Search

Introduction: Oral targeted therapies are a new option for lung cancer treatment. However, patient's belief about these drugs - which may interact with adherence - is poorly known in this setting., Method: Our study is a pilot prospective unicentric study. Inclusion criteria were: to have been diagnosed with a lung cancer; and to be prescribed with an oral targeted therapy in second line or more. The main objective was to assess patient's specific (SB) and general beliefs (GB) about these drugs according to the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ). The declared adherence was assessed with the Morisky's test. All included patients underwent a semi-structured interview with a psychologist., Results: Fifthteen patients were included: 12 underwent erlotinib treatment and 3 a crizotinib treatment. The mean score (±standard deviation) at BMQ was 54/85 (±6) overall; 34/50 (±5) for specific belief and 19/35 (±3) for general belief about drugs. During interview, 47% believed in efficacy of targeted oral therapy; 93% reported concerns about their drug; 80% considered that the information given by the physician about the drug was comprehensive; but 40% still required additional information about it. The mean score at Morisky's test was 3/4 (±2) and 53% reported to have forgotten at least once their antineoplastic drug. No correlation was found between belief and adherence., Conclusion: Belief about t anti-cancer targeted oral therapy is relatively fair but adherence is moderate in this pilot study. Interview shows the need for additional information about the prescribed drug., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

What Is Known and Objectives: In cancer care, clinical pharmacists contribute to improving prevention and management of drug-related problems (DRPs). The 3-year EPICC study (Evaluation of Pharmaceutical Intervention in Cancer Care) aimed to collect and analyse pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) in oncology., Methods: The free online version of the French Society of Clinical Pharmacy (SFPC) coding system, ACT-IP, was used, supplemented by a standardized dedicated cancer-care decision tree., Results: A total of 29,589 medication orders (77,004 anticancer drug preparations) were analysed. Eight hundred and ninety-four PIs were recorded. ACT-IP identified 54·1% of DRPs as concerning over- or underdosage. The standardized dedicated cancer-care decision tree identified the three principal causes of dosage problems: 50·2% due to miscalculation, 20% to omission of dose adjustment and 12% to poor choice of antineoplastic regimen. About 13·8% of DRPs were adverse effects and 3·9% were drug-drug interactions. The decision tree showed that 22% of adverse events could be circumvented by a switch within the same drug family and 72% of drug-drug interactions would have led to increased neoplastic toxicity., Discussion: Pharmaceutical analysis of prescription forms contributes to medication safety in cancer care, and the present dedicated decision tree highlights additional information about DRPs and PIs. The DRP rate (3% of prescriptions) was consistent with the literature. The pharmacist has a role to play in optimizing the management of patients with cancer in terms of dose adjustment, drug toxicity management, improvement of administration and drug-drug interactions., What Is New and Conclusion: This study, highlighting PIs in cancer care, is the first of this scale in terms of number of prescriptions analysed (nearly 30 000). Results demonstrated the specificity of DRPs and PIs for patients with cancer and the value of a dedicated coding system in cancer care., (© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

A study of olfactory function was performed in 15 bronchial cancer patients receiving cisplatin and 15 control subjects. Whereas odor detection and odor identification abilities were not influenced by the administration of cisplatin, a decrease in pleasantness was observed only for food odors, and not for non-food odors. Taken as a whole, these findings suggest that cisplatin therapy in bronchial cancer patients impairs the pleasure of perceived food odors, which may account for disturbances in food intake and quality of life in this population., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: As chemotherapy gains wider acceptance for the treatment of earlier stages of NSCLC, particularly in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting, physicians face a growing population of high performance status patients who have relapsed after their first-line chemotherapy. The type of second-line chemotherapy after initial adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment with a platinum-based regimen remains largely undefined. The current study has been designed to compare the classical mono chemotherapy docetaxel with a docetaxel cisplatin doublet., Methods: Patients will be randomized in 2 arms. Arm: docetaxel cisplatin (cycles repeated every 21 days), 4 cycles followed by 2 cycles of docetaxel alone in case of objective response or stabilisation. Arm B: docetaxel alone (cycles repeated every 21 days), 4 cycles followed by 2 cycles of docetaxel alone in case of objective response or stabilisation., Expected Results: 300 patients will be randomized with a statistical hypothesis of a progression free survival of 3 months in the control arm and of 4.5 months in the experimental arm.

