Search

Aims: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) prolongs survival in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, but limited data exist on its use in patients with hepatic impairment. This Phase I, open-label, nonrandomized study investigated the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of FTD/TPI in patients with advanced solid tumours (except breast cancer) and varying degrees of hepatic impairment, to provide dosing recommendations., Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with advanced solid tumours and normal hepatic function, or mild, moderate or severe hepatic impairment according to National Cancer Institute criteria, were planned to be enrolled. Patients received FTD/TPI 35 mg/m 2 orally twice daily on days 1-5 and 8-12 of each 28-day cycle., Results: Twenty-four patients were enrolled to the normal hepatic function (n = 8) and mild (n = 10) and moderate (n = 6) hepatic impairment cohorts. Overall, 12 patients (50.0%) had at least 1 adverse event leading to study discontinuation. In the moderate hepatic impairment cohort, 5 of 6 patients experienced grade ≥ 3 elevation in bilirubin. No patients with severe hepatic impairment were enrolled. FTD area under the curve at steady state decreased by 18% and 22% in the mild and moderate cohorts, respectively; however, no clear change was observed in TPI area under the curve., Conclusions: FTD/TPI can be safely administered in patients with normal hepatic function and mild hepatic impairment, with no initial dose adjustment. FTD/TPI is not recommended for use in patients with moderate hepatic impairment because of findings of grade 3 or 4 increased blood bilirubin. Therefore, FTD/TPI is not recommended for patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment., (© 2019 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Purpose: The objective of this phase II study was to evaluate the potential of pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interactions between ramucirumab and irinotecan or its metabolite, SN-38, when administered with folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI)., Methods: Patients received intravenous infusions of FOLFIRI and ramucirumab 8 mg/kg on Day 1 of a 2-week cycle. FOLFIRI was administered alone in Cycle 1; ramucirumab followed by FOLFIRI was administered in all subsequent cycles. Blood was collected at regular intervals after infusions in Cycles 1 and 2 to determine irinotecan, SN-38, and ramucirumab concentrations. PK parameters were derived by noncompartmental analysis., Results: Twenty-nine patients received treatment. The dose-normalized area under the concentration versus time curve from zero to infinity [AUC(0-∞)] and the maximum observed concentration (C max) of irinotecan and SN-38 were comparable between Cycle 1 (FOLFIRI alone) and Cycle 2 (ramucirumab + FOLFIRI). The ratios of geometric least squares (LS) means for irinotecan were 0.93 (90 % CI 0.83-1.05) for AUC(0-∞) and 1.04 (90 % CI 0.97-1.12) for C max. The ratios of geometric LS means for SN-38 were 0.95 (90 % CI 0.88-1.04) for AUC(0-∞) and 0.97 (90 % CI 0.85-1.12) for C max. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events, regardless of grade, were fatigue (19 patients, 65.5 %), diarrhea, (16 patients, 55.2 %), and neutropenia (15 patients, 51.7 %). Grade ≥3 neutropenia was reported in 7 (24.1 %) patients., Conclusions: There was no PK drug-drug interaction between ramucirumab and irinotecan or its metabolite, SN-38. Ramucirumab with FOLFIRI was well tolerated in this study, with no new safety concerns.

Purpose: Necitumumab is a second-generation, recombinant, human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that blocks the ligand binding site of the epidermal growth factor receptor. The primary objective of this phase 2 study, conducted in accordance with International Conference on Harmonisation E14 guidance, was to determine the effect of necitumumab treatment on QT/QTc interval in patients with advanced solid tumors., Methods: Patients received necitumumab monotherapy at an absolute dose of 800 mg, once per week for each 6-week cycle. Triplicate electrocardiogram readings were taken at pretreatment (baseline) and then weekly at multiple timepoints that were time-matched with blood samples to determine necitumumab concentrations., Results: Seventy-five patients received treatment. Overall, the upper bound of the two-sided 90 % confidence interval for mean change from baseline in QTc in cycle 1 did not exceed 10 ms. No patients had a mean QTcF interval >500 ms, and no patients had an increase of >60 ms. Necitumumab concentration-QTc analysis also showed that necitumumab is unlikely to cause QTc prolongation., Conclusions: The results demonstrate lack of effect of necitumumab on the QTc interval in heavily pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors, suggesting that QT prolongation is not a major safety concern for necitumumab at the recommended therapeutic dose. The safety profile was consistent with the known safety profile of necitumumab.

