Search

We report the population pharmacokinetic (PK) and exposure-response analyses of a novel subcutaneous formulation of daratumumab (DARA) using data from 3 DARA subcutaneous monotherapy studies (PAVO Part 2, MMY1008, COLUMBA) and 1 combination therapy study (PLEIADES). Results were based on 5159 PK samples from 742 patients (DARA 1800 mg subcutaneously, n = 487 [monotherapy, n = 288; combination therapy, n = 199]; DARA 16 mg/kg intravenously, n = 255 [all monotherapy, in COLUMBA]; age, 33-92 years; weight, 28.6-147.6 kg). Subcutaneous and intravenous DARA monotherapies were administered once every week for cycles 1-2, once every 2 weeks for cycles 3-6, and once every 4 weeks thereafter (1 cycle is 28 days). The subcutaneous DARA combination therapy was administered with the adaptation of corresponding standard-of-care regimens. PK samples were collected between cycle 1 and cycle 12. Among monotherapy studies, throughout the treatment period, subcutaneous DARA provided similar/slightly higher trough concentrations (C trough ) versus intravenous DARA, with lower maximum concentrations and smaller peak-to-trough fluctuations. The PK profile was consistent between subcutaneous DARA monotherapy and combination therapies. The exposure-response relationship between daratumumab PK and efficacy or safety end points was similar for subcutaneous and intravenous DARA. Although the ≤65-kg subgroup reported a higher incidence of neutropenia, no relationship was found between the incidence of neutropenia and exposure, which was attributed, in part, to the preexisting imbalance in neutropenia between subcutaneous DARA (45.5%) and intravenous DARA (19%) in patients ≤50 kg. A flat relationship was observed between body weight and any grade and at least grade 3 infections. The results support the DARA 1800-mg subcutaneous flat dose as an alternative to the approved intravenous DARA 16 mg/kg., (© 2020 Janssen Pharmaceuticals. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

