Search

The international phase IIIb study, ATHENA assessed the combination of bevacizumab/taxane-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in real-life setting. Among the 365 patients included in France, median overall survival (OS) is 28.4 months (CI95% 24.8-33.0), with a median time from treatment start to end of study of 36,5 months (25,1-45,4). Exploratory analyses in three sub-groups show that the median OS in long responder patients (not progressing for at least one year; n = 116) is not reached. In responder patients (n = 308), median OS is 33.0 months (CI95% 28.6-37.4) and 12.4 months (CI95% 11.2-17.4) in non-responders (n = 41). In patients with mBC expressing hormone receptors (HR+), treated with first-line hormone therapy before inclusion (n = 87) median OS in is 23.2 months (CI95% 19.6-28.6), and 35.3 months (CI95% 32.2-not reached); P = 0.004 in patients treated first with chemotherapy + bevacizumab (n = 179). The safety analysis in the various sub-groups of grade 3-5 adverse events of particular interest to bevacizumab of this study was comparable to the safety data of randomized phase III studies.

Bisphosphonates, such as pamidronate, are a new class of drugs, initially described for treatment of neoplasic hypercalcemia. Currently, they also may be used in the treatment of bone metastases from solid tumor, even without hypercalcemia. Hypocalcemia is a potential adverse effect of these drugs, which is considered infrequent and rarely symptomatic. We describe three cases of severe hypocalcemia following one injection of pamidronate. The three patients had bone metastases from solid tumors (breast in two cases, prostate in one), at least partially osteoblastic, and none had hypercalcemia. The induced hypocalcemia was rapid in onset, severe, and durable. The mechanism seems to be multiple and may include both the expected reduction of osteolysis and also a rapid and direct action on parathyroid glands followed by resistance to parathormone. Some elements could amplify the phenomenon, such as latent hypoparathyroidism after surgery, cervical radiotherapy, hypomagnesemia, or low 25 hydroxy vitamin D (25OH D). For patients who have such risk factors, it may be useful to check calcium several days after the first injection.

We investigated whether estrogenic recruitment could enhance the antitumor effect of chemotherapy in 165 patients with advanced breast cancer, presumably sensitive to hormonal treatments (ER + and/or PgR + lesions). The therapeutic regimen consisted of: (a) estrogenic suppression by aminoglutethimide 1 g/day + hydrocortisone 40 mg/day; surgical castration in premenopausal patients only; (b) FAC (5FU 500 mg/m2; ADM 50 mg/m2; CPA 500 mg/m2) for 3 weeks; (c) following randomization, exactly 24 h prior to chemotherapy, patients had to take 1 tablet of either placebo (PL) or 50 microgram ethinylestradiol (EE2). Tolerance, responses, time to progression and median survival were identical in both groups. Thus, EE2 before chemotherapy did not contribute to the efficacy of this particular therapeutic regimen, which yielded an overall response rate of 64%. We conclude that the validity of the hormonal recruitment concept has not yet been established in clinical practice, so that this approach remains experimental.

Background: Surgical or medical castration and antiestrogenic treatment with tamoxifen are common endocrine treatments for premenopausal women with breast cancer. However, tamoxifen therapy induces high levels of plasma estradiol, with unknown long-term effects. In this study, we investigated the effect of combining estrogen suppression with the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist buserelin and estradiol receptor blockade with tamoxifen to determine whether the high estradiol levels induced by tamoxifen could be reduced and whether the antitumor effects would be better.Methods: In a three-arm, randomized, prospective trial, from 1988 through 1995, a total of 161 premenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer were randomly assigned to treatment with buserelin, tamoxifen, or both. Patients with steroid receptor-negative tumors or with tumors of unknown receptor status who had a disease-free interval of less than 2 years were excluded. The median follow-up was 7.3 years, during which 76% of the patients died, all of breast cancer. Patient and tumor characteristics were well balanced among treatment groups. All P values are from two-sided tests.Results: Combined treatment with buserelin and tamoxifen was superior to treatment with buserelin or tamoxifen alone by objective response rate (48%, 34%, and 28% of patients who could be evaluated, respectively; P =.11 [chi(2) test]), median progression-free survival (9.7 months, 6.3 months, and 5.6 months; P =.03), and overall survival (3.7 years, 2.5 years, and 2.9 years; P =.01). Actuarial 5-year survival percentages were 34.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 20.4%-48.0%), 14.9% (95% CI = 3.9%-25.9%), and 18.4% (95% CI = 7.0%-29.8%), respectively. No differences in antitumor effects were observed between single-agent treatment groups. During combined treatment or treatment with buserelin alone, plasma estradiol levels were suppressed equally; in contrast, during treatment with tamoxifen alone, plasma estradiol levels increased threefold to fourfold over pretreatment levels.Conclusion: Combined treatment with buserelin and tamoxifen was more effective and resulted in longer overall survival than treatment with either drug alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]