Search

Purpose: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is approved for advanced colorectal and gastric/gastroesophageal cancer; however, data in patients with renal impairment (RI) are limited. This phase I study evaluated FTD/TPI in patients with advanced solid tumors and varying degrees of RI to develop dosing guidance., Methods: Patients were enrolled into normal renal function (CrCl ≥ 90 mL/min), mild RI (CrCl 60-89 mL/min), or moderate RI (CrCl 30-59 mL/min) cohorts and administered the recommended FTD/TPI dose (35 mg/m 2 twice daily, days 1-5 and 8-12; 28-day cycle). Based on interim pharmacokinetics/safety data, patients with severe RI (CrCl 15-29 mL/min) were enrolled and received FTD/TPI 20 mg/m 2 twice daily., Results: Forty-three patients (normal renal function [n = 12]; mild RI [n = 12]; moderate RI [n = 11]; severe RI [n = 8]) were enrolled and treated. At steady state, compared to values in patients with normal renal function, FTD area under the curve (AUC) was not significantly different in patients with RI, but TPI AUC was significantly higher and increased with RI severity. FTD/TPI safety profile was consistent with prior experience, but grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were more frequent in the RI cohorts (83.3% [mild], 90.9% [moderate], 75.0% [severe], and normal [50.0%]). Hematologic AEs (anemia and neutropenia) were more frequent with RI. Overall, seven patients discontinued because of unrelated, nonhematologic AEs., Conclusion: FTD/TPI is safe and tolerable at the recommended 35 mg/m 2 dose in patients with mild/moderate RI and at the reduced 20 mg/m 2 dose in patients with severe RI., Trial Registration: NCT02301117, registration date: November 21, 2014., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Adenosine mediates immunosuppression within the tumor microenvironment through triggering adenosine 2A receptors (A2AR) on immune cells. To determine whether this pathway could be targeted as an immunotherapy, we performed a phase I clinical trial with a small-molecule A2AR antagonist. We find that this molecule can safely block adenosine signaling in vivo . In a cohort of 68 patients with renal cell cancer (RCC), we also observe clinical responses alone and in combination with an anti-PD-L1 antibody, including subjects who had progressed on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Durable clinical benefit is associated with increased recruitment of CD8 + T cells into the tumor. Treatment can also broaden the circulating T-cell repertoire. Clinical responses are associated with an adenosine-regulated gene-expression signature in pretreatment tumor biopsies. A2AR signaling, therefore, represents a targetable immune checkpoint distinct from PD-1/PD-L1 that restricts antitumor immunity. SIGNIFICANCE: This first-in-human study of an A2AR antagonist for cancer treatment establishes the safety and feasibility of targeting this pathway by demonstrating antitumor activity with single-agent and anti-PD-L1 combination therapy in patients with refractory RCC. Responding patients possess an adenosine-regulated gene-expression signature in pretreatment tumor biopsies. See related commentary by Sitkovsky, p. 16 . This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1 ., (©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Expressed on activated T and natural killer cells, 4-1BB/CD137 is a costimulatory receptor that signals a series of events resulting in cytokine secretion and enhanced effector function. Targeting 4-1BB/CD137 with agonist antibodies has been associated with tumor reduction and antitumor immunity. C-C chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) is highly expressed in various solid tumor indications and associated with poor prognosis. This phase Ib, open-label study in patients with advanced solid tumors assessed the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of utomilumab (PF-05082566), a human monoclonal antibody (mAb) agonist of the T-cell costimulatory receptor 4-1BB/CD137, in combination with mogamulizumab, a humanized mAb targeting CCR4 reported to deplete subsets of regulatory T cells (Tregs)., Methods: Utomilumab 1.2-5 mg/kg or 100 mg flat dose every 4 weeks plus mogamulizumab 1 mg/kg (weekly in Cycle 1 followed by biweekly in Cycles ≥2) was administered intravenously to 24 adults with solid tumors. Blood was collected pre- and post-dose for assessment of drug pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamic markers. Baseline tumor biopsies from a subset of patients were also analyzed for the presence of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), CD8, FoxP3, and 4-1BB/CD137. Radiologic tumor assessments were conducted at baseline and on treatment every 8 weeks., Results: No dose-limiting toxicities occurred and the maximum tolerated dose was determined to be at least 2.4 mg/kg per the time-to-event continual reassessment method. No serious adverse events related to either treatment were observed; anemia was the only grade 3 non-serious adverse event related to both treatments. Utomilumab systemic exposure appeared to increase with dose. One patient with PD-L1-refractory squamous lung cancer achieved a best overall response of partial response and 9 patients had a best overall response of stable disease. No patients achieved complete response. Objective response rate was 4.2% (95% confidence interval: 0.1-21.1%) per RECIST 1.1. Depletion of Tregs in peripheral blood was accompanied by evidence of T-cell expansion as assessed by T-cell receptor sequence analysis., Conclusions: The combination of utomilumab/mogamulizumab was safe and tolerable, and may be suitable for evaluation in settings where CCR4-expressing Tregs are suppressing anticancer immunity., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02444793.

