Search

Objectives: The WNT pathway is an important oncologic driver of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The first-in-class recombinant fusion protein ipafricept (IPA) blocks Wnt signaling through binding of Wnt ligands. This phase Ib trial was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RPh2) for IPA in combination with taxane and platinum therapy (C/P)., Methods: Dose escalation started with a standard 3 + 3 design for IPA/C/P with q3w intravenous IPA on Day 1, in cycles 1 to 6 with C (AUC = 5 mg/ml·min) and P (175 mg/m 2 ). For enhanced bone safety the trial was revised to 6-patient cohorts with a q3w regimen of IPA on Day 1 and C/P on Day 3 (IPA → C/P)., Results: 37 patients have been treated; 30 of whom were treated following protocol revision to q3w IPA(D1) → C/P(D3) (2 & 4 mg/kg). IPA-related TEAEs that occurred in ≥15% included: fatigue (40%); nausea (35%); diarrhea and decreased appetite (22%) each; dysgeusia (19%); and vomiting (16.2%). 22% reported ≥1 IPA related TEAE Grade ≥3 the most common of which was neutropenia at 16%. There were no DLTs; the MTD was not reached. The maximum administered dose based on bone safety was 6 mg/kg. The overall response rate (ORR) was 75.7%. Median PFS was 10.3 months (95% CI 8.5-14.2) and OS 33 months (95% CI 23.4-NR)., Conclusions: IPA is well tolerated in combination with sequential C/P. ORR, PFS and OS are comparable to historical data but bone toxicity at efficacy doses of this particular Wnt inhibitor limit further development in EOC., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a modified paclitaxel/doxorubicin/cisplatin (TAP) regimen which incorporated intraperitoneal (IP) paclitaxel or IP paclitaxel/cisplatin in advanced endometrial cancer., Methods: Patients (pts) with FIGO (1998) Stage IIIA/IIIC with positive cytologic washings/ascites, adnexa, or serosa or Stage IV (intraperitoneal disease spread), histologically confirmed endometrial cancer were eligible. The study was designed as a phase I, 3+3 dose escalation study evaluating 5 dose levels (DL). All pts received cycles 1-2 with IV TAP, and cycles 3-6 with IV/IP therapy, on a 21day schedule. Adverse events were evaluated on cycles 3-4 for dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and dose escalation decisions., Results: Twenty-one pts were enrolled, of which 17 were evaluable for DLT. Most pts had Stage IV disease (76%) and serous/clear cell histology (59%). The MTD was determined to be DL 3 (cycles 3-6 including paclitaxel 90mg/m(2) IP, doxorubicin 45mg/m(2) IV, cisplatin 50mg/m(2)). Three DLT events occurred and were related to grades 3-4 metabolic toxicities. There was one grade 2 sensory neuropathy event and myelosupression was tolerable without the use of G-CSF. 88% of evaluable pts completed 6cycles of therapy. With a median follow-up of 22months, 46% of patients remain progression-free at 2years., Conclusion: We described an IV/IP based modification of a standard TAP regimen in endometrial cancer. Based on the high rate of completing 6cycles of therapy, low rates of neuropathy, and promising PFS, further study of IP therapy in endometrial cancer is warranted., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: There is a lack of reliable indicators to predict who will benefit most from anti-angiogenic therapy, such as bevacizumab. Recognizing obesity is associated with increased levels of VEGF, the main target of bevacizumab, we sought to assess if adiposity, measured in terms of BMI, subcutaneous fat area (SFA), and visceral fat area (VFA) was prognostic., Methods: Reviewed 46 patients with advanced EOC who received primary treatment with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy (N=21) or chemotherapy alone (N=25) for whom complete records, CT prior to the first cycle of chemo, and serum were available. CT was used to measure SFA and VFA by radiologists blinded to outcomes. ELISA was used to measure serum levels of VEGF and angiopoietin-2 in the bevacizumab group., Results: BMI, SFA, and VFA were dichotomized using the median and categorized as "high" or "low". In the bevacizumab group median PFS was shorter for patients with high BMI (9.8 vs. 24.7months, p=0.03), while in the chemotherapy group median PFS was similar between high and low BMI (17.6 vs. 11.9months, p=0.19). In the bevacizumab group patients with a high BMI had higher median levels of VEGF and angiopoietin-2, 371.9 vs. 191.4pg/ml (p=0.05) and 45.9 vs. 16.6pg/ml (p=0.09) respectively. On multivariate analysis neither BMI, SFA, nor VFA were associated with PFS (p=0.13, p=0.86, p=0.16 respectively) or OS (p=0.14, p=0.93, p=0.28 respectively) in the chemotherapy