Search

Typically, peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCLs) prognosis is estimated using overall survival before treatment. However, these estimates cannot show how prognosis evolves with the changing hazard rate over time. Patients (n = 650) with newly diagnosed PTCLs were enrolled retrospectively. After a median follow-up of 5.4 years, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL, NOS) and NK/T cell lymphoma had initially lower 3-year conditional overall survival (COS3; i.e., the 3-year conditional overall survival was defined as the probability of surviving an additional 3 years) and higher hazards of death (26-44.3%). However, after 2 years, the COS3 increased and the death risk decreased over time, whereas anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive anaplastic large-cell lymphoma constantly had a lower risk over time (0-19.5%). For patients with complete remission after initial treatment, prognosis varied by histological subtypes, with PTCL, NOS having a negative impact. Our data suggested that the risk stratification using the International Prognostic Index might not accurately predict the COS3 for survivors of PTCLs. The COS3 provided time-dependent prognostic information for PTCLs, representing a possible surrogate prognosis indicator for long-term survivors after systemic chemotherapy.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are a heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas with poor clinical outcomes. Pralatrexate showed efficacy and safety in recurrent or refractory PTCLs. The purpose or this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of pralatrexate in relapsed or refractory PTCLs in real-world practice. This was an observational, multicenter, retrospective analysis. Between December 2012 and December 2016, a total of 38 patients with relapsed or refractory PTCLs were treated with pralatrexate at 10 tertiary hospitals in Korea. Patients received an intravenous infusion of pralatrexate at a dose of 30 mg/m 2 /week for 6 weeks on a 7-week schedule. Modified dosing and/or scheduling was allowed according to institutional protocols. Median patient age was 58 years (range, 29-80 years) and the most common subtype was peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (n = 23, 60.5%). The median dosage of pralatrexate per administration was 25.6 mg/m 2 /wk (range, 15.0-33.0 mg/m 2 /wk). In intention-to-treat analysis, 3 patients (7.9%) showed a complete response and 5 patients (13.2%) showed a partial response, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR) of 21.1%. The median duration of response was 7.6 months (range, 1.6-24.3 months). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-1.8 months) and the median overall survival was 7.7 months (95% CI, 4.4-9.0 months). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (n = 13, 34.2%), neutropenia (n = 7, 23.7%), and anemia (n = 7, 18.4%). Our study showed relatively lower ORR and shorter PFS in patients with recurrent or refractory PTCLs treated with pralatrexate in real-world practice. The toxicity profile was acceptable and manageable. We also observed significantly lower dose intensity of pralatrexate in real-world practice.

Purpose: The aim of this open-label, first-in-setting, randomized phase III trial was to evaluate the efficacy of alisertib, an investigational Aurora A kinase inhibitor, in patients with relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL)., Patients and Methods: Adult patients with relapsed/refractory PTCL-one or more prior therapy-were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive oral alisertib 50 mg two times per day (days 1 to 7; 21-day cycle) or investigator-selected single-agent comparator, including intravenous pralatrexate 30 mg/m 2 (once per week for 6 weeks; 7-week cycle), or intravenous gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 or intravenous romidepsin 14 mg/m 2 (days 1, 8, and 15; 28-day cycle). Tumor tissue (disease subtype) and imaging were assessed by independent central review. Primary outcomes were overall response rate and progression-free survival (PFS). Two interim analyses and one final analysis were planned., Results: Between May 2012 and October 2014, 271 patients were randomly assigned (alisertib, n = 138; comparator, n = 133). Enrollment was stopped early on the recommendation of the independent data monitoring committee as a result of the low probability of alisertib achieving PFS superiority with full enrollment. Centrally assessed overall response rate was 33% for alisertib and 45% for the comparator arm (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.33 to 1.08). Median PFS was 115 days for alisertib and 104 days for the comparator arm (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.637 to 1.178). The most common adverse events were anemia (53% of alisertib-treated patients v 34% of comparator-treated patients) and neutropenia (47% v 31%, respectively). A lower percentage of patients who received alisertib (9%) compared with the comparator (14%) experienced events that led to study drug discontinuation. Of 26 on-study deaths, five were considered treatment related (alisertib, n = 3 of 11; comparator, n = 2 of 15). Two-year overall survival was 35% for each arm., Conclusion: In patients with relapsed/refractory PTCL, alisertib was not statistically significantly superior to the comparator arm.

The peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) account for 5% to 10% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas. In the up-front setting, approximately one-quarter of patients experience a long-term remission. In the setting of relapsed and refractory disease, the median progression-free survival and overall survival are reported to be only 3.7 and 6.5 months, respectively. Unfortunately, the molecular and genetic characterization of PTCL has lagged well behind that of the B-cell lymphomas, although several recent experiences are shedding light on the remarkable molecular heterogeneity that has come to define these diverse diseases. The need to identify new active drugs for patients with PTCL has been addressed in part over the last several years, as 4 drugs have now been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with relapsed or refractory disease, and a plethora of new studies exploring novel combinations have begun to emerge. More advanced techniques in molecular biology, such as next-generation sequencing, gene expression profiling, and comparative genomic hybridization, have helped identify subtleties among subtypes and potentially identify new targets. Many of these recent clinical advances have been based on the recognition that PTCL is a disease that may be broadly characterized by gross epigenetic dysregulation with sensitivity to histone deacetylase inhibitors. In this report, we discuss emerging new therapies in relapsed and refractory PTCL and try to place these new findings in the evolving biological understanding of the disease.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas are aggressive lymphomas with poor outcomes for which novel treatments are urgently needed. Alisertib (MLN8237) is a second-generation oral Aurora A kinase inhibitor. Treatment with alisertib results in an accumulation of cells with abnormal mitotic spindles, leading to decreased proliferation and apoptosis in a range of human tumor cell lines. Alisertib has shown single-agent antitumor activity in animal xenograft models and promising antitumor activity alone or in combination with other agents in patients with solid and hematologic cancers, and T-cell lymphomas in particular. It is currently being tested in randomized controlled Phase III trials in relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Opinion statement: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are rare and heterogeneous diseases that carry, with the exception of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) anaplastic large cell lymphoma, a poor prognosis when treated with conventional chemotherapy. Historically, PTCL was treated like aggressive B-cell lymphomas, and to date cyclophosphamide, prednisone, vincristine, and doxorubicin (CHOP) remains the most commonly used regimen, despite disappointing results. Given the poor outcomes of PTCL patients, a number of studies have investigated the role of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) in the upfront setting, with different results. However, there are no prospective randomized trials, and the clinical benefit appears to be restricted to patients who achieve an objective response after induction chemotherapy. Nevertheless, with the exception of low-risk ALK+ anaplastic large cell lymphoma, in light of the available data, HDT/ASCT for consolidation should be recommended for patients deemed eligible. The results of phase II trials showed that allogeneic stem cell transplantation can cure some relapsed/refractory patients, and few studies have evaluated this strategy in the frontline setting. With the availability of recently approved new drugs as well as new targeted agents under investigation, a number of ongoing studies are testing novel combinations aiming to improve rate and durability of responses to induction chemotherapy.

The rate of long-term remissions after treatment of peripheral T cell lymphomas (PTCL) with standard CHOP-like protocols is unsatisfactory. A prospective multicenter phase II trial was initiated in untreated patients with PTCL of all International Prognostic Index-risk groups, evaluating alemtuzumab consolidation in patients with complete or good partial remission after CHO(E)P-14 induction. Twenty-nine (70.7 %) of the 41 enrolled patients received alemtuzumab consolidation (133 mg in total). The main grades 3-4 toxicities during alemtuzumab therapy were infections and neutropenia with one potentially treatment-related death. Complete responses were seen in 58.5 %, partial responses in 2.4 % and 29.3 % had progressive disease. After a median observation time of 46 months, 19 patients have died, 16 of them due to lymphoma and/or salvage therapy complications. Event-free and overall survival at 3 years in the whole intent to treat population are 32.3 and 62.5 %, respectively, and 42.4 and 75.1 % in the patients who received alemtuzumab. In conclusion, application of a short course of alemtuzumab after CHO(E)P-14 induction is feasible although complicated by severe infections. A current phase III trial, applying alemtuzumab as part of the initial chemotherapy protocol to avoid early progression, will further clarify its significance for the therapeutic outcome.

