Search

Background: high recurrence rates of up to 75% within 2 years in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients resected for cure indicate a high medical need for clinical prediction tools and patient specific treatment approaches. Addition of the EGFR inhibitor erlotinib to adjuvant chemotherapy failed to improve outcome but its efficacy in some patients warrants predictors of responsiveness., Patients and Methods: we analysed tumour samples from 293 R0-resected patients from the randomized, multicentre phase III CONKO-005 trial (gemcitabine ± erlotinib) with targeted sequencing, copy number, and RNA expression analyses., Findings: a total of 1086 mutations and 4157 copy-number aberrations (CNAs) with a mean of 17.9 /tumour were identified. Main pathways affected by genetic aberrations were the MAPK-pathway (99%), cell cycle control (92%), TGFβ signalling (77%), chromatin remodelling (71%), and the PI3K/AKT pathway (65%). Based on genetic signatures extracted with non-negative matrix factorization we could define five patient clusters, which differed in mutation patterns, gene expression profiles, and survival. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, SMAD4 aberrations were identified as a negative prognostic marker in the gemcitabine arm, an effect that was counteracted when treated with erlotinib (DFS: HR=1.59, p = 0.016, and OS: HR = 1.67, p = 0.014). Integration of differential gene expression analysis established SMAD4 alterations with low MAPK9 expression (n = 91) as a predictive biomarker for longer DFS (HR=0.49; test for interaction, p = 0.02) and OS (HR = 0.32; test for interaction, p = 0.001)., Interpretation: this study identified five biologically distinct patient clusters with different actionable lesions and unravelled a previously unappreciated association of SMAD4 alteration status with erlotinib effectiveness. Confirmatory studies and mechanistic experiments are warranted to challenge the hypothesis that SMAD4 status might guide addition of erlotinib treatment in early-stage PDAC patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Damm reports personal fees from Roche, Novartis, AbbVie, Astra Zeneca outside the submitted work. Dr. Sinn reports personal fees from Sanofi, Astra Zeneca, Amgen, Servier, MSD, Incyte, Pfizer outside the submitted work. Dr. Bullinger reports personal fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Hexal, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Menarini, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Seattle Genetics outside the submitted work. Dr. Keilholz reports personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Merck Serono, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca outside the submitted work. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: CONKO-006 was designed for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma with postsurgical R1 residual status to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of gemcitabine and sorafenib (GemSorafenib) compared with those of gemcitabine + placebo (GemP) for 12 cycles., Patients and Methods: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study was planned to detect an improvement in recurrence-free survival (RFS) from 42% to 60% after 18 months. Secondary objectives were overall survival (OS), safety and duration of treatment., Results: 122 patients were included between 02/2008 and 09/2013; 57 were randomised to GemSorafenib and 65 to GemP. Patient characteristics were wellbalanced (GemSorafenib/GemP) in terms of median age (63/63 years), tumour size (T3/T4: 97/97%), and nodal positivity (86/85%). Grade 3/4 toxicities comprised diarrhoea (GemSorafenib: 12%; GemP: 2%), elevated gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) (19%; 9%), fatigue (5%; 2%) and hypertension (5%; 2%), as well as neutropenia (18%; 25%) and thrombocytopenia (9%; 2%). By August 2017, 118 (97%) RFS event had occurred. There were no difference in RFS (median GemSorafenib: 8.5 versus GemP: 9.4 months; p = 0.730) nor OS (median GemSorafenib: 17.6 versus GemP: 17.5 months; p = 0.481). Landmark analyses suggest that patients who received more than six cycles of postoperative chemotherapy had significantly longer OS (p = 0.021)., Conclusion: CONKO-006 is the first randomised clinical trial to include exclusively patients with PDAC with postsurgical R1 status thus far. Sorafenib added to gemcitabine did neither improve RFS nor OS. However, postoperative treatment exceeding six months seemed to prolong survival and should be further investigated in these high-risk patients., Clinical Trial Information: German Tumor Study Registry (Deutsches Krebsstudienregister), DRKS00000242., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: Treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma (APC) and hyperbilirubinaemia is problematic because these patients were regularly excluded from clinical studies. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel and gemcitabine (nab-P/G) is an evidence-based treatment for patients with APC. This retrospective study investigated the safety and efficacy of nab-P/G in patients with APC and cholestatic hyperbilirubinaemia., Methods: We screened our prospective database for patients with APC treated with nab-P/G at total bilirubin levels of ≥1.2 mg/dl. Patients were assigned into three groups according to their bilirubin level (A: 1.2-3 mg/dl, B: >3-5 mg/dl, C: >5 mg/dl). Analyses with regard to safety and survival were performed., Results: Twenty-nine of 168 patients screened between Dec 2013 and Dec 2015 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most patients (83%) were male; median age was 63 [41-79] years. Nab-P/G administrations in patients with an elevated bilirubin level (median, range) did not result in unexpected toxicities assessed by predefined (non-)haematological parameters. Median overall survival (mOS) for the whole group was 11.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.8-14.0) months; for A: 11.8 (95% CI: 6.5-16.5), B: 9.2 (95% CI: 1.1 - NA) months and C 11.8 (95% CI: 5.9-20.0] months (p = 0.843). Again, mOS from the first application of nab-P/G did not differ between the groups (p = 0.13)., Conclusion: Nab-P/G administrations in our pts with cholestatic hyperbilirubinaemia suffering from APC were feasible and safe with respect to individualised dose administrations. A multicenter phase 1 trial in pts with hyperbilirubinaemia is started (AIO-PAK-0117) to confirm these findings in a prospective setting., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose Gemcitabine is standard of care in the adjuvant treatment of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine has shown efficacy in the treatment of advanced PDAC and was considered to improve survival in patients with primarily resectable PDAC after R0 resection. Patients and Methods In an open-label, multicenter trial, patients were randomly assigned to one of two study arms: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 days 1, 8, 15, every 4 weeks plus erlotinib 100 mg once per day (GemErlo) or gemcitabine (Gem) alone for six cycles. The primary end point of the study was to improve disease-free survival (DFS) from 14 to 18 months by adding erlotinib to gemcitabine. Results In all, 436 patients were randomly assigned at 57 study centers between April 2008 and July 2013. A total of 361 instances (83%) of disease recurrence were observed after a median follow-up of 54 months. Median treatment duration was 22 weeks in both arms. There was no difference in median DFS (GemErlo 11.4 months; Gem 11.4 months) or median overall survival (GemErlo 24.5 months; Gem 26.5 months). There was a trend toward long-term survival in favor of GemErlo (estimated survival after 1, 2, and 5 years for GemErlo was 77%, 53%, and 25% v 79%, 54%, and 20% for Gem, respectively). The occurrence or the grade of rash was not associated with a better survival in the GemErlo arm. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, CONKO-005 is the first study to investigate the combination of chemotherapy and a targeted therapy in the adjuvant treatment of PDAC. GemErlo for 24 weeks did not improve DFS or overall survival over Gem.

