Search

Purpose: Siltuximab is a chimeric, anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody with potential therapeutic benefit in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients. We assessed the safety and tolerability of siltuximab in combination with docetaxel, the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel alone and with siltuximab, and the efficacy and pharmacodynamics of siltuximab plus docetaxel., Patients and Methods: In an open-label, dose-escalation, multicenter, phase 1 study, patients with metastatic, progressive CRPC received docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) q3w plus siltuximab 6 mg/kg q2w (n=12), 9 mg/kg q3w (n=12), or 12 mg/kg q3w (n=15). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), PSA, and radiologic response according to WHO criteria were evaluated., Results: DLT was reported in 1 of 11 patients receiving 6 mg/kg, 1 of 12 receiving 9 mg/kg, and in 1 of 14 receiving 12 mg/kg. Common Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia (73 %), leukopenia (60 %), lymphopenia (30 %), dyspnea (19 %), and fatigue (14 %). Toxicities were not dose dependent. Siltuximab did not affect docetaxel pharmacokinetics. The pharmacokinetic profile for siltuximab in combination was similar to single-agent siltuximab pharmacokinetics. Twenty-three (62 %; 95 % CI 45 %, 78 %) of 37 combination-treated patients achieved a confirmed ≥ 50 % PSA decline. Of 17 patients with measurable disease at baseline, 2 confirmed and 2 unconfirmed radiologic partial responses ranging 190 to 193 days were achieved with 9- and 12-mg/kg siltuximab. C-reactive protein concentrations were suppressed throughout treatment in all patients., Conclusion: These results suggest that siltuximab in combination with docetaxel is safe and shows preliminary efficacy in patients with CRPC, although alternative siltuximab schedules may be better tolerated for future studies.

Purpose: This open-label phase II trial assessed mitoxantrone/prednisone (M/P) with and without siltuximab (CNTO 328), an anti-interleukin-6 chimeric monoclonal antibody, for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who received prior docetaxel-based chemotherapy., Methods: Part 1 assessed the safety of biweekly siltuximab 6 mg/kg plus M 12 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks and P. Part 2 assessed efficacy and safety of siltuximab plus M/P versus M/P alone. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Progression was defined as progressive disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST), or ≥ 3 new skeletal lesions with clinical deterioration or without deterioration confirmed by repeated bone scan. Rising prostate-specific antigen was not considered progression., Results: Siltuximab plus M/P was well tolerated in Part 1 (n=9). In Part 2, 48 and 49 patients received siltuximab plus M/P or M/P alone, respectively. Enrolment was prematurely terminated by the Independent Data Monitoring Committee since an apparent imbalance in patient baseline characteristics (favoring the M/P only arm) made it unlikely that the study could achieve its primary efficacy end-point. Median PFS was 97 days with siltuximab combination and 228 days with M/P alone (hazard ratio, 1.72; P=0.043). Use of a novel non-validated PFS definition may have contributed to this result. Abnormal laboratory assessments were more frequent with the combination. Infection and febrile neutropenia rates were similar between groups. Greater C-reactive protein suppression was achieved during siltuximab combination treatment compared with M/P alone (P=0.0003)., Conclusion: While siltuximab plus M/P appeared well tolerated, improvement in outcomes was not demonstrated., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: For patients with advanced cancers, it is important that treatment improves the quality as well as the quantity of survival. This quality-adjusted time without symptoms of progression or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis provides a combined measure of both the overall survival interval and the quality of survival for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) receiving temsirolimus, interferon (IFN)-alpha or the combination of these agents, using data from a phase III clinical trial., Methods: Overall survival was partitioned into three distinct health states: time with serious toxicity (TOX), time after progression (REL) and time without symptoms of progression or toxicity (TWiST). Health states were quality weighted by patient-reported EQ-5D measures collected while receiving treatment., Results: All 626 patients from the trial were included in computation of health-state durations. EQ-5D questionnaires were obtained from 260 patients upon progression and from 230 after a grade 3 or 4 adverse event, and from 278 patients in the TWiST state. Patients receiving temsirolimus had 38% longer TWiST than those receiving IFNalpha (6.5 vs 4.7 months, respectively; p = 0.0005). Patients receiving temsirolimus had 25% longer quality-adjusted survival in terms of Q-TWiST than those receiving IFNalpha (7.0 vs 5.6 months, respectively; p = 0.0015). Differences between the combination (temsirolimus + IFNalpha) and IFNalpha groups were not statistically significant. Threshold utility analysis indicated that temsirolimus was the preferred alternative for all possible utility weights for REL and TOX health states., Conclusion: Temsirolimus resulted in significantly longer Q-TWiST (quality-adjusted survival) in patients with advanced RCC than IFNalpha therapy.

