Search

Background: Bone-targeted agents (BTA), such as denosumab (DN) and zoledronic acid (ZA), have historically reduced the risk of skeletal related events in cancer patients with bone metastases (BM), with no improvement in survival outcomes. In the immunotherapy era, BM have been associated with poor prognosis upon immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Currently, the impact of bone tumor burden on survival upon BTAs in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients treated with ICI remains unknown., Methods: Data from ICI-treated aNSCLC patients with BM (4/2013-5/2022) in one institution were retrospectively collected. BTA-ICI concurrent treatment was defined as BTA administration at any time before or within 90 days from ICI start. High bone tumor burden (HBTB) was defined as ≥ 3 sites of BM. Median OS (mOS) was estimated with Kaplan-Meier. Aikaike's information criterion (AIC) was used to select the best model for data analysis adjusted for clinical variables., Results: Of 134 patients included, 51 (38 %) received BTA. At a mFU of 39.6 months (m), BTA-ICIs concurrent treatment did not significantly impact on mOS [8.3 m (95% CI 3.9-12.8) versus (vs) 6.8 m (95% CI 4.0-9.6) p = 0.36]; these results were confirmed after adjustment for clinical variables selected by AIC. A multivariate model showed a significant interaction between BTA use and HBTB or radiation therapy to BM. In subgroup analyses, only HBTB confirmed to be associated with significantly longer mOS [8.3 m (95% CI 2.4-14.2) vs 3.5 m (95% CI 2.9-4.1), p = 0.003] and mPFS [3.0 m (95% CI 1.6-4.4) vs 1.8 m (95% CI 1.6-2.0) p = 0.001] upon BTA-ICI concurrent treatment, with the most pronounced OS benefit observed for DN-ICI concurrent regimen [15.2 m (95% CI 0.1-30.7) vs 3.5 m (95% CI 2.9-4.1) p = 0.002]., Conclusions: In the immunotherapy era, HBTB can identify patients experiencing survival benefit with BTA, especially with DN-ICI combination. HBTB should be included as a stratification factor in the upcoming trials assessing BTA and ICI combinations in patients with aNSCLC and BM., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: SM declares personal fees from Italfarmaco, Sanofi and MSD outside the submitted work. EZ declares personal fees from AMGEN, outside the submitted work CP declares personal fees from BMS and MSD, outside the submitted work. AP declares personal fees from Astrazeneca, Roche, BMS. GG declares travel accommodation from Roche and personal fees from Italfarmaco, Astra Zeneca, BMS, MSD outside the submitted work. MCG declares personal financial interests with the following organizations: AstraZeneca, MSD International GmbH, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim Italia S.p.A, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Ignyta, Incyte, Inivata, MedImmune, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda; she also declares Institutional financial interests with the following organizations: Eli Lilly, MSD, Pfizer (MISP), AstraZeneca, MSD International GmbH, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim Italia S.p.A, Celgene, Ignyta, Incyte, Inivata, MedImmune, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Tiziana, Foundation Medicine; at the end, she has received research funding from the following organizations: AIRC, AIFA, Italian Moh, TRANSCAN. FdB provided consultation, attended advisory boards and/or provided lectures for the following organizations, from whom received honoraria or education grants: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, BMS, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ignyta, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer. GLR declares personal fees from MSD, TAKEDA; GSK; AMGEN; PFIZER; SANOFI; JANSEN; Eli Lilly, BMS, Roche, Italfarmaco, Novartis and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. DS declares personal fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim and BMS, outside the submitted work. RF declares personal fees from MSD and Beigene outside the submitted work. The other authors report no conflict of interest. ., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cabozantinib strongly inhibits osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption in vitro. We aimed to evaluate its effect on bone turnover markers (BTMs) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma., Methods: This is a monocentric prospective study on patients with mRCC treated with cabozantinib between October 2016 and July 2018. We collected blood samples at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of treatment. We compared sets of data obtained from plasma samples in the whole population with unpaired 2-tailed Student t tests and data for a subset of patients for which all timepoints were available with paired 2-tailed Student t tests. We used the Kaplan-Meier method for survival analyses and the log-rank test to compare the curves., Results: Our analysis included 39 patients. At month 3, the mean C-terminal cross-linked telopeptides of type I collagen (CTx) and the mean N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen (PINP) levels were significantly decreased in the whole population ( p = 0.013 and p < 0.0001, respectively), as well as at paired analysis ( p = 0.015 and p = 0.045, respectively). No differences were observed between baseline and 6 months ( p = 0.053 and p = 0.087, respectively). After 3 months, the mean parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels significantly increased in the whole population ( p = 0.004), as well as at paired analysis; the mean PTH levels increased significantly at 3 and 6 months, respectively ( p = 0.019 and p = 0.041, respectively). Changes in BTM levels were not associated with outcome., Conclusions: Cabozantinib significantly reduced bone resorption as demonstrated by the decrease of CTx and showed a transient secondary increase of PTH.

