Aging of the population has led to an increase in the prevalence of cancer among older adults. In Japan, single agent chemotherapy was recommended for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for those, who were aged ≥75 years, while the Western guidelines did not recommend a specific regimen. In clinical practice, physicians are required to decide the treatment based on a lack of enough evidence. This study aimed to examine the prescribing patterns of first-line chemotherapy according to age in the real-world practice. Data from the survey database of Diagnostic Procedure Combination and hospital-based cancer registries of designated cancer centers nationwide were used. The first-line chemotherapy regimens among 9,737 patients who were diagnosed with advanced lung cancer between January and December 2013, were identified and compared based on age. We found that the proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy decreased with age; 80.0%, 70.4%, 50.6%, and 30.2% of patients aged 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, and ≥ 85 years, respectively, received chemotherapy. Among them, platinum doublets were prescribed for 62.7% of the patients who were aged ≥ 70 years, and 60.7% of the patients who were aged ≥ 75 years with no driver mutations in NSCLC; only 37.6% of them received single agents. Patients who were aged ≥ 80 years also preferred platinum doublets (35.6%). Carboplatin was commonly prescribed in all age groups; only 28.4% of those receiving platinum doublets selected cisplatin. In this study, platinum doublets were identified as the most commonly prescribed regimen in those who were aged ≥ 70 years. Despite recommendations of Japanese guidelines for NSCLC, 60.7% of those who were aged ≥75 years received platinum doublets. Additionally, patients who were aged ≥ 80 years also received systemic chemotherapy, including platinum doublets; age did not solely influence regimen selection., Competing Interests: I have read journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Ayako Okuyama reports grants and other from National Cancer Center in Japan, during the conduct of the study. Akihiro Hirakawa reports grants and personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical, and personal fees from Astellas Pharma, AbbVie, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Kissei Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, and Nippon Shinyaku, outside the submitted work. Yasushi Goto reports grants and personal fees from Eli Lilly, Chugai, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Novartis, MSD, Guardant Health, and Ono Pharmaceutical, and grants from Kyorin, and Dai-ichi Sankyo, and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, and Glaxo Smith Kline, outside the submitted work. Yasuhiro Fujiwara reports grants and committee member from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, and The Ministry of Health Labor and Welfare, Japan, during the conduct of the study, and lecture fee from Astra Zeneca KK, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Novartis Pharma KK, SRL Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb KK, and Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, outside the submitted work. Takahiro Higashi is employed by the National Cancer Center Japan, which is responsible for operating hospital-based cancer registries nationwide, during the conduct of the study, and the data collection was funded by the internal grant of National Cancer Center. Kan Yonemori reports personal fees from Novartis, Pfizer, Chugai, Eisai, Taiho, and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Shoko Noda-Narita, Asuka Kawachi, and Ryo Sadachi, have nothing to disclose. The competing interests stated do not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.