Search

Importance: To date, single-agent programmed cell death 1 protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint blockade has shown limited activity in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Combination strategies of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition with antiangiogenic therapy have the potential for synergistic activity through modulation of the microenvironment and represent a potential therapeutic opportunity in this disease., Objective: To evaluate the activity of combined nivolumab and bevacizumab in women with relapsed ovarian cancer., Design, Setting, and Participants: A single-arm, phase 2 study enrolled patients between February 8, 2017, and December 29, 2017, at 2 sites in the United States; the primary data analysis was completed July 27, 2018. Thirty-eight women with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer were enrolled in this study. Participants had disease recurrence within 12 months of their last platinum-based therapy and had received between 1 and 3 lines of prior therapy., Interventions: Participants received intravenous nivolumab and intravenous bevacizumab once every 2 weeks., Main Outcome and Measures: The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) as measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Secondary end points included evaluation of the ORR by platinum sensitivity, assessment of progression-free survival, assessment of safety data, and investigation of the association of tumor PD-L1 with response to therapy., Results: Of the 38 women enrolled, 18 had platinum-resistant and 20 had platinum-sensitive disease; mean (SD) age was 63.0 (9.1) years. Eleven patients experienced a confirmed response to nivolumab with bevacizumab (ORR, 28.9%; 95% exact binomial CI, 15.4%-45.9%), with 1 additional unconfirmed response. The ORR was 40.0% (19.1%-64.0%) in platinum-sensitive and 16.7% (95% CI 3.6%-41.4%) in platinum-resistant participants. Thirty-four participants (89.5%) experienced at least 1 treatment-related adverse event; 9 participants (23.7%) experienced a grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse event. Median progression-free survival was 8.1 months (95% CI, 6.3-14.7 months). In 36 histologic samples for which PD-L1 testing could be performed, 22 samples (61.1%) had a PD-L1 tumoral percentage less than 1, and 14 samples (38.9%) had a PD-L1 tumoral percentage of 1 or greater. Ten responses occurred in patients with PD-L1 tumor percentage less than 1, and 2 in patients with PD-L1 tumor percentages of 1 or greater., Conclusions and Relevance: The nivolumab with bevacizumab combination appeared to show activity in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer, with greater activity in the platinum-sensitive setting. Alternative combinational strategies may be necessary in the platinum-resistant setting.

PURPOSE New strategies are needed to improve outcomes for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that neutralizes vascular endothelial growth factor but is associated with GI perforations (GIPs) in patients with recurrent disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS An open-label, phase II clinical trial was conducted in newly diagnosed patients with stage > or = IC epithelial müllerian tumors. Patients received intravenous (IV) carboplatin (area under the curve = 5), paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) IV), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg IV) for six to eight cycles on day 1 every 21 days. Bevacizumab was omitted in the first cycle and continued as a single agent for 1 year. Results Sixty-two women participated in this study. Fifty-one patients (82%) were optimally surgically cytoreduced before treatment. The median age was 58 years (range, 18 to 77 years). Forty-five women (73%) had ovarian cancer, 10 (16%) had peritoneal cancer, four (6%) had fallopian tube cancers, and three (5%) had uterine papillary serous tumors. The majority of patients (90%) had stage III or IV disease. A median of 17 maintenance cycles (range, 0 to 25+ cycles) of bevacizumab (556 cycles) were administered with mild toxicity. Treatment was associated with two pulmonary embolisms and two GIPs, all occurring during the chemotherapy phase of treatment (364 total cycles). No grade 4 toxicities were seen during maintenance bevacizumab treatment. Radiographic responses were documented in 21 (75%) of 28 women with measurable disease (11 complete responses and 10 partial responses), with CA-125 responses in 76% of patients (11 complete responses, 21%; and 35 partial responses, 55%). The progression-free survival rate at 36 months was 58%. CONCLUSION The regimen of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab with maintenance bevacizumab is feasible, safe, and worthy of future study in advanced ovarian cancer.

