Search

Background: Checkpoint inhibitor therapy is a standard of care for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Treatment options after checkpoint inhibitor therapy include vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF-R) tyrosine kinase inhibitors, although no prospective data regarding their use in this setting exist. Axitinib is a VEGF-R inhibitor with clinical data supporting increased activity with dose titration. We aimed to investigate the activity of dose titrated axitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who were previously treated with checkpoint inhibitor., Methods: We did a multicentre, phase 2 trial of axitinib given on an individualised dosing algorithm. Patients at least 18 years of age with histologically or cytologically confirmed locally recurrent or metastatic renal cell carcinoma with clear cell histology, a Karnofsky Performance Status of 70% or more, and measurable disease who received checkpoint inhibitor therapy as the most recent treatment were eligible. There was no limit on number of previous therapies received. Patients received oral axitinib at a starting dose of 5 mg twice daily with dose titration every 14 days in 1 mg increments (ie, 5 mg twice daily to 6 mg twice daily, up to 10 mg twice daily maximum dose) if there was no axitinib-related grade 2 or higher mucositis, diarrhoea, hand-foot syndrome, or fatigue. If one or more of these grade 2 adverse events occurred, axitinib was withheld for 3 days before the same dose was resumed. Dose reductions were made if recurrent grade 2 adverse events despite treatment breaks or grade 3-4 adverse events occurred. The primary outcome was progression-free survival. Analyses were done per protocol in all patients who received at least one dose of axitinib. Recruitment has been completed and the trial is ongoing. This trial is registered with ClincalTrials.gov, number NCT02579811., Findings: Between Jan 5, 2016 and Feb 21, 2018, 40 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of study treatment. With a median follow-up of 8·7 months (IQR 3·7-14·2), the median progression-free survival was 8·8 months (95% CI 5·7-16·6). Fatigue (83%) and hypertension (75%) were the most common all-grade adverse events. The most common grade 3 adverse event was hypertension (24 patients [60%]). There was one (3%) grade 4 adverse event (elevated lipase) and no treatment-related deaths occurred. Serious adverse events that were likely related to therapy occurred in eight (20%) patients; the most common were dehydration (n=4) and diarrhoea (n=2)., Interpretation: Individualised axitinib dosing in patients with metastatic renal cell inoma previously treated with checkpoint inhibitors did not meet the prespecified threshold for progression free survival, but these data show that this individualised titration scheme is feasible and has robust clinical activity. These prospective results warrant consideration of axitinib in this setting., Funding: Pfizer., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Pancreatic cancer is the most lethal common solid malignancy. Systemic therapies are often ineffective, and predictive biomarkers to guide treatment are urgently needed. We generated a pancreatic cancer patient-derived organoid (PDO) library that recapitulates the mutational spectrum and transcriptional subtypes of primary pancreatic cancer. New driver oncogenes were nominated and transcriptomic analyses revealed unique clusters. PDOs exhibited heterogeneous responses to standard-of-care chemotherapeutics and investigational agents. In a case study manner, we found that PDO therapeutic profiles paralleled patient outcomes and that PDOs enabled longitudinal assessment of chemosensitivity and evaluation of synchronous metastases. We derived organoid-based gene expression signatures of chemosensitivity that predicted improved responses for many patients to chemotherapy in both the adjuvant and advanced disease settings. Finally, we nominated alternative treatment strategies for chemorefractory PDOs using targeted agent therapeutic profiling. We propose that combined molecular and therapeutic profiling of PDOs may predict clinical response and enable prospective therapeutic selection. Significance: New approaches to prioritize treatment strategies are urgently needed to improve survival and quality of life for patients with pancreatic cancer. Combined genomic, transcriptomic, and therapeutic profiling of PDOs can identify molecular and functional subtypes of pancreatic cancer, predict therapeutic responses, and facilitate precision medicine for patients with pancreatic cancer. Cancer Discov; 8(9); 1112-29. ©2018 AACR. See related commentary by Collisson, p. 1062 This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1047 ., (©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Little is known about the outcomes, safety, and response to subsequent therapies of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) treated with atezolizumab outside clinical trials., Objectives: The objectives of the study include to report the clinical efficacy and safety of atezolizumab, and the response to future therapies in clinical practice outside clinical trials., Patient and Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center study including consecutive patients with confirmed mUC who received at least one dose of atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks between May 2016 and April 2017., Results: Seventy-nine patients, median age 72 years (range 29-93), 71% men and 76% ECOG PS 0-1, were identified. Most patients (79%) had primary cancer in the bladder, 62% had prior surgery, and 75% received at least one prior line of treatment (34 patients had prior cisplatin-based chemotherapy). Best response included 18% partial response, 29% stable disease, and 53% progressive disease. Patients were on atezolizumab for a median of 2.7 months (95%CI, 1.8-3.6) and median PFS was 3.2 months (95%CI, 1.6-4.8). A total of 33 (42%) patients had significant (any cause) AEs, including grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia in two patients; no toxic deaths were reported. At time of data analysis, only 18% of patients received at least one subsequent line of treatment for a median of 1.8 months (95%CI, 0.0-5.0) while 42% were referred to palliative care/hospice or died., Conclusions: Patients with mUC who progressed on atezolizumab were unlikely to receive subsequent systemic treatments and the benefit of those treatments appeared limited in our cohort. The findings may impact timing and designs of clinical trials in mUC.