Introduction: Gefitinib (Iressa, ZD 1839; AstraZeneca) is a selective Epidermal Growth Factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. In two randomized phase II trials (IDEAL 1 and IDEAL 2), it has demonstrated an activity against NSCLC, showing partial response and symptoms improvement rates respectively in about 20% and 40% of patients. Multivariate analyses revealed that being a woman, a non-smoker and having an adenocarcinoma was associated with response rate., Methods: We describe a retrospective study of patients receiving Gefitinib as a third line compassionate treatment of NSCLC., Results: We enrolled 37 patients (29 men, 8 women). Tumors included 25 adenocarcinoma, 4 squamous cell carcinoma, 7 large cell carcinoma, and 1 neuroendocrine carcinoma. Partial response rate was 8.1%, and stable disease rate 27.0%. The 3 responders were all non-smoker women, with an histological type of adenocarcinoma. Symptoms improvement was observed in 59.5% of patients. Main toxicities were diarrhoea and skin reactions. We observed that responding patients had more adverse drugs-related reactions than stable or non-responding patients., Conclusions: Gefitinib is a meaningful active therapy in NSCLC with a favorable toxicity profile. We suggest that being a woman, a never-smoker and having an adenocarcinoma may be clinical predictive factors of response to Gefitinib.

Some subgroups of patients with advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are frequently considered ineligible for the aggressive, platinum-based combination chemotherapy that is the recommended treatment. Elderly patients may have a poorer tolerance of chemotherapy due to impaired organ function and frequent comorbidities; patients with poor performance status (PS; > or =2 due to NSCLC and/or coexisting illnesses) are often considered unfit for chemotherapy; other patients may be unable or unwilling to endure the toxicity or inconvenience of chemotherapy. These patient groups may benefit from novel, relatively nontoxic treatment modalities. Gefitinib ("Iressa", ZD1839) 250 mg day(-1) is well tolerated and has proven antitumour and symptom improvement activity in patients with previously treated NSCLC. Phase II trials (IDEAL 1 and 2) of gefitinib in advanced/metastatic NSCLC included 70 out of 425 (16.5%) patients with PS > or =2, and their response rate, clinical benefit rate and rates of adverse events were similar to those of the overall trial population. In addition, many patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC with poor PS or advanced age have received gefitinib 250 mg day(-1) in an Expanded Access Programme (EAP). Observations from the EAP support those of IDEAL 1 and 2, and indicate that gefitinib 250 mg day(-1) warrants further investigation in these patient groups.

Elderly patients form an increasing proportion of the lung cancer population. However, they are poorly represented in clinical trials. The published studies are generally phase II trials on highly selected small numbers of patients. Applying these trials to clinical practice is therefore difficult and this is compounded by the fear of increased treatment toxicity in elderly patients. In the event of organ failure (respiratory, cardiac or other organ failure), where conventional therapy is not possible, there are a number of alternative options: radiotherapy for inoperable limited non-small-cell-lung cancer, chemotherapy without platinum for those with more extensive disease or with analogues of platinum for small-cell-lung-cancer. Finally, adjunctive therapy with haematopoietic-cell growth factors or cytoprotectors may allow full doses of treatment to be delivered whilst limiting toxicity. More studies in elderly patients, with larger numbers, are needed to develop more rational therapeutic strategies. We present here some studies of reference and the most recent publications on this subject.

