4 results on '"Shani, Adi"'
Search Results
2. First-line selective internal radiotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer (FOXFIRE, SIRFLOX, and FOXFIRE-Global): a combined analysis of three multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trials
- Author
-
Wasan, Harpreet S, Gibbs, Peter, Sharma, Navesh K, Taieb, Julien, Heinemann, Volker, Ricke, Jens, Peeters, Marc, Findlay, Michael, Weaver, Andrew, Mills, Jamie, Wilson, Charles, Adams, Richard, Francis, Anne, Moschandreas, Joanna, Virdee, Pradeep S, Dutton, Peter, Love, Sharon, Gebski, Val, Gray, Alastair, Bateman, Andrew, Blesing, Claire, Brown, Ewan, Chau, Ian, Cummins, Sebastian, Cunningham, David, Falk, Stephen, Hadaki, Maher, Hall, Marcia, Hickish, Tamas, Hornbuckle, Joanne, Lofts, Fiona, Lowndes, Sarah, Mayer, Astrid, Metcalfe, Matthew, Middleton, Gary, Montazeri, Amir, Muirhead, Rebecca, Polychronis, Andreas, Purcell, Colin, Ross, Paul, Sharma, Ricky A, Sherwin, Liz, Smith, David, Soomal, Rubin, Swinson, Daniel, Walther, Axel, Wasan, Harpreet, Wilson, Greg, Amin, Pradip, Angelelli, Bruna, Balosso, Jacques, Beny, Alex, Bloomgarden, Daniel, Boucher, Evelyn, Brown, Michael, Bruch, Harald-Robert, Bui, James, Burge, Matthew, Cardaci, Giuseppe, Carlisle, James, Chai, Seungjean, Chen, Yi-Jen, Chevallier, Patrick, Chuong, Michael, Clarke, Stephen, Coveler, Andrew, Craninx, Michael, Delanoit, Thierry, Deleporte, Amã©lie, Eliadis, Paul, Facchini, Francis, Ferguson, Thomas, Ferrante, Michel, Frenette, Gary, Frick, Jacob, Ganju, Vinod, Garofalo, Michael, Geboes, Karen, Gehbauer, Gerald, George, Benjamin, Geva, Ravit, Gordon, Michael, Gregory, Kate, Gulec, Seza, Hannigan, James, van Hazel, Guy, Heching, Norman, Helmberger, Thomas, Hendlisz, Alain, Hendrickx, Koen, Holtzman, Matthew, Isaacs, Richard, Jackson, Christopher, MORRISON JR, PHILIP JAMES, Kaiser, Adeel, Karapetis, Chris, Kaubisch, Andreas, Yon-Dschun, Ko, Krã¶ning, Hendrik, Lammert, Frank, Liauw, Winston, Limentani, Steven, Louafi, Samy, de Man, Marc, Margolis, Jeffrey, Martin, Robert, Martoni, Andrea, Marx, Gavin, Matos, Marco, Monsaert, Els, Moons, Veerle, Nott, Louise, Nusch, Arnd, O'Donnell, Anne, Ozer, Howard, Padia, Siddarth, Pavlakis, Nick, Perez, David, Pluntke, Stefan, Polus, Marc, Powell, Alex, Pracht, Marc, Price, Timothy, Ransom, David, Rebischung, Christine, Ridwelski, Karsten, Riera-Knorrenschild, Jorge, Riess, Hanno, Rilling, William, Robinson, Bridget, Rodrãguez, Javier, Sanchez, Federico, Sauerbruch, Tilmann, Savin, Michael, Scheidhauer, Klemens, Schneiderman, Elyse, Seeger, Grant, Segelov, Eva, Schmueli, Einat Shaham, Shani, Adi, Shannon, Jenny, Sharma, Navesh, Shibata, Stephen, Singhal, Nimit, Smith, Denis, Smith, Randall, Stemmer, Salomon, Stã¶tzer, Oliver, Strickland, Andrew, Tatsch, Klaus, Terrebonne, Eric, Tichler, Thomas, Vehling-Kaiser, Ursula, Vera-Garcia, Ruth, Vogl, Thomas, Walpole, Euan, Wang, Eric, Whiting, Samuel, Wolf, Ido, Ades, Steven, Aghmesheh, Morteza, Auber, Miklos, Ayala, Hubert, Boland, Patrick, Bouche, Eveline, Bowers, Charles, Bremer, Christoph, Burge, Mathew, Casado, Ana Ruiz, Cooray, Prasad, Crain, Martin, De Wit, Maike, Deleporte, Amelie, Dowling, Kyran, Durand, Aurelie, Faivre, Sandrine, Feeney, Kynan, Ferguson, Tom, Ferru, Aurelie, Fragoso, Maria, Granetto, Cristina, Hammel, Pascal, Issacs, Richard, Iyer, Renuka, Kim, Yeul Hong, Liang, Jin Tung, Lim, Lionel, Liu, Jin Hwang, Masi, Gianluca, Mosconi, Stefania, Numico, Gianmauro, Ratner, Lynn, Sae-Won, Han, Singh, Madhu, Stoltzfus, Patricia, Tan, Iain, Trogu, Antonio, Underhill, Craig, Westcott, Mark, FOXFIRE Trial Investigators, SIRFLOX Trial Investigators, and FOXFIRE-Global Trial Investigators
- Subjects
Aged, 80 and over ,Adult ,Male ,Radiotherapy ,Brachytherapy ,Liver Neoplasms ,Aged ,Antineoplastic Agents ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,Colorectal Neoplasms ,Disease-Free Survival ,Female ,Humans ,Middle Aged ,Radiotherapy, Adjuvant ,Treatment Outcome ,Oncology ,Articles ,digestive system diseases ,Editorial ,Colonic Neoplasms ,80 and over ,Human medicine ,Adjuvant - Abstract
