Search

Histamine (Hi) combined to melphalan in a rat experimental model of isolated limb perfusion (ILP) for lower limb soft tissue sarcoma, resulted in overall response rates (OR) of 66%. Likewise, ILP with interleukin-2 (IL-2) resulted in OR of 67%, when combined to melphalan, in the same experimental model. In systemic immunotherapy, the combination of IL-2 and Hi has been used for solid tumor treatment based on immunomodulatory effects. In this study, we used our well-established ILP experimental model to evaluate whether the synergistic effect between the two drugs seen in the systemic setting, could further improve response rates in a loco-regional setting. Histological evaluation was done directly and 24 h after ILP. Melphalan uptake by tumor and muscle were measured. Hi and IL-2 together, combined to melphalan in the ILP led to OR of only 28%. Histology of tumors demonstrated partial loss of Hi-induced hemorrhagic effect when IL-2 was present. Melphalan accumulation in the tumor when both Hi and IL-2 were added (3.1-fold) was very similar to accumulation with Hi only (2.8-fold), or IL-2 only (3.5-fold) combined to melphalan. In vitro there was no synergy between the drugs. In conclusion there was a negative synergistic effect between IL-2 and Hi in the regional setting.

Our objective was to determine the response to gemcitabine plus docetaxel in advanced urothelial transitional cell carcinoma in a phase II trial, and gemcitabine distribution between plasma and erythrocytes, following docetaxel administration. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma, following a maximum of one prior chemotherapy regimen, were given gemcitabine 800 mg/m on days 1 and 8 plus docetaxel 85 mg/m on day 8, every 21 days. Gemcitabine was measured in the plasma and erythrocytes of nine patients before and after docetaxel administration. Thirty-four patients (median 63 years; range 49-79 years), of whom seven had prior chemotherapy and 27 were chemotherapy-naive, received a median of six cycles (range 1-6). Complete and partial remissions were observed in two and 16 (including three pretreated) patients, respectively, for an overall response rate of 53%. Median response duration was 5 months (range 1-39+). Haematoxicity was manageable, despite grade 3 infections in 24% of patients, but other toxicities were mostly mild. An apparent shift of gemcitabine from plasma to erythrocytes occurred after docetaxel in five of six patients evaluable for this analysis. We conclude gemcitabine plus docetaxel is tolerable and highly active in treated and untreated patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma.

Addition of high-dose tumor necrosis factor-alpha to melphalan-based isolated limb perfusion enhances anti-tumor effects impressively. Unfortunately, the mechanism of action of tumor necrosis factor-alpha is still not fully understood. Here, we investigated the effects of tumor necrosis factor-alpha on the tumor microenvironment and on secondary immunological events during and shortly after isolated limb perfusion in soft-tissue sarcoma-bearing rats. Already during isolated limb perfusion, softening of the tumor was observed. Co-administration of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in the isolated limb perfusion with melphalan induced a six-fold enhanced drug accumulation of melphalan in the tumor compared with isolated limb perfusion with melphalan alone. In addition, directly after perfusion with tumor necrosis factor-alpha plus melphalan, over a time-frame of 30 min, vascular destruction, erythrocyte extravasation and hemorrhage was detected. Interstitial fluid pressure and pH in the tumor, however, were not altered by tumor necrosis factor-alpha and no clear immune effects, cellular infiltration or cytokine expression were observed. Taken together, these results indicate that tumor necrosis factor-alpha induces rapid damage to the tumor vascular endothelial lining resulting in augmented drug accumulation. As other important parameters were not changed (e.g. interstitial fluid pressure and pH), we speculate that the tumor vascular changes, and concurrent hemorrhage and drug accumulation are the key explanations for the observed synergistic anti-tumor response.

