, 200 mg/sm continuous infusion days 1-5. Median age of treated patients was 63 (17-78): 10 de novo leukemias (4 greater than 65 yrs 3 with cardiomyopathy); 12 secondary leukemias (5 secondary to a myelodysplastic syndrome, 5 to myeloproliferative syndrome, 2 to other neoplasias); 3 relapses; 2 refractory., Results: Fifteen patients (55.5%) achieved CR (8 de novo leukemias, 3 relapses, 4 secondary leukemias); 7 died in induction, 5 progressed. Median remission duration was 27 weeks (range 5-70 wks) and overall median survival 13 weeks (range 4-80). Extraematological toxicity was low, but five patients died from infections and two from hemorrhages., Conclusions: The combination tested in this trial proved effective in the treatment of "poor risk" ANLL, but the results need to be confirmed on greater numbers of patients, mainly in the group of de novo leukemias that can't be treated with more aggressive regimens.