Lessons Learned: The combination of axitinib and crizotinib has a manageable safety and tolerability profile, consistent with the profiles of the individual agents when administered as monotherapy.The antitumor activity reported here for the combination axitinib/crizotinib does not support further study of this combination treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma given the current treatment landscape., Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors have been successfully used to treat metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC); however, resistance eventually develops in most cases. Tyrosine protein kinase Met (MET) expression increases following VEGF inhibition, and inhibition of both has shown additive effects in controlling tumor growth and metastasis. We therefore conducted a study of axitinib plus crizotinib in advanced solid tumors and mRCC., Methods: This phase Ib study included a dose-escalation phase (starting doses: axitinib 3 mg plus crizotinib 200 mg) to estimate maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in patients with solid tumors and a dose-expansion phase to examine preliminary efficacy in treatment-naïve patients with mRCC. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and biomarkers were also assessed., Results: No patients in the dose-escalation phase ( n = 22) experienced dose-limiting toxicity; MTD was estimated to be axitinib 5 mg plus crizotinib 250 mg. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were hypertension (18.2%) and fatigue (9.1%). In the dose-expansion phase, overall response rate was 30% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.9-54.3), and progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.5-not reached)., Conclusion: The combination of axitinib plus crizotinib, at estimated MTD, had a manageable safety profile and showed evidence of modest antitumor activity in mRCC., (© AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary are the property of the authors.)

Purpose: The objective of this phase II study was to evaluate pharmacokinetic interaction potential between ramucirumab and paclitaxel in patients with advanced cancer., Methods: This study was designed to assess 2-way pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between ramucirumab and paclitaxel. Twenty-four patients participated in Part A, which consisted of a 2-week monotherapy period in which paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) was administered on day 1, followed by a 4-week cycle of combination treatment with ramucirumab (8 mg/kg on days 1 and 15; paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15). Patients could continue to receive combination therapy with ramucirumab and paclitaxel. In 16 patients in Part B, ramucirumab monotherapy was administered on day 1 of a 3-week cycle. Patients could continue to receive ramucirumab monotherapy or combination therapy with paclitaxel., Results: Concomitant administration of ramucirumab had no effect on pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, with ratios of geometric least squares (LS) means (with ramucirumab vs. alone) of 1.09 (90 % confidence interval [CI] 0.93, 1.29) for AUC(0-∞) and 0.97 (90 % CI 0.83, 1.13) for C max. In addition, similar ramucirumab pharmacokinetic characteristics were observed with or without paclitaxel administration. The ratios of geometric LS means of AUC(0-∞) and C max of ramucirumab (with paclitaxel vs. alone) were 1.00 (90 % CI 0.84, 1.19) for AUC(0-∞) and 1.07 (90 % CI 0.93, 1.24) for C max, respectively., Conclusions: Concomitant paclitaxel administration is unlikely to affect the pharmacokinetics of ramucirumab, and vice versa. The incidence and severity of adverse events were consistent with the known safety profiles of paclitaxel and ramucirumab.

Background: Docetaxel is the standard of care for patients with metastatic, castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Gemcitabine is a nucleoside analogue with broad antitumor activity. In a phase 2 study of combined docetaxel and gemcitabine, the authors assessed its safety and activity in patients with chemotherapy-naive, metastatic CRPC., Methods: Eligible patients had untreated, metastatic CRPC with radiologic and/or biochemical evidence of progression after antiandrogen withdrawal with castrate testosterone levels, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 to 2, and adequate organ function; no previous chemotherapy was permitted. Patients received gemcitabine (800 mg/m²) Days 1 and 8 and docetaxel (75 mg/m²) on Day 8 every 21 days for a maximum of 6 cycles. Response was evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) for measurable disease. A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response was defined as a decline ≥ 50% in baseline PSA level., Results: Thirty-five patients with chemotherapy-naive, metastatic CRPC were enrolled. The median age was 67 years, and 60% of patients had an ECOG PS of 0. PSA responses were observed in 49% of patients. Among the patients who had measurable disease (n = 25), 3 patients (12%) had a confirmed, RECIST-defined partial response (PR); 4 patients (16%) had an unconfirmed PR; and 15 patients (60%) achieved stable disease. The most common adverse events included grade 1 and 2 fatigue (69%), alopecia (80%), and nausea/vomiting (54%). No treatment-related deaths were noted, but an unusually high incidence of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed., Conclusions: The efficacy of combined gemcitabine and docetaxel in metastatic CRPC was similar to that observed with single-agent docetaxel. In contrast to single-agent docetaxel, the combination was moderately toxic and had an impact primarily on bone marrow reserve., (Copyright © 2010 American Cancer Society.)

Approximately 40-50% of glioblastomas (GBM) overexpress epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Erlotinib is a specific and potent EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor active against refractory GBM. Patients with non-small cell lung cancer and > or =grade 2 erlotinib-induced rash have improved survival. This phase 2 study assessed the efficacy and safety of concurrent radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide with pharmacodynamic dose escalation of erlotinib in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. Patients received RT 60 Gy in 30 fractions with concurrent temozolomide 75 mg/m(2)/day x 42 days, followed in four weeks by temozolomide 150-200 mg/m(2)/day x 5, every 28 days for 12 cycles. Patients received erlotinib, 50 mg/day and increased by 50 mg/day every 2 weeks until the occurrence of grade 2 rash or to a maximum dose of 150 mg/day, from day 1 until disease progression. Twenty-seven patients were treated in this study. Twenty-two (81%) patients came off study for progressive disease (18 [67%]) or adverse events (4 [15%]). Eighteen patients (67%) have died. Median progression-free survival was 2.8 months, and the median overall survival was 8.6 months. Five patients remain on study with a median follow-up of 16 months. Grade 3/4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia, anemia, lymphopenia, fatigue, and febrile neutropenia. There were four deaths on study, three definitely treatment-related; therefore, the trial was terminated after accrual of 27 of 30 planned patients. Erlotinib co administered with RT and temozolomide was not efficacious and had an unacceptable toxicity.