We have performed in vitro incubations of blood from male and female volunteers with gemcitabine and docetaxel alone, and in combination, at different concentration gradients in order to investigate changes in partition between red blood cells (RBCs), total plasma and the free fraction. After extraction and sample pre-treatment, a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method followed by UV detection was used to determine the concentrations of both drugs in the different blood constituents. The partition ratio [the concentration in the erythrocytes divided by the concentration in plasma (E/P)] was calculated. The partition ratio of docetaxel varied from 0.02 to 1.44 (mean 0.35), reflecting its relatively low affinity for RBCs, probably because of its high plasma protein binding (more than 98%). For gemcitabine, the partition ratio varied from 1 to 5, reflecting a high affinity for RBCs (less than 10% plasma protein bound). The partition ratios of both drugs increased significantly with higher whole-blood concentrations, favoring uptake in the erythrocytes when plasma protein binding is saturated. Combination incubations showed a complex and unexplained interaction between gender and the influence of docetaxel on the partition of gemcitabine. We conclude that the incorporation of drugs into the RBC pool may be important for transportation to tumor tissue and efficacy. In combination, one anti-cancer agent can alter the partition ratios of other anti-cancer agents.

The cytokine interleukin 2 (IL-2) is a mediator of immune cell activation with some antitumor activity, mainly in renal cell cancer and melanoma. We have previously shown that tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha has strong synergistic antitumor activity in combination with chemotherapeutics in the isolated limb perfusion (ILP) setting based on a TNF-mediated enhanced tumor-selective uptake of the chemotherapeutic drug followed by a selective destruction of the tumor vasculature. IL-2 can cause vascular leakage and edema and for this reason we examined the antitumor activity of a combined treatment with IL-2 and melphalan in our well-established ILP in soft tissue sarcoma-bearing rats (BN175). ILP with either IL-2 or melphalan alone has no antitumor effect, but the combination of IL-2 and melphalan resulted in a strong synergistic tumor response, without any local or systemic toxicity. IL-2 enhanced significantly melphalan uptake in tumor tissue. No signs of significant vascular damage were detected to account for this observation, although the tumor sections of the IL-2- and IL-2 plus melphalan-treated animals revealed scattered extravasation of erythrocytes compared with the untreated animals. Clear differences were seen in the localization of ED-1 cells, with an even distribution in the sham, IL-2 and melphalan treatments, whereas in the IL-2 plus melphalan-treated tumors clustered ED-1 cells were found. Additionally, increased levels of TNF mRNA were found in tumors treated with IL-2 and IL-2 plus melphalan. These observations indicate a potentially important role for macrophages in the IL-2-based perfusion. The results in our study indicate that the novel combination of IL-2 and melphalan in ILP has synergistic antitumor activity and may be an alternative for ILP with TNF and melphalan.

Background: We have previously shown how tumor response of isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan was improved when tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) was added. Taking into account that other vasoactive drugs could also improve tumor response to ILP, we evaluated histamine (Hi) as an alternative to TNF-alpha., Methods: We used a rat ILP model to assess the combined effects of Hi and melphalan (n = 6) on tumor regression, melphalan uptake (n = 6), and tissue histology (n = 2) compared with Hi or melphalan alone. We also evaluated the growth of BN-175 tumor cells as well as apoptosis, necrosis, cell morphology, and paracellular permeability of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) after Hi treatment alone and in combination with melphalan., Results: The antitumor effect of the combination of Hi and melphalan in vivo was synergistic, and Hi-dependent reduction in tumor volume was blocked by H1 and H2 receptor inhibitors. Tumor regression was observed in 66% of the animals treated with Hi and melphalan, compared with 17% after treatment with Hi or melphalan alone. Tumor melphalan uptake increased and vascular integrity in the surrounding tissue was reduced after ILP treatment with Hi and melphalan compared with melphalan alone. In vitro results paralleled in vivo results. BN-175 tumor cells were more sensitive to the cytotoxicity of combined treatment than HUVECs, and Hi treatment increased the permeability of HUVECs., Conclusions: Hi in combination with melphalan in ILP improved response to that of melphalan alone through direct and indirect mechanisms. These results warrant further evaluation in the clinical ILP setting and, importantly, in organ perfusion.

