1. Venetoclax Plus Rituximab in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: 4-Year Results and Evaluation of Impact of Genomic Complexity and Gene Mutations From the MURANO Phase III Study.
- Author
-
Kater AP, Wu JQ, Kipps T, Eichhorst B, Hillmen P, D'Rozario J, Assouline S, Owen C, Robak T, de la Serna J, Jaeger U, Cartron G, Montillo M, Dubois J, Eldering E, Mellink C, Van Der Kevie-Kersemaekers AM, Kim SY, Chyla B, Punnoose E, Bolen CR, Assaf ZJ, Jiang Y, Wang J, Lefebure M, Boyer M, Humphrey K, and Seymour JF
- Subjects
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Biomarkers, Tumor genetics, Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic administration & dosage, Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic adverse effects, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Karyopherins genetics, Progression-Free Survival, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf genetics, Receptor, Notch1 genetics, Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear genetics, Rituximab administration & dosage, Rituximab adverse effects, Sulfonamides administration & dosage, Sulfonamides adverse effects, Treatment Outcome, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 genetics, Exportin 1 Protein, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell drug therapy, Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell genetics, Mutation
- Abstract
Purpose: In previous analyses of the MURANO study, fixed-duration venetoclax plus rituximab (VenR) resulted in improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). At the 4-year follow-up, we report long-term outcomes, response to subsequent therapies, and the predictive value of molecular and genetic characteristics., Patients and Methods: Patients with CLL were randomly assigned to 2 years of venetoclax (VenR for the first six cycles) or six cycles of BR. PFS, overall survival (OS), peripheral-blood minimal residual disease (MRD) status, genomic complexity (GC), and gene mutations were assessed., Results: Of 389 patients, 194 were assigned to VenR and 195 to BR. Four-year PFS and OS rates were higher with VenR than BR, at 57.3% and 4.6% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.25), and 85.3% and 66.8% (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.65), respectively. Undetectable MRD (uMRD) at end of combination therapy (EOCT) was associated with superior PFS compared with low MRD positivity (HR, 0.50) and high MRD positivity (HR, 0.15). Patients in the VenR arm who received ibrutinib as their first therapy after progression (n = 12) had a reported response rate of 100% (10 of 10 evaluable patients); patients subsequently treated with a venetoclax-based regimen (n = 14) had a reported response rate of 55% (six of 11 evaluable patients). With VenR, the uMRD rate at end of treatment (EOT) was lower in patients with GC than in those without GC ( P = .042); higher GC was associated with shorter PFS. Higher MRD positivity rates were seen with BIRC3 and BRAF mutations at EOCT and with TP53 , NOTCH1 , XPO1 , and BRAF mutations at EOT., Conclusion: Efficacy benefits with fixed-duration VenR are sustained and particularly durable in patients who achieve uMRD. Salvage therapy with ibrutinib after VenR achieved high response rates. Genetic mutations and GC affected MRD rates and PFS.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF