Search

Aim of the Study: The aim of this randomised trial was to determine advantages and drawbacks of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancers > 3 cm., Material and Methods: Two hundred and seventy-two women (age 70) with operable breast cancers larger than 3 cm (T2-3/N0-1/M0) were included in a randomised trial from January 1, 1985 to April 30, 1989. Patients in group A (n = 138) were treated by mastectomy and axillary node dissection. Adjuvant chemotherapy was indicated for 104 patients with axillary node involvement (n = 82) or negative oestrogen and progesterone receptors (EPR-) (n = 22). Patients in group B (n = 134) were treated by initial chemotherapy (identical as in group A) followed by locoregional treatment according to the response. Before treatment, the average of clinical tumoural diameter was 43 mm., Results: The median follow-up was 124 months. In group B, 49 patients (36.5%) were resistant to chemotherapy; a conservative breast surgical treatment was performed in the other 84 patients sensitive to chemotherapy (62.6%). In this last subgroup, 19 (22.6%) needed a secondary mastectomy because of locoregional recurrence. Survival rates were not different in groups A and B, but loco-regional recurrences were frequent in group B. At 10 years, the overall survival rate was 60% and half of living patients in group B were free of cancer and with their breast., Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy permitted in two-thirds of cases breast conservation treatment, initially considered to be impossible. Locoregional recurrences are more frequent than after mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Important improvements in local control with increasing function-sparing treatment have been achieved in adult soft tissue sarcomas (STS). However, the global prognosis of these diseases remains poor and 40% of patients with STS currently die of metastases within 5 years. In fact, the impact of chemotherapy remains debated, particularly in the adjuvant setting. Thirteen randomized clinical trials with no-treatment control arms have been published to assess adjuvant chemotherapy. A benefit has been demonstrated in 2 studies for overall survival, and in 5 studies when considering disease-free survival (DFS). Globally, despite large differences between studies (patient selection and treatment modalities), overall survival, DFS and local control of the chemotherapy arm were always better than those of the observed arm. These effects were also confirmed in 3 meta-analyses on published data. However, according to the preliminary results of a meta-analysis on individual patient data, overall survival does not appear to be significantly affected. Therefore, adjuvant chemotherapy for STS remains investigational. Randomized studies have to be pursued on the basis of previously performed trials in order to assess which patient group really benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Unlabelled: The objective of this phase II study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of carboplatin and etoposide as salvage treatment, in previously treated patients with persistent or recurrent ovarian cancer following first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: From July 1990 to August 1994, 58 patients were treated with 3-week cycles of chemotherapy consisting of carboplatin (200 mg/m2, D1) and etoposide (120 mg/m2, D1, D2). Criteria for evaluating previous response to cisplatin were strictly defined., Results: The overall response rate was 36%, with five complete responses (CR, 9%), 16 partial responses (PR, 27%) and the median duration of response was 10 months (range: 4 to 38). In the group of patients who progressed during the first year following the diagnosis, the response was 1 CR and 2 PR (12%) and in the group of patients who progressed from the second year after diagnosis, 4 CR and 14 PR (56%), with a median survival of 8.5 and 21 months respectively (p = 0.0013). The response rate was 59% in the potentially platinum sensitive group versus 8.7% in the primary resistant group (0.02 < p < 0.05). Myelotoxicity was the main side-effect but did not appear to be cumulative. Grade 3 and grade 4 anemia were observed in 26% and 3% of the patients respectively, neutropenia in 14% and 2% and thrombocytopenia in 14% and 8.5%. One patient died of sepsis associated with neutropenia., Conclusion: Treatment was easily manageable and well tolerated. The advantage of carboplatin and etoposide combination in potentially responsive patients is represented by the reduced nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity and ototoxicity as compared with cisplatin containing regimen, with durable feasibility in outpatients. This second-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer is effective as salvage treatment in potentially responsive patients with late recurrent tumors, while paclitaxel is the drug of choice for patients who have developped primary or secondary resistance to platin therapy.