Aims: To determine the population pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of doxorubicin (Dox), etoposide (Eto) and ifosfamide (Ifo) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients, to assess the potential relationship between those parameters and to estimate the impact of individual morphological and biological covariates on patients' PK parameters., Methods: Twenty-four patients with either SCLC limited to the thorax or extensive SCLC entered the study. All but one received at least two 3 day courses of the standard AVI (Dox 50 mg m-2 day 1, Eto 120 mg m-2 day 1,2,3, Ifo 2000 mg m-2 day 1,2) regimen. Individual blood samples were collected during each course and data on 47 courses were available. Data were analysed with the NONMEM program. Dox, Eto and Ifo plasma concentrations were studied with multicompartment (3, 2 and 2, respectively) models. Inter-individual and interoccasion (course-to-course) variabilities were estimated. The influence of individual covariates (age, sex, stage of the disease, weight, height, body-surface area, serum creatinine, total protein, LDH, ASAT, ALAT, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-GT, bilirubin) on PK parameters was also assessed. Correlations between individual PK parameters of Dox, Eto and Ifo were explored by using Pearson's correlation coefficient., Results: Multiple data were available for each patient. Dox clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (Vd) were 32.0 l h-1 and 9.3 l (Inter-individual variability: 17.2% and 19.2%). Eto CL (l h-1) and Vd were, respectively, 3.34-0.0083* serum creatinine (micromol l-1) and 6.38 l (interindividual variability: 15.6% and 18.7%). Ifo CL and Vd at day 1 were 5.6 l h-1 and 26.0 l (interindividual variability: 10.1% and 17.2%, respectively). Estimation of course-to-course variability improved the precision of PK models in some cases. No correlation was observed between the respective PK parameters of each drug. Of individual covariates tested, only serum creatinine correlated with Eto CL (r = -0.37, P < 0.001). Self-induction of the metabolism of Ifo was apparent (mean CL increase from day 1 to day 2 : 42%) and individually correlated with the CL value at day 1 (r = -0.61, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Assessment of potential relationships between individual systemic exposure of chemotherapy and therapeutic endpoints (tumour response, toxicity and survival) will be required to adjust drugs dosages based on individual PK parameters rather than questionable body-surface area. However, all three drugs in the AVI regimen should be monitored simultaneously.

From November 1992 to March 1994 we concluded a phase II trial of the combination of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and ifosfamide 3 g/m2 on day 1 and increasing doses of vinorelbine (Navelbine; Burroughs Wellcome Co, Research Triangle Park, NC; Pierre Fabre Medicament, Paris, France). Group A was given vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on day 1, group B 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, and group C 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 and 12.5 mg/m2 on day 8. Inclusion criteria were histologically proven non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIB or IV disease, no underlying disease, performance status < 2, no previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy, not older than 75 years, and informed consent. Treatment was given for 3 weeks. Eighty-six patients were included: 34 in group A, 28 in group B, and 24 in group C. One patient in group B was excluded because of false histology on review. Thirty-seven patients had stage IIIB and 48 had state IV disease, and 37 had squamous cell carcinoma, 32 had adenocarcinoma, and 16 had large cell carcinoma. The median age was 59.2 years (age range, 36 to 73 years). Evaluation was made 3 weeks after the third course of therapy. Thoracic radiotherapy (60 Gy) was given in stage IIIB disease; in stage IV disease, when an objective response was achieved, three additional courses of chemotherapy were given. The response rate after three cycles was 32% in group A, 44% in group B, and 67% in group C. Dose intensity, using Hryniuk's method, was the same for cisplatin and ifosfamide in the three groups. Dose intensity for vinorelbine was 8.1 mg/m2/wk in group A, 14.7 mg/m2/wk in group B, and 16.9 mg/m2/wk in group C. This study shows that increased dose intensity with vinorelbine is feasible and seems to increase the response rate and median survival, which was 28 weeks in group A and 38 weeks in group B. Median survival had not been reached in group C.