Background: Sunitinib malate is an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has demonstrated superior efficacy over interferon (IFN)-alpha in a phase III trial in first-line, metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Herein, we report the results of a phase I dose-finding study of sunitinib in combination with IFN-alpha as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic RCC., Patients and Methods: Treatment-naive patients with clear-cell metastatic RCC received sunitinib at a starting dose of 50 mg or 37.5 mg orally once daily in 6-week cycles (schedule 4/2) plus IFN-alpha at a starting dose of 3 MU subcutaneously 3 times a week, with weekly intrapatient dose escalation to a maximum of 9 MU as tolerated. Patients who did not tolerate either drug received lower doses of either or had dose interruptions., Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled; their median age was 64 years (range, 45-77 years). All patients experienced grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events; the most common were neutropenia, fatigue, and thrombocytopenia. After a median of 4 cycles (range, 1-9 cycles), 3 patients (12%) had a partial response, and 20 (80%) had stable disease., Conclusion: Although reduced starting doses were tolerated (37.5 mg for sunitinib and 3 MU for IFN-alpha), even these lower doses might not be well tolerated for long-term treatment of patients with metastatic RCC. Based on historical data, sunitinib on schedule 4/2 appears to be more effective as single-agent therapy. Further study of sunitinib plus IFN-alpha on this schedule is not being pursued in RCC.

Purpose: A tool that quantifies the risk of treatment-related toxicity based on individual patient characteristics can augment the informed consent process and safety monitoring in the setting of phase II cancer treatment trials of molecularly targeted agents (MTAs)., Methods: A regression model was constructed to predict the risk of a serious adverse event (SAE) with an MTA and presented as a nomogram. Estimation of risk can be performed by integrating risk estimates from the nomogram and from a reference or average patient. Internal validation was performed using bootstrapping techniques., Results: A total of 578 patients were treated with one of 14 MTAs given alone or in combination on one of 27 clinical trials performed by the Princess Margaret Hospital Drug Development Program between 2001 and 2006. Approximately 50% and 24% of patients experienced an SAE and an attributable SAE (SAEatt) during cycle 1, respectively. Albumin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), number of target lesions, prior radiotherapy, Charlson score, age, and performance status were included in the optimal model as predictors of a cycle 1 SAE, whereas the number of prior chemotherapy regimens, baseline creatinine, LDH, prior radiotherapy, Charlson score, body-surface area, and performance status were included as predictors of an SAEatt. Moderate-good internal validity was demonstrated, with area under the curve estimates ranging from 56.7% to 86.1% for all SAEs and 63.0% to 89.7% for SAEatts., Conclusion: A regression model was constructed that predicts the SAE and SAEatt risk for an individual patient during cycle 1 of phase II trial treatment with moderate to good internal validity. External validation is still required.