group. However, in the bevacizumab group BMI was significantly associated with PFS (p=0.02); accounting for confounders adjusted HR for high vs. low BMI was 5.16 (95% CI 1.31-20.24). Additionally in the bevacizumab group SFA was significantly associated with OS (p=0.03); accounting for confounders adjusted HR for high vs. low SFA was 3.58 (95% CI 1.12-11.43)., Conclusion: Results provide the first evidence in EOC that patients with high levels of adiposity may not derive benefit from bevacizumab and that measurements of adiposity are likely to be a useful biomarker., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine the progression free survival (PFS), toxicity, and patterns of failure for early stage, high-intermediate risk (H-IR) patients in a phase II trial with adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VCB) and three cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel., Methods: Surgically staged patients with stage I-IIb endometrial cancer with H-IR factors were treated with VCB (2100cGy) followed by three cycles of carboplatin (AUC 6) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)). The primary endpoint was PFS at 2 years, with toxicity and sites of failure as secondary endpoints. Toxicity was assessed by patient report (CTCAE v. 3) as well as by delays or dose modifications in treatment., Results: All patients completed VCB and 19/23 (83%) completed both VCB and 3 cycles of chemotherapy. Mean time to complete VCB was 14.5 days with minimal acute toxicity noted. At 6 months, all toxicity related to VCB had resolved. In total 60 cycles of chemotherapy were given, with one dose reduction (1.6%) for grade 2 neuropathy and seven delays (11.6%) in treatment due to hematologic toxicity. At a median follow-up of 44.5 months, 91% of patients remained progression free at 2 years. Four patients experienced a recurrence; they recurred both locally and distant., Conclusions: Adjuvant therapy with VCB and chemotherapy is well tolerated in a population of patients with H-IR endometrial carcinoma and provides 2 year PFS of 91%. A randomized trial is currently underway to assess whether combined VCB and chemotherapy reduces the rate of recurrence compared to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in this patient population., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and acute dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of intravenous topotecan administered with weekly cisplatin during pelvic radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer., Methods: Patients were treated at one of two dose levels receiving intravenous topotecan at 0.5mg/m(2) and cisplatin at either 30 or 40 mg/m(2) given weekly for 6 weeks concurrently with pelvic radiation and intracavitary brachytherapy. The primary endpoint for the escalation study was acute dose-limiting toxicities occurring within 30 days of completing radiation therapy., Results: Eleven patients were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicity consisting of Grade 3 nausea and vomiting lasting >24h in one patient and grade 3 febrile neutropenia in another patient occurred at the first dose level of weekly topotecan 0.5mg/m(2) and cisplatin 40 mg/m(2). This necessitated de-escalation to weekly cisplatin 30 mg/m(2) in combination with topotecan 0.5mg/m(2) and pelvic radiation. This dose level was tolerable in 6 evaluable patients with only one DLT consisting of grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 3 abdominal pain and grade 3 elevated gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT)., Conclusions: In women with locally advanced cervical cancer, intravenous topotecan 0.5mg/m(2) and cisplatin 30 mg/m(2) given weekly for 6 weeks with concurrent pelvic radiation and intracavitary brachytherapy were tolerable. Further expansion of the feasibility cohort of this study was suspended based on the results of a phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy of platinum combinations in advanced and recurrent cervical cancer., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