Background: Given the variability in drug levels with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), dose escalation at the occurrence of progressive disease (PD) might have antitumor effects., Patients and Methods: The data from patients with mRCC who were treated at the Cleveland Clinic with TKIs and received a dose escalation after PD in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1, were retrospectively reviewed. Patient- and disease-related data were collected and summarized as frequency counts and percentages or medians and ranges. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to summarize the treatment duration for the escalated doses., Results: Twenty-two patients were identified. Most patients (82%) were men; the median age at diagnosis was 58 years (range, 40-71 years). The most common histologic type was clear cell (73%). Axitinib was the most frequently escalated agent after PD (17 patients), followed by sunitinib (3 patients), and pazopanib (2 patients). Before PD, the median treatment duration was 6.8 months (range, 1.6-50.6 months). Of the 18 patients with evaluable tumor measurements after dose escalation, 14 (78%) had a decrease in tumor burden. The median decrease in tumor burden after dose escalation was 14% (range, 2%-58%); 4 patients (22%) had decreases ≥10%, 2 (11%) ≥20%, and 4 (22%) >30% (RECIST partial response). At the last follow-up examination, 5 patients (23%) continued to be treated at escalated doses. The median duration of escalated therapy was estimated at 10.1 months (range, 0.6 to 37.9 months)., Conclusion: Dose escalation of TKIs after PD for select patients with mRCC can lead to a reduction in tumor burden and extend the duration of therapy., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Somatic mutations have the potential to encode "non-self" immunogenic antigens. We hypothesized that tumors with a large number of somatic mutations due to mismatch-repair defects may be susceptible to immune checkpoint blockade., Methods: We conducted a phase 2 study to evaluate the clinical activity of pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed death 1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, in 41 patients with progressive metastatic carcinoma with or without mismatch-repair deficiency. Pembrolizumab was administered intravenously at a dose of 10 mg per kilogram of body weight every 14 days in patients with mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancers, patients with mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancers, and patients with mismatch repair-deficient cancers that were not colorectal. The coprimary end points were the immune-related objective response rate and the 20-week immune-related progression-free survival rate., Results: The immune-related objective response rate and immune-related progression-free survival rate were 40% (4 of 10 patients) and 78% (7 of 9 patients), respectively, for mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancers and 0% (0 of 18 patients) and 11% (2 of 18 patients) for mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancers. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were not reached in the cohort with mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer but were 2.2 and 5.0 months, respectively, in the cohort with mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancer (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.10 [P<0.001], and hazard ratio for death, 0.22 [P=0.05]). Patients with mismatch repair-deficient noncolorectal cancer had responses similar to those of patients with mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer (immune-related objective response rate, 71% [5 of 7 patients]; immune-related progression-free survival rate, 67% [4 of 6 patients]). Whole-exome sequencing revealed a mean of 1782 somatic mutations per tumor in mismatch repair-deficient tumors, as compared with 73 in mismatch repair-proficient tumors (P=0.007), and high somatic mutation loads were associated with prolonged progression-free survival (P=0.02)., Conclusions: This study showed that mismatch-repair status predicted clinical benefit of immune checkpoint blockade with pembrolizumab. (Funded by Johns Hopkins University and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01876511.).

Inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway frequently induce hypertension when used to treat patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This analysis characterizes hypertension and hypertension-related events in patients treated with the VEGF pathway inhibitors axitinib or sorafenib in the AXIS trial. AXIS was a randomized phase III study of axitinib versus sorafenib in patients with metastatic RCC following failure of one prior systemic regimen. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension were excluded, but patients with hypertension controlled with antihypertensive medication were allowed to participate. Guidelines for hypertension management included adjustment or addition of antihypertensive medications and/or axitinib or sorafenib dose reductions, interruptions, or discontinuations. Treatment-emergent all-causality hypertension occurred in 145 (40.4 %) axitinib-treated patients (N = 359) and 103 (29.0 %) sorafenib-treated patients (N = 355), with grade 3 hypertension reported in 55 (15.3 %) and 38 (10.7 %) patients, respectively, and grade 4 hypertension reported in one (0.3 %) patient in each arm. Hypertension-related events led to axitinib dose interruptions (n = 46; 12.8 %), dose reductions (n = 16; 4.5 %), or discontinuations (n = 1; 0.3 %). Approximately 50 % of axitinib-treated patients with grade 3 or 4 hypertension continued treatment for ≥ 9 months. Hypertension-related sequelae occurred in <1 % of axitinib-treated patients. Hypertension was more frequently observed during treatment with axitinib than sorafenib in patients with RCC, but axitinib-induced hypertension rarely led to treatment discontinuation or cardiovascular sequelae. Recommendations for monitoring blood pressure and managing hypertension during axitinib therapy are presented.