Therapies which target VEGF and mTOR are now available for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, but there is a continued need to develop agents for patients who become refractory to these initial agents. Tandutinib is a relatively selective inhibitor of type III tyrosine kinase receptor kinases with promising activity in some tumors. In this trial, 10 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma refractory to previous therapy with sunitinib or sorafenib (median age 61 years, 80% performance status 0, 60% intermediate MSKCC risk classification) received tandutinib 500 mg bid daily with RECIST-defined response as the primary endpoint and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as secondary endpoints. No patient had more than 2 cycles of therapy and 50% of patients only received 1 cycle with 70% of patients discontinuing for progressive disease and 30% for toxicity. Tandutinib was not well tolerated with dose reduction in 60% of patients due to adverse events. The most common grade 3 toxicity was fatigue (30%). Tandutinib had no clinical activity and due to the excessive toxicity should not be developed further in patients with sunitinib or sorafenib-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Importance of the Field: Patients with prostate cancer who have progression of their disease while on androgen deprivation therapy have limited therapeutic options. Docetaxel is currently the only agent that increases overall survival in patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer; additional agents are needed., Areas Covered in This Review: This review will describe the importance of endothelin-1 (ET-1) for growth of prostate cancer cells, development of bone metastases, and pain responses; the preclinical data for zibotentan, a specific inhibitor of the ET(A) receptor; and the clinical development of atrasentan, a first-generation ET receptor inhibitor, and zibotentan, a more selective inhibitor of the ET(A) receptor., What the Reader Will Gain: Readers will understand the importance of ET-1 as a novel pathway to target for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer due to its association with prostate cancer growth, metastases to bone, and pain. Readers will learn about the preclinical and clinical development of zibotentan, including the promising Phase II results that have resulted in an extensive Phase III clinical trials program., Take Home Message: Modulating the activity of ET-1 through the ET(A) receptor is a novel target for treating patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. There are currently three ongoing Phase III trials with zibotentan, a selective ET(A) inhibitor, to determine the effect of this agent on overall survival in these patients.

VEGF and mTOR inhibitors have encouraging clinical activity for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but may lead to significant short- and long-term toxicities. Although 40-70% of adverse events (AEs) are grade 1 and 2, 10-20% of patients develop grade 3 or 4 AEs requiring dose reductions, drug holidays or treatment discontinuation. The long-term impact of the most common grade 3 and 4 AEs observed in Phase III trials evaluating VEGF and mTOR inhibitors, including hypertension, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, hand-foot-syndrome and myelosuppression, are a concern in RCC patients who are living longer and receiving chronic sequential or combination therapy. There is a clear need to develop a more rational way to individualize therapy for RCC. Long-term follow-up from existing Phase II/III trials should provide us with increased understanding of the potential implications of AEs in RCC patients. Prevention, early recognition and aggressive management of side effects are fundamental to avoid significant long-term complications and unnecessary dose reductions, which can ultimately reduce the efficacy of these novel agents.

Purpose: Carboxyamidotriazole (CAI) is a novel antineoplastic agent in clinical development with limited oral bioavailability. In vitro, ketoconazole has been demonstrated to inhibit CYP3A4-mediated metabolism of CAI. We performed this phase I trial to determine if ketoconazole-mediated CYP3A4 inhibition would lead to favorable alteration of CAI pharmacokinetics, and to evaluate the safety, toxicity and tolerability of the proposed combination., Design: Forty-seven patients were treated using a standard three patients per cohort CAI dose-escalation scheme. In cycle 1, CAI was administered alone on day-6 followed by a single dose of ketoconazole (200 mg) on day 0. CAI and ketoconazole (200 mg/day) were subsequently coadministered on days 1 and 3-28. Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were obtained following the doses on days-6 and 1. All subsequent cycles were of 28-day duration, and consisted of daily CAI and ketoconazole coadministration., Results: Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on samples from 44 patients. In most patients administration of ketoconazole produced an increase in CAI AUC and Cmax with a decrease in CAI clearance. Seven patients experienced stable disease for up to 12 months. Gastrointestinal and constitutional toxicities were the most common toxicities., Conclusions: Coadministration of CAI with ketoconazole increased CAI exposure in most of the patients without altering the toxicity profile of CAI. The highest CAI dose administered on the trial was 300 mg/day. The clinical utility of such a modulation strategy might be explored in future clinical trials of CAI.

