Search

Background: Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumour in children. Relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma is associated with a poor outcome. We assessed the combination of irinotecan-temozolomide and dasatinib-rapamycin (RIST) in patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma., Methods: The multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2, RIST-rNB-2011 trial recruited from 40 paediatric oncology centres in Germany and Austria. Patients aged 1-25 years with high-risk relapsed (defined as recurrence of all stage IV and MYCN amplification stages, after response to treatment) or refractory (progressive disease during primary treatment) neuroblastoma, with Lansky and Karnofsky performance status at least 50%, were assigned (1:1) to RIST (RIST group) or irinotecan-temozolomide (control group) by block randomisation, stratified by MYCN status. We compared RIST (oral rapamycin [loading 3 mg/m 2 on day 1, maintenance 1 mg/m 2 on days 2-4] and oral dasatinib [2 mg/kg per day] for 4 days with 3 days off, followed by intravenous irinotecan [50 mg/m 2 per day] and oral temozolomide [150 mg/m 2 per day] for 5 days with 2 days off; one course each of rapamycin-dasatinib and irinotecan-temozolomide for four cycles over 8 weeks, then two courses of rapamycin-dasatinib followed by one course of irinotecan-temozolomide for 12 weeks) with irinotecan-temozolomide alone (with identical dosing as experimental group). The primary endpoint of progression-free survival was analysed in all eligible patients who received at least one course of therapy. The safety population consisted of all patients who received at least one course of therapy and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01467986, and is closed to accrual., Findings: Between Aug 26, 2013, and Sept 21, 2020, 129 patients were randomly assigned to the RIST group (n=63) or control group (n=66). Median age was 5·4 years (IQR 3·7-8·1). 124 patients (78 [63%] male and 46 [37%] female) were included in the efficacy analysis. At a median follow-up of 72 months (IQR 31-88), the median progression-free survival was 11 months (95% CI 7-17) in the RIST group and 5 months (2-8) in the control group (hazard ratio 0·62, one-sided 90% CI 0·81; p=0·019). Median progression-free survival in patients with amplified MYCN (n=48) was 6 months (95% CI 4-24) in the RIST group versus 2 months (2-5) in the control group (HR 0·45 [95% CI 0·24-0·84], p=0·012); median progression-free survival in patients without amplified MYCN (n=76) was 14 months (95% CI 9-7) in the RIST group versus 8 months (4-15) in the control group (HR 0·84 [95% CI 0·51-1·38], p=0·49). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (54 [81%] of 67 patients given RIST vs 49 [82%] of 60 patients given control), thrombocytopenia (45 [67%] vs 41 [68%]), and anaemia (39 [58%] vs 38 [63%]). Nine serious treatment-related adverse events were reported (five patients given control and four patients given RIST). There were no treatment-related deaths in the control group and one in the RIST group (multiorgan failure)., Interpretation: RIST-rNB-2011 demonstrated that targeting of MYCN-amplified relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma with a pathway-directed metronomic combination of a multkinase inhibitor and an mTOR inhibitor can improve progression-free survival and overall survival. This exclusive efficacy in MYCN-amplified, relapsed neuroblastoma warrants further investigation in the first-line setting., Funding: Deutsche Krebshilfe., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.)

We conducted a clinical trial and report the long-term outcome of 773 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia upon risk-adapted therapy accrued in trial CoALL 07-03 (from the Cooperative Study Group for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia). In a 2-step stratification, patients were allocated to receive either low- or high-risk treatment, based on initial white blood cell count, age, and immunophenotype. A second stratification was performed according to the results of in vitro pharmacosensitivity toward prednisolone, vincristine, and asparaginase (PVA score) and in vivo response after induction therapy (minimal residual disease [MRD]). Therapy was reduced for both risk groups in patients with a low PVA score or negative MRD result, and intensified in patients with a high PVA score. Overall outcome improved significantly compared with the predecessor CoALL 06-97 trial, with identical therapy backbone despite treatment reduction in 15.8% of patients (10-year probability of event-free survival, 83.5% vs 73.9%; overall survival, 90.7% vs 83.8%). Outcome for patients in the reduced treatment arms was superior to that of patients in the standard arms, associated with a profound reduction in frequency and severity of infectious complications. Importantly, we observed a lack of correlation between in vitro and in vivo drug response, as well as a lower predictive value of in vitro drug testing, reflecting an intrinsic limitation of this methodology that prevents its use for treatment stratification in future trials. In conclusion, it might be possible to reduce chemotherapy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia selected by stringent in vivo measurement of MRD without jeopardizing overall outcome., (© 2019 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Juvenile xanthogranuloma (JXG) is a disorder of disputed origin thought to be related to the dermal/interstitial macrophage. A 5-year-old female presented with an aggressive systemic JXG that developed 5 months after the diagnosis of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). Examination of the T-cell receptor gamma (TCR-γ) rearrangement in T-ALL blasts, JXG infiltrated lymph node biopsies and micro-dissected JXG histiocytes revealed an identical bi-allelic TCR-γ rearrangement in all samples, thus providing evidence for a clonal relationship between T-ALL and JXG in this case., (Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)