Background: Estramustine phosphate is a mustard-oestradiol conjugate, and has hormonal and non-hormonal effects. In phase II trials of patients with cancer, response to microtubule inhibitors increases when these drugs are combined with estramustine. We aimed to assess whether combining estramustine with chemotherapy increases survival in patients with castration-refractory prostate cancer., Methods: We systematically searched for randomised clinical trials that compared chemotherapy regimens with and without estramustine in patients with histologically-proven prostate cancer and were published between 1966 and 2004. Data from these studies were verified centrally and updated individual patient data were analysed. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, time to PSA progression, and toxicity. A Cox regression model that was stratified by trial and adjusted for covariates at baseline was used., Findings: The initial search identified seven eligible trials that included 742 patients, from which data from five trials including 605 patients had been collected. Individual patient data from two trials (137 patients) were no longer available. The 605 patients had been accrued between Jan 1, 1993 and Dec 1, 2003 and randomly assigned to chemotherapy plus estramustine or to chemotherapy without estramustine. Chemotherapy (with or without estramustine) consisted of docetaxel, paclitaxel, ixabepilone, and vinblastine. Median follow-up was 2.8 years (range 0.0-3.4), and 510 deaths had occurred by the end of follow-up. Cox regression analysis stratified by trial showed that concentrations of serum haemoglobin (p<0.0001), use of chemotherapy plus estramustine (p=0.008), performance status (p=0.002), and serum PSA concentrations (p=0.04) were associated independently with overall survival. Overall survival was significantly better in patients assigned chemotherapy plus estramustine (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.77 [95% CI 0.63-0.93], p=0.008). Estimated absolute increase in overall survival when estramustine was added to chemotherapy was 9.5% (SE 4.0) at 1 year after randomisation. We did not note a significant association between treatment effect on overall survival and age, concentration of serum haemoglobin, performance status, or serum PSA concentration. Patients who received chemotherapy plus estramustine had a better PSA response than those who received chemotherapy without estramustine (RR 0.53 [0.38-0.72], p<0.0001). Time to PSA progression was significantly longer in patients assigned chemotherapy plus estramustine than in those assigned chemotherapy without estramustine (HR 0.74 [0.58-0.94], p=0.01). Patients assigned chemotherapy and estramustine had more grade 3 or grade 4 thromboembolic events compared with those assigned chemotherapy without estramustine (12 of 271 vs 1 of 275)., Interpretation: In patients with castration-refractory prostate cancer, addition of estramustine to chemotherapy increases time to PSA progression and overall survival compared with chemotherapy without estramustine. However, this benefit should be balanced with the risk of increased thromboembolic events in patients who receive estramustine and chemotherapy in combination compared with chemotherapy without estramustine.

Background: Interferon alfa is widely used for metastatic renal-cell carcinoma but has limited efficacy and tolerability. Temsirolimus, a specific inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin kinase, may benefit patients with this disease., Methods: In this multicenter, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 626 patients with previously untreated, poor-prognosis metastatic renal-cell carcinoma to receive 25 mg of intravenous temsirolimus weekly, 3 million U of interferon alfa (with an increase to 18 million U) subcutaneously three times weekly, or combination therapy with 15 mg of temsirolimus weekly plus 6 million U of interferon alfa three times weekly. The primary end point was overall survival in comparisons of the temsirolimus group and the combination-therapy group with the interferon group., Results: Patients who received temsirolimus alone had longer overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.92; P=0.008) and progression-free survival (P<0.001) than did patients who received interferon alone. Overall survival in the combination-therapy group did not differ significantly from that in the interferon group (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.20; P=0.70). Median overall survival times in the interferon group, the temsirolimus group, and the combination-therapy group were 7.3, 10.9, and 8.4 months, respectively. Rash, peripheral edema, hyperglycemia, and hyperlipidemia were more common in the temsirolimus group, whereas asthenia was more common in the interferon group. There were fewer patients with serious adverse events in the temsirolimus group than in the interferon group (P=0.02)., Conclusions: As compared with interferon alfa, temsirolimus improved overall survival among patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma and a poor prognosis. The addition of temsirolimus to interferon did not improve survival. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00065468 [ClinicalTrials.gov].)., (Copyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Objectives: To exploit the favorable dose intensity and safety profile of weekly paclitaxel, we conducted a Phase I trial of paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion in combination with estramustine phosphate (EM) in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). The antimicrotubule drug combination of paclitaxel by 96-hour infusion plus EM is active in HRPC., Methods: Twenty-four patients with metastatic HRPC and progressive tumor after antiandrogen withdrawal were enrolled in this study. Oral EM was taken at a dose of 600 mg/m(2) daily for the initial 21 patients and on a reduced schedule of 280 mg twice daily for the final 3 patients. Paclitaxel was escalated from 60 to 118 mg/m(2)., Results: The major toxicities were gastrointestinal and thromboembolic complications related to daily oral dosing of EM. Of the first 21 patients, one third (n = 7) discontinued therapy within 4 weeks because of protracted nausea and/or thrombotic complications. Dose-limiting toxicities at 118 mg/m(2) paclitaxel were fatigue and hepatotoxicity. Of 13 patients with measurable soft-tissue lesions, 6 had objective partial regressions, and 9 (37.5%) of 24 patients (95% confidence interval 19.1% to 59.1%) with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels had a 50% or greater decline of at least 4 weeks' duration., Conclusions: Weekly paclitaxel at doses of 60 to 107 mg/m(2) were feasible in combination with oral EM, but daily oral EM produced unacceptable toxicity. On the basis of these results, a Phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel with the reduced dose and schedule of EM was initiated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group to assess further the benefits and risks of this treatment in men with metastatic HRPC.