This Policy Review presents the International Myeloma Working Group's clinical practice recommendations for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Based on the results of phase 2 and phase 3 trials, these recommendations are proposed for the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory disease who have received one previous line of therapy, and for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who have received two or more previous lines of therapy. These recommendations integrate the issue of drug access in both low-income and middle-income countries and in high-income countries to help guide real-world practice and thus improve patient outcomes., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Intravenous daratumumab for treatment of patients with multiple myeloma involves a lengthy infusion that affects quality of life, and infusion-related reactions are common. Subcutaneous daratumumab is thought to be easier to administer and to cause fewer administration-related reactions. In this study (COLUMBA), we tested the non-inferiority of subcutaneous daratumumab to intravenous daratumumab., Methods: In this ongoing, multicentre (147 sites in 18 countries), open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3 trial, we recruited adult patients (age ≥18 years) if they had confirmed relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma according to International Myeloma Working Group criteria; received at least three previous lines of therapy, including a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug, or were double refractory to both a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug; and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or lower. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation schedule and balanced using randomly permuted blocks to receive daratumumab subcutaneously (subcutaneous group) or intravenously (intravenous group). Randomisation was stratified on the basis of baseline bodyweight (≤65 kg, 66-85 kg, >85 kg), previous therapy lines (≤four vs >four), and myeloma type (IgG vs non-IgG). Patients received 1800 mg of subcutaneous daratumumab co-formulated with 2000 U/mL recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 or 16 mg/kg of intravenous daratumumab once weekly (cycles 1-2), every 2 weeks (cycles 3-6), and every 4 weeks thereafter (28-day cycles) until progressive disease or toxicity. The co-primary endpoints were overall response and maximum trough concentration (C trough ; cycle 3, day 1 pre-dose). The non-inferiority margin for overall response was defined using a 60% retention of the lower bound (20·8%) of the 95% CI of the SIRIUS trial. Efficacy analyses were done by intention-to-treat population. The pharmacokinetic-evaluable population included all patients who received all eight weekly daratumumab doses in cycles 1 and 2 and provided a pre-dose pharmacokinetics blood sample on day 1 of cycle 3. The safety population included all patients who received at least one daratumumab dose. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03277105., Findings: Between Oct 31, 2017, and Dec 27, 2018, 655 patients were screened, of whom 522 were recruited and randomly assigned (subcutaneous group n=263; intravenous group n=259). Three patients in the subcutaneous group and one in the intravenous group did not receive treatment and were not evaluable for safety. At a median follow-up of 7·5 months (IQR 6·5-9·3), overall response and C trough met the predefined non-inferiority criteria. An overall response was seen in 108 (41%) of 263 patients in the subcutaneous group and 96 (37%) of 259 in the intravenous group (relative risk 1·11, 95% CI 0·89-1·37). The geometric means ratio for C trough was 107·93% (90% CI 95·74-121·67), and the maximum C trough was 593 μg/mL (SD 306) in the subcutaneous group and 522 μg/mL (226) in the intravenous group. The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were anaemia (34 [13%] of 260 patients evaluable for safety in the subcutaneous group and 36 [14%] of 258 patients in the intravenous group), neutropenia (34 [13%] and 20 [8%]), and thrombocytopenia (36 [14%] and 35 [14%]). Pneumonia was the only serious adverse event in more than 2% of patients (seven [3%] in the subcutaneous group and 11 [4%] in the intravenous group). There was one death resulting from a treatment-related adverse event in the subcutaneous daratumumab group (febrile neutropenia) and four in the intravenous group (sepsis [n=2], hepatitis B reactivation [n=1], and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia [n=1])., Interpretation: Subcutaneous daratumumab was non-inferior to intravenous daratumumab in terms of efficacy and pharmacokinetics and had an improved safety profile in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. These data could contribute to the approval of the subcutaneous daratumumab formulation by regulatory bodies., Funding: Janssen Research & Development., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable despite recent therapeutic advances. RAS mutations are frequently associated with relapsed/refractory disease. Efforts to target the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway with the MEK inhibitor, trametinib (Tra) have been limited by toxicities and the development of resistance. Dexamethasone (Dex) is a corticosteroid commonly used in clinical practice, to enhance efficacy of anti-myeloma therapy. Therefore, we hypothesised that the combination of Tra and Dex would yield synergistic activity in RAS-mutant MM., Methods: The response of human MM cell lines to drug treatment was analysed using cell proliferation assays, Western blotting, Annexin V and propidium iodide staining by flow cytometry and reverse phase protein arrays. The efficacy of trametinib and dexamethasone treatment in the MM.1S xenograft model was assessed by measuring tumor volume over time., Results: The Tra/Dex combination demonstrated synergistic cytotoxicity in KRAS G12A mutant lines MM.1S and RPMI-8226. The induction of apoptosis was associated with decreased MCL-1 expression and increased BIM expression. Reverse phase proteomic arrays revealed suppression of FAK, PYK2, FLT3, NDRG1 and 4EBP1 phosphorylation with the Tra/Dex combination. Notably, NDRG1 expression was associated with the synergistic response to Tra/Dex. MM cells were sensitive to PDK1 inhibition and IGF1-induced signalling partially protected from Tra/Dex treatment, highlighting the importance of this pathway. In the MM.1S tumor xenograft model, only the combination of Tra/Dex resulted in a significant inhibition of tumor growth., Conclusions: Overall Tra/Dex demonstrates antiproliferative activity in RAS-mutant MM cell lines associated with suppression of pro-survival PDK1 signalling and engagement of apoptotic pathways. Our data support further investigation of this combination in RAS-mutant MM.