Background Data suggest selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) in third-line or subsequent therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer has clinical benefit in patients with colorectal liver metastases with liver-dominant disease after chemotherapy. The FOXFIRE, SIRFLOX, and FOXFIRE-Global randomised studies evaluated the efficacy of combining first-line chemotherapy with SIRT using yttrium-90 resin microspheres in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with liver metastases. The studies were designed for combined analysis of overall survival. Methods FOXFIRE, SIRFLOX, and FOXFIRE-Global were randomised, phase 3 trials done in hospitals and specialist liver centres in 14 countries worldwide (Australia, Belgium, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, New Zealand, Portugal, South Korea, Singapore, Spain, Taiwan, the UK, and the USA). Chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (WHO performance status 0 or 1) with liver metastases not suitable for curative resection or ablation were randomly assigned (1: 1) to either oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (FOLFOX: leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) or FOLFOX plus single treatment SIRT concurrent with cycle 1 or 2 of chemotherapy. In FOXFIRE, FOLFOX chemotherapy was OxMdG (oxaliplatin modified de Gramont chemotherapy; 85 mg/m(2) oxaliplatin infusion over 2 h, L-leucovorin 175 mg or D,L-leucovorin 350 mg infusion over 2 h, and 400 mg/m(2) bolus fluorouracil followed by a 2400 mg/m(2) continuous fluorouracil infusion over 46 h). In SIRFLOX and FOXFIRE-Global, FOLFOX chemotherapy was modified FOLFOX6 (85 mg/m(2) oxaliplatin infusion over 2 h, 200 mg leucovorin, and 400 mg/m(2) bolus fluorouracil followed by a 2400 mg/m(2) continuous fluorouracil infusion over 46 h). Randomisation was done by central minimisation with four factors: presence of extrahepatic metastases, tumour involvement of the liver, planned use of a biological agent, and investigational centre. Participants and investigators were not masked to treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed in the intention-to-treat population, using a two-stage meta-analysis of pooled individual patient data. All three trials have completed 2 years of follow-up. FOXFIRE is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN83867919. SIRFLOX and FOXFIRE-Global are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00724503 (SIRFLOX) and NCT01721954 (FOXFIRE-Global). Findings Between Oct 11, 2006, and Dec 23, 2014, 549 patients were randomly assigned to FOLFOX alone and 554 patients were assigned FOLFOX plus SIRT. Median follow-up was 43.3 months (IQR 31.6-58.4). There were 411 (75%) deaths in 549 patients in the FOLFOX alone group and 433 (78%) deaths in 554 patients in the FOLFOX plus SIRT group. There was no difference in overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04, 95% CI 0.90-1.19; p=0.61). The median survival time in the FOLFOX plus SIRT group was 22.6 months (95% CI 21.0-24.5) compared with 23.3 months (21.8-24.7) in the FOLFOX alone group. In the safety population containing patients who received at least one dose of study treatment, as treated, the most common grade 3-4 adverse event was neutropenia (137 [24%] of 571 patients receiving FOLFOX alone vs 186 (37%) of 507 patients receiving FOLFOX plus SIRT). Serious adverse events of any grade occurred in 244 (43%) of 571 patients receiving FOLFOX alone and 274 (54%) of 507 patients receiving FOLFOX plus SIRT. 10 patients in the FOLFOX plus SIRT group and 11 patients in the FOLFOX alone group died due to an adverse event; eight treatment-related deaths occurred in the FOLFOX plus SIRT group and three treatment-related deaths occurred in the FOLFOX alone group. Interpretation Addition of SIRT to first-line FOLFOX chemotherapy for patients with liver-only and liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer did not improve overall survival compared with that for FOLFOX alone. Therefore, early use of SIRT in combination with chemotherapy in unselected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer cannot be recommended. To further define the role of SIRT in metastatic colorectal cancer, careful patient selection and studies investigating the role of SIRT as consolidation therapy after chemotherapy are needed. Copyright (C) The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.