Twenty-nine patients with progressive hormone-refractory metastatic adenocarcinoma of the prostate were treated with daily estramustine phosphate at 10 mg/kg, and I.V. doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Twenty-six patients were evaluable. Four of seven patients with nonosseous measurable disease had partial responses lasting 3 to 10 months. Eleven of 19 patients with osseous metastases had stable disease or improvement on bone scan, 6 of these for 7 months or longer. Median time to progression was 20 weeks, and the median survival was 43 weeks.

Purpose: To compare vinblastine versus the combination of vinblastine plus estramustine as treatment for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC)., Patients and Methods: A total of 201 patients with metastatic prostate cancer, progressive after hormonal therapy and antiandrogen withdrawal (if prior antiandrogen treatment), were randomized to receive vinblastine (V) 4 mg/m(2) by intravenous bolus weekly for 6 weeks followed by 2 weeks off, either alone or together with estramustine phosphate (EM-V) 600 mg/m(2) PO days 1 through 42, repeated every 8 weeks. Of 193 eligible patients, 98 received V, and 95 received EM-V., Results: Overall survival trended in favor of EM-V but was not significantly different as determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis (P =.08). Median survival was 11.9 months for EM-V and 9.2 months for V. EM-V was superior to V for secondary end points of time to progression (P <. 001, stratified log rank test; median 3.7 v 2.2 months, respectively) and for proportion of patients with >/= 50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline sustained for at least 3 monthly measurements (25.2% v 3.2%, respectively; P <.0001). Granulocytopenia was significantly less for EM-V compared with V (grade 2, 3, and 4 = 7%, 7%, and 1% v 27%, 18% and 9%, respectively; P <.0001); however, grade 2 or worse nausea (26% v 7%, respectively; P =.0002) and extremity edema (22% v 8%, respectively; P =.005) were more frequent for EM-V., Conclusion: Although overall survival was not significantly greater for the combination, EM-V was superior to V for time to progression and PSA improvement. These results encourage further study of estramustine-based antimicrotubule drug combinations in HRPC.

Background: Chemotherapy has a limited impact on adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Although biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by leucovorin (LV) and interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) has improved the outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma compared with 5-FU alone, this approach has not been extensively evaluated in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma., Methods: Twenty-seven patients with bidimensionally measurable, metastatic gastric carcinoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 received the combination of IFN-alpha (5 million U/m2 administered subcutaneously daily on Days 1-7), LV (500 mg/m2 administered intravenously over 30 minutes immediately after IFN-alpha on Days 2-6), and 5-FU (370 mg/m2 given as an intravenous bolus 60 minutes after LV on Days 2-6), with treatment repeated every 4 weeks. Oral cryotherapy was administered routinely before each dose of 5-FU to reduce the incidence of severe stomatitis., Results: The median age of the patients was 58 years (range, 20-76), and 22 patients had residual, unresectable primary lesions. The median number of cycles received was 3 (range, 1-11). Of 24 patients who received at least 2 cycles of treatment, 15 (62.5%) did not require dose reduction for toxicity during the initial 2 cycles. The predominant toxicities were gastrointestinal: diarrhea and stomatitis of Grade 3-4 occurred in 28.6% and 35.7% of patients, respectively. Other severe (Grade 3-4) toxicities were granulocytopenia (which occurred in 21.4% of patients) and fatigue (in 10.7%). Fever and flu-like symptoms were common but usually mild. Of 24 patients who were evaluable for response, 3 had partial responses (PR) of 16, 23, and 33 weeks' duration, respectively, for a response rate of 12.5% (95% confidence interval = 2.7-32.4%). Two additional patients had reductions in tumor size sufficient for PR, but scans to document the minimum required response duration of 4 weeks were not obtained before progressive disease occurred. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 2.5 and 7.8 months, respectively., Conclusions: Although this regimen can be administered safely with appropriate supportive care to patients with good performance status, it has limited therapeutic activity in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma.

