Search

The Australian Leukaemia Study Group has performed a randomized trial of interferon alpha-2A (Roferon-A) as a co-induction agent together with intensive combination chemotherapy and as maintenance following completion of 12 cycles of induction treatment. When used as a co-induction agent, interferon-alpha did not improve response rates, time-to-treatment failure, or overall survival. Patients who had interferon together with intensive combination therapy (PCAB: prednisone 60 mg/m2 days 1-5, cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 day 1, BCNU 30 mg/m2 day 1, doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 day 1, repeated every 28 d for a total of 12 cycles) had more leucocyte and granulocyte toxicity and received a lower dose intensive of cytotoxic drugs than those patients who received PCAB without interferon. There was a trend towards prolongation of plateau phase which did not reach significance. Interferon, however, did improve the survival of patients who achieved plateau; for those patients interferon was associated with a 33% decrease in the rate of death after adjusting for initial beta-2 microglobulin level.

Background: Selection of patients for a clinical trial is affected by awareness of the existence of the trial, interest in the study question and clinical practices and views of the clinicians., Aims: To investigate the selectivity that may have occurred at Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute (PMCI) during the ANZ Lymphoma Group trial of MACOP-B vs CHOP in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)., Methods: NHL patients at PMCI in the study period were assessed against the trial's eligibility criteria. Comparisons were made between eligible (except for consent) non-trial patients and all patients actually randomised into the trial., Results: Of 497 patients presenting during the trial period, 320 (64%) did not meet the specified eligibility criteria, 102 (21%) were unsuitable on other grounds (age and medical) and 75 (15%) were eligible. Of those eligible, 43 (57%) were entered into the trial and 32 (43%) were not. Four non-trial patients had inappropriate application of eligibility criteria and 13 unknown reason. Eligible non-trial patients were similar to trial patients in most patient and tumour characteristics and overall survival. Significantly more non-trial patients had higher stage disease (p = 0.02). More non-trial patients had lower grade histology, but this was not significant., Conclusions: Physician selectivity occurred with respect to patient entry, but trial and non-trial patients were similar in most characteristics. Eligibility criteria should specify that patients can withstand all trial drugs and patient availability for treatment and follow-up. PMCI trial accural could have been up to 33% greater. These results suggest the trial accrual period could have been 25% shorter. Patient entry into this trial by PMCI clinicians compared favourably with other centres.

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of dose and dose intensity (DI) of induction and consolidation chemotherapy on relapse rates in 264 de novo patients with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL). Patients were randomised to receive cytosine arabinoside (ARAC) 100 mg/m2 continuous infusion for 7 days and daunorubicin (DNR) 50 mg/m2 IV day 1-3 (7-3) or the same drugs with the addition of etoposide 75 mg/m2 IV days 1-7 (7-3-7). Cox proportional hazards regression models were used throughout to identify prognostic factors, including dose delivery parameters, influencing the rate of relapse. Of 152 patients who achieved a complete remission (CR), 104 have relapsed with a median duration of CR of 15.8 months. Actual dose delivered was prospectively documented. Cox regression analysis identified the most significant prognostic factors jointly influencing duration of CR as performance status groups (p < 0.0001), percentage peripheral blasts (p = 0.0015), 7-3-7 arm (p = 0.0075), age < 40 years (p = 0.022) and induction dose ARA-C plus DNR (p = 0.029). In this analysis patients randomized to the 7-3-7 arm had an estimated 43% reduction in the relapse rate and each 10% reduction of doses ARA-C and DNR was associated with an estimated 45% increase in the relapse rate. The number of induction courses, delays in treatment and induction dose intensity did not significantly influence the duration of CR nor did any of the consolidation treatment parameters.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Sixty-seven patients with advanced breast cancer were prospectively entered into a Phase II trial of cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally on days 1-14, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, and prednisolone 40 mg/m2 orally on days 1-14 (CMFP) rapidly alternating with doxorubicin 25-30 mg/m2 i.v. on day 8 and vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 i.v. on day 8 (AV). Complete responses (CR) were seen in 7 patients, partial responses (PR) in 25 (CR + PR, 48%), stable disease in 24, and progressive disease in 9. The median time to disease progression was 9.8 months, and the median survival 19.4 months. Neutropenia was the major toxicity with WHO grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 50% of patients. CMFP/AV is a well-tolerated, effective regimen in advanced breast cancer but does not appear to be superior to CMFP alone.