BACKGROUND.: The objective of this study was to determine the toxicity of cisplatin-based intraperitoneal (IP)/intravenous (IV) treatment using a modified version of the IP/IV arm of GOG 172. METHODS.: Patients with stage IC-IV and recurrent ovarian cancer were treated with D1 paclitaxel (IV at 135 mg/m², 3-h infusion) and cisplatin (IP at 50 mg/m²) and D8 cisplatin (IP at 50 mg/m²) every 21 days for 6 cycles. The primary outcome measure was completion of 6 cycles. Toxicity was assessed using the CTCAE, v.3.0 as well as subjective reporting by patients after each cycle. RESULTS.: Twenty-one patients completed 87 cycles of chemotherapy with IP cisplatin and intravenous (IV) paclitaxel. Eleven patients (52%) were able to complete all 6 cycles. Reasons for failing to complete treatment: progression of disease (n=3), grade 3-4 ototoxicity (n=2), IP port complication (n=1), grade 4 fatigue (n=1), small bowel obstruction (n=1), severe paclitaxel reaction (n=1) and one patient refused further treatment (n=1). Dose reductions of paclitaxel (135 mg/m² to 110 mg/m²) were implemented per protocol for neutropenia (n=3) at a frequency of 3.75%. Dose delays were noted prior to 9 cycles for neutropenia (n=6), thrombocytopenia (n=1), elevated creatinine (n=1), and grade 3 rash (n=1) at a frequency of 10%. CONCLUSIONS.: Although only 52% of patients were able to complete 6 cycles of cisplatin-based IP chemotherapy, significant reductions in cisplatin-related metabolic toxicity and catheter-related complications were noted., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To assess the differences in health-related quality of life (HRQL) of 4 cisplatin containing doublet chemotherapy combinations in women with advanced/recurrent cervical carcinoma., Methods: Patients were randomized to three-week cycles of paclitaxel + cisplatin (PC); vinorelbine + C (VC); gemcitabine + C (GC); or topotecan + C (TC). We report HRQL results from data available on 434 eligible patients enrolled into this 513 patient trial. HRQL was assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cervix (FACT-Cx) the FACT/Gynecologic Oncology Group (FACT/GOG) four-item neurotoxicity scale, and the 0-10 "worst pain" item from the Brief Pain Inventory, at baseline (pre-treatment), prior to beginning cycle 2, prior to beginning cycle 5, and at 9 months after enrollment. As reported by Monk et al. (2009) [13] VC, GC and TC were found not to be superior to PC with regard to progression-free survival or overall survival., Results: The trial was terminated early due to planned interim futility analysis, reducing power for HRQL analysis from 85% to 55%. Patients receiving VC, GC and TC doublets did not report significantly different HRQL, neuropathy, or pain from those who received the PC (control) doublet. Patients receiving PC tended to report worse neuropathy during treatment than patients who received other doublets (especially GC and TC), but the differences were not statistically significant., Conclusion: None of the 3 experimental doublets was different from PC in terms of HRQL during treatment. Long-term toxicity data are inconclusive. Except where patients may wish to reduce their risk of worsening pre-treatment neuropathy, PC remains the standard of care for this disease., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study evaluated whether progression-free interval (PFI) following primary chemotherapy (PCT) was predictive of overall survival (OS) after second-line chemotherapy in advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (EC)., Methods: This is a pooled analysis of patients who recurred after PCT and were treated with second-line chemotherapy on Gynecologic Oncology Group trials. PFI-1 measured from initiation of PCT to recurrence or treatment-free interval (TFI) measured from completion of PCT to initiation of second-line chemotherapy was evaluated in relation to clinical outcomes., Results: A total of 586 patients treated on 5 phase 3 PCT protocols were included. Baseline factors in primary setting associated with clinical outcome after PCT were also predictive of OS after second-line chemotherapy, including race, Gynecologic Oncology Group performance status, grade, and prior radiation therapy (P<.01). PFI-1 was the most significant factor predictive of survival after second-line chemotherapy, with a 30% reduction in the risk of death for PFI-1>6 months compared with ≤6 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.84 [P<.0001]) and median OS after second-line chemotherapy of 10 versus 5 months. A total of 275 patients treated on 9 phase 2 second-line chemotherapy protocols were also evaluated, and TFI>3 months was associated with a 25% reduction in the risk of death (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-0.97 [P=.030]) and median OS after second-line chemotherapy of 10 versus 7 months compared with TFI≤3 months. The tumor response to second-line chemotherapy was 9.6% versus 5.8%; the difference was not statistically significant., Conclusions: Time to recurrence after PCT is predictive of survival after recurrence in advanced/recurrent EC. However, there is no evidence that this variable can be used in selecting salvage chemotherapy., (Copyright © 2010 American Cancer Society.)

Purpose: Assess toxicity and efficacy of cisplatin (Cis) doublet combinations in advanced and recurrent cervical carcinoma., Patients and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) over 24 hours plus Cis 50 mg/m(2) day 2 every 3 weeks (PC, reference arm); vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 plus Cis 50 mg/m(2) day 1 every 3 weeks (VC); gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) day 1 and 8 plus Cis 50 mg/m(2) day 1 every 3 weeks (GC); or topotecan 0.75 mg/m(2) days 1, 2, and 3 plus Cis 50 mg/m(2) day 1 every 3 weeks (TC). Survival was the primary end point with a 33% improvement relative to PC considered important (85% power, alpha = 5%). Quality-of-life data were prospectively collected., Results: A total of 513 patients were enrolled when a planned interim analysis recommended early closure for futility. The experimental-to-PC hazard ratios of death were 1.15 (95% CI, 0.79 to 1.67) for VC, 1.32 (95% CI, 0.91 to 1.92) for GC, and 1.26 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.82) for TC. The hazard ratios for progression-free survival (PFS) were 1.36 (95% CI, 0.97 to 1.90) for VC, 1.39 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.96) for GC, and 1.27 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.78) for TC. Response rates (RRs) for PC, VC, GC, and TC were 29.1%, 25.9%, 22.3%, and 23.4%, respectively. The arms were comparable with respect to toxicity except for leucopenia, neutropenia, infection, and alopecia., Conclusion: VC, GC, and TC are not superior to PC in terms of overall survival (OS). However, the trend in RR, PFS, and OS favors PC. Differences in chemotherapy scheduling, pre-existing morbidity, and toxicity are important in individualizing therapy.

Objective: The pattern of metastasis for Stage IV endometrial carcinoma (EC) is similar to that for ovarian carcinoma (OC), hence the goal of surgical management for both diseases is optimal cytoreduction (CRS) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The objective of this study is to evaluate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced EC compared to a cohort of patients with OC matched for age and residual disease., Methods: Patients with Stage IVB EC treated with curative intent between the years of 1990-2006 were identified and data abstracted regarding demographics, surgical procedures, pathologic factors, and follow-up. Two patients with Stage IIIC OC were matched for each Stage IVB EC based on age and residual disease. Stage IVB EC patients with distant metastasis were excluded. All OC patients underwent primary CRS and received combination platinum based chemotherapy. PFS and OS were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank analysis., Results: 55 patients with Stage IVB EC underwent primary CRS and adjuvant therapy with curative intent. Optimal CRS (<1 cm residual disease) was achieved in 87% (n=48). The most common histologic subtypes were serous (53%, n=29), endometrioid (44%, n=24) and clear cell (3%, n=2). Adjuvant therapy with curative intent included platinum based combination chemotherapy (60%, n=33), platinum based chemotherapy with radiation (25%, n=14), and radiation alone (15%, n=8) depending on the time period of treatment. Seven patients had residual disease >1 cm following CRS, 6 of whom received chemotherapy alone. Two-year OS for the entire cohort was 52 vs. 76% for patients with EC compared to OC (p=0.008). For suboptimal EC vs. OC patients was 33% vs. 66% for OC patients (p=NS). EC patients with optimal CRS had OS of 57% at 2 years compared to 82% for OC patients (p=0.02). Median PFS was 13 months vs. 20 months for all EC and OC patients, respectively (p=0.01). Using a Cox proportional hazards model, optimal CRS was associated with a survival advantage over suboptimal for EC patients with a hazard ratio of 2.4., Conclusions: The treatment paradigm for advanced EC has undergone a drastic evolution from palliation to CRS and combination chemotherapy. Despite similarities in disease distribution and histology, OS for EC patients with intraperitoneal metastasis does not approach that of patients with advanced OC. Further research to identify the molecular characteristics of EC may identify important differences from OC and provide insight for the development of novel primary and salvage treatment strategies for patients with advanced EC.