Purpose The Sequential Treatment of CD20-Positive Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD-1) trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01458548) established sequential treatment with four cycles of rituximab followed by four cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy as a standard in the management of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) and identified response to rituximab induction as a prognostic factor for overall survival. We hypothesized that rituximab consolidation might be sufficient treatment for patients with a complete response after rituximab induction. Patients and Methods In this prospective, international, multicenter phase II trial, 152 treatment-naive adult solid organ transplant recipients, with CD20 + PTLD unresponsive to immunosuppression reduction, were treated with four weekly doses of rituximab induction. After restaging, complete responders continued with four courses of rituximab consolidation every 21 days; all others received four courses of rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy every 21 days. The primary end point was treatment efficacy measured as the response rate in patients who completed therapy and the response duration in those who completed therapy and responded. Secondary end points were frequency of infections, treatment-related mortality, and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Results One hundred eleven of 126 patients had a complete or partial response (88%; 95% CI, 81% to 93%), of whom 88 had a complete response (70%; 95% CI, 61% to 77%). Median response duration was not reached. The 3-year estimate was 82% (95% CI, 74% to 90%). Median overall survival was 6.6 years (95% CI, 5.5 to 7.6 years). The frequency of grade 3 or 4 infections and of treatment-related mortality was 34% (95% CI, 27% to 42%) and 8% (95% CI, 5% to 14%), respectively. Response to rituximab induction remained a prognostic factor for overall survival despite treatment stratification. Conclusion In B-cell PTLD, treatment stratification into rituximab or rituximab plus CHOP consolidation on the basis of response to rituximab induction is feasible, safe, and effective.

Objectives: With increasing numbers of therapeutic options in inoperable pancreatic cancer (PAC), patients tend to receive more than just a first line (FL) therapy., Methods: All patients who started FL for PAC at our institution (1997-2012) were retrospectively studied to identify patient's and treatment characteristics. Significant parameters in regard to second-line (SL) related survival were looked for as the basis for a prognostic model. This score was validated in a patient cohort from the CONKO-003 study., Results: Two hundred eighty of 521 (53.7%) patients received SL therapy, median overall survival (OS) from the beginning of SL (OS2) was 5.1 months. Significant more SL patients had undergone surgery, a higher Karnofsky performance state (KPS) and a duration of FL longer than 4 months.Prognostic factors impacting OS2 were KPS, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels at start of SL and the duration of FL. These 3 factors establish a prognostic score--validated in CONKO-003--for SL patients with 3 subgroups: "good" (median OS2, 9.3 months), "intermediate" (median OS2, 7.1 months), "poor" prognosis (median OS2, 3.8 months; P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Among patients with PAC, more than 50% receive SL therapy. Our prognostic model identifies 3 subgroups and can identify patients with a maximum benefit of SL therapy.

Background: This Phase-I-study aimed to determine the recommended Phase-II-dosing-schedule of LY2334737, an oral gemcitabine prodrug, in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors. Pharmacokinetics, cytokeratin-18 (CK18) levels, genetic polymorphisms, and antitumor activity were additionally evaluated., Methods: Patients received escalating doses of LY2334737 either every other day for 21 days (d) followed by 7 days-drug-free period (QoD-arm) or once daily for 7 days every other week (QD-arm). The 28 days-cycles were repeated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation was succeeded by a dose-confirmation phase (12 additional patients to be enrolled on the maximum tolerated dose [MTD])., Results: Forty-one patients received QoD- (40-100 mg) and 32 QD-dosing (40-90 mg). On QoD, 3/9 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) on the 100 mg dose (2 × G3 diarrhea, 1 × G3 transaminase increase); 1 additional DLT (G3 diarrhea) occurred during dose confirmation at 90 mg (12 patients). On QD, 1 patient each experienced DLTs on 60 mg (G3 transaminase increase) and 80 mg (G3 prolonged QTcF-interval); 2/7 patients had 3 DLTs on the 90 mg dose (diarrhea, edema, liver-failure; all G3). The MTD was established at 90 mg for the QoD-arm. Seven patients on QoD and 4 on QD achieved SD (no CR + PR). Pharmacokinetics showed a dose-proportional increase in exposure of LY2334737 and dFdC without accumulation after repeated dosing. Significant increases in CK18 levels were observed. Genetic polymorphism of the cytidine deaminase gene (rs818202) could be associated with ≥ G3 hepatotoxicity., Conclusions: Both schedules displayed linear pharmacokinetics and acceptable safety profiles. The recommended dose and schedule of LY2334737 for subsequent Phase-II-studies is 90 mg given QoD for 21 day.

Background and Objectives: The continuous progress in treatment options for pancreatic adenocarcinoma has lead to a re-evaluation of prognostic markers. In this study the prognostic relevance of DNA Index and classical histopathological parameters with regard to disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed within the CONKO-001 patient population., Methods: One hundred forty three fresh-frozen paraffin-embedded tissue samples of the resected tumor specimen of the CONKO-001 patient population were available for DNA index analysis to evaluate its impact on patient outcome., Results: Median DFS (7.3 vs. 14.3 months; P = 0.004) and median OS (16.6 vs. 29.2 months; P = 0.011) were significantly decreased in patients with a high DNA index (>1.4). Multivariate analysis revealed both DNA index (DFS: P = 0.002; OS: P = 0.019) and tumor grading (DFS: P = 0.004; OS: P = 0.004) as individual prognostic markers for DFS and OS. The following prognostic subgroups were identified: good (low DNA Index + G1/2 tumor grading), intermediate (low DNA Index + G3 tumor grading or high DNA Index + G1/2 tumor grading), poor (high DNA Index + G3 tumor grading)., Conclusion: The DNA index/tumor grading constellation may serve as a helpful guide for personalized treatment recommendations for adjuvant therapy of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: This double-blind, phase 3 study assessed the efficacy and safety of ganitumab combined with gemcitabine as first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer., Patients and Methods: Patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned 2 : 2 : 1 to receive intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle) plus placebo, ganitumab 12 mg/kg, or ganitumab 20 mg/kg (days 1 and 15 of each cycle). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and efficacy by levels of circulating biomarkers., Results: Overall, 322 patients were randomly assigned to placebo, 318 to ganitumab 12 mg/kg, and 160 to ganitumab 20 mg/kg. The study was stopped based on results from a preplanned futility analysis; the final results are reported. Median OS was 7.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.3-8.2] in the placebo arm, 7.0 months (95% CI, 6.2-8.5) in the ganitumab 12-mg/kg arm [hazard ratio (HR), 1.00; 95% CI, 0.82-1.21; P = 0.494], and 7.1 months (95% CI, 6.4-8.5) in the ganitumab 20-mg/kg arm (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.76-1.23; P = 0.397). Median PFS was 3.7, 3.6 (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.84-1.20; P = 0.520), and 3.7 months (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.77-1.22; P = 0.403), respectively. No unexpected toxicity was observed with ganitumab plus gemcitabine. The circulating biomarkers assessed [insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), IGF-binding protein-2, and -3] were not associated with a treatment effect on OS or PFS by ganitumab., Conclusion: Ganitumab combined with gemcitabine had manageable toxicity but did not improve OS, compared with gemcitabine alone in unselected patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01231347., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

In patients with advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer, the prognosis is generally poor. Within recent years, new treatment options such as the FOLFIRINOX regimen (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin) or the combination of nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine have shown a clinically relevant survival benefit over the standard gemcitabine in patients with good performance status. Unfortunately, patients with hyperbilirubinaemia, who constitute a substantial proportion of the pancreatic cancer patients, have been excluded from most clinical studies. Consequently, our knowledge on the appropriate medical treatment of this patient group is limited. In a meeting of German medical oncology experts, the available clinical evidence and own clinical experience regarding the management of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and hyperbilirubinaemia was discussed. The present publication summarises the discussion outcomes with regard to appropriate management of these patients, including consensus-based recommendations for nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine treatment, according to the best available evidence. In summary, knowledge of the underlying aetiology of hyperbilirubinaemia and the metabolisation routes of the cytotoxic drugs is crucial before initiating chemotherapy. As effective treatment options should also be made available to patients with comorbid conditions, including hyperbilirubinaemia, the experts provide advice for an initial dose reduction of chemotherapy with nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine based on the total bilirubin level in patients with biliary obstruction or extensive liver metastasis., (© 2015 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg.)