Objectives: Despite the initial clinical benefit, resistance to antiangiogenic therapies develops through the activation of alternative pathways. We measured plasma levels of circulating angiogenic factors to explore their predictive role in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with pazopanib., Materials and Methods: mRCC patients receiving first-line pazopanib were prospectively enrolled. The levels of circulating interleuchine (IL)-6, IL-8, stromal derived factor-1, vascular endothelial growth factor-A, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), osteopontin, and E-selectin were quantified at baseline and every 4 weeks until disease progression (PD). Patients were dichotomized into "low" and "high" subgroups by a cutoff point defined by the respective median circulating angiogenic factor (CAF) value at baseline. Then, association with the objective response was determined. Changes in CAF levels between baseline and PD were also compared., Results: Among 25 patients included in the final data set, 6 patients were still on treatment. As best response, 12 patients presented a partial response (48%), 9 showed stable disease, and 4 showed PD. The median follow-up was 31.9 months. The median progression-free survival was 14.8 months. Low baseline levels of IL-6, IL-8, HGF, and osteopontin were found to be significantly associated with objective response. In addition, patients with low baseline levels of HGF showed longer progression-free survival and overall survival, whereas patients with low baseline levels of IL-8 showed longer overall survival. Among patients experiencing PD, the median plasma levels of stromal derived factor-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor-A were significantly higher compared with the baseline (P=0.01; P=0.011). Conversely, the median levels of E-selectin were significantly lower compared with the baseline (P=0.017)., Conclusion: Changes in levels of selected CAFs were associated with response/resistance to pazopanib in mRCC patients.

A still relevant number of patients with RAS-BRAF wild-type colorectal cancer (CRC) do not respond to treatment with antiepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab, suggesting that additional biomarkers to guide patient selection are urgently needed. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) may represent such a biomarker. In this prospective study, 38 patients with advanced RAS-BRAF-wild-type CRC received third-line therapy with cetuximab-irinotecan or panitumumab. Peripheral blood samples for CTC status determination were collected at baseline, during treatment at early (2-4 weeks) and at later (8-10 weeks) times. CTC enrichment was done with the AdnaTest ColonCancerSelect kit, whereas CTC detection was done with the AdnaTest ColonCancerDetect kit. CTC status positivity was defined according to the kit manufacturer's thresholds. Fifty percent of patients were defined as CTC positive at baseline and the overall RECIST response rate was 26%. CTC baseline status was not associated with treatment response, whereas early CTC status and CTC status changes during treatment were significantly associated with tumor response. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly shorter progression-free survival (median, 2.0 versus 4.0 months, p = 0.004) and overall survival (4.7 versus11.4, p = 0.039) in patients with early CTC + status compared with CTC - ones. In multivariable analysis including classical prognostic factors, the CTC status changes profile during treatment was an independent predictor of both progression-free survival (p < 0.001) and overall-survival (p = 0.001). CTC status assessed early during treatment with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies may predict treatment failure in advance compared to imaging-based tools., (© 2015 UICC.)