Objectives: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and feasibility of weekly cisplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy administered concurrently with whole abdominal radiation therapy (WART) in women with high-risk endometrial cancer., Methods: Following surgery, patients with stage III-IV endometrial cancer (any histology) or with stage I-II serous or clear cell histology, and with largest residual disease

Objective: The cornerstone of therapy for advanced ovarian cancer is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by platinum based chemotherapy. Optimal management for very elderly women (>80) is unclear. This study sought to review the experience with treating ovarian cancer in this population., Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of patients treated between 1991 and 2006. Outcomes included post-operative complications, chemotherapy received and overall survival. Statistical analysis was performed with SAS v.9.1., Results: 85 patients were identified with a mean age of 84 years. 86% of patients presented with advanced disease. Primary CRS was performed on 80%. Among patients with advanced disease who underwent either primary (68) or interval debulking (2), 74% were left with <1 cm residual disease. Post-operative complications were common with 15% of patients suffering cardiac or pulmonary complications, over 10% with prolonged ileus, wound complications or mental status changes and over 30% requiring transfusion or antibiotics. Death prior to hospital discharge and within 60 days of surgery occurred in 13% and 20%. Among patients who underwent CRS, 13% were unable to receive indicated adjuvant therapy. Among those who were treated, 25% were treated with single agent platinum and 43% completed <3 cycles. Two-year overall survival for those who underwent CRS followed by adjuvant therapy is 51%., Conclusions: Our data suggests that patients >80 may not tolerate combination surgery and chemotherapy. The extremely high proportion of post-operative complications and relatively high proportion of post-operative deaths argues for a more prudent approach to this group of patients.

Objectives: To explore associations between histology and outcome in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer patients participating in Gynecologic Oncology Group chemotherapy trials., Methods: Age, race, performance status, histologic type (serous=S; clear cell=CC; endometrioid=E), disease stage, and prior radiation were evaluated using various analytic methods to evaluate the probability of response and identify independent predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: Single agent or combination chemotherapy regimens including doxorubicin (A) (12%), doxorubicin/cisplatin (AP) (63%), doxorubicin/paclitaxel (AT) (13%), and paclitaxel/doxorubicin/cisplatin (TAP) (11%) were used among 1203 patients treated on 4 randomized clinical trials. Breakdown of disease stage was 7.8% stage III, 22.8% stage IV, and 69.4% recurrent disease. Histologic distribution was 18% S, 3.7% CC, 8.5% mixed, 51.7% E and 18.1% other. More S/CC patients enrolled on trials with advanced stage (III-IV) disease (as opposed to recurrent disease) compared to E patients (45% vs. 24%, p<0.05). Overall response rate was 42% (E=44%, S=44%, CC=32%). Histologic type was not an independent predictor of response. Independent predictors of PFS included race, performance status, disease stage, and CC histology. Histology was also an independent predictor of OS; the relative hazard ratio for S histology was 1.2 (1.02-1.4; p=0.03), and for CC was 1.51 (1.1-2.07; p=0.01)., Conclusion: In patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer treated with A, P and/or T, response was not associated with histology. This exploratory analysis does not support exclusion of S tumors in future trials. Poorer PFS and OS were observed in CC compared to other types, but a lack of benefit from chemotherapy was not shown, and as this histology represents such a small fraction, it does not seem feasible to have separate chemotherapy trials for CC.