Unlabelled: Neoadjuvant sunitinib might downsize unresectable renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and enable nephrectomy in a subset of patients. After neoadjuvant sunitinib in 27 RCC patients, tumors were resected in 13 patients. Higher attenuation using computed tomography (CT) scans and favorable response according to Morphology, Attenuation, Size, and Structure (MASS) criteria after 2 cycles of sunitinib were independent predictors of subsequent tumor resection., Introduction: In patients with locally advanced and metastatic RCC, selection criteria for nephrectomy are imprecise. Neoadjuvant sunitinib might downsize unresectable tumors and enable nephrectomy. CT scans of unresectable primary RCCs before and after neoadjuvant sunitinib were retrospectively reviewed to identify radiographic features associated with patient selection for surgery., Patients and Methods: CT scans of 27 patients with RCC (31 tumors) treated with neoadjuvant sunitinib were performed as part of a prospective clinical trial. After neoadjuvant sunitinib, tumors were surgically resected in 13 patients (17 tumors) and not resected in 14 patients (14 tumors). Response to treatment with sunitinib was assessed with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and MASS criteria., Results: On the contrast-enhanced CT scan before nephrectomy compared with the baseline CT scan, 88% of resected tumors demonstrated decreased size (median decrease 26%; -2.0 cm; P < .001), 88% had decreased attenuation (median decrease 30%; -27 Hounsfield units; P = .004), and 76% had increased necrosis (P < .001). Response to sunitinib was significantly more favorable (according to MASS criteria) in resected than in nonresected tumors (P = .005). In addition, the degree of baseline necrosis was less in tumors subsequently resected than in nonresected tumors (P = .05). Multivariate analysis showed that higher tumor attenuation after 2 cycles of sunitinib therapy and a favorable response (MASS criteria) after 2 cycles of sunitinib therapy were independent predictors of subsequent tumor resection., Conclusion: In unresectable primary RCC tumors, changes in select CT parameters after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant sunitinib might be associated with the potential for surgical resection., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Long-term survival rates for patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have stagnated at 20% for more than a decade, demonstrating the need to develop novel adjuvant therapies. Gemcitabine-erlotinib therapy has demonstrated a survival benefit for patients with metastatic PDAC. Here we report the first phase 2 study of erlotinib in combination with adjuvant chemoradiation and chemotherapy for resected PDAC., Methods and Materials: Forty-eight patients with resected PDAC received adjuvant erlotinib (100 mg daily) and capecitabine (800 mg/m(2) twice daily Monday-Friday) concurrently with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), 50.4 Gy over 28 fractions followed by 4 cycles of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days) and erlotinib (100 mg daily). The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS)., Results: The median follow-up time was 18.2 months (interquartile range, 13.8-27.1). Lymph nodes were positive in 85% of patients, and margins were positive in 17%. The median RFS was 15.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.4-17.9), and the median overall survival (OS) was 24.4 months (95% CI, 18.9-29.7). Multivariate analysis with adjustment for known prognostic factors showed that tumor diameter >3 cm was predictive for inferior RFS (hazard ratio, 4.01; P=.001) and OS (HR, 4.98; P=.02), and the development of dermatitis was associated with improved RFS (HR, 0.27; P=.009). During CRT and post-CRT chemotherapy, the rates of grade 3/4 toxicity were 31%/2% and 35%/8%, respectively., Conclusion: Erlotinib can be safely administered with adjuvant IMRT-based CRT and chemotherapy. The efficacy of this regimen appears comparable to that of existing adjuvant regimens. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0848 will ultimately determine whether erlotinib produces a survival benefit in patients with resected pancreatic cancer., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The current treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted agents is continuous therapy until progression of disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Chronic mild to moderate toxicity and risk of long-term toxicity ensue for some patients. It is hypothesized that patients with an initial response to treatment can maintain disease control off all therapy for a period of time., Methods: A retrospective study of patients with mRCC who initiated VEGF-targeted therapy between January 2004 and December 2009 at The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, or Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France, was conducted. Patients had achieved RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors)-defined stable disease or better on therapy, and were then taken off all therapy for reasons not including disease progression. Patient, disease, and therapy characteristics were recorded. The primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS), measured as the time from discontinuation of therapy to RECIST-defined PD., Results: Forty patients were identified. After a median follow-up of 29.7 months (range, 4.2 to 84.7 months), 25 patients (63%) had PD off therapy (median PFS, 10.0 months; range, 1.4-27.2 months). Among these patients, 8 (32%) had progression in sites that were not previously involved with disease. Heng risk group (hazard ratio, 2.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-5.22; P = .011) and achievement of a complete response prior to discontinuing therapy (hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.86; P = .025) were independent predictors of PFS in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model., Conclusions: A select subset of mRCC patients achieving stable disease or better on VEGF-targeted therapy can be observed off all therapy. Further prospective investigation is warranted., (Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.)

Purpose: We investigated the effect of sunitinib on locally advanced primary renal carcinoma tumors and the ability to facilitate subsequent surgery., Materials and Methods: Patients with an unresectable primary renal tumor, with or without distant metastases, received 50 mg sunitinib with continuous daily dosing in a phase II trial. Computerized tomography was performed every 12 weeks to determine surgical resectability. The primary end point of the trial was the percentage of patients with renal cell carcinoma and initially unresectable primary tumors who could undergo nephrectomy after sunitinib therapy., Results: Of 30 patients enrolled in the study (19 with distant metastases) 28 (35 total renal tumors) were evaluable for response. The median change in primary renal cell carcinoma tumors was a 22% decrease, corresponding to a median absolute reduction of 1.2 cm. The median reduction in primary renal cell carcinoma tumors of clear cell histology was -28% (absolute reduction 1.7 cm) compared to a 1.4% increase (0.1 cm absolute increase) in nonclear cell tumors. Of these patients 13 (45%) met the primary end point of being able to undergo nephrectomy after preoperative sunitinib. All patients had viable renal cell carcinoma in the surgical specimen and surgical morbidity was consistent with prior experience of nephrectomy in patients without preoperative therapy., Conclusions: Sunitinib as initial therapy in patients with locally advanced features of the primary tumor was feasible and resulted in an antitumor effect that enabled subsequent surgery in a subset of patients. Further prospective study is required to refine the most suitable application of this approach., (Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