Purpose: To evaluate the antitumor activity of 96-hour paclitaxel and daily oral estramustine phosphate (EMP) in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC)., Patients and Methods: Thirty-four patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate that progressed after one or more hormonal therapies and a trial of antiandrogen withdrawal were enrolled onto this phase II trial. Patients received paclitaxel 120 mg/m2 by 96-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 1 through 4 of each 21-day cycle, together with daily oral EMP 600 mg/m2/d, continuously., Results: Four of nine patients with measurable disease had objective responses (one complete response [CR] and three partial responses [PRs]) in liver (two patients) or nodes (two patients) of 2, 6, 8, and 20 months' duration. Of 25 assessable patients with metastases limited to bone, 14 had a > or = 50% decline in pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level sustained for at least 6 weeks and seven had a > or = 80% decline. Overall, 17 of 32 patients (53.1%) with elevated pretreatment PSA levels had a > or = 50% decline of PSA and nine (28.1%) had a > or = 80% decrease. The main toxicities (> or = grade 2) were nausea, fluid retention, and fatigue, which occurred in 33%, 33%, and 24.2% of patients. Median time to progression, based on increasing PSA level and other clinical criteria, was 22.5 weeks. The estimated median overall survival time is 69 weeks., Conclusion: The combination of EMP and 96-hour paclitaxel is an active regimen for patients with HRPC. These results further support the therapeutic strategy of combining agents that impair microtubule function by complementary mechanisms.

Long misclassified as an alkylating agent, estramustine phosphate is a stable conjugate of estradiol and nornitrogen mustard with antimitotic properties. Binding of the drug to microtubule-associated proteins, tubulin, and proteins of the nuclear matrix are presently considered to be the most likely mechanisms underlying the cytotoxicity of estramustine in androgen-independent prostatic carcinoma. Identification of these mechanisms of action has led to clinical reevaluation of estramustine phosphate (EMP) in several rationally designed drug combinations. Combination of EMP with either vinblastine, paclitaxel or etoposide has produced antitumor responses in 30% to 60% of patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma as determined by reduction in bidimensionally measurable soft tissue disease, pain, and serum prostate-specific antigen. Whereas the antitumor activity of the combinations has been greater than additive for the single agents, the toxicities of treatment have not been greater than predicted for the individual drugs. The promising results of EMP-based chemotherapy encourage additional laboratory and clinical investigations to develop more effective therapy for hormone-refractory disease and for selected patients with earlier stages of prostate cancer.

Combination antimicrotubule therapy with estramustine phosphate (EMP) and vinblastine has reproducible activity in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) with an objective response rate of 31%. Although paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) by 24-hour infusion was inactive in HRPC, 0.5 to 1.0 nmol/L concentrations of paclitaxel combined with EMP exerted synergistic cytotoxicity in DU-145 androgen-independent human prostate cancer cell lines. Based on these results, we treated 24 patients with HRPC using the combination of paclitaxel 120 to 140 mg/m2 by 96-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks plus daily oral EMP at 600 mg/m2/d. Of seven patients with measurable soft tissue metastases, three have attained partial responses and a fourth patient is nearing partial response status. Of 16 patients with bone-only disease evaluated by change in serum prostate-specific antigen levels, 11 patients (68.8%) have had decreases of > or = 50% from pretreatment baseline. The prostate-specific antigen decrease has exceeded 80% in six of 16 (37.5%) patients. For all 23 evaluable patients, the prostate-specific antigen has decreased by > or = 50% in 15 (65.2%) and by > or = 80% in eight (34.7%). Grade 4 leukopenia occurred in one of 21 patients treated at the paclitaxel dose of 120 mg/m2/96 hr and one of three patients treated at 140 mg/m2/96 hr. The incidence of nausea (50%) and peripheral edema (37.5%) was similar to that associated with single-agent EMP. These results demonstrate that 96-hour paclitaxel plus EMP is active in HRPC and provide further evidence that the rational combination of antimicrotubule agents leads to synergistic antitumor activity in HRPC.