Purpose: To assess the efficacy of a second-line regimen of oxaliplatin and folinic acid-modulated fluorouracil in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who have experienced progression while receiving gemcitabine monotherapy., Patients and Methods: A randomized, open-label, phase III study was conducted in 16 institutions throughout Germany. Recruitment ran from January 2004 until May 2007, and the last follow-up concluded in December 2012. Overall, 168 patients age 18 years or older who experienced disease progression during first-line gemcitabine therapy were randomly assigned to folinic acid and fluorouracil (FF) or oxaliplatin and FF (OFF). Patients were stratified according to the presence of metastases, duration of first-line therapy, and Karnofsky performance status., Results: Median follow-up was 54.1 months, and 160 patients were eligible for the primary analysis. The median overall survival in the OFF group (5.9 months; 95% CI, 4.1 to 7.4) versus the FF group (3.3 months; 95% CI, 2.7 to 4.0) was significantly improved (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.91; log-rank P = .010). Time to progression with OFF (2.9 months; 95% CI, 2.4 to 3.2) versus FF (2.0 months; 95% CI, 1.6 to 2.3) was significantly extended also (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.94; log-rank P = .019). Rates of adverse events were similar between treatment arms, with the exception of grades 1 to 2 neurotoxicity, which were reported in 29 patients (38.2%) and six patients (7.1%) in the OFF and FF groups, respectively (P < .001)., Conclusion: Second-line OFF significantly extended the duration of overall survival when compared with FF alone in patients with advanced gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer., (© 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Background: Advanced pancreatic cancer (APC), beside its high mortality, causes the highest rates of venous thromboembolic events (VTE). Enoxaparin, a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), is effective in prevention and treatment of VTE. Some small studies indicated that this benefit might extend to patients with cancer and probably prolong survival due to independent mechanisms. We initiated this safety investigation to get feasibility information on intensified chemotherapy combined with LMWH in outpatients with APC treated in 1st line., Methods: The trial was a prospective, open-label, single center investigation in outpatients with inoperable pancreatic cancer who were treated with intensified first-line chemotherapy along with concomitant application of subcutaneous LMWH. The combined chemotherapy consisted of gemcitabine 1 g/m2 (30 min), 5-FU 750 mg/m2 (24 h), folinic acid 200 mg/m2 (30 min), and Cisplatin 30 mg/m2 (90 min) on day 1 and 8; q3w for the first 12 weeks (GFFC) followed by gemcitabine alone in patients without cancer progression. The simultaneous application of prophylactic enoxaparin started on day 1 of chemotherapy with a fixed dose of 40 mg daily. Statistical analyses were performed using R 3.01 with software package CMPRSK and SPSS software v19.0., Results: The investigation was stopped after recruitment of 19 patients. At this time 15 patients had completed the required 12 weeks of treatment. Based on 71 cycles of GFFC + enoxaparin (median 4/pt [range: 2-4]) and 108 cycles of single-agent gemcitabine + enoxaparin (median 4/pt [range: 0-18]) the cumulative frequency of NCI-CTC toxicities grade 3/4 was below 10%. One case (5%) of a symptomatic non-lethal thromboembolic event was observed while receiving LMWH treatment. No severe bleeding event as defined in the protocol has been observed. The median overall survival was 10.05 [95% CI: 8.67-18.14] months., Conclusions: The addition of enoxaparin to GFFC chemotherapy is feasible, safe and does not appear to affect the efficacy or the toxicity profile of the chemotherapy regimen in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Based on these findings we have initiated the randomized CONKO-004 trial to examine whether enoxaparin reduces the incidence of thromboembolic events or increases overall outcome., Trial Registration: Clinical Trials NCT01945879.

Background: Long-term survival (LTS) in patients (pts) with pancreatic cancer is still uncommon, little data is available to identify long-term survivors. The CONKO-001 study, which established gemcitabine after resection as adjuvant therapy, may provide data to answer this question., Methods: CONKO-001 pts with an overall survival ≥5 years were compared to those who survived <5 years. Central re-evaluation of primary histology was performed. Univariate analysis with the χ(2) -test identified qualifying factors. Logistic regression was used to investigate the influence of these covariates on LTS., Results: Of the evaluable 354 CONKO-001 pts, 54 (15%) with an overall survival ≥5 years were identified. It was possible to obtain tumor specimens of 39 pts (72%). Histological re-evaluation confirmed adenocarcinoma in 38 pts, 1 showed a high-grade neuroendocrine tumor. Univariate analysis for all 53 LTS pts with adenocarcinoma compared to the remaining 300 non-LTS pts revealed as relevant active treatment, tumor grading, tumor size, lymph nodes. No significance could be demonstrated for resection margin, sex, age, Karnofsky performance status, CA 19-9 at study entry. In multivariate analysis, tumor grading, active treatment, tumor size, lymph node involvement were independent prognostic factors for LTS., Conclusion: Long-term survival can be achieved in adenocarcinoma of the pancreas., (© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy requires the implantation of a transcatheter application system which is traditionally performed by surgery. This procedure, but particularly the adjacent drug application via pump or port is often hampered by specific complications and device failure. Interventionally implanted port catheter systems (IIPCS) facilitate the commencement of HAI without need for laparatomy, and are associated with favorable complication rates. We here present an evaluation of the most important technical endpoints associated with the use of IIPCS for HAI in patients with primary liver cancers., Methods: 70 patients (pts) with hepatocellular (HCC, n=33) and biliary tract cancer (BTC, n=37) were enrolled into a phase II -study. Of those, n=43 had recurrent disease and n=31 suffered from liver-predominant UICC-stage IVb. All pts were provided with IIPCSs before being treated with biweekly, intraarterial chemotherapy (oxaliplatin, 5-Flourouracil, folinic acid). The primary objective of the trial was defined as evaluation of device-related complications and port duration., Results: Implantation of port catheters was successful in all patients. Mean treatment duration was 5.8 months, and median duration of port patency was not reached. Disease-progression was the most common reason for treatment discontinuation (44 pts., 63%), followed by chemotherapy-related toxicity (12 pts., 17%), and irreversible device failure (5 pts., 7%). A total of 28 port complications occurred in 21 pts (30%). No unexpected complications were observed., Conclusions: HAI via interventionally implanted port catheters can be safely applied to patients with primary liver tumors far advanced or/and pretreated.