There are many important considerations during preclinical development of cancer nanomedicines, including: 1) unique aspects of animal study design; 2) the difficulties in evaluating biological potency, especially for complex formulations; 3) the importance of analytical methods that can determine platform stability in vivo, and differentiate bound and free active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) in biological matrices; and 4) the appropriateness of current dose scaling techniques for estimation of clinical first-in-man dose from preclinical data. Biologics share many commonalities with nanotechnology products with regard to complexity and biological attributes, and can, in some cases, provide context for dealing with these preclinical issues. In other instances, such as the case of in vivo stability analysis, new approaches are required. This paper will discuss the significance of these preclinical issues, and present examples of current methods and best practices for addressing them. Where possible, these recommendations are justified using the existing regulatory guidance literature., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Treatment options for renal cell carcinoma have changed dramatically since 2005 when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved six new therapies. These agents inhibit pathways relevant in the pathogenesis of renal cell carcinoma, interfering with tumor angiogenesis, cell progression, and metastasis. Understanding the pharmacology of these agents is necessary for clinicians to provide appropriate patient education, assure adherence with the treatment plan, and facilitate early identification and intervention for side effects. These activities will provide positive clinical outcomes.

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and safety of axitinib, an oral, potent, and selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors 1, 2, and 3 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) refractory to prior therapies that included, but were not limited to, sorafenib., Patients and Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, phase II study, patients with sorafenib-refractory mRCC received a starting dose of axitinib 5 mg orally twice daily. A one-arm, single-stage design was used to estimate the primary end point of objective response rate (ORR), defined by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors). Secondary end points included safety, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and patient-reported outcomes., Results: Of 62 patients recruited, 100% had received prior sorafenib, and 74.2% had received two or more prior systemic treatments. The axitinib dose was titrated to greater than 5 mg twice daily in 53.2% of patients, and 35.5% of patients had the dose modified to less than 5 mg twice daily. In 62 patients evaluable for response, the ORR was 22.6%, and the median duration of response was 17.5 months. Median PFS and OS times were 7.4 months (95% CI, 6.7 to 11.0 months) and 13.6 months (95% CI, 8.4 to 18.8 months), respectively. All-causality grade 3 to 4 adverse events included hand-foot syndrome (16.1%), fatigue (16.1%), hypertension (16.1%), dyspnea (14.5%), diarrhea (14.5%), dehydration (8.1%), and hypotension (6.5%)., Conclusion: Axitinib has antitumor activity in patients with mRCC refractory to prior VEGF-targeted therapy, including sorafenib. Toxicities were mild to moderate and were manageable. A randomized, phase III trial to compare axitinib with sorafenib in patients who have mRCC refractory to one prior first-line therapy regimen is underway.

Purpose: Immune dysfunction reported in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients may contribute to tumor progression. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) represent one mechanism by which tumors induce T-cell suppression. Several factors pivotal to the accumulation of MDSC are targeted by the tyrosine kinase inhibitor, sunitinib. The effect of sunitinib on MDSC-mediated immunosuppression in RCC patients has been investigated., Experimental Design: Patient peripheral blood levels of MDSC and regulatory T-cell (Treg) and T-cell production of IFN-gamma were evaluated before and after sunitinib treatment. Correlations between MDSC and Treg normalization as well as T-cell production of IFN-gamma were examined. The in vitro effect of sunitinib on patient MDSC was evaluated., Results: Metastatic RCC patients had elevated levels of CD33(+)HLA-DR(-) and CD15(+)CD14(-) MDSC, and these were partially overlapping populations. Treatment with sunitinib resulted in significant reduction in MDSC measured by several criteria. Sunitinib-mediated reduction in MDSC was correlated with reversal of type 1 T-cell suppression, an effect that could be reproduced by the depletion of MDSC in vitro. MDSC reduction in response to sunitinib correlated with a reversal of CD3(+)CD4(+)CD25(hi)Foxp3(+) Treg cell elevation. No correlation existed between a change in tumor burden and a change in MDSC, Treg, or T-cell production of IFN-gamma. In vitro addition of sunitinib reduced MDSC viability and suppressive effect when used at >/=1.0 microg/mL. Sunitinib did not induce MDSC maturation in vitro., Conclusions: Sunitinib-based therapy has the potential to modulate antitumor immunity by reversing MDSC-mediated tumor-induced immunosuppression.

Purpose: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with sarcomatoid differentiation is an aggressive disease that is associated with poor outcomes to chemotherapy or immunotherapy. The utility of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy in patients with this disease is unknown., Patients and Methods: Patients who had mRCC with sarcomatoid features in the primary tumor and who were treated with VEGF-targeted therapy were retrospectively identified. Pathology slides were reviewed to determine the percentage of sarcomatoid differentiation. Objective response rate, percentage of tumor burden shrinkage, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were determined., Results: Forty-three patients who had sarcomatoid mRCC were identified. The median percentage of sarcomatoid features was 14% (range, 3% to 90%). Patients were treated with either sunitinib (49%), sorafenib (28%), bevacizumab (19%), or sunitinib plus bevacizumab (5%). Partial responses were observed in eight patients (19%); 21 patients (49%) had stable disease; and 14 patients (33%) had progressive disease as their best response. Partial responses were limited to patients who had underlying clear-cell histology and less than 20% sarcomatoid elements. Median tumor shrinkage was -2% (range, -85% to 127%), and 53% achieved some degree of tumor shrinkage on therapy. Median PFS and OS were estimated to be 5.3 months and 11.8 months, respectively., Conclusion: Patients who have mRCC and sarcomatoid differentiation can demonstrate objective responses and tumor shrinkage to VEGF-targeted therapy. Patients who have clear-cell histology and a lower percentage of sarcomatoid differentiation may have better outcomes with VEGF-targeted therapy.