Estramustine phosphate is a unique antimitotic agent that binds to tubulin and microtubule-associated proteins. Preclinically, estramustine combined with other microtubule inhibitors, like vinblastine or paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ), produced additive or greater antimitotic and cytotoxic effects. Clinically, the estramustine/vinblastine combination has significant activity in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. We have begun a phase I study of paclitaxel by 96-hour continuous infusion every 3 weeks combined with daily oral estramustine (600 mg/m2). Eighteen patients with refractory solid tumors have received paclitaxel doses ranging from 80 to 140 mg/m2. Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia occurred in one of seven and two of four patients treated at the 120- and 140-mg/m2 dose levels, respectively. The latter two patients experienced grade 3 mucositis and had mean plasma paclitaxel levels exceeding 0.1 mumol/L. Other toxicities, principally nausea and hepatic function abnormalities, have been mild. The apparent steady-state concentrations of paclitaxel 100 and 120 mg/m2 administered with estramustine are similar to those reported for single-agent paclitaxel administered as a 96-hour infusion at doses of 100 and 120 mg/m2. In contrast, at the 140 mg/m2 dose level, paclitaxel concentrations increased throughout the infusion, and steady state was not reached in three of the four patients treated. Objective responses have been observed in two of three patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and in two patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer and measurable soft tissue metastases. Two additional patients with prostate cancer have been treated with the estramustine/paclitaxel combination, one achieving a major response and the other stable disease. The recommended phase II dose for 96-hour infusional paclitaxel with daily oral estramustine is at least 120 mg/m2. Studies to determine the effect of estramustine on paclitaxel pharmacokinetics are continuing. The antitumor activity observed merits phase II studies of this combination in hormone-resistant prostate cancer and other malignancies.