Background: This phase III study investigated the addition of aflibercept to gemcitabine, in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer., Patients and Methods: Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous (i.v.) aflibercept, 4 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or matching placebo combined with gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m(2) i.v. weekly for 7 weeks out of 8, then weekly for 3 weeks out of 4 until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. The primary objective was to demonstrate an improvement in overall survival (OS) between the treatment arms., Results: The study was stopped for futility following a planned interim analysis of OS in 427 randomised patients. With a median follow-up of 7.9 months, based on the 546 patients at study termination, median OS was 7.8 months in the gemcitabine plus placebo arm (n=275) versus 6.5 months in the gemcitabine plus aflibercept arm (n=271), which was not significant (hazard ratio 1.165, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.921-1.473, p=0.2034). Median progression-free survival was 3.7 months in both arms. Treatment discontinuations due to adverse events were more frequent in the aflibercept than in the placebo-containing arm (23% versus 12%)., Conclusion: Adding aflibercept to gemcitabine did not improve OS in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Burkitt lymphoma post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (Burkitt-PTLD) is a rare form of monomorphic B-cell PTLD for which no standard treatment has been established. Currently, the treatment of Burkitt lymphoma outside the post-transplantation setting involves high doses of alkylating agents, frequent dosing, and intrathecal and/or systemic central nervous system prophylaxis. In PTLD, however, such protocols are associated with considerable toxicity and mortality., Methods: The authors present a retrospective series of 8 adult patients with Burkitt-PTLD. Six patients were reported to the prospective German PTLD registry or were enrolled in the PTLD-1 trial, and 2 patients had received treatment before 2000, thus allowing for comparison with the pre-rituximab era., Results: Seven of the 8 patients were men. The median age at presentation was 38 years, and the median time since transplantation was 5.7 years. Five of 8 patients had histologically established, Epstein-Barr virus-associated disease, and 7 of 7 patients were positive for a MYC translocation. Five of 8 patients received sequential immunochemotherapy (4 courses of rituximab [R] followed by 4 cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone [CHOP] or R plus CHOP [R-CHOP]). In this group, 5 of 5 patients reached complete remission (CR), and their overall survival (OS) was significantly longer (P = .008) compared with the OS for 2 of 8 patients who received first-line CHOP and did not respond. One of 8 patients (who had stage IV disease with meningiosis) received combination therapy (cyclophosphamide pretreatment, rituximab, intrathecal chemotherapy, whole-brain irradiation, and radioimmunotherapy) and reached CR. Overall, 6 of 8 patients reached CR; and, after a median follow-up of 4.7 years (range, 1.7-4.8 years), the median OS was 36.7 months. There was no treatment-related mortality under first-line therapy., Conclusions: In the largest adult case series in Burkitt-PTLD to date, sequential immunochemotherapy with rituximab followed by standard CHOP or R-CHOP was a both safe and effective treatment., (Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.)

Background: Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) develops in 1-10% of transplant recipients and can be Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) associated. To improve long-term efficacy after rituximab monotherapy and to avoid the toxic effects of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) chemotherapy seen in first-line treatment, we initiated a phase 2 trial to test whether the subsequent use of rituximab and CHOP would improve the outcome of patients with PTLD., Methods: In this international multicentre open-label phase 2 trial, treatment-naive adult solid-organ transplant recipients diagnosed with CD20-positive PTLD who had failed to respond to upfront immunosuppression reduction received four courses of rituximab (375 mg/m(2) intravenously) once a week followed by 4 weeks without treatment and four cycles of CHOP every 3 weeks. In case of disease progression during rituximab monotherapy, CHOP was started immediately. Supportive therapy with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor after chemotherapy was mandatory and antibiotic prophylaxis was recommended. The primary endpoint was treatment efficacy measured as response rates in all patients who completed treatment with rituximab and CHOP, per protocol, and response duration, in all patients who completed all planned therapy and responded. Secondary endpoints were frequency of infections, treatment-related mortality, and overall survival. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01458548., Findings: 74 patients were enrolled between Dec 12, 2002 and May 5, 2008, of whom 70 patients were eligible to receive treatment. PTLD was of late type in 53 (76%) of 70 patients, monomorphic in 67 (96%) of 70, and histologically EBV associated in 29 (44%) of 66 cases. Four of 70 patients did not receive CHOP. 53 of 59 patients had a complete or partial response (90%, 95% CI 79-96), of which 40 (68%, 55-78) were complete responses. At data cutoff (June 1, 2011) median response duration in the 53 patients who had responded to treatment had not yet been reached (>79·1 months). The main adverse events were grade 3-4 leucopenia in 42 of 62 patients (68%, 55-78) and infections of grade 3-4 in 26 of 64 patients (41%, 29-53). Seven of 66 patients (11%, 5-21) had CHOP-associated treatment-related mortality. Median overall survival was 6·6 years (95% CI 2·8-10·4; n=70)., Interpretation: Our results support the use of sequential immunochemotherapy with rituximab and CHOP in PTLD., Funding: F Hoffmann-La Roche, Amgen Germany, Chugaï France., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The low incidence and the variable presentation complicate clinical investigations on biliary tract cancer. The results of Valle et al. in 2009 provided, for the first time, an evidence-based palliative treatment for this rare tumor type. So far no data are available in Germany regarding the current daily care practice., Methods: We started this national survey in May 2011, including about 3,400 members of the AIO (Working Group Medical Oncology), DGHO (German Society of Hematology and Oncology) and GGHBB (Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology in Berlin and Brandenburg). The standardized online form contained questions concerning field of action and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Evaluation was conducted anonymously., Results: 162 responses could be obtained, corresponding to a response rate of about 5%. 70.4% of the respondents were physicians in hospitals, 23.5% stated to work in private practices. 61.7% of the respondents were medical oncologists and 27.2% gastroenterologists. 52.5% of the participants pointed out to use the standard regimen of gemcitabine and cisplatin. For second-line regimen, the most frequent answer (29%) specified the administration of oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine., Conclusions: This survey may help to clarify the current oncologic daily care procedures for patients with biliary tract cancer in Germany. The results can be helpful for further clinical investigations or the implementation of a tumor-specific register.

Purpose: This open-label, multi-center phase II study investigated the efficacy and safety of the combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) plus gemcitabine (GFF) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The study is based on our completed dose finding phase I trial., Methods: A total of 90 patients (pts) were recruited between 02/2000 and 04/2002 to receive 5-FU 750 mg/m(2) (24 h, i.v.), FA 500 mg/m(2) (2 h, i.v.) and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) (30 min, i.v.) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Treatment was repeated on day 43 until disease progression. The primary objective was the 1-year survival rate. The trial was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki., Results: The 1-year survival rate was 25% [95% CI: 16-34], median overall survival was 6.8 months [95% CI: 5.13-8.45], 9 patients showed partial responses (PR) so that the overall response rate was 10.3%. Overall control rate (PR + stable disease for at least 6 months) was 56%. Median time to progression was 4.6 months [95% CI: 3.68-5.52]. In 402 GFF cycles, we observed adverse events grade 3 in up to 10% of patients and grade 4 below 5% of patients., Conclusions: The GFF combination appears to be effective and well tolerated. This intravenous regimen represents an intensified therapy with low frequency of toxicities and seems to be convenient for patients who are unable to get oral anti-neoplastic medication. After these encouraging results, the German CONKO-002 trial investigated the GFF regimen versus single-agent gemcitabine.

