Search

Background: Pancreatic cancer is mainly a disease of the elderly population, but clinical trials do not reflect this age distribution. Data on treatment strategies and outcome of older patients are limited. The aim of our study was to analyze safety and outcome in elderly patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with palliative chemotherapy at the outpatient clinic of the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) at Heidelberg University Hospital., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 53 patients ≥70 years using a prospectively maintained database. Requirements were (1) histologically proven diagnosis of ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma, (2) age ≥70 at time of diagnosis of advanced disease, and (3) measurable advanced disease., Results: The median age was 73 years. 81% of the patients received a gemcitabine-based first-line therapy. Median overall survival was 6.7 months. Survival differed significantly between patient groups with low (≤1) and high (≥2) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (7.8 vs. 3.9 months, p = 0.002). 30.2% of the patients developed side effects resulting in dosage reductions. 39.6% of the patients received second-line treatment. Residual survival after disease progression was significantly longer for second-line treatment compared to best supportive care (151 vs. 39 days, p = 0.019)., Conclusions: Overall, our older patients did not have an inferior outcome compared to the reported trial populations that included younger patients. Thus, palliative chemotherapy should be considered independently from chronological age, but the performance status should be carefully noticed. Second-line therapy should be considered for patients in good performance status after first progression., (Copyright © 2014 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Adjuvant chemotherapy prolongs survival in patients with pancreatic cancer, but its benefit is limited. Long-term survival times of up to 44 months after adjuvant chemoradioimmunotherapy in phase II trials motivated the present study., Patients and Methods: Between 2004 and 2007, 132 R0/R1 resected patients received either fluorouracil (FU), cisplatin, and interferon alfa-2b (IFN α-2b) plus radiotherapy followed by two cycles of FU (arm A, n=64) or six cycles of FU monotherapy (arm B, n=68). One hundred ten patients (arm A, n=53; arm B, n=57) received at least one dose of the study medication, and these patients composed the per-protocol (PP) population. Biomarkers were analyzed longitudinally for their predictive value., Results: Median survival for all randomly assigned patients was 26.5 months (95% CI, 21.6 to 39.5 months) in arm A and 28.5 months (95% CI, 20.4 to 38.6 months) in arm B. The hazard ratio was 1.04 (arm A v arm B: 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.53; P=.99). Median survival for the PP population was 32.1 months (95% CI, 22.8 to 42.2 months) in arm A and 28.5 months (95% CI, 19.5 to 38.6 months) in arm B (P=.49). Eighty-five percent of patients in arm A and 16% of patients in arm B experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity. The quality of life was temporarily negatively affected in arm A., Conclusion: The FU, cisplatin, and IFN α-2b plus radiotherapy regimen did not improve the survival compared with FU monotherapy. Given the substantial adverse effects, this treatment can currently not be recommended. Nevertheless, the outcome in both arms represents the best survival, to our knowledge, ever reported for patients with resected pancreatic cancer in randomized controlled trials. Future studies will demonstrate whether immune response to IFN α-2b challenge has a predictive value.

Background: The 5-year survival of patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma is still unsatisfying. The ESPAC-1 and the CONKO 001 trial proofed that adjuvant chemotherapy improves 5-year survival significantly from approximately 14% to 21%. In parallel, investigators from the Virginia Mason Clinic reported a 5-year survival rate of 55% in a phase II trial evaluating a combination of adjuvant chemotherapy, immunotherapy and external beam radiation (CapRI-scheme). Two other groups confirmed in phase II trials these results to a certain extent. However, these groups reported severe gastrointestinal toxicity (up to 93% grade 3 or 4 toxicity). In a randomized controlled phase III trial, called CapRI, 110 patients were enrolled from 2004 to 2007 in Germany and Italy to check for reproducibility. Interestingly, much less gastrointestinal toxicity was observed. However, dose-reduction due to haematological side effects had to be performed in nearly all patients. First clinical results are expected for the end of 2009., Methods/design: CapRI-2 is an open, controlled, prospective, randomized, multicentre phase II trial with three parallel arms. A de-escalation of the CapRI-scheme will be tested in two different modifications. Patients in study arm A will be treated as outpatients with the complete CapRI-scheme consisting of cisplatin, Interferon alpha-2b and external beam radiation and three cycles of 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion. In study arm B the first de-escalation will be realised by omitting cisplatin. Next, patients in study arm C will additionally not receive external beam radiation. A total of 135 patients with pathologically confirmed R0 or R1 resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma are planned to be enrolled. Primary endpoint is the comparison of the treatment groups with respect to six-month event-free-survival. An event is defined as grade 3 or grade 4 toxicity, objective tumour recurrence, or death., Discussion: The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate de-escalation of the CapRI-scheme. It is hypothesised that removal of cisplatin and radiotherapy will have no significant effect or only a minor impact on the clinical response but result in substantially lower toxicity., Trial Registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN79802092.