- Published
- 2017
3. Phase II study of cisplatin, epirubicin, UFT, and leucovorin (PELUF) as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic gastric cancer.
- Author
-
Idelevich, Efraim, Karminsky, Natalie, Dinerman, Michael, Katsenelson, Rivka L., Zvi, Nana Ben, Baruch, Noa Ben, Biran, Haim, Man, Sofia, and Shani, Adi
- Subjects
GASTROINTESTINAL diseases ,GASTRIC diseases ,METASTASIS ,CANCER invasiveness ,COMBINATION drug therapy ,CISPLATIN ,ANTINEOPLASTIC agents ,FOLINIC acid - Abstract
More than two-thirds of patients with gastric cancer present with metastatic disease and their curative options are limited. This phase II study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of cisplatin, epirubicin, tegafur-uracil (UFT) and leucovorin in patients with metastatic gastric cancer (MGC). Thirty-nine patients with previously untreated metastatic or unresectable gastric cancer received intravenous cisplatin 60 mg/m2 and epirubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 28-day cycle; UFT 300 mg/m2 was administered with oral leucovorin 30 mg/day in divided doses on days 1-22, followed by a 7-day rest. Two patients achieved a complete response, 13 had a partial response (overall response rate 38%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 24-52%) and 16 patients (41%) had stable disease. Median time to progression was 6. 5 months (95% CI 5. 5-7. 5 months); overall survival was 9. 5 months (95% CI 8. 5-13. 5 months). Grade 3/4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 20%, 8%, and 3% of patients, respectively; two patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in three patients. The combination of cisplatin, epirubicin, UFT, and leucovorin has significant activity and tolerable toxicities in patients with MGC and represents a convenient treatment option for these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Impact of the 12-Gene Colon Cancer Assay on Clinical Decision Making for Adjuvant Therapy in Stage II Colon Cancer Patients.
- Author
-
Brenner, Baruch, Geva, Ravit, Rothney, Megan, Beny, Alexander, Dror, Ygael, Steiner, Mariana, Hubert, Ayala, Idelevich, Efraim, Gluzman, Alexander, Purim, Ofer, Shacham-Shmueli, Einat, Shulman, Katerina, Mishaeli, Moshe, Man, Sophia, Soussan-Gutman, Lior, Tezcan, Haluk, Chao, Calvin, Shani, Adi, and Liebermann, Nicky
- Subjects
- *
COLON cancer patients , *COLON cancer treatment , *ADJUVANT treatment of cancer , *MEDICAL decision making , *CANCER relapse , *SURGICAL excision , *ANTINEOPLASTIC agents , *FLUOROURACIL , *ORGANOPLATINUM compounds , *COLON tumors , *COMBINED modality therapy , *DNA , *EVALUATION of medical care , *POLYMERASE chain reaction , *TUMOR classification , *RETROSPECTIVE studies , *DIAGNOSIS , *THERAPEUTICS - Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the impact of the 12-gene Colon Cancer Recurrence Score Assay-a clinically validated prognosticator in stage II colon cancer after surgical resection-on adjuvant treatment decisions in T3 mismatch repair proficient (MMR-P) stage II colon cancer in clinical practice.Methods: This retrospective analysis included all patients with T3 MMR-P stage II colon cancer (Clalit Health Services members) with Recurrence Score results (time frame January 2011 to May 2012). Treatment recommendations pretesting were compared with the treatments received. Changes were categorized as decreased (to observation alone/removing oxaliplatin from the therapy) or increased (from observation alone/adding oxaliplatin to the therapy) intensity.Results: The analysis included 269 patients; 58%, 32%, and 10% of the values were in the low (<30), intermediate (30-40), and high (≥41) score groups, respectively. In 102 patients (38%), treatment changed post-testing (decreased/increased intensity 76/26 patients). The overall impact was decreased chemotherapy use (45.0% to 27.9%; P < 0.001). Treatment changes occurred in all score groups, but more frequently in the high (change rate 63.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 42.3%-80.6%) than in the intermediate (30.6%; 95% CI 21.0%-41.5%) and low (37.6%; 95% CI 30.0%-45.7%) score groups. The direction of the change was consistent with the assay result, with increased intensity more common in higher score values and decreased intensity more common in lower score values.Conclusions: Testing significantly affected adjuvant treatment in T3 MMR-P stage II colon cancer in clinical practice. The study is limited by its design, which compared treatment recommendations pretesting to actual treatments received post-testing, lack of a control group, and nonassessment of confounding factors that may have affected treatment decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.