Background: Gemcitabine usually given until progressive disease (PD) is the main first-line treatment option for patients with inoperable advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). Currently there is no accepted active regimen for second-line chemotherapy. Previous phase II studies suggest clinical relevant activity of oxaliplatin, folinic acid and 5-FU (OFF). We initiated a phase III multicentre study comparing OFF versus best supportive care (BSC) in patients with APC progressing while on gemcitabine therapy., Methods: In this open randomized study, patients with CT and/or MRI confirmed progressive disease while on gemcitabine therapy were randomized 1:1 to OFF or BSC. Stratification included duration of first-line therapy (<3, 3 to 6 and >6 months), performance status (KPS 70-80%; 90-100%) and tumour stage (M1/M0). OFF consisted of folinic acid 200mg/m(2) followed by 5-fluorouracil 2g/m(2) (24h) on d1, d8, d15, d22 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) on days 8 and 22. After a rest of 3 weeks the next cycle was started on d43. A total of 165 patients were calculated to demonstrate a doubling of survival time after progression on first-line therapy., Results: After inclusion of forty six patients the trial was terminated according to predefined protocol regulations due to insufficient accrual (lack of acceptance of BSC by patients and physicians. Patient characteristics were well balanced between both study arms. The OFF regimen was well tolerated with more patients with grade I/II paraesthesia and grade II/III nausea/emesis and diarrhoea. Median second-line survival was 4.82 [95% Confidence Interval; 4.29-5.35] months for OFF treatment and 2.30 [95% CI; 1.76-2.83] months with BSC alone (0.45 [95% CI: 0.24-0.83], p = 0.008). Median overall survival for the sequence GEM-OFF was 9.09 [95% CI: 6.97-11.21] and 7.90 [95% CI: 4.95-10.84] months for GEM-BSC (0.50 [95% CI: 0.27-0.95], p = 0.031) respectively., Interpretation: Although stopped prematurely, this randomized trial provides at first time evidence for the benefit of second-line chemotherapy as compared to BSC alone for patients with APC. OFF significantly prolonged survival time compared to BSC alone after failure of first-line therapy with gemcitabine., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aims and Background: The advantage of administering chemotherapy by hepatic arterial infusion is the achievement of high drug concentrations in the liver. Oxaliplatin, irinotecan and 5-flourouracil are active agents in advanced gastric cancer. Therefore a retrospective analysis was performed to investigate the effects of these drugs administered by hepatic arterial infusion in heavily pretreated gastric cancer patients with predominant hepatic metastases. Very limited data about hepatic arterial infusion exist in western gastric cancer patients., Methods: Seven patients with advanced gastric cancer were included in the retrospective analysis. All patients had proven progressive disease prior to initiation of hepatic arterial infusion. All had an ECOG performance status of < or =2 and had received at least two previous systemic chemotherapy regimens, including the combination of cisplatin/5-fluorouracil. Patients were given chemotherapy by hepatic arterial infusion: 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2, together with folinic acid, 300 mg/m2/2 h, followed by oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2/2 h, every 2 weeks., Results: Fifty-four cycles of hepatic arterial infusion (range, 2-21) with a median treatment duration of 6 cycles were administered in 7 patients. The treatment was feasible and safe, no grade 3-4 toxicity was observed. One patient showed stabilization of liver metastases over 7 months. In 6 of the 7 patients there was radiologically proven progressive disease after a median treatment time of 10 weeks., Conclusions: Chemotherapy by hepatic arterial infusion is modestly effective in heavily pretreated gastric cancer patients. Hepatic arterial infusion has a very favorable toxicity profile and can be safely administered even in elderly patients. It might be an additional therapeutic option and should be further investigated. The literature on hepatic arterial infusion in gastric cancer patients is reviewed.

As far as the management of primary resectable liver metastases is concerned, three approaches are currently competing with each other: surgery alone, surgery with pre- and postoperative chemotherapy, and surgery with postoperative chemotherapy alone. The core of the argument for pre- and postoperative chemotherapy in these patients is the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 40983 study, which concluded that, in comparison with surgery alone, perioperative chemotherapy improved the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) by 7 months. In contrast to this, there are two smaller studies--at a somewhat lower strength of evidence-- indicating that adjuvant chemotherapy extends PFS by 9.1 months compared with surgery alone. In Germany, the adjuvant approach continues to be favored in many places; this can also be seen in the formulation of the S3 guideline. In patients with unresectable liver metastases--with the associated difficulty of classification due to the lack of clear and definitive criteria--preoperative systemic therapy to induce 'conversion' is indicated, in order to allow secondary resection. In KRAS wild-type tumors, high response rates (in terms of a reduction in size of the metastases, such as according to RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors)) and a high conversion rate are achieved using a cetuximab/chemotherapy combination. Triple chemotherapy combinations with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin and irinotecan also produce high response rates. Bevacizumab/chemotherapy combinations have led to a high number of complete and partial pathohistological remissions in phase II studies; these seem to correlate with long survival times. In the absence of long-term survival data, it therefore seems to remain unclear as to what is the best parameter to use in order to assess the success of preoperative treatment. Lung metastases, too, or local peritoneal carcinomatosis can nowadays be operated on in selected patients with a good prospect of long-term remission or even cure. The surgery should, however, generally only be carried out in experienced centers, especially in the case of peritoneal carcinomatosis. For synchronous metastasization, the appropriate management depends on the size and extent of liver metastases and of the primary tumor. Small, peripherally lying and safely resectable liver metastases can be removed before or at the same time as the primary tumor, especially if a hemicolectomy is being carried out. If the metastases are unresectable and there is no bleeding or stenosis, the primary tumor can also be left in situ and systemic chemotherapy can be carried out first. However, it should be borne in mind that, according to current data, palliative resection of the primary tumor combined with systemic therapy leads to longer overall survival than does chemotherapy alone. Whether resection or chemotherapy should be done first therefore depends on the patient's clinical situation., (Copyright (c) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

We addressed the effect of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) treatment with rituximab monotherapy or CHOP-based chemotherapy (+/- rituximab) after upfront immunosuppression reduction (IR) on renal graft function in a longitudinal analysis of 58 renal transplant recipients with PTLD and 610 renal transplant controls. Changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate over time were calculated from a total of 6933 creatinine measurements over a period of >1 year using a linear mixed model with random and fixed effects. Renal graft function significantly improved with treatment of PTLD, especially in the chemotherapy subgroup. Patients treated with IR+chemotherapy +/- rituximab had a noninferior graft function compared with untreated controls suggesting that the negative impact of IR on the renal graft function can be fully compensated by the immunosuppressive effect of CHOP. The immunosuppressive effect of single agent rituximab may partially compensate the negative impact of IR on the graft function. Thus, it is possible to reduce immunosuppression when using chemotherapy to treat PTLD.

Background: Liver resection is the only curative treatment offering a chance of long-term survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRM). Recent data indicated that liver resection in patients with tumor progression while receiving chemotherapy was associated with poor outcome. The aim of the study was to identify risk factors for poor outcome in patients with pre-operative chemotherapy of CRM., Methods: We analyzed 160 patients after liver resection for CRM with preoperative systemic. chemotherapy. Three groups of patients were identified: 44 patients (27.5%) had a tumor response, 20 (12.5%) showed stable disease, and 96 (60%) patients had tumor progression while on chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 2.4 years (range, 6 days-11.1 years). All available clinicopathologic variables possibly associated with outcome were evaluated., Results: Survival was 88%, 53%, and 37% at 1, 3, and 5 years. Noncurative resection, carcinoembryonic antigen levels >200 ng/ml, tumor grading, size of the largest tumor >5 cm, and number of metastases were associated with poor patient outcome. In the multivariate analysis, tumor free margin and tumor grading correlated with the outcome. Tumor progression while on chemotherapy had no influence on the long-term survival., Conclusion: Liver resection offers a long-term survival benefit for patients with CRM, even when tumor growth proceeds during pre-operative chemotherapy.