Purpose: This trial of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group compares the use of high-dose therapy (HDT) as part of primary treatment with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) plus etoposide followed by involved-field (IF) radiotherapy in a randomized, multicenter, phase III study., Patients and Methods: Three hundred twelve patients with "aggressive" non-Hodgkin's lymphoma aged

Purpose: We report two randomized trials of adjuvant systemic therapy in 747 patients < or = 65 years of age with histologically proven node-positive breast cancer., Patients and Methods: Patients were selected for the two trials on the basis of lymph node and hormone receptor status. The only stratification was based on the treating institution. In patients with a lower probability of recurrence (n = 276), a comparison between endocrine therapy (tamoxifen [Tam] 30 mg/d for 2 years) and chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil [CMF] intravenously [IV], six cycles every 4 weeks) was performed. In patients with a higher risk of recurrence (n = 471), a comparison between chemotherapy alone (doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide [AC] i.v., eight cycles every 3 weeks) and the same chemotherapy plus Tam was made., Results: Overall, we found that CMF and Tam are equally effective in a subgroup of patients with a relatively good prognosis (low-risk patients). However, in the subset of women < or = 49 years old, a significantly greater disease-free survival (DFS) rate (P = .01) and overall survival (OS) rate (P = .002) was observed following therapy with CMF compared with Tam. In patients > or = 50 years old, the opposite was found, and Tam appeared to be superior to CMF (DFS, P = .003; OSm P = .5). These results must be interpreted cautiously, since a post-hoc stratification of patients by age (< or = 49, > or = 50) was performed, and significantly more younger, low-risk patients were randomized to receive chemotherapy alone and more older patients to receive Tam alone. Among patients with a relatively poor prognosis (high-risk patients), a combination of AC plus Tam was equivalent to AC and, when women were analyzed by age, this was found to be true of patients < or = 49 years as well. However, the addition of Tam to AC in women age > or 50 years resulted in a statistically significantly higher DFS (P = .01) and a trend toward better OS compared with women who received AC alone., Conclusion: Further trials are required to analyze the role of combined simultaneous or sequential chemoendocrine adjuvant treatment or each single therapy alone in defined risk-adapted subsets of node-negative and node-positive patients.

This prospective trial was designed to help in selecting therapy for patients with elevated and normal plasma prolactin. Ninety-two patients entered this trial, of whom 86 were evaluable for final analysis. Hyperprolactinemic patients (n = 31) were randomized to receive VAC/FMC chemotherapy with or without bromoergocryptine. Normoprolactinemic patients with 'low risk' metastatic disease (disease-free interval greater than 30 months, ER/PR positive or unknown) were treated with medroxyprogesterone acetate or VAC/FMC chemotherapy. Normoprolactinemic 'high risk' patients (n = 42) (disease-free interval less than 30 months, EP/PR negative) received VAC/FMC chemotherapy with or without medroxyprogesterone acetate (MAP). The results show that bromoergocryptine does not improve response rate, duration of response and survival. Median survival of patients with elevated basal plasma prolactin (greater than 15 ng/ml) is reduced to 9 months compared to patients with normal basal plasma prolactin (17 months, log-rank p = 0.005). Unexpectedly, TRH stimulation proved inappropriate to separate normo- and hyperprolactinemic patients in terms of survival. Normoprolactinemic 'low risks' (tamoxifen failures) were observed to qualify for further hormone therapy (median survival 21+ months). Normoprolactinemic 'high risks' showed median survival of about 12 months with no apparent benefit for those receiving MAP, additionally. The results suggest that basal hyperprolactinemia, disease free interval, ER/PR receptor status, and liver metastasis are important prognostic variables. Endocrine and cytotoxic chemotherapy should be selected according to these risk factors.