We evaluated the effect of different intervals and sequences of the vascular targeting agent combretastatin A-4 disodium phosphate (CA4DP) and CPT-11 administration on tumour growth delay and intratumoral uptake of CPT-11 using a syngeneic rhabdomyosarcoma tumour model. Irrespective of the administration sequence, the combination of CA4DP and CPT-11 significantly increases tumour growth delay in comparison with both drugs alone (P<0.001). Intratumoral CPT-11 concentration generally decreased (up to 5-fold) in the combination groups, while SN-38, the active metabolite of CPT-11, increased up to 9-fold. However, the increased amount of intratumoral SN-38 trapping after CA4DP injection did not correlate with the observed tumour growth delay. In conclusion, CA4DP significantly enhances the antitumour effect of CPT-11, which is not greatly influenced by the administration sequence, and which lacks a correlation with the intratumoral trapping of CPT-11 or SN-38. Mechanisms other than trapping are likely to be involved in the chemosensitising capacity of CA4DP.

Docetaxel is a new antimicrotubule agent that has been shown to be active against a variety of solid tumors. Ifosfamide is an alkylating drug that has demonstrated activity against non-small cell lung cancer, testicular cancer, breast cancer, and soft tissue sarcoma. This phase I study of the combination of these drugs was performed to assess the feasibility of using the two agents together, to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the side effects, and to propose a safe schedule for further phase II studies. Thirty-four patients with histologically confirmed solid tumors who had not been treated previously with taxanes or ifosfamide and who had received no more than one line of chemotherapy for advanced disease were entered into the study. Treatment consisted of docetaxel given as a 1-hour infusion followed by ifosfamide as a 24-hour infusion (schedule A), or ifosfamide followed by docetaxel (schedule B) every 3 weeks. Docetaxel doses ranged from 60 to 85 mg/m2 and ifosfamide doses from 2.5 to 5.0 g/m2. Grades 3 and 4 granulocytopenia were observed in 89% of courses and appeared to be of short duration and related to the ifosfamide dose. Febrile neutropenia and sepsis occurred in 17% and 2% of courses, respectively. Severe anemia and thrombocytopenia were uncommon. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild to moderate, and included alopecia, nausea, vomiting, mucositis, diarrhea, sensory neuropathy, skin and nail toxicity, hypersensitivity reactions, and edema. Schedule B appeared to induce more gastrointestinal toxicity than schedule A. One complete response in soft tissue sarcoma and two partial responses, one in cancer of unknown primary and the other in non-small cell lung cancer, were documented. The dose-limiting toxicity for schedule A was neutropenic fever at a dose of 85 mg/m2 docetaxel and 5 g/m2 ifosfamide. The dose-limiting toxicity for schedule B was neutropenic fever at a dose of 75 mg/m2 docetaxel and 4 g/m2 ifosfamide. A dose of 75 mg/m2 docetaxel combined with 5 g/m2 ifosfamide according to schedule A can be recommended for further studies.

Docetaxel and ifosfamide have shown significant activity against a variety of solid tumours. This prompted a phase I trial on the combination of these drugs. This phase I study was performed to assess the feasibility of the combination, to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the side effects, and to propose a safe schedule for further phase II studies. A total of 34 patients with a histologically confirmed solid tumour, who were not pretreated with taxanes or ifosfamide and who had received no more than one line of chemotherapy for advanced disease were entered into the study. Treatment consisted of docetaxel given as a 1-h infusion followed by ifosfamide as a 24-h infusion (schedule A), or ifosfamide followed by docetaxel (schedule B) every 3 weeks. Docetaxel doses ranged from 60 to 85 mg m(-2) and ifosfamide doses from 2.5 to 5.0 g m(-2). Granulocytopenia grade 3 and 4 were common (89%), short lasting and ifosfamide dose dependent. Febrile neutropenia and sepsis occurred in 17% and 2% of courses respectively. Non-haematological toxicities were mild to moderate and included alopecia, nausea, vomiting, mucositis, diarrhoea, sensory neuropathy, skin and nail toxicity and oedema. There did not appear to be any pharmacokinetic interaction between docetaxel and ifosfamide. One complete response (CR) (soft tissue sarcoma) and two partial responses (PRs) were documented. A dose of 75 mg m(-2) of docetaxel combined with 5.0 g m(-2) ifosfamide appeared to be manageable. Schedule A was advocated for further treatment.