Background: This phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin (O), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid (FA) (OFF) as second-line treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma after failure of first-line gemcitabine treatment., Patients and Methods: 37 patients with confirmed progressive disease on gemcitabine therapy were treated with OFF (O 85 mg/m(2) days 8, 22; FA 500 mg/m(2), followed by 5-FU 2,600 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, 15, 22) every 6 weeks. Patients were treated on an outpatient basis and remained on treatment until disease progression., Results: All patients were assessable for toxicity and effectiveness. We observed moderate hematotoxicity, the most common non-hematologic toxicity was neurotoxicity. A total of 12 patients had grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities: nausea and vomiting (4 patients), reversible neurotoxicity (5 patients), and diarrhea (3 patients). No grade 4 toxicities were observed. Median time to progression was 12 (1-125) weeks. Survival in second line was 22 (4-326+) weeks. Overall disease control rate was 49% (complete remission = 3%; partial remission = 3%; stable disease > 12 weeks = 43%)., Conclusions: This regimen is feasible and active with an acceptable toxicity profile; it can be safely administered in an outpatient setting. There is an urgent need for further investigation in phase III trials., (Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Before a decision is made to give a particular drug treatment, first of all the best strategy for the individual patient must be determined. In a patient with an aggressive tumour, for whom a secondary curative approach by means of metastasis resection is not an option, the preferred first-line treatment will generally be a triple combination therapy containing bevacizumab - and this is also true in KRAS/BRAF wild-type patients, since the main aim here is to achieve the longest possible survival time with a minimum of side effects. If an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody (cetuximab or panitumumab) is to be used in first-line or later therapy, then the presence of a KRAS mutation must be excluded beforehand. It is very likely sensible also to exclude a BRAF mutation. Second-line treatment after a first-line therapy containing bevacizumab may be a combination chemotherapy or, in patients who are KRAS wild-type (and possibly also BRAF wild-type), irinotecan plus cetuximab. Locoregional treatments such as chemoembolisation, selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT), and stereotactic

Background: Advanced pancreatic cancer, in addition to its high mortality, is characterized by one of the highest rates of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) as compared to other types of cancer. Enoxaparin, a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), has proven to be effective for the prevention and treatment of VTE in surgical and general medical patients. Results of some small studies suggest that this benefit might extend to patients with cancer, however, enoxaparin is not currently indicated for this use. This phase IIb study was designed to analyze the efficacy of enoxaparin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer undergoing systemic chemotherapy., Methods: The aim of this prospective multicenter trial is to compare concomitant treatment with enoxaparin to no anticoagulation in 540 patients. Primary endpoint is the incidence of clinically relevant VTE (symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the leg and/or pelvic and/or pulmonary embolism (PE)) within the first 3 months. Secondary endpoints include the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE after 6, 9 and 12 months as well as remission at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, overall survival and bleeding., Trial Registration: isrctn.org identifier CCT-NAPN-16752, controlled-trials.com identifier: ISRCTN02140505., Results: An interim analysis for safety performed after inclusion of 152 patients revealed no increased risk of bleeding (5 pts vs. 6 pts, Chi2: 0.763)., Conclusion: PROSPECT is a pivotal study in elucidating the role of low molecular weight heparins in advanced pancreatic cancer. Its results will lead to a new understanding of the role of heparins in the prevention of venous thromboembolism and of their effect on survival, remission rates and toxicity of chemotherapeutic regimens.

Background: Single-agent rituximab has demonstrated encouraging efficacy and tolerability in posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) failing to respond to immunosuppression reduction (IR). This retrospective analysis was undertaken to determine the efficacy and safety of salvage therapy in recipients of solid organ transplants with progression of PTLD after rituximab first-line therapy., Methods: Eleven patients who had received IR and single-agent rituximab were analyzed. Of these, 10 had received CHOP salvage chemotherapy. One patient with limited disease received tumor irradiation and further IR. Most patients (73%) had late PTLD (median onset of disease 145 months posttransplant), and most (83%) had monomorphic histology; 36% had EBV-association., Results: IR and irradiation therapy re-induced complete remission (CR) and allowed long-term disease control in a patient with polymorphic PTLD relapse. CHOP therapy achieved CR in five (50%) and partial remission (PR) in two (20%) patients. Four of five (80%) patients achieving CR remained in CR at a median follow-up of 44.2 months. Of the patients achieving PR, one is currently alive, and the second died from transplant rejection after converting to CR after consolidative chemotherapy. Patients with stable disease (two) and progressive disease (one) have died from PTLD. There was one possible CHOP-associated death (acute cardiac event) and two patients had to be switched to less-toxic monotherapies. Median overall survival was 46.5 months (95% confidence interval: 23.6-49.1 months)., Conclusions: CHOP salvage therapy achieved a favorable overall response rate of 70% in this setting, indicating that PTLD generally remains chemotherapy-sensitive after progression following first-line rituximab.

Purpose: The effect of whole body hyperthermia (WBH) at 41.8-42 degrees C on the cellular immune system is still poorly investigated. The aim of this study was to identify genes that become upregulated in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) of cancer patients during a combined treatment with WBH and chemotherapy by generating complex arrays of cDNA., Methods: PBLs were obtained from four patients with different malignancies treated with WBH and varying cytostatic schedules before treatment and immediately thereafter. After constructing subtracted cDNA libraries, clones were screened for cDNA induction by dot-blot and semi-quantitative RT-PCR (sq-RT-PCR)., Results: Among 192 clones, 39 cDNAs were significantly upregulated. Sequencing revealed three groups of genes for which upregulation of mRNA was confirmed by sq-RT-PCR. The first group consisted of genes encoding for various heat shock proteins (HSP 60, 90a, 90b, 105). Further sq-RT-PCR demonstrated differential expression of HSP27 and HSP70 as well. The second group (calcyclin-binding-protein, haemoglobin-beta-chain) comprised genes without pre-specified association to hyperthermia. The cDNA encoding macrophage-inflammatory-protein-1-beta was also observed and may be associated with the pre-described activation of lymphocyte sub-populations during WBH., Conclusion: Treatment with WBH and chemotherapy elicits significant short-term effects on the expression of a variety of genes responsible for cellular integrity, stimulation and migration of immune effector cells. Further investigation is warranted to more clearly define the role of those genes for the clinical effect of WBH.

Purpose: The present study compares quality of life (QoL) after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with or without hyperthermia in patients with advanced rectal cancer., Methods: Between April 1994 and May 1999, 137 patients were treated by neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with (69 patients (50.4%)) or without (68 patients (49.6%)) hyperthermia. Forty-six patients (33.6%) filled-out a 'Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index' (GIQLI) questionnaire at four time points (before and after neoadjuvant therapy, early after surgery and after long-term follow-up) and were included in the present study., Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the global GIQLI index between patients treated with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with and without hyperthermia at any time point. The longitudinal analysis of GIQLI values in both treatment groups showed specific profiles that were identical in both treatment groups. Occurrence of severe toxicity during the neoadjuvant therapy in both arms lead to a significant temporary reduction of QoL scores at TP2 without any detrimental long-term effects. Patients with sphincter preservation and patients with sphincter resection reported similar QoL scores during long-term follow-up., Conclusion: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with and without hyperthermia has similar effects on the QoL of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The addition of hyperthermia during the neoadjuvant therapy with the potentially associated inconveniences has no negative effects on QoL.