Background: Maintenance therapy following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can delay disease progression and prolong survival in patients with multiple myeloma. Ixazomib is ideally suited for maintenance therapy given its convenient once-weekly oral dosing and low toxicity profile. In this study, we aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of ixazomib as maintenance therapy following ASCT., Methods: The phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled TOURMALINE-MM3 study took place in 167 clinical or hospital sites in 30 countries in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia, and North and South America. Eligible participants were adults with a confirmed diagnosis of symptomatic multiple myeloma according to International Myeloma Working Group criteria who had achieved at least a partial response after undergoing standard-of-care induction therapy followed by high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m 2 ) conditioning and single ASCT within 12 months of diagnosis. Patients were randomly assigned in a 3:2 ratio to oral ixazomib or matching placebo on days 1, 8, and 15 in 28-day cycles for 2 years following induction, high-dose therapy, and transplantation. The initial 3 mg dose was increased to 4 mg from cycle 5 if tolerated during cycles 1-4. Randomisation was stratified by induction regimen, pre-induction disease stage, and response post-transplantation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by intention-to-treat analysis. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of ixazomib or placebo, according to treatment actually received. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02181413, and follow-up is ongoing., Findings: Between July 31, 2014, and March 14, 2016, 656 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive ixazomib maintenance therapy (n=395) or placebo (n=261). With a median follow-up of 31 months (IQR 27·3-35·7), we observed a 28% reduction in the risk of progression or death with ixazomib versus placebo (median PFS 26·5 months [95% CI 23·7-33·8] vs 21·3 months [18·0-24·7]; hazard ratio 0·72, 95% CI 0·58-0·89; p=0·0023). No increase in second malignancies was noted with ixazomib therapy (12 [3%] patients) compared with placebo (eight [3%] patients) at the time of this analysis. 108 (27%) of 394 patients in the ixazomib group and 51 (20%) of 259 patients in the placebo group experienced serious adverse events. During the treatment period, one patient died in the ixazomib group and none died in the placebo group., Interpretation: Ixazomib maintenance prolongs PFS and represents an additional option for post-transplant maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma., Funding: Millennium Pharmaceuticals, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

During the last few years, several new drugs have been introduced for treatment of patients with multiple myeloma, which have significantly improved the treatment outcome. All of these novel substances differ at least in part in their mode of action from similar drugs of the same drug class, or are representatives of new drug classes, and as such present with very specific side effect profiles. In this review, we summarize these adverse events, provide information on their prevention, and give practical guidance for monitoring of patients and for management of adverse events.

Background: Multiple myeloma is consistently preceded by monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), which is usually only treated by a form of anti-multiple myeloma therapy if it is causing substantial disease through deposition of secreted M proteins. However, studies comparing how MGUS and multiple myeloma plasma cell clones respond to these therapies are scarce. Biclonal gammopathy multiple myeloma is characterised by the coexistence of an active multiple myeloma clone and a benign MGUS clone, and thus provides a unique model to assess the responses of separate clones to the same anti-multiple myeloma therapy, in the same patient, at the same time. We aimed to identify how MGUS and multiple myeloma plasma cell clones responded to anti-multiple myeloma therapy in patients newly diagnosed with biclonal gammopathy multiple myeloma., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified patients with biclonal gammopathy multiple myeloma by central laboratory analysis of 6399 newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma enrolled in three UK clinical trials (Myeloma IX, Myeloma XI, and TEAMM) between July 7, 2004, and June 2, 2015. In addition to the inclusion criteria of these trials, our study necessitated at trial entry the presence of two distinct M proteins in immunofixation electrophoresis. The primary endpoint was difference in response achieved with anti-multiple myeloma therapy on MGUS (which we defined as M2) and multiple myeloma (M1) clones-overall, within patients, and between therapy types-with international therapy response criteria assessed with χ 2 analyses. We analysed by intention to treat., Findings: 44 patients with biclonal gammopathy multiple myeloma with IgG or IgA MGUS clones were subsequently identified from the three trials and then longitudinally monitored. 41 (93%) of M1 clones had a response to therapy (either complete response, very good partial response, partial response, or minor response) compared with only 28 (64%) of M2 clones (p=0·0010). For the 20 patients who received intensive therapy, there was no difference between the proportion of responding clones in M1 (19 [95%]) and M2 (15 [75%], p=0·13). However, for the 17 patients who received non-intensive therapy, 16 (94%) of M1 clones had a response compared with ten [59%] of M2 clones (p=0·031). When examining clones within the same patient, 30 (68%) of 44 individual patients had different levels of responses within the M1 and M2 clones. One patient exhibited M2 progression to myeloma and subsequently died., Interpretation: These results show that, in patients with biclonal gammopathy multiple myeloma, anti-multiple myeloma therapies exert a greater depth of response against multiple myeloma plasma cell clones than MGUS plasma cell clones. Although some MGUS clones exhibited a complete response, many did not respond, which suggests that the underlying features that render multiple myeloma plasma cells susceptible to therapy are present in only some MGUS plasma cell clones. To determine MGUS clone susceptibly to therapy, future studies might seek to identify, with biclonal gammopathy multiple myeloma as an investigative model, the genetic and epigenetic alterations that affect whether MGUS plasma cell clones are responsive to anti-multiple myeloma therapy., Funding: National Institute of Health Research, Medical Research Council, and Cancer Research UK., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Multiple myeloma is a malignancy of terminally differentiated plasma cells and is incurable in the majority of the patients. Thus, novel effective treatment regimens are urgently needed. In this study, we examined the effects of co-treatment with proteasome-inhibitor bortezomib and topoisomerase II inhibitor etoposide in multiple myeloma cells lines OPM-2, RPMI-S and NCI-H929. Using the median effect method of Chou and Talalay, we evaluated the combination indices (CI) for simultaneous and sequential treatment schedules. In the sequential treatment schedule, we found strong synergistic effects in all three cell lines, even at low single-agent cytotoxicity levels. When cells were treated simultaneously with both drugs, the synergy was present but less pronounced than in the sequential treatment schedule. The synergistic effects observed in the co-treatment schedules were accompanied by an inhibition of anti-apoptotic effects that were induced by etoposide alone. Namely, bortezomib abrogated both etoposide-induced NF-kappaB activation and etoposide-induced bcl-2 up-regulation. Our data suggest that combining etoposide with bortezomib might be useful for cancer treatment, as bortezomib potentially inhibits counter-regulatory mechanisms of tumor cells, which are induced by topoisomerase II inhibition and which may contribute to acquired chemoresistance.