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy in adult women. The most easily identifiable riskfactor is a strong family history of either ovarian or breast cancer; that may indicate the presence of an inherited germ-line mutation in either BRCA-1 or BRCA-2. Common symptoms, such as abdominal bloating and early satiety, indicate more advanced disease, involving the upper abdomen and present in approximately 70% of patients at the time of diagnosis. Physical examination often reveals the presence of a pelvic mass, which is best evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) for confirmation. Exploratory laparotomy is required for histologic confirmation, staging and tumor debulking and should be performed by a surgeon trained in these aspects of ovarian cancer management. Patients with early-stage disease, limited to the ovary or pelvis (stages I and II, respectively), have survival in the 80-95% range, whereas the survival of patients with disease involving the upper abdomen or beyond (stages III and IV, respectively) is 10-30%. Because of the propensity of EOC to spread beyond the confines of the ovary, the majority of patients will require postoperative chemotherapy in an attempt to eradicate residual disease. For selected patients with early-stage disease, confined to the ovary, such as those with well-differentiated, completely encapsulated tumors (e.g., stage IA, grade 1), no further treatment is necessary in view of excellent survival after surgery alone. For patients with higher-risk early-stage disease (e.g., those with pelvic extension, capsular rupture or involvement, positive washings, ascites or high-grade lesions) and for patients with advanced-stage disease (stages III and IV), postoperative combination chemotherapy with a taxane and platinum combination is the standard of care. Such treatment is capable of inducing responses in > 70% of patients with residual EOC and is also capable of prolonging both disease-free and overall survival. Unfortunately, despite an initial response to chemotherapy in the majority of patients, relapse is afrequent problem and is often detected by a rise in the serum tumor marker CA-125 in the absence of symptoms or signs of disease by physical examination or radiographic studies. In such cases, a hormonal maneuver is oftentimes considered in order to avoid the toxic effects of chemotherapy when the patient is asymptomatic and the goal of treatment is largely palliation, although eventually the development of clinical progression mandates the institution of second-line chemotherapy. If the treatment-free interval is > 6 months from the completion of first-line treatment, rechallenge with platinum-based chemotherapy is a reasonable first step. For those patients who develop resistance to second-line platinum or who have difficulty tolerating this agent, multiple other options are available for relapse management, including liposomal doxorubicin, topotecan, gemcitabine and etoposide per os. Eventually the disease becomes resistant to multiple chemotherapy agents, and reorienting management toward supportive care and pain control is necessary. Ongoing efforts to identify more effective multiagent first-line regimens, to develop more effective strategies for early detection and to incorporate agents with novel mechanisms of action, such as antiangiogenesis compounds, hold promise.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of combining docetaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine (DoCaGem) as first-line treatment of ovarian and other müllerian origin tumors., Methods: Four dose levels were planned for this phase I trial. Treatment consisted of carboplatin on day 1 only, docetaxel on days 1 and 8, and gemcitabine on days 1 and 8, every 21 days., Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled, of whom 18 were evaluable for toxicity. The first 5 patients enrolled at dose level I (carboplatin AUC 5, 30 mg/m(2) docetaxel, 800 mg/m(2) gemcitabine) experienced no dose-limiting toxicity. At dose level II, 4/4 evaluable patients experienced significant bone marrow suppression that required dose reduction and/or dose delay. Further dose escalation was not attempted, and 9 additional patients were enrolled in dose level I. Of the 67 cycles administered on dose level I, day 8 treatment could not be administered due to bone marrow suppression in 16 cycles (24%), and prolongation of the cycle length from day 22 to day 29 was required in 13 cycles (19%). There were no episodes of febrile neutropenia in evaluable patients and no treatment-related deaths. Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity (fatigue) occurred in 1 cycle. Response was determined in the 14 evaluable patients who tolerated 4 or more cycles of therapy, with 11 obtaining a complete clinical response and 3 obtaining a partial clinical response., Conclusions: The DoCaGem regimen is highly active, but myelosuppression at dose level I prevents full dose delivery. Other strategies to combine these three active agents are reasonable to explore.

Objectives: The goal of this study was to determine the maximally tolerated doses (MTDs) of carboplatin, paclitaxel (Taxol), etoposide, and cyclophosphamide (CTEC) with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF, Filgrastim) support as first-line chemotherapy in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)., Methods: Newly diagnosed patients with either stage IV EOC, or stage III EOC and any amount of gross residual tumor after surgical debulking were eligible to receive six cycles of CTEC over five different dose levels in this phase I trial (planned 21-day cycle length). Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and cyclophosphamide were administered intravenously on Day 1, and oral etoposide was administered on Days 1, 2, and 3. G-CSF was administered beginning Day 4., Results: Twenty patients received a total of 98 cycles of CTEC over the five dose levels evaluated. Bone marrow suppression was the major toxic effect, with grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia being observed in 25 and 23% of cycles, respectively. The overall incidence of febrile neutropenia was 10%, and no toxic deaths occurred. No grade IV thrombocytopenia or febrile neutropenia was observed once the carboplatin dose was reduced from AUC of 7 to 5. Nonhematologic toxicity was generally mild (grade 2 or less). Dose-limiting toxicity was not observed at the highest dose level evaluated in this study, preventing assignment of the MTD. The clinical complete response rate was 92%, although 15 of 16 evaluable patients have progressed with a median progression-free interval of 4 months (range, 2-11 months). One patient remains disease-free 9 months from the completion of CTEC., Conclusions: The CTEC regimen is well tolerated and highly active. Although the MTD was not reached in this study, the short median progression-free interval suggests that this regimen is unlikely to be superior to standard treatment with paclitaxel and carboplatin. Strategies to optimize the development of future combination chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of newly diagnosed ovarian cancer are discussed., (Copyright 2000 Academic Press.)