Purpose: Selection of a feasible sequence and schedule of carboplatin in combination with topotecan for evaluation in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)., Patients and Methods: Women with stages III-IV EOC or primary peritoneal carcinoma without prior chemotherapy were assigned to consecutive cohorts evaluating a "forward" (carboplatin day 1, topotecan days 1-3), "reverse" (carboplatin day 3, topotecan days 1-3), or "extended reverse" sequence (carboplatin day 5, topotecan days 1-5). Patients received 4 cycles carboplatin-topotecan followed by 4 cycles carboplatin-paclitaxel. Feasibility was defined according to the cumulative proportion of patients with dose-limiting events (DLEs) during the first four cycles., Results: Sixty-eight patients were enrolled across 5 cohorts. The forward sequence demonstrated unacceptable hematologic DLEs at the lowest topotecan dose (0.75 mg/m2/day x 3 days). The reverse sequence was feasible at 1.25 mg/m2/day x 3 days, with only 1/15 patients experiencing a DLE within 4 cycles, and 14/15 patients were able to receive 4 subsequent cycles of carboplatin-paclitaxel. The extended reverse sequence was associated with excessive DLEs at 1.00 mg/m2/day x 5 days. Prophylactic hematopoietic growth factors were not required., Conclusion: Higher doses of topotecan could be safely administered with reduced toxicity over multiple cycles using the reverse sequence, which was selected for phase III evaluation. The relative efficacy of the forward and reverse sequence is unknown.

Objectives: The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) compared methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) with topotecan and cisplatin (TC) or cisplatin alone (C) in advanced cervical cancer. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and quality of life (QOL) as secondary objectives., Methods: Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive either cisplatin 50 mg/m2 q 3 weeks (C) or cisplatin 50 mg/m2 day 1 and topotecan 0.75 mg/m2 days 1-3 q 3 weeks (TC) or methotrexate 30 mg/m2 days 1, 15, and 22, vinblastine 3 mg/m2 days 2, 15, and 22, doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 day 2, and cisplatin 70 mg/m2 day 2 q 4 weeks (MVAC). QOL was assessed at four time points using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cervix (FACT-Cx), Neurotoxicity Subscale (FACT/GOG-NTX subscale), and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)., Results: One hundred eighty-six patients (C = 60; TC = 63; MVAC = 63) were enrolled before MVAC was closed by the GOG Data Safety Monitoring Board after four treatment-related deaths occurred on that arm. MVAC produced a 22% overall response rate (95% CI: 0.13 to 0.34) and median PFS and OS of 4.4 months and 9.4 months, respectively. Compared with C and TC, there was more hematologic toxicity with MVAC. There were no appreciable differences in QOL scores after controlling for baseline scores., Conclusions: MVAC's clinical activity tended to be similar to that of TC but with an unacceptable risk of death from sepsis at this dose and schedule. Nevertheless, QOL, as measured by these instruments, was not substantially impaired by this regimen.