Purpose: Immune dysfunction is well documented in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients and likely contributes to tumor evasion. This dysfunction includes a shift from a type-1 to a type-2 T-cell cytokine response and enhanced T-regulatory (Treg) cell expression. Given the antitumor activity of select tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as sunitinib in metastatic RCC (mRCC) patients, it is relevant to assess their effect on the immune system., Experimental Design: Type-1 (IFNgamma) and type-2 (interleukin-4) responses were assessed in T cells at baseline and day 28 of treatment with sunitinib (50 mg/d) by measuring intracellular cytokines after in vitro stimulation with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 antibodies., Results: After one cycle of treatment, there was a significant increase in the percentage of IFNgamma-producing T cells (CD3(+), P < 0.001; CD3(+)CD4(+), P = 0.001), a reduction in interleukin-4 production (CD3(+) cells, P = 0.05), and a diminished type-2 bias (P = 0.005). The increase in type-1 response may be partly related to modulation of Treg cells. The increased percentage of Treg cells noted in mRCC patients over healthy donors (P = 0.001) was reduced after treatment, although not reaching statistical significance. There was, however, an inverse correlation between the increase in type-1 response after two cycles of treatment and a decrease in the percentage of Treg cells (r = -0.64, P = 0.01). In vitro studies suggest that the effects of sunitinib on Treg cells are indirect., Conclusions: The demonstration that sunitinib improved type-1 T-cell cytokine response in mRCC patients while reducing Treg function provides a basis for the rational combination of sunitinib and immunotherapy in mRCC.

Background: Sunitinib and sorafenib are small molecules that inhibit the vascular endothelial growth factor and related receptors with substantial clinical activity reported in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Cytopenia and macrocytosis have been described in patients treated with these agents., Methods: A retrospective review of all patients with metastatic RCC who were treated with sunitinib or sorafenib for at least 3 months at the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute was undertaken. Complete blood count (CBC) data including red blood cell indices were recorded at baseline, after 3 months of therapy, and at the end of treatment., Results: A total of 61 patients were treated with sunitinib and 37 patients were treated with sorafenib with available CBC data. In patients treated with sunitinib, the median corpuscular volume (MCV) increased significantly at 3 months compared with baseline (median increase of 5.1 femtoliters [fL]; P < .001) and continued to increase throughout treatment. Patients who developed hypothyroidism had a larger MCV increase at 3 months than patients who remained euthyroid (P = .06), although macrocytosis was observed in patients without hypothyroidism. Ten patients discontinued sunitinib therapy, and the MCV decreased in all patients within 2 to 4 months, without further intervention. Bone marrow analysis of 4 patients revealed a hypocellular bone marrow with trilineage hematopoiesis and no evidence of metastasis. There was no evidence of folate or vitamin B12 deficiency. In contrast to sunitinib, there was no change in the MCV for patients treated with sorafenib., Conclusions: Macrocytosis was a common occurrence after treatment with sunitinib but not sorafenib in patients with metastatic RCC. Sunitinib-induced macrocytosis is reversible with drug discontinuation., ((c) 2008 American Cancer Society.)

Purpose: The von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene is often inactivated (by mutation or promoter hypermethylation) in renal cell carcinoma but the relation to therapeutic outcome is unclear., Materials and Methods: Patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma with available baseline tumor samples who received vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapy were included in analysis. Patient characteristics, VHL gene status and clinical outcome were documented. Our primary end point was to test for response rate in relation to VHL inactivation. Progression-free survival and overall survival in relation to VHL status were investigated as secondary end points., Results: A total of 123 patients were evaluable. Response rate, median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 37% (95% CI 28-46), 10.8 (95% CI 7.7-14.8) and 29.8 (CI not estimable) months, respectively. Patients with VHL inactivation had a response rate of 41% vs 31% for those with wild-type VHL (p = 0.34). Patients with loss of function mutations (frameshift, nonsense, splice and in-frame deletions/insertions) had a 52% response rate vs 31% with wild-type VHL (p = 0.04). On multivariate analysis the presence of a loss of function mutation remained an independent prognostic factor associated with improved response. Progression-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different based on VHL status., Conclusions: To our knowledge this is the largest analysis investigating the impact of VHL inactivation on the outcome of vascular endothelial growth factor targeted agents in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. We did not find a statistically significant increase in response to vascular endothelial growth factor targeted agents in patients with VHL inactivation. Loss of function mutations identified a population of patients with a greater response. Investigation of downstream markers is under way.

Purpose: Antiangiogenic therapy with sunitinib and sorafenib has become the standard of care for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. However, the clinical benefit of these agents after prior antiangiogenic therapy has not been defined. Currently, several agents with a putative antiangiogenic mechanism exist and they are often being used in sequence with little to no data regarding activity in a second line or later setting., Materials and Methods: Patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma currently being treated with either sunitinib or sorafenib after receiving 1 or more prior antiangiogenic agent(s) were investigated in a retrospective analysis. Time to progression and the overall response rate by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors were evaluated., Results: Thirty patients receiving current sunitinib (16 patients) or sorafenib (14 patients) were identified. Patients received 1 or more prior antiangiogenic therapies: thalidomide, lenalidomide, bevacizumab, volociximab, AG13736, sorafenib or sunitinib. Of 16 patients treated with sunitinib 13 had some degree of tumor shrinkage, including 9 with a partial response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Of 14 patients treated with sorafenib 10 had some degree of tumor shrinkage, including 1 with a partial response. The median time to progression for the entire cohort was 10.4 months., Conclusions: Significant antitumor activity is observed when sorafenib or sunitinib are used in patients who have failed prior therapy with an antiangiogenic agent. Prior response to an antiangiogenic agent does not appear to predict subsequent clinical benefit to either sunitinib or sorafenib.

Sunitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Complete responses (CRs) to sunitinib have been documented in the literature. However, a detailed description and analysis of these patients is lacking. Seventy-four patients receiving sunitinib at the Cleveland Clinic in first-, second-, and third-line clinical trials were reviewed to determine the number of patients with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)-defined CRs and patients who have achieved near CRs (nCRs) with a > 90% reduction in composite tumor volume or residual disease of 22 months while on maintenance sunitinib. The patients who obtained CRs had nonbulky pulmonary metastases, had favorable or intermediate Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center risk profiles, were treated with sunitinib in the first-line setting, and had a significant reduction in composite tumor measurements within the first 2 cycles. Two additional patients achieved nCRs, including a patient who had previously progressed on bevacizumab. Finally, 1 patient achieved sufficient downstaging and reduction of tumor volume such that the remaining lesion could be excised to produce a surgical CR. Sunitinib is capable of producing durable CRs in patients with cytokine-naive, metastatic RCC who have nonbulky pulmonary metastases. Additionally, nCRs can be seen despite nonpulmonary metastatic sites and previous VEGF-targeted therapy.

Diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) frequently occurs at advanced stages, severely limiting the success of treatment, and median survival is barely more than a year. Previously, treatment of renal cancer was limited to nephrectomy or immunotherapy (interleukin or interferon-alpha), which was effective in a small subset of patients but often was accompanied by severe side effects. New orally administered targeted therapies have become available, offering broader benefits to patients with advanced RCC. Sorafenib is an oral, multikinase inhibitor recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as treatment for advanced RCC based on its extension of median progression-free survival from 12-24 weeks. Oncology nurses must ensure patient adherence and manage side effects of emerging treatments. This article reviews the management of skin rash, hand-foot skin reaction, hypertension, diarrhea, and fatigue in patients receiving sorafenib. In addition, a case study of a patient receiving sorafenib is presented.

Sunitinib is an inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptors, and it has antitumor activity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. To further investigate the fatigue associated with sunitinib therapy, thyroid function tests were performed on patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who were receiving sunitinib. Seventy-three patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma were treated with sunitinib at the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, and 66 of them had thyroid function test results available. Fifty-six (85%) of the 66 patients had one or more abnormality in their thyroid function test results, consistent with hypothyroidism, and 47 (84%) of the 56 patients with abnormal thyroid function tests had signs and/or symptoms possibly related to hypothyroidism. Thyroid hormone replacement was undertaken in 17 patients, and symptoms improved in nine of them. Thyroid function test abnormalities appear to be common in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib, and routine monitoring is warranted.

Background: A pilot study was conducted to investigate the toxicity and tolerance to low-dose subcutaneous interleukin-2 (IL-2) for patients with resected renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at high risk for recurrent disease (TNM stages III and IV resected distant metastases)., Patients and Methods: Patients with surgically resected locally advanced (T3-4 or N1-2) or metastatic RCC were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups that received different dose levels and schedules of subcutaneous IL-2 as follows: dose level 1, 4 MIU/m2 per day, every other week for 24 weeks (n = 10); dose level 2, 8 MIU/m2 per day, every other week for 24 weeks (n = 9); dose level 3, 4 MIU/m2 per day, weeks 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20 (n = 11); and dose level 4, 8 MIU/m2 per day, weeks 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20 (n = 10). Interleukin-2 was administered in 2 daily doses on days 1-5 of each week indicated. A dose level was considered tolerable if no more than 2 patients experienced grade 3/4 toxicity., Results: Forty-one patients were entered in the study and 40 were evaluable for toxicity. Therapy was well tolerated at all dose levels and schedules, with most patients (98%) experiencing mild-to-moderate constitutional symptoms. Grade 3/4 toxicity was seen in 8 patients (20%). Interleukin-2 dose reductions were required in 7 patients, and no patient discontinued therapy secondary to toxicity. Of 39 patients evaluable for efficacy, 31 have experienced relapse (79%), and 15 have died (38%). Median survival was 1.4 years, and the 3-year disease-free survival rate was 33%. Median overall survival has not been reached; however, the 3-year survival rate was 70%. There was no statistically significant difference between any of the treatment arms with respect to disease-free survival or 3-year survival (P > 0.54 and P >or= 0.09 for all pairwise comparisons), schedules (dose level 1/2 vs. 3/4; P = 0.46 and P = 0.5), or dose of IL-2 administered (dose level 1/3 vs. 2/4; P = 0.99 and P = 0.1)., Conclusion: Subcutaneous IL-2 was well tolerated for 6 months in patients with surgically resected RCC at high risk of recurrence. Future adjuvant trials in this setting are not likely to include IL-2 in view of the clinical efficacy and favorable toxicity profiles of selected multitargeted kinase inhibitors.