Colon tumours are intrinsically resistant to chemotherapy and most of them express the multidrug transporter P glycoprotein (Pgp). Whether this Pgp expression determines their resistance to anticancer agents in patients is not known. We report here on the reversibility of intrinsic multidrug resistance in a syngeneic, solid tumour model. CC531 is a rat colon carcinoma that expresses Pgp, as was shown with the monoclonal antibody C-219. In vitro the sensitivity to doxorubicin, daunorubicin and colchicine was enhanced by the addition of the chemosensitizers verapamil and cyclosporin A (CsA), while the sensitivity to cisplatin was not enhanced. In a daunorubicin accumulation assay verapamil and CsA enhanced the daunorubicin content of CC531 cells. In vivo CsA was injected intramuscularly for 3 consecutive days at a dose of 20 mg kg-1 day-1. This resulted in whole-blood CsA levels above 2 mumol/l, while intratumoral CsA levels amounted to 3.6 mumol/kg. In a subrenal capsule assay the maximal tolerable dose of doxorubicin (4 mg/kg) significantly reduced tumour growth. Doxorubicin at 3 mg/kg was not effective, but in combination with CsA this dose was as effective as 4 mg/kg doxorubicin. These experiments show that adequate doses of the chemosensitizing drug CsA can be obtained in vivo, resulting in increased antitumoral activity of doxorubicin in vivo. The in vitro and in vivo data together suggest that the chemosensitization by CsA is mediated by Pgp. This finding may have implications for the application of CsA and CsA-like chemosensitizers in the clinical setting.

The CMF-regimen is amongst the most effective chemotherapeutic approaches in the treatment of breast cancer. It is generally accepted that the efficacy of the combination of the three agents used in the regimen, i.e., cyclophosphamide (CY), methotrexate (MTX) and fluorouracil (FUra), is based on interactions between the drugs at the intratumoral level. In WAG/Rij rats we previously demonstrated that change of FUra clearance at the first day of the CMF-regimen occurs owing to concomitant CY + MTX. In the present study clearance of FUra and the first product of FUra catabolism, FUraH2, were monitored at day 1 and day 8 of the regimen upon treatment with single agent FUra (F), MTX + FUra (MF), CY + FUra (CF), and CY + MTX + FUra (CMF). At the first day of treatment, FUra and FUraH2 systemic exposure was demonstrated to be increased in CMF-treated rats owing to concomitant CY+MTX. At the eighth day of treatment it was found that repeated CY administration during the previous seven days in CF-treated rats resulted in increased FUra and FUraH2 systemic exposure and therefore increased the dose of FUra artificially. It is concluded that altered FUra clearance owing to extratumoral interactions by concomitant CY and MTX contributes to the efficacy of the CMF-regimen.

The contribution of the agents used in the CMF regimen, i.e., cyclophosphamide (CY), methotrexate (MTX) and fluorouracil (FUra), to the development of toxicity was determined in tumor-bearing WAG/Rij rats. Data from untreated (U) rats were compared with data from rats treated with single-agent therapy (C-, M- and F-treatment groups), with data from double-agent therapy (CM-, MF- and CF-treatment groups) and with data from the triple combination: the CMF-treatment group. Doses of agents of interest were the same in all treatment groups. The sequence of administration was (1) CY; (2) MTX and (3) FUra which is similar to clinical treatment with CMF. Systemic levels of CY, MTX and FUra were comparable to those found in patients treated according to the CMF regimen. Toxicity was evaluated by body-weight changes, water and food consumption, white blood cell (WBC) and platelet cell (Pts) counts. With the exception of WBC and Pts nadirs, estimated toxicity parameters reflected toxicity over the whole treatment period of 14 days. The toxicity was generally mild and well tolerated, with one fatality in the M-treatment group. CY was the main contributor to toxicity; it caused both myelotoxicity and gastro-intestinal toxicity. The contribution of FUra was judged to be negligible. MTX + FUra did not increase host toxicity in a synergistic or even an additional fashion. The absence of addition or synergism of toxic side-effects can be explained both by site-specific interactions at the pharmacodynamic level and by interactions at the pharmacokinetic level.