Purpose: Curcumin is a natural polyphenolic derogate extracted from spice turmeric, exhibiting anti-inflammatory and chemopreventive activities. It was described to interact with the signalosome-associated kinases and the proteasome-ubiquitin system, which both are involved in the osteoclastogenesis. Thus, we hypothesized that curcumin could diminish osteoclast differentiation and function., Methods: For the experiments considering osteoclast differentiation and resorptional activities, preosteoclasts were cultured for 4 weeks and treated with curcumin at subapoptotic dosages. Derived mature osteoclasts were identified as large, multinucleated cells with expression of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase activity. Formation of resorption lacunae, a hallmark of osteoclast activity, was quantified using dentine pits and light microscopy. The signaling pathways were examined by ELISA-based methods and by immunoblotting., Results: Both 1 and 10 microM curcumin abrogated osteoclast differentiation (by 56 and 81%) and function (by 56 and 99%) (P < 0.05) dose-dependently. The effects were accompanied by the inhibition of I kappaB phosphorylation and NF-kappaB activation. In contrast, subtoxic doses did not have any significant effects on proteasome inhibition., Conclusion: This manuscript is the first report that describes the effects of curcumin toward human osteoclastogenesis, and builds the framework for clinical trials of curcumin in the treatment of cancer-induced lytic bone disease.

Lytic bone destruction is a hallmark of multiple myeloma (MM) and is because of an uncoupling of bone remodeling. Secretion of Dickkopf (DKK)-1 by myeloma cells is a major factor which causes inhibition of osteoblast precursors. In this study, the effect of different treatment regimens for MM on serum DKK-1 was evaluated and correlated with the response to treatment in 101 myeloma patients receiving bortezomib, thalidomide, lenalidomide, adriamycin and dexamethasone (AD) or high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). At baseline, myeloma patients had increased serum DKK-1 as compared with patients with MGUS (mean 3786 pg/mL vs. 1993 pg/mL). There was no difference between previously untreated MM patients and patients at relapse. A significant decrease of DKK-1 after therapy was seen in the following groups: Bortezomib (4059 pg/mL vs. 1862 pg/mL, P = 0.016), lenalidomide (11837 pg/mL vs. 4374 pg/mL, P = 0.039), AD (1668 pg/mL vs. 1241 pg/mL, P = 0.016), and AD + HDCT + ASCT (2446 pg/mL vs. 1082 pg/mL, P = 0.001). Thalidomide led to a non-significant decrease in DKK-1 (1705 pg/mL vs. 1269 pg/mL, P = 0.081). Within all groups, a significant decrease of DKK-1 was only seen in responders (i.e. patients achieving complete remission or partial remission), but not in non-responders. We show for the first time that serum DKK-1 levels decrease in myeloma patients responding to treatment, irrespective of the regimen chosen. These data suggest that myeloma cells are the main source of circulating DKK-1 protein and provide a framework for clinical trials on anti-DKK-1 treatment in MM.