From January 1978 to December 1980, 222 patients with metastatic breast cancer were included into a prospective multicenter trial. All patients were treated once a month with six cycles of VAC- (vincristine, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy, followed by FMC (5-fluorouracil, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide) until progression was documented. By random assignment, the patients received immunostimulation with Corynebacterium parvum (CP) by one of four methods: subcutaneous (SC) on either day 1 or day 14, intravenous (IV) on either day 1 or day 14. The 214 evaluable patients were equally distributed to the four arms. The rates of complete or partial response to VAC/FMC plus CP did not differ significantly between the treatment groups. Of our patients, 22-33% were definite treatment failures. The Kaplan-Meier curves of duration of remission (medians 14 vs. 9 vs. 13 vs. 11 months) did not differ significantly. Only small differences in survival were noted among the four study groups (medians 15.4 vs. 17.5 vs. 17.2 vs. 13.0 months). However, complete and partial responders lived significantly longer (Log rank test P = 0.008), when CP was given on day 14 by the SC rather than IV route (29+ vs. 14.3 months). Patients in the four study groups were treated with virtually identical doses of VAC/FMC chemotherapy. Patients receiving CP intravenously on day 14 experienced significantly lower mean leukocyte counts than patients in the other groups. Many patients suffered from high temperature (requiring treatment with antipyretics) and severe gastrointestinal toxicity, particularly when CP was given IV on day 1 together with the chemotherapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

In a phase-III study in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of low malignancy we compared a combination therapy with vincristine (COP) with a vindesine combination (CEP). Remission rates, duration of remission and survival was favorable for the CEP combination without reaching the level of significance. The peripheral neurotoxicity of grade 2 and 3 according to WHO criteria was observed more frequently with vincristine. The vincristine-induced neurotoxicity in 6 patients was not impaired when a change was made to vindesine treatment.

The efficacy of chemotherapy with sequential methotrexate (MTX) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in metastatic colorectal cancer was studied in a multicenter phase II trial using a seven-hour time interval. Forty-two patients were evaluable for response and 16 achieved objective tumor regression (greater than 50%). Median survival of all patients was 12.5 months. The result of this study indicates that MTX and 5-FU are synergistic in human colorectal cancer if given sequentially with a seven-hour time interval. This is supported by a review of the literature that reveals a significantly higher response rate in patients treated with a four-hour or more MTX/5-FU interval as compared to a one-hour interval.

In all, 171 patients with histologically verified non-small cell lung carcinoma were treated with ifosfamide 2.0 g/m2 on days 1-5 in combination with (91 patients) etoposide 120 mg/m2 on day 1. Therapeutic regimens were repeated after 4 weeks. Supportive treatment with mesna (20% of the ifosfamide doses at 0, 4, and 8 h) was performed. Cisplatin treatment was supported by mannitol-induced diuretic hydration. The overall response rate of ifosfamide/etoposide was calculated to be 27%, with 1 complete and 24 partial remissions. The median survival time for all patients was 8.5 months, for responders 14 months (P less than 0.05), for patients with no change 9.5 months, and for patients with tumor progression 4 months. With ifosfamide/cisplatin, there were 4 complete and 21 partial remissions (response rate 35%). The median survival time for all patients was 8.3 months, for responders 11.5 months, and for patients with tumor progression 4 months. Age, sex, and histological tumor type had no significant effect on survival. Patients with better performance stage and limited disease lived significantly longer. The main side-effects of the cisplatin combination were vomiting, bone marrow depression, and neuropathy. The etoposide combination was tolerated better. Urotoxicity was not significant, as a consequence of treatment with mesna. The results show that the combination ifosfamide/etoposide or ifosfamide/cisplatin are effective in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, being comparable to other combinations of etoposide/cisplatin and vindesine/cisplatin. Because of the better tolerability, the combination ifosfamide/etoposide is superior to cisplatin combinations.