Aims: To determine the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluoruracil (5-FU) taken orally with eniluracil and to compare the performance of different pharmacokinetic analysis methods in the detection a potential food-drug interaction., Methods: In a randomized, open-label, two-way crossover study, 12 patients received eniluracil (50 mg, orally) on days 1 and 2 and 5-FU (20 mg/m(2), orally) on day 2 following either a 2-h fast or 20 min after a standard meal. Treatments were separated by 7 days. Timed blood samples were collected during the first two treatment periods and 5-FU concentrations determined by GC/MS. Data were analyzed and pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were obtained using a noncompartmental, two-stage and population analysis methods., Results: In fasted individuals, the clearance/bioavailability of 5-FU was estimated to be 5.6 l/h. The mean absorption lag-time was 0.24 h and was followed by rapid absorption of 5-FU. Administration of 5-FU and eniluracil with food resulted in a decrease in the 5-FU absorption rate constant by 90%. As a result, the peak plasma concentration (C(max)) of 5-FU was decreased by 21% and the time to C(max) was increased 2.9-fold. Clearance of 5-FU, relative bioavailability, and area under the plasma concentration vs time curve (AUC) remained unchanged with coadministration of food. Similar results were obtained using all three data analysis methods., Conclusions: Administration of food with oral 5-FU and eniluracil slowed absorption of 5-FU and decreased 5-FU C(max), but did not effect AUC. Further investigation of the incorporation of population pharmacokinetic approaches in food effect studies is warranted.

Systematic studies evaluating clinical benefit of tumor genomic profiling are lacking. We conducted a prospective study in 250 patients with select solid tumors at the Cleveland Clinic. Eligibility required histopathologic diagnosis, age of 18 years or older, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, and written informed consent. Tumors were sequenced using FoundationOne (Cambridge, MA). Results were reviewed at the Cleveland Clinic Genomics Tumor Board. Outcomes included feasibility and clinical impact. Colorectal (25%), breast (18%), lung (13%), and pancreatobiliary (13%) cancers were the most common diagnoses. Median time from consent to result was 25 days (range = 3-140). Of 223 evaluable samples, 49% (n = 109) of patients were recommended a specific therapy, but only 11% (n = 24) received such therapy: 12 on clinical trials, nine off-label, three on-label. Lack of clinical trial access (n = 49) and clinical deterioration (n = 29) were the most common reasons for nonrecommendation/nonreceipt of genomics-driven therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Etoposide is a widely used cytotoxic drug that is commercially available in both intravenous and oral formulations. High interpatient pharmacokinetic variability has been associated with oral etoposide administration. Various strategies used in the past to reduce such variability have not been successful. Hence, this study was designed to evaluate if pharmacokinetic modulation of oral etoposide with ketoconazole could lead to a favorable alteration of etoposide pharmacokinetics, and to assess the feasibility and safety of this approach. Thirty-two patients were treated with ketoconazole 200 mg daily with an escalating dose of oral etoposide starting at a dose of 50 mg every other day. Pharmacokinetic samples were obtained during the first treatment cycle after the administration of an oral etoposide and ketoconazole dose. Additional baseline pharmacokinetic studies of etoposide alone were performed 4 days prior to the first treatment cycle. Dose limiting toxicities were neutropenia and fatigue. Ketoconazole increased the area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) of oral etoposide by a median of 20% ( p < 0.005). Ketoconazole did not reduce the interpatient variability in etoposide pharmacokinetics. Pretreatment bilirubin levels correlated with etoposide clearance (Spearman’s r = −0.48, p = 0.008). The maximum tolerated dose was etoposide administered at 50 mg daily and ketoconazole 200 mg qd for 3 of 5 weeks. Ketoconazole reduces the apparent clearance of oral etoposide, does not alter its toxicity profile and does not reduce interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. Other methods to reduce the pharmacokinetic variability of oral etoposide are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]