JM-216 is an orally bioavailable platinum compound with activity against many tumor models. The objective of this study was to determine the safety profile and anti-tumor activity of JM-216 in patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) when given orally daily x 5 days. In this open label phase II study JM-216 was administered orally at the dose of 120 mg/m2/d for 5 days every 4 weeks. Patients continued on the therapy until evidence of disease progression or intolerable toxicity developed. Dose escalation and de-escalation were allowed according to patient's tolerance. Thirty-nine patients were enrolled onto the study and received a total of 155 courses (median 2, range 1-16) of JM-216. Dose delays (77% of courses) and dose reductions (31% of courses) were common and were mainly due to myelosupression. Treatment was discontinued in 5 patients due to treatment related toxicities. One patient developed myelodysplastic syndrome 11 months after the start of treatment. The most frequent grade III or higher adverse events included thrombocytopenia (54%), neutropenia (52%), anemia (24%) nausea (13%), vomiting (16%) and diarrhea (28%). PSA response was assessed in 32 patients, 10 (26%) had partial response, 14 (36%) had stable disease while PSA progression was seen in 8 (21%) patients. Of 20 (54%) patients with measurable disease two patients had a documented partial response. Although JM-216 had moderate activity in HRPC when given on daily basis for 5 days, it is associated with significant treatment related toxicities in this patient population.