Cyclophosphamide (CY) was administered to 22 breast cancer patients treated routinely according to the CMF regimen: 75 mg/m3/d x 14 d p.o. CY, 30 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 i.v. methotrexate (MTX) and 500 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 i.v. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU). The sequence of drug administration was always the same: 1) CY, 2) MTX; and 3) 5-FU. Capillary gas chromatography was performed for determination of CY in blood. Bioavailability (F) could be determined in 14 patients since CY was also administered intravenously in the same dose. The data of systemic exposure of oral CY in the other 8 patients were matched to those of the first 14 in whom bioavailability could be determined. Mean F was 0.85 +/- 0.22 (85% +/- 22%); in 1 patient F was 0.43 (43%). Furthermore, 3 patients treated with only p.o. CY had low estimated F values: 0.45, 0.49 and 0.50. In comparing patient characteristics with pharmacokinetic data, it was concluded that age might have a predictive value for elimination half-life t 1/2 z of i.v. CY. The youngest patients showed shortest t1/2 z and were also amongst those with the lowest F. This indication requires an extension of the study as well as monitoring of CY metabolism as a function of age. For the premenopausal patients this might be of particular importance, since this group is known to be prone to benefit from chemotherapeutic treatment according to the CMF regimen.

Influence of the 2 antimetabolites used in the CMF-regimen, methotrexate (MTX, M) and fluorouracil (FUra, F) on in vivo pharmacokinetics of orally administered cyclophosphamide (CY, C), were studied in WAG/Rij rats. Blood plasma concentrations of CY following oral administration were monitored in single-agent CY, in CY + MTX (CM), in CY + FUra (CF) and in CY + MTX + FUra (CMF) treatments. Each treatment group consisted of at least 10 rats. CY was determined in 50 microliters of plasma by capillary gas chromatography on the first day of chemotherapy. Statistical analysis of blood plasma concentration data revealed a significant influence of both MTX and FUra on CY input/output function (p:0.01). MTX and FUra significantly increased the area under the plasma concentration time-curve, whereas tmax was significantly prolonged in CF and CMF treatment groups (p:0.01). It is suggested that MTX and FUra interact at the site of CY pre-systemic metabolism, including first-pass metabolism, subsequently resulting in prolonged absorption.

Forty-one clinical patients were studied on the first day of the first course of the CMF-regimen; administered by a fixed dosage scheme depending solely on body surface area of the patient in question. Parmacokinetic parameters were calculated for each drug: the data were analysed in conformity with the usual pharmacokinetic models. The results indicate a large pharmacokinetic variability, especially for cyclophosphamide (C). The large variability in plasma concentrations of C is presumed to be substantially attributable to the drug formula used.

Cyclophosphamide was administered to 12 breast cancer patients in combination with methotrexate and fluorouracil. Doses prescribed were cyclophosphamide 75 mg/m2, methotrexate 30 mg/m2 and fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 (per square meter body surface). Cyclophosphamide was administered intravenously and orally in aqueous solutions and in tablets in a randomized cross-over trial. Methotrexate and fluorouracil were administered intravenously, methotrexate was given first and then fluorouracil. Assays of cyclophosphamide in blood plasma were performed by capillary gas chromatography. Data of mean bioavailability of cyclophosphamide administered by tablets were suggestive of sufficient absorption. In 2 patients, however, a lower bioavailability of cyclophosphamide was demonstrated. Intra-individual differences in the terminal slope of the plasma decay curves after intravenous and oral administration in some patients decreased the calculated bioavailability of cyclophosphamide, if these values were included in the calculation of cyclophosphamide bioavailability. Compared with the administration of the solutions peak times, lag-times and mean absorption times of cyclophosphamide given in tablets were markedly prolonged. It is concluded that interactions between cyclophosphamide and methotrexate and/or fluorouracil after oral dosing as tablets are different from interactions observed after intravenous administration of cyclosphosphamide.

In tumor-bearing WAG/Rij rats the interaction of cyclophosphamide and/or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with methotrexate as manifested at the pharmacokinetic level was studied. Four groups were formed of at least ten animals. The control group, which received single-agent methotrexate, was compared with groups that received methotrexate plus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate plus 5-FU, and methotrexate plus cyclophosphamide plus 5-FU. There appeared to be an increase of 40% in the clearance of methotrexate by the triple combination. Cyclophosphamide especially diminished the terminal part of the concentration-time curve of methotrexate.