Background: The application of induction chemotherapy failed to provide a consistent benefit for local control in primary treatment of advanced head and neck (H&N) cancers. The aim of this study was to compare the results of concomitant application of radiochemotherapy for treating locally advanced head-and-neck carcinoma in comparison with the former standard of sequential radiochemotherapy., Methods: Between 1987 and 1995 we treated 122 patients with unresectable (stage IV head and neck) cancer by two different protocols. The sequential protocol (SEQ; 1987-1992) started with two courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin [CDDP] + 120-h continuous infusions (c.i.) of folinic acid [FA] and 5-fluorouracil [5-FU]), followed by a course of radiochemotherapy using conventional fractionation up to 70 Gy. The concomitant protocol (CON; since 1993) combined two courses of FA/5-FU c.i. plus mitomycin (MMC) concomitantly with a course of radiotherapy up to 30 Gy in conventional fractionation, followed by a hyperfractionated course up to 72 Gy. Results from the two groups were compared., Results: Patient and tumor characteristics were balanced (SEQ = 70, CON = 52 pts.). Mean radiation dose achieved (65.3 Gy vs. 71.6 Gy, p = 0.00), response rates (67 vs. 90 % for primary, p = 0.02), and local control (LC; 17.6% vs. 41%, p = 0.03), were significantly lower in the SEQ group, revealing a trend towards lower disease-specific (DSS; 19.8% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.08) and overall (14.7% vs. 23.7%, p = 0.11) survival rates after 5 years. Mucositis grades III and IV prevailed in the CON group (54% versus 44%). Late toxicity was similar in both groups., Conclusion: Concurrent chemotherapy seemed more effective in treating head and neck tumors than induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation, resulting in better local control and a trend towards improved survival.

Adult Wilms' tumor (AWT) is a very rare and aggressive malignancy, and little information is available on effective therapy in adults. Although mutations in WT1 have been found in 10% to 15% of childhood Wilms' tumor patients, to date WT1 mutations in AWT patients have not been described. The authors describe a 47-year-old man with relapsed AWT and a novel germline alteration in intron 1 of WT1: IVS1-6 C-->A. This alteration may reduce the splicing efficiency for exon 2 and possibly results in exon skipping. The effective salvage chemotherapy contained ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide and was followed by a high-dose chemotherapy that contained melphalan, carboplatin, and etoposide. Both chemotherapy regimens showed moderate treatment-related toxicity. This report is the first that indicates that adult nephroblastoma patients also may carry WT1 germline mutations.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of a novel hyperthermic chemotherapy approach for patients with locally recurrent adenocarcinoma of the rectum. All patients were pre-irradiated (> or = 45 Gy) and had histologically proven pelvic recurrence. Hyperthermic chemotherapy was applied according to a modified 'OFF'-schedule with weekly infusions of 43 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin (i.v., 120 min), 500 mg/m2 of folinic acid (i.v., 120 min) and 2.6 g/m2 of continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil (24 h) for 6 consecutive weeks. Oxaliplatin was started in parallel to pelvic radiofrequency hyperthermia that was provided by the BSD 2000-system. A total of 67 applications were administered to nine patients and were well tolerated. A total of 55/67 (82%) chemotherapy courses were applied without dose-reduction. In 62/67 (93%) hyperthermia sessions, a treatment time of > 60 min was maintained. Tolerated power levels were on average 600 W and, thus, slightly lower than those described in curative pelvic hyperthermia schedules. Eight out of 10 episodes of severe (WHO III degrees) toxicity represented typical side-effects of the chemotherapy given (nausea n = 4, diarrhoea n = 3, neuropathy n = 1). Two severe adverse events were firstly attributable to hyperthermia (haematuria, n = 1; deterioration of a decubital ulcer, n = 1). No patient suffered WHO-disease progression during the treatment period. Two patients achieved a partial remission. It is concluded that hyperthermic chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, folinic acid and 5-FU is feasible on an outpatient basis. Overall toxicity was moderate, although hyperthermia may add side-effects to this approach. Results, moreover, suggest a relevant palliative effect in patients with pre-irradiated pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer.

This phase I/II study evaluated the feasibility, toxicity and response rates of von Ardenne's systemic cancer multistep therapy (sCMT) when applied as an adjunct to cytostatic therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. sCMT consists of whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) at 41.8-42.1 degrees C, hyperglycaemia and hyperoxaemia. All patients who entered the trial first received three monthly courses of chemotherapy (folinic acid, 50 mg, days 1-5; 5-fluorouracil, 425 mg/m2, days 1-5; mitomycin 8 mg/m2, day 1), followed by response evaluation according World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Responders (partial/complete remission) were assigned to three further courses of chemotherapy, whereas non-responders (stable/progressive disease) were allocated to additional sCMT on day 1 of every subsequent chemotherapy course. The WBH procedure was administered under general anaesthesia employing the Iratherm-2000 radiant heat device. Of 28 patients enrolled, 19 received more than three treatment courses. Eight of these 19 patients had responded to chemotherapy (PR) and thus obtained three further courses of chemotherapy alone. In 10 of 19 patients who had not responded (SD, PD), three additional courses of chemotherapy were combined with sCMT (with 25 sCMT applications). One patient who did not respond to initial treatment declined sCMT and was continued with chemotherapy alone. It was found that sCMT was feasible, but associated with a specific spectrum of grade III/IV toxicity (skin 20%, pain 16%, peripheral nerves 8% of treatment courses). The fact that three patients who did not respond to initial chemotherapy achieved a PR after additional sCMT suggests that sCMT may enhance the effect of chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer.

The suppression and eradication of malignant tumours by targeting the endothelial cells of the tumour is one of the rapidly evolving new approaches to cancer therapy. Head and neck tumours, because of their high levels of vascularization, present themselves as ideal candidates for such antiangiogenic strategies. We report a heavily pretreated patient with a tumour 15 cm in diameter representing fourth relapse of squamous cell carcinoma, which had its origin in the upper left jaw. The patient was treated with the antiangiogenetic, cyclic peptide, EMD 121974 [cilengitide] (600 mg/m2 over 60 minutes i.v.) on day 1 and 4 in combination with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 over 30 minutes) administered days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for five months, and a partial remission was achieved. This resulted in a clinical improvement in the ability of the patient to eat and smell. The patient remained stable for 12 months on cilengitide mainenance therapy, with no tendency towards spontaneous bleeding. This clinical case demonstrates the clinical efficacy of the antiangiogenetic agent cilengitide, in combination with gemcitabine, in inhibiting rapid growth of highly vascularized tumour and highlights the potential of this new therapeutic agent

Between 1987 and 2000, 111 patients with epidermoid anal cancer (T1-T4 Nx M0) were assigned to primary simultaneous radiochemotherapy (RCT) with a radiation dose of 45 Gy, performed either as a split course with 2-Gy single fractions (schedule A, 1987-1996, n = 65 patients) or continuously with fractions of 1.8 Gy (schedule B, 1996-2000; n = 38 patients). The chemotherapy consisted of continuous infusions of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 800/1,000 mg/m(2)/day, on 4/5 consecutive days, during weeks 1 and 5) together with one (schedule A) or two (schedule B) short infusions of mitomycin C (10 mg/m(2)) during the first course of 5-FU. Associations between clinical outcome and various prognostic factors were assessed in 103 patients who completed these schedules. For both patient groups combined, 5-year local control rate was 67% and 5-year survival rate 71%. Advanced tumor stage, size, and nodal status significantly decreased the 5-year local control rate as well as the overall treatment time (OTT) >41 days (58% for OTT >41 days vs. 79% for OTT < or =41 days; p = 0.04). However, we did not find a correlation with the prescribed radiotherapy schedule (A or B). In conclusion, in patients with anal carcinomas treated with RCT with a radiation dose of 45 Gy, the predominant determinant of local control is the resulting OTT and not the administration schedule (split course or continuous radiotherapy)., (Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel)

The prognosis for advanced esophageal carcinoma is poor with a median survival of 9-12 months and 5-year-survival rate of 10-20%. Combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is considered to be the standard therapy, but has a high potential of side effects and is usually not given on an ambulatory basis. This phase I study was designed to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly cisplatin in combination with standard doses of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2), 30 min) and 5-FU (750 mg/m(2), 24 h)/folinic acid (200 mg/m(2), 30 min). All drugs were to be given on a day 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 6-weekly cycle in an outpatient setting. Nineteen chemonaive patients with inoperable stage IIa, III and IV squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were enrolled into the study. Eight, six and five patients were enrolled at cisplatin dose levels 0 (20 mg/m(2) ), I (25 mg/m(2) ) and II (30 mg/m(2)), respectively. One hundred and eighty-one out of 187 treatments (55 cycles) were given on an outpatient basis. The dose-limiting toxicities of this schedule were leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. Other side effects were mild. Dose level II (30 mg/m(2)) was defined as the MTD for cisplatin when used in this combination and schedule. Partial responses were observed in 10 of the 19 enrolled patients. The side effect profile seen in this study in combination with the preliminary evidence of efficacy justifies further testing in a phase II setting with a cisplatin dose of 25 mg/m(2) and offers a treatment option for patients in an outpatient setting.