Low-dose phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate (PALA) may potentiate both 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) incorporation into RNA and thymidylate synthase inhibition by 5-fluorodeoxyuridylate (5-FdUMP). The gastrointestinal toxicity of 5-FU is not increased by PALA administration. Exogenous leucovorin, on the other hand, which enhances thymidylate synthase inhibition, appears to increase the clinical toxicity of 5-FU in a dose-dependent manner. As a result, the clinical use of high-dose leucovorin requires a marked dose reduction of 5-FU. Extracellular leucovorin levels of 1 microM suffice to maximize the enhancement of thymidylate synthase inhibition in several models. We conducted a trial to add leucovorin to the PALA/5-FU regimen. We chose a leucovorin dose that was predicted to yield end-infusion total reduced folate concentrations of 1 microM. The major endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of 5-FU in this combination. The regimen consisted of 250 mg/m2 PALA given on day 1 and, 24 h later, escalating 5-FU doses ranging from 1,850 to 2,600 mg/m2 admixed with 50 mg/m2 leucovorin and given by 24-h infusion. Courses were repeated weekly. A total of 24 patients with a median performance status of 1 were entered at three dose levels. Diarrhea was dose-limiting; 6/13 patients had grade II or worse diarrhea at 2,600 mg/m2. Dose modification resulted in a mean dose intensity of 2,300 mg/m2 at both the 2,600- and 2,300-mg/m2 dose levels. The 2,300-mg/m2 dose is suitable for phase II testing of this regimen. Three patients (two with breast cancer and 1 with sarcoma) had a partial remission. We measured steady-state concentrations (Css) of 5-FU in 23 patients. The mean Css increased with dose from 0.738 to 1.03 micrograms/ml. Total body clearance did not vary with dose in this range. Patients with grade II or worse diarrhea had a higher mean Css (1.10 +/- 0.19) than those with grade O or I toxicity (0.835 +/- 0.25, P < 0.02). Total bioactive folates (bound and free) were measured using a biological assay. Pretreatment values ranged from 2 to 52 nM and were not predictive of toxicity. End-infusion (23-h) values were somewhat lower than predicted and ranged from 400 to 950 nM. The risk of diarrhea was positively correlated with end-infusion total folate values. In a logistic regression analysis, total folate values obtained at 23 h were a more powerful predictor of diarrhea than were 5-FU Css values.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Purpose: Estramustine phosphate (EMP) and vinblastine are two microtubule inhibitors with distinct molecular targets and at least additive antimicrotubule effects in vitro. Their modest single-agent activities in hormone-refractory prostate cancer, nonoverlapping toxicities, and lack of cross-resistance prompted a phase II trial in hormone-refractory prostate cancer., Patients and Methods: Thirty-six assessable patients at the Fox Chase Cancer Center and seven Fox Chase Cancer Center Network institutions were treated with oral EMP 600 mg/m2 on days 1 to 42 and vinblastine 4 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) once a week for 6 weeks. Courses were repeated every 8 weeks. Response assessment was based on a change in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and was correlated with change in pain scores., Results: PSA decreased from baseline by at least 50% in 22 patients (61.1%) and by > or = 75% in eight patients (22.2%). A 50% or more decrease in PSA on three successive 2-week measurements together with an improved or stable pain score, performance status, and measurable soft tissue disease (if present) was required for a partial response (PR), which occurred in 11 patients for an overall response rate of 30.5% (95% confidence interval, 15.6% to 45.6%). In seven patients with measurable nonosseous disease, there was one PR (14%) and one minor response (MR). In 28 patients with assessable pain, major pain responses occurred in 12 (42.9%). PSA response (> or = 50% decrease times three measurements) was predictive of major pain response with a 93.7% specificity, a 50% sensitivity, and a positive predictive value of 85.7%., Conclusion: We conclude that EMP and vinblastine is an active combination in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Preclinical and clinical studies demonstrate that the selective antitumor activity of fluorouracil (5-FU) is enhanced by agents which perturb certain intracellular nucleotide pools. We previously demonstrated that the combination of N-phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate (PALA), which depletes pyrimidine nucleotide pools, and 5-FU yielded a 43% response rate among 37 assessable patients with colorectal carcinoma. In preclinical tumor models, 6-methylmercaptopurine riboside (MMPR), an inhibitor of purine synthesis, elevates phosphoribosylpyrophosphate (PRPP) pools and promotes the anabolism of 5-FU to fluorinated nucleotides. In vivo, the addition of MMPR enhances the therapeutic efficacy of PALA-5-FU. In a phase I trial, we sought to determine the optimal dose and schedule of MMPR in combination with PALA (250 mg/m2 on day 1) and 5-FU (1300 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion on day 2). MMPR (75-225 mg/m2) was given intravenously on day 1 to 27 patients with solid tumors (15 colorectal, seven breast, five other). Toxic effects were mild to moderate and included leukopenia, mucositis, nausea, or rash. Two of seven patients given MMPR at 225 mg/m2 had grade 3 diarrhea. PRPP was measured using a [14C]orotic acid 14CO2 release assay in tumor biopsy specimens obtained before and 12 hours and 24 hours after MMPR doses were given to 20 patients. The addition of MMPR elevated PRPP pools in human solid tumors. At 12 hours after treatment, two (50%) of four patients showed a twofold or greater elevation of PRPP at the MMPR dose level of 75 mg/m2; a similar elevation was observed in five (71%) of seven patients given 150 mg/m2 MMPR and in three (43%) of seven patients given 225 mg/m2 MMPR. At 24 hours after treatment, results for the respective dose levels of MMPR were two (33%) of six patients, one (20%) of five patients, and four (57%) of seven patients. Administration of the two highest MMPR dose levels appeared to result in a greater increase in tumor PRPP levels. However, toxicity was greater at the 225 mg/m2 dose level; therefore, the 150 mg/m2 dose level was favored. Tumor levels of PRPP decreased between 12 hours and 24 hours in nine (56%) of 16 patients. This time course indicates that MMPR should be administered at the beginning of the 24-hour infusion of 5-FU.