Objectives: This trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cisplatin plus gemcitabine in previously treated squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix., Subjects and Methods: All women had measurable histologically confirmed squamous cell cervical cancer and a GOG performance status less than or equal to 2. The women were to receive cisplatin at 30 mg/m(2) plus gemcitabine at 800 mg/m(2) day 1 and day 8 every 28 days., Results: Between February 2001 and May 2002, 32 eligible patients were entered. All women had received prior chemotherapy and 29 had received radiation. Twenty patients received platinum previously twice. The median time from primary treatment to recurrence was 21 months, but the median time from last prior chemotherapy was less than 2 months. A second phase of accrual was not indicated per the established stopping rules. There were 7 (21.9%) partial responses and median response duration was 2.1 months. Twelve additional women (37.5%) had stable disease. Nine women (28.1%) had increasing disease. Median time to progression was 3.5 months. There were no treatment-related deaths. Six women had grade 4 neutropenia, three had grade 4 anemia, and two had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 4 gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in two women and grade 4 anorexia occurred in one., Conclusions: This study suggests modest activity for the gemcitabine plus cisplatin doublet in previously treated squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. The objective response rate of 22% is comparable to that of other active agents and combinations tested in this setting. Toxicities were primarily hematologic and generally manageable with dose reductions.

Objective: To evaluate our experience with ovarian carcinosarcoma and identify prognostic factors., Methods: Thirty-one cases of ovarian carcinosarcoma were identified over a 6-year time period through tumor registry and pathology records. Fisher exact test and log rank using Kaplan-Meier method (P < 0.05) were used to compare variables with outcome., Results: All 31 patients underwent initial surgical treatment with an appropriate staging procedure. Stage distribution: 1 stage I, 6 stage II, 23 stage III, and 1 stage IV. The median follow-up was 28 months. The median survival for the entire group was 21 months. Early vs. advanced stage significantly influenced progression-free interval, P = 0.05. Nineteen patients were found to have stage IIIC disease and required debulking procedures. In patients with stage IIIC disease, presence of residual disease was associated with decreased overall survival, P = 0.03. 29 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy with 11 patients receiving ifosfamide/cisplatin and 16 patients receiving carboplatin/taxol. Progression-free interval was improved with the use of ifosfamide/cisplatin vs. carboplatin/taxol. The median PFI was 12 months in the carbo/taxol group and has not been reached in the ifos/cisplatin group (P = 0.005). The overall survival was also significantly improved with the use of ifosfamide/cisplatin, P = 0.03. In advanced stage patients, overall survival was not significantly influenced by type of adjuvant chemotherapy administered, P = 0.13., Conclusions: Ovarian carcinosarcoma has a poor overall prognosis with median survival rates reported in the literature ranging from 7-10 months. Our series, although limited by a small number of patients, exhibits a more encouraging median survival of 21 months for the overall group. Aggressive debulking to eliminate residual disease and the use of ifosfamide/cisplatin chemotherapy seem to be factors in this improved outcome.

Objectives: Safe, effective treatments are needed for relapsed ovarian cancer. Goals include improving symptoms, enhancing quality of life, and prolonging survival. The plethora of agents currently available present difficult choices for physicians. The present effort seeks to examine the role of one of these agents, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin., Methods: A roundtable meeting of experts in the management of ovarian carcinoma was held to build consensus around the present and future role of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for ovarian cancer and other gynecologic malignancies., Results: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is effective and well tolerated in relapsed ovarian cancer. When compared with topotecan in a phase III randomized trial, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin showed several advantages: improved quality of life, fewer severe adverse events, fewer dose modifications, less hematologic support, and lower total cost per patient. In platinum-sensitive patients, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin also produced a survival advantage. Results from prospective and retrospective studies further demonstrate the improved cardiac safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin compared to conventional anthracyclines., Conclusions: Based on survival and toxicity advantages and a once-monthly administration schedule, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is the first-choice nonplatinum agent for relapsed ovarian cancer. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin may also have clinical application in combination regimens for platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer, as consolidation/maintenance therapy for ovarian cancer, as a component of first-line therapy for ovarian cancer, and in the treatment of other gynecologic malignancies. Future clinical trials will further define and maximize the role of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in the treatment of ovarian cancer and other gynecologic malignancies.