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most frequently reported gastrointestinal tumors and has been reported to have a 5-year survival rate of < 5%. It is most commonly diagnosed at an advanced stage and until recently, the most frequently administered treatment for patients with advanced disease has been palliative 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. However, in clinical trials, the novel antinucleoside gemcitabine is currently considered the standard of care and has demonstrated both a survival benefit over 5-FU and an improvement in disease-related symptoms in those patients with advanced disease. The current review presents an overview of recently completed and ongoing clinical trials of gemcitabine/5-FU combination therapy for pancreatic cancer. In these trials, the administration of 5-FU varied widely from bolus injection to 24-hour infusion to protracted infusion over several weeks. These variations make a definitive judgment of this combination difficult, especially because the majority of the data represent only Phase I and Phase II study results. Although a recently completed randomized Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus bolus 5-FU versus gemcitabine failed to show a clinically meaningful survival benefit for the combination arm, current data indicate that other gemcitabine/5-FU combinations might provide a therapeutic advantage over gemcitabine alone. However, the results of ongoing Phase III studies must be reviewed before a definitive statement can be made regarding the value of this combination in the treatment of pancreatic cancer., (Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.10758)

Objectives: Carboplatin and paclitaxel can be applied safely and effectively as single agents for the treatment of ovarian cancer on a weekly basis. A multicenter, phase-I study was conducted to investigate the maximum tolerated dose of a weekly combination regimen., Methods: We enrolled 21 patients with primary, surgically resected, advanced ovarian cancer (FIGO III/ IV) and a median age of 59 (range, 35 to 79) years. For a fixed dose of paclitaxel at 100 mg/m(2), carboplatin was administered at levels equating an area under the curve of 2.0 (6 patients), 2.5 (7 patients), and 3.0 (8 patients), respectively. Treatment schedule consisted of six cycles with drug delivery once a week, followed by a 2-week break, and another six cycles. After a treatment-free interval of 28 days, three more cycles were administered., Results: No dose-limiting toxicity was observed at the first level. Three patients developed dose-limiting toxicity (thrombocytopenia, neutropenic fever, and grade 3 neuropathy) receiving carboplatin at area under the curve 2.5. Another three patients developed dose-limiting toxicity at the highest carboplatin dose, of whom two encountered refractory thrombocytopenia, whereas another experienced neutropenic fever despite prophylactic granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor use. Alopecia was documented in 17 patients. Neurotoxicity was usually mild to moderate. CA-125 concentrations normalized (<35 U/ml) in 13 of 19 patients (68%) by the end of therapy. A 50% response was observed in 16 of 19 subjects., Conclusions: Weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel is a well-tolerated combination regimen in patients with primary, advanced ovarian cancer. The recommended dose for a phase II study is carboplatin at 100 mg/m(2) and carboplatin at area under the curve 2.0., ((c) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).)

Pancreatic cancer, one of the most frequently reported gastrointestinal tumors, has a 5-year survival of less than 5%. Despite representing only 2-3% of the total cancer incidence, it is the fifth leading cause of cancer death. This is because it is commonly only diagnosed at an advanced stage. Until recently the traditional therapy for patients with advanced disease was palliative 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. However, the novel antinucleoside gemcitabine (Gemzar) has demonstrated a survival benefit over 5-FU, and an improvement in disease-related symptoms and quality of life in patients with advanced disease. This review presents an overview of the clinical studies of gemcitabine, either alone or in combination, with other chemotherapeutic agents and/or radiation therapy, in the treatment of these patients. A comparison of these studies is made with those using alternative treatment regimens. The data suggest that gemcitabine in combination with biomodulated 5-FU should be considered the standard palliative treatment to which other new drug combinations or combined modality chemoradiation regimens should be compared.

Background: Gemcitabine (Gemzar) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus folinic acid (FA) both have proven activity in the treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The present study was initiated to investigate the efficacy of gemcitabine in combination with 5-FU-FA., Patients and Methods: Thirty-eight patients, median age 60 years (range 34-70) with inoperable, stage IV, pancreatic cancer were enrolled into the study and treated on an outpatient basis. All except one patient received at least one cycle of treatment with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2), followed by FA (200 mg/m2) and 5-FU (750 mg/m2) administered as a 24-hour continuous infusion on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 42-day schedule. No patient had received prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy. All 38 patients were assessed for efficacy, toxicity and time to progressive disease., Results: Two patients (5%), achieved a partial response and thirty-four patients (89%) achieved stable disease. There were two early deaths (< or = 4 weeks). The median time to progression was 7.1 months (range 0.4-18.1+; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 5.3-7.9 months). Three patients had a progression-free interval of greater than 12 months and 12 of 38 patients (32%) survived longer than 12 months. The median overall survival was 9.3 months (range 0.5-26.5; 95% CI: 7.3-13.0 months). The incidence of grade 3 and 4 toxicities was low., Conclusions: The combination of gemcitabine and 5-FU-FA is active and well tolerated and seems to offer an improvement in progression-free interval over both gemcitabine monotherapy and 5-FU-FA therapy.

Gemcitabine (Gemzar) has a significant impact upon survival and quality of life for patients with pancreatic cancer, compared with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). This phase I study was initiated to define the recommended dose of 5-FU delivered as a 24 h infusion in combination with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and folinic acid (200 mg/m2) in patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer, treated on an outpatient basis. Drugs were administered weekly for 4 weeks out of 6 weeks. Sixteen chemonaive patients (median age 59 years, range 51-66) were enrolled, 15 had stage IV and one stage III disease. The median Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was 70 (range 60-80). Six patients received 5-FU 750 mg/m2, eight received 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 and two received 5-FU 1250 mg/m2. The maximum tolerated dose of 5-FU was 1000 mg/m2. Hepatotoxicity was dose limiting. One patient who received 5-FU 1250 mg/m2 died as a result of hepatorenal failure. There was one partial response, nine patients had stable disease for more than 3 months and 13 patients had improved KPS. The median time to progressive disease was 31 weeks (range 5-50 weeks). A phase 11 trial is underway to further assess the activity of this combination at the recommended dose of 750 mg/m2 5-FU.

Failure of local tumor control is of critical importance in the clinical management of large pelvic tumors. For bulky sarcomas of the pelvis a new treatment strategy could be of importance in the future using preoperative regional hyperthermia combined with systemic chemotherapy. In our case history of a patient with unresectable Ewing sarcoma of the pelvis no tumor response could be observed during multi-drug chemotherapy alone. However, after treatment with regional hyperthermia combined with systemic chemotherapy, the tumor mass became resectable and was separated from the adjacent tissue by a fibrotic pseudocapsule. Histological evaluation of the tumor tissue showed a complete change of the pattern.