The addition of the antifol methotrexate to cisplatin (DDP) produces supraadditive antitumor effects in preclinical studies, but in the clinic this combination of two nephrotoxic drugs is limited by excessive toxicity. Trimetrexate (TMTX) is a second generation antifol with predominantly nonrenal elimination and antitumor activity superior to that of methotrexate in preclinical models. In early clinical trials TMTX demonstrated promising activity in non-small cell lung cancer, and nephrotoxicity was rare. We performed a Phase I clinical and pharmacological study of TMTX (escalating doses) in combination with DDP (20 mg/m2), both administered i.v. for 5 consecutive days, every 4 wk. The pharmacokinetics of TMTX was determined in 15 patients after administration of the single agent (baseline study) and following the Day 1 and Day 5 doses in the TMTX-DDP combination. The recommended Phase II single-agent dose of TMTX on this schedule, 8 mg/m2, did not produce excessive toxicity when given concurrently with DDP. Significant drug-related nephrotoxicity was not observed, even in patients receiving multiple courses of TMTX-DDP. The mean renal clearance of TMTX increased 1.4-fold and 2.8-fold over baseline on Days 1 and 5, respectively, of TMTX-DDP. Urinary flow was similarly greater on days of TMTX-DDP treatment. The nonrenal clearance of TMTX was unaffected by concurrent DDP. The steady-state volume of distribution, Vdss, and terminal elimination half-life were significantly greater on Day 5 of TMTX-DDP compared to baseline. The plasma protein-binding of TMTX in vitro was not altered by DDP, and the disappearance of ultrafilterable DDP from normal plasma in vitro was unchanged by TMTX. Although a protein-binding interaction of TMTX and DDP was not detected in normal plasma in vitro, the changes in renal clearance, Vdss, and the terminal half-life were consistent with a greater fraction of unbound TMTX in plasma following Day 5 of TMTX-DDP. Effects of DDP on the binding of TMTX to extravascular tissue components, or on the renal handling of TMTX, cannot be excluded. The increase in TMTX renal clearance correlated with increased urinary flow, which may improve the therapeutic index of TMTX as both an antineoplastic and antiparasitic agent.

The scheduling of chemotherapeutic agents may be important in optimising their antitumour actions. This has been explored in non-Hodgkin lymphoma, osteogenic sarcoma and bladder cancer with improved results using intensive, weekly dosing schemas. We began a phase II study of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and vinblastine in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on a weekly schedule. 38 patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC were entered; 32 are evaluable for response. 11 patients were treated with 5-fluorouracil 1.5 g/m2 and vinblastine 4 mg/m2 by 24-h continuous infusion, and cisplatin 30 mg/m2 over 30 min, 6-8 h after the start of the infusion. Because of prohibitive myelotoxicity, the next 27 patients received 5-fluorouracil 1.2 g/m2 and vinblastine 3 mg/m2. None had had prior chemotherapy while 6 had had previous radiation therapy. Myelosuppression was the predominant toxic effect. Other side-effects included neuropathy, diarrhoea, mucositis, nausea and vomiting. 32 patients are evaluable for response: there have been 14 partial remissions (44%). Responses have occurred chiefly in lung and lymph nodes. The median survival on this study is 7 months, and responders did not live longer than non-responders. While this regimen is well tolerated by the majority of patients and has a response rate comparable to other active regimens identified in single institution studies, survival does not appear to be enhanced. We conclude that the schedule manipulation described here does not enhance the therapeutic index of these drugs in NSCLC.

Based on the synergy of sequential methotrexate (MTX) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in vitro and in vivo and the superior antitumor activity of trimetrexate (TMTX) compared with MTX in preclinical models, we carried out a phase I trial of TMTX and 5-FU (fixed dose, 400 mg/m2 per day), both given as 10-min i.v. infusions daily x 5 days, every 28 days. The TMTX dose was escalated from 3.0 to 14.0 mg/m2 per day. In all, 92 evaluable courses were given to 34 patients, half of whom were heavily pretreated with radiation or cytotoxics. Myelosuppression and mucositis were the dose-limiting toxicities but were not different in heavily or minimally pretreated patients; there were five episodes of moderate to severe mucositis. Rash, fatigue, and diarrhea were mild toxicities. Plasma TMTX elimination was biexponential, with a mean t.1/2 alpha of 0.23 h and a t.1/2 beta of 16.7 h. The area under the plasma TMTX concentration versus time curve increased linearly with dose, suggesting first-order elimination. Total plasma TMTX clearance (mean +/- SD) was 14.3 +/- 5.9 ml/min per m2. Renal clearance accounted for approximately 7% of total clearance, indicating biotransformation as the major route of elimination. TMTX was highly protein-bound (97%). Thus, TMTX can be given with 5-FU (400 mg/m2) on a daily x 5-day bolus schedule at the 12 mg/m2 per day dose level, which was the recommended dose of TMTX as a single agent for phase II studies using the 5-day bolus schedule.