Purpose: Attempts to increase dose-intensity in clinical practice have been limited by cumulative hematologic toxicity despite the use of hematopoietic growth factors. To address this problem, we designed a study to determine whether four cycles of dose-intensive chemotherapy with carboplatin could be administered in the outpatient setting using granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) that had been harvested before initiation of treatment., Patients and Methods: An initial cycle (cycle no. 0) of cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 followed by GM-CSF was used to mobilize PBPCs harvested by leukapheresis for 6 consecutive days. Cycles no. 1 through 4 consisted of outpatient carboplatin 600 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 followed by GM-CSF 5 micrograms/kg subcutaneously (SC) twice per day every 28 days. In cycle no. 1, PBPC were not reinfused to assess the effects of GM-CSF alone. In cycles no. 2 through 4, PBPCs were reinfused on day 3 in an outpatient setting., Results: In eight assessable patients, the addition of PBPCs in cycle no. 2 resulted in a significant reduction in the median duration of thrombocytopenia less than 20,000/microL (6.5 v 1 day; P = .016), days to platelets more than 50,000/microL (20.5 v 15 days; P = .020), number of platelet transfusions (five v 1.5; P = .016), and duration of neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] < 1,000/microL (7 v 2.5 days; P = .008) when compared with cycle no. 1. Dose-limiting hematologic toxicity, defined as more than 7 days of platelets less than 20,000/microL or ANC less than 500/microL, was observed in four of eight patients during cycle no. 1, but not during cycles no. 2, 3, and 4 of chemotherapy supported by PBPCs (a total of 19 cycles in eight patients). Five of eight patients completed all four cycles of high-dose therapy. Three patients did not complete four cycles due to late thrombocytopenia (n = 2) or tumor progression (n = 1)., Conclusion: These results indicate a benefit of PBPCs in addition to GM-CSF in alleviating myelosuppression of dose-intensive chemotherapy. Initial collection of PBPCs may allow administration of repetitive cycles of high-dose chemotherapy with acceptable toxicity to outpatients at disease onset.

The treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with high dose cytosine arabinoside (ara-C) results in short-lived complete response rates of 30-50%. We have previously shown that entry of myeloid leukemic cells into S phase can be accelerated in vitro through the use of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF), resulting in enhancement of ara-C-mediated cytotoxicity. In order to evaluate the in vivo biological and clinical effects of this strategy in patients with high risk AML, we treated three patients with either refractory or relapsed disease with a continuous infusion of rhGM-CSF (0.45 micrograms/kg/h aglycoprotein) for 18 h, followed by the institution of high dose ara-C and continuation of rhGM-CSF throughout the 4 day duration of ara-C treatment. Prior to therapy, no patient had detectable levels of circulating rhGM-CSF, and there was no evidence of GM-CSF receptor occupancy in leukemic myeloblasts. After 18 h of rhGM-CSF therapy, all patients had biologically active levels of circulating rhGM-CSF (7.9-12.0 ng/ml), and two patients showed a significant degree of leukemic GM-CSF receptor occupancy without evidence of GM-CSF receptor down-regulation. A significant rise in the S phase fraction of leukemic myeloblasts was observed at 18 h of rhGM-CSF treatment in all three patients (29-56% increment). The toxicity of combined rhGM-CSF/ara-C therapy included pericarditis and cerebellar degeneration in one patient, fever and mild renal dysfunction in two patients, and mild hepatic dysfunction in all three patients. Each patient showed a transient rise in the absolute neutrophil and blast count during rhGM-CSF/ara-C administration, followed by profound, but clinically tolerable, myelosuppression. No patient developed clinical evidence of leukostasis. There was one death related to pericardial tamponade, one death related to refractory disease, and one clinical and cytogenetic remission. These results suggest that exogenously administered rhGM-CSF is capable of rapidly mobilizing leukemic cells into S phase in vivo and theoretically should be useful in overcoming kinetic resistance to ara-C. Clinical trials of this regimen in patients with high risk AML who are not already pharmacologically resistant to ara-C are warranted.