The proteasome is a multicatalytic threonine protease responsible for intracellular protein turnover in eukaryotic cells, including the processing and degradation of several proteins involved in cell cycle control and the regulation of apoptosis. Preclinical studies have shown that the treatment with proteasome inhibitors results in decreased proliferation, induction of apoptosis, and sensitization of tumor cells against conventional chemotherapeutic agents and irradiation. The effects were conferred to stabilization of p21, p27, Bax, p53, I-KB, and the resulting inhibition of the nuclear factor-KB (NF-KB) activation. Bortezomib is the first proteasome inhibitor that has entered clinical trials. In multiple myeloma, both the FDA (United States Food and Drug Administration) and EMEA (European Medicine Evaluation Agency) granted an approval for the use of bortezomib (Velcade, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA) for the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma. At present, clinical trials are examining the activity in a variety of solid tumors and hematological malignancies.

Objectives: Myeloma bone disease is a result of excessive osteoclast activation and impaired osteoblast function. Recent in vitro studies suggested that proteasome inhibitors might increase osteoblast function., Methods: We analyzed serum markers of osteoblast activity in 25 patients with multiple myeloma receiving bortezomib alone or in combination with dexamethasone. As control, serum samples from 58 consecutive myeloma patients receiving a therapy different than bortezomib (i.e. adriamycin/dexamethasone, melphalan/prednisone or thalidomide) were evaluated. The serum concentrations of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and osteocalcin were quantified before initiation of treatment and after 3 months., Results: In patients treated with bortezomib, mean serum levels of osteocalcin significantly increased from 6.3 to 10.8 microg/L (P = 0.024), while mean BAP levels increased from 19.7 to 30.2 U/L (P < 0.0005). Of interest, the increase in BAP was significant both in responders and non-responders. In contrast, the control group did not show a statistically significant change in BAP (24.8 U/L vs. 23.3 U/L) and osteocalcin (6.8 microg/L vs. 6.5 microg/L) before and after the treatment., Conclusion: These data show that treatment with bortezomib leads to enhanced markers of osteoblast activity in patients with myeloma. The comparison with the control group suggests that the effect on osteoblasts is unique to the proteasome inhibitor.

Increased bone resorption is a major characteristic of multiple myeloma and is caused by osteoclast activation and osteoblast inhibition (uncoupling). Myeloma cells alter the local regulation of bone metabolism by increasing the receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL) and decreasing osteoprotegerin expression within the bone marrow microenvironment, thereby stimulating the central pathway for osteoclast formation and activation. In addition, they produce the chemokines MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta, and SDF-1alpha, which also increase osteoclast activity. On the other hand, myeloma cells suppress osteoblast function by the secretion of osteoblast inhibiting factors, e.g., the Wnt inhibitors DKK-1 and sFRP-2. Moreover, they inhibit differentiation of osteoblast precursors and induce apoptosis in osteoblasts. The resulting bone destruction releases several cytokines, which in turn promote myeloma cell growth. Therefore, the inhibition of bone resorption could stop this vicious circle and not only decrease myeloma bone disease, but also the tumor progression.

Proteasome inhibitors represent novel anti-cancer drugs which interact with the proteasome-ubiquitin pathway. The 26S proteasome is a multicatalytic threonine protease with three distinct catalytic activities. It is responsible for intracellular protein turnover in eukaryotic cells, including the processing and degradation of short- and some long-living proteins required for regulation of various cellular functions. Subsequently, the inhibition of the proteasomal function results in stabilization and accumulation of its substrates, which notably include cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, transcriptional factors, tumor suppressor proteins and proto-oncogenes. This results in confounding signals in the cell inducing cell cycle arrest and activation of apoptotic programs. Acting on transcriptional factor NF-kappaB, which is upregulated in some tumors undergoing chemotherapy or irradiation and downregulated by proteasome inhibition, a significant chemosensitization and consequently synergistic effects concerning the anti-tumor activity could be achieved. Bortezomib is the first proteasome inhibitor that has entered clinical trials. In multiple myeloma, both the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicine Evaluation Agency granted approval for the use of bortezomib (Velcade) for the treatment of multiple myeloma patients who have received at least two prior therapies and have demonstrated disease progression on the last therapy. At present, other trials examine the activity in a variety of solid tumors and hematological malignancies. This paper reviews preclinical and clinical results.