Background: A phase I study using recombinant human interleukin-4 (rhuIL-4) administered as a continuous intravenous infusion was conducted in patients with advanced cancer to study the toxicity profile and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of this cytokine., Methods: Twenty-six patients with non-hematologic malignancies were treated with escalating doses of rhuIL-4 administered as 24-hour continuous intravenous infusion on days 1-5 and 15-19 every 28 days. The dose levels of rhuIL-4 were: dose level I-0.25 microg/kg/day (3 patients), dose level II-0.5 microg/kg/day (5 patients), dose level III-1.0 microg/kg/day (3 patients), dose level IV-2.0 microg/kg/day (10 patients) and dose level V-4.0 microg/kg/day (5 patients)., Results: Dose limiting toxicity of continuous infusion rhuIL-4 occurred at 4.0 microg/kg/day D1-5 and 15-19, in three of five patients and consisted of hematologic (thrombocytopenia and prolongation of PT) and neurologic (headache and neurocortical toxicity) toxicity. A mild flu-like syndrome characterized by fever, chills, fatigue, headache, anorexia, arthralgias and myalgias was seen almost universally, occurred more commonly and with increasing severity with higher dose levels and resolved completely on discontinuing therapy with rhuIL-4. None of the enrolled patients had an objective response to treatment with continuous infusion rhuIL-4., Conclusions: A five-day continuous infusion of rhuIL-4 given biweekly is well tolerated with a MTD of 2.0 microg/kg/day.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved clinical outcomes in many malignancies, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Awareness of potential adverse events and effective management of these toxicities is critical to maximizing clinical outcomes. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib is approved as front-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC), making it the first checkpoint inhibitor and tyrosine kinase inhibitor combination approved for any malignancy. Given overlapping toxicities with this combination, the toxicity profile of each drug must be considered when assessing and managing toxicities in patients treated with pembrolizumab and axitinib. Use of online resources, including published guidelines from ASCO, the Immuno-Oncology Essentials Web site, and other organizations, can assist oncology and nononcology health care professionals to more effectively manage toxicities, maximize clinical outcomes, and improve quality of life for patients with aRCC. Herein, we describe a case of a patient with aRCC treated with pembrolizumab and axitinib, highlighting a systematic approach to toxicity management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND Multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have antitumor activity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Resistance to these agents develops frequently, and their use is often limited by intolerance. Ramucirumab is a recombinant human monoclonal antibody directed against human vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. For this study, the authors investigated the clinical efficacy and safety of ramucirumab in patients with TKI-resistant/intolerant mRCC. METHODS In this single-arm phase 2 trial, patients received ramucirumab 8 mg/kg every 2 weeks until they developed disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the best objective response rate (ORR); additional endpoints included the disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), the median duration of overall response, and safety. RESULTS Thirty-nine patients with RCC received ramucirumab monotherapy. Prior TKI therapy included sunitinib (59% of patients), sunitinib and sorafenib (30.8% of patients), and sorafenib (10.3% of patients). The ORR was 5.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6%-17.3%). The 12-week DCR was 64.1% (95% CI, 47.2%-78.8%). The median PFS was 7.1 months (95% CI, 4.1-9.7 months), and the median overall survival was 24.8 months (95% CI, 18.9-32.6 months). Grade 3 or higher adverse events that occurred in ≥5% of patients included grade 3 hypertension (7.7%) and proteinuria (5.1%). There was 1 on-study death from multiorgan failure. CONCLUSIONS Although the study did not meet its primary endpoint of ≥15% ORR, ramucirumab was associated with evidence of antitumor activity in patients with TKI-resistant/intolerant mRCC. Ramucirumab was safe and well tolerated. Cancer 2014;120:1647-1655. © 2014 American Cancer Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The multitargeted tyrosine-kinase inhibitor sunitinib has emerged as one of the standards of care for good and intermediate-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Although generally associated with acceptable toxicity, sunitinib exhibits a novel and distinct toxicity profile that requires monitoring and management. Fatigue, diarrhea, anorexia, oral changes, hand-foot syndrome and other skin toxicity, thyroid dysfunction, myelotoxicity, and hypertension seem to be the most common and clinically relevant toxicities of sunitinib. Drug dosing and treatment duration are correlated with response to treatment and survival. Treatment recommendations for hypertension have been published but, currently, no standard guidelines exist for the management of noncardiovascular side effects. To discuss the optimal management of noncardiovascular side effects, an international, interdisciplinary panel of experts gathered in November 2009. Existing literature on incidence, severity, and underlying mechanisms of side effects as well as on potential treatment options were carefully reviewed and discussed. On the basis of these proceedings and the thorough review of the existing literature, recommendations were made for the monitoring, prevention, and treatment of the most common noncardiovascular side effects and are summarized in this review. The proactive assessment and consistent and timely management of sunitinib-related side effects are critical to ensure optimal treatment benefit by allowing appropriate drug dosing and prolonged treatment periods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Advances in the understanding of the biology of renal cell carcinoma have led to recent approval of several new agents including drugs that target vascular endothelial growth factor. Sunitinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor which interferes with multiple intracellular tumorogenic pathways, and has demonstrated impressive antitumor activity in phase II and subsequently improvement in progression free survival in phase III renal cancer trials. We review the unique side effects of sunitinibtherapy with emphasis on establishing effective patient education for anticipation and early management of therapy-related side effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. The anticancer multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) are associated with cutaneous adverse events, including hand--foot skin reaction (HFSR), a condition affecting 20%--40% of patients. Symptoms are usually mild, but can evolve into a painful condition that limits function and impacts quality of life (QoL), resulting in shortened cancer treatment duration or intensity. The goal of this study was to systematically review the literature on the prevention and palliation of MKI-associated HFSR, to identify areas for further clinical study, and to provide a foundation for evidence-based guidelines for HFSR management. Methods. Systematic searches of the National Library of Medicine's PubMed database, Cochrane Reviews, BIOSIS, CancerLit, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology website were conducted using search terms for cutaneous toxicities associated with chemotherapeutic agents. Articles were categorized (C) based on type of agent and cutaneous reaction as: C1 (MKI and HFSR); C2 (MKI and other cutaneous toxicity); C3 (other antineoplastic agents and HFSR); and C4, other. Results. Of the 2,069 abstracts screened, 350 (17%) met the criteria for C1--C4, with 56 (16%) coded as C1 with details of HFSR histology, pathogenesis, clinical outcome, QoL impact, and/or prevention and treatment approaches in MKI-treated patients. No randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) on prevention/palliation of HFSR were identified. Anecdotal evidence or expert opinion advocated protective measures, preventive and therapeutic skin care, systemic analgesics for pain, vitamin B6, and MKI dose modification. Conclusion. No articles containing evidence from RCTs on preventive/palliative approaches to MKI-associated HFSR have been published. Systematic study of optimal treatment strategies for HFSR is needed to advance development of evidence-based treatment guidelines. The Oncologist 2009;14:291--302 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The multitargeted kinase inhibitors (MKIs) sorafenib and sunitinib have shown benefit in patients with renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma (sorafenib), and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (sunitinib). Their efficacy in other malignancies is currently being investigated because of their broad range of activity. The effectiveness of these drugs is somewhat diminished by the development of a variety of toxicities, most notably hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR). Although HFSR does not appear to directly affect survival, it can impact quality of life and lead to MKI dose modification or interruption, potentially limiting the antitumor effect. Currently, no standard guidelines exist for the prevention and management of MKI-associated HFSR. To address this issue, an international, interdisciplinary panel of experts gathered in January 2008 to discuss and evaluate the best-practice management of these reactions. Based on these proceedings, recommendations for the management of HFSR have been provided to offer patients the best possible quality of life while taking these drugs and to optimize the patient benefit associated with MKI therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pegylated interferon α-2b (PEG-Intron®) is a conjugate of polyethylene glycol (PEG) and interferon alpha-2b, has a prolonged half-life, and an increased area under the curve (AUC) for interferon α-2b. The combination of PEG-Intron® with recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) was investigated in a phase 1 trial. To determine the maximal tolerable dose (MTD) and preliminary efficacy of concurrent subcutaneous (SC) administration of PEG-Intron® and rIL-2 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Cohorts of 3–6 patients received escalating doses of PEG-Intron® (I-1.5, II- 1.5, III-3.0, IV-3.0, V-4.5 μg/kg SC) given weekly in combination with rIL-2 administered three times weekly (TIW) for 6 weeks. rIL-2 dose levels were escalated in weeks 1 and 4 (I-10.0, II-15.0, III-15.0, IV-20.0, V-20.0 MIU/m2 SC), and 5.0 MIU/m2 SC TIW was administered during weeks 2, 3, 5 and 6. Thirty-four patients (24 men; 10 women) were accrued at dose levels I ( n = 4), II ( n = 4), III ( n = 6), IV ( n = 14), and V ( n = 6) between October 2000 and October 2002. All but one patient had prior nephrectomy ( n = 33) and all but one patient (97%) had received no prior systemic therapy. Patients received a median of four cycles of treatment (range 1–9). Dose limiting toxicity occurred at dose level V and included grade 4 neutropenia and hypoxemia. A partial response was found in 5 pts (15%). Median progression-free and overall survival were 9.0 (95% C.I. 5.6–13.1 months) and 31.9 months (95% C.I. 17.2–61.9 months), respectively. The combination of PEG-Interferon and SC rIL-2 can be administered with acceptable toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sunitinib is an inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptors, and it has antitumor activity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. To further investigate the fatigue associated with sunitinib therapy, thyroid function tests were performed on patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who were receiving sunitinib. Seventy-three patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma were treated with sunitinib at the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, and 66 of them had thyroid function test results available. Fifty-six (85%) of the 66 patients had one or more abnormality in their thyroid function test results, consistent with hypothyroidism, and 47 (84%) of the 56 patients with abnormal thyroid function tests had signs and/or symptoms possibly related to hypothyroidism. Thyroid hormone replacement was undertaken in 17 patients, and symptoms improved in nine of them. Thyroid function test abnormalities appear to be common in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib, and routine monitoring is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]