Peripheral T-cell and NK-cell lymphomas are uncommon disorders accounting for 10-15% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). The NHL classification project represents the first attempt to systematically study the distribution of NHL subtypes based on a collaborative international effort and it confirmed the wide geographic variation in the frequency of different subtypes of PTCL. Subsequently, the International T-cell Lymphoma Project (ITLP), the largest collaborative international effort to date, reported prevalence and outcomes of 1314 cases of PTCL from 22 institutions worldwide with central pathology review. The ITLP consortium launched a prospective study, the T-cell project, in September 2006 aimed at collecting an exhaustive clinical and biologic data set on 1000 patients with PTCL for better definition of prognostic factors that would influence outcomes of these patients. This review aims to describe the difference in frequency and outcomes for various subtypes of PTCL based on these studies., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

In children, T and NK-cell lymphomas are uncommon in Western Countries. While there has been significant experience treating T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), other subtypes are very rarely encountered and there are no standard approaches to their management. There are many challenges in defining optimal therapy for many of these diseases but recent progress in elucidating their biology has led to new molecular insights and identified interesting targets for novel drug discovery. In this review, we discuss these disorders in children, how they are approached therapeutically and what lies on the horizon with respect to novel treatment approaches., (Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Peripheral T-cell and NK-cell lymphomas (PT/NKCL) are a heterogeneous group of lymphoid neoplasms with poor outcomes. There is no consensus on the best front line therapy or management of relapsed/refractory disease. The use of autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been studied in both settings to improve outcomes. Multiple retrospective and several prospective trials were reported. While at first sight the outcomes in the relapsed/refractory setting appear similar in B-cell and T-cell lymphomas when treated with high dose therapy (HDT) and autologous HCT, it is becoming obvious that only specific subtypes of PTCL benefit from this approach (i.e. anaplastic large cell lymphoma [ALCL] and angioimmunoblastic lymphoma [AITL] in second CR). In less favorable histologies, HDT seems to provide limited benefit, with the majority of patients experiencing post-transplant relapse. The use of autologous HCT to consolidate first remission has been evaluated in several prospective trials. Again, the best results were observed in ALCL, but the superiority of this approach over chemotherapy alone needs confirmation in randomized trials. In less favorable histologies, high-dose consolidation resulted in low survival rates comparable to those obtained with chemotherapy alone, and without randomized trials it is hard to recommend this strategy to all patients with newly diagnosed PT/NKCL. Allogeneic HCT might provide potent and potentially curative graft-vs-lymphoma effect and overcome chemotherapy resistance. Only a few studies have been reported to date on allogeneic HCT in PT/NKCL. Based on available data, eligible patients benefit significantly from this approach, with 50% or more patients achieving long-term disease control or cure, although at the expense of significant treatment related mortality (TRM). Reduced-intensity conditioning regimens appear to have lower TRM and might extend this approach to older patients. With the recent approval of several novel agents for relapsed/refractory PT/NKCL and their impact on survival of patients after relapse, it is becoming even more difficult to assess the benefit of HCT on overall survival and apply the results of non-randomized studies to clinical practice. Development of effective clinico-pathologic prognostic models might provide the opportunity to better define the role of HCT for patients with various subtypes of PT/NKCL. The first randomized trial comparing upfront autologous and allogeneic HCT was initiated by the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group, and the results of this study might help answer some of the controversies for the first time., (Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

In patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs), T-cell lymphoma (TCL) confers a poor prognosis. Since rituximab has increased survival for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), we hypothesized that the difference in outcome by phenotype became more pronounced recently and evaluated these changes using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Cases diagnosed in 1992-1997 (era 1) and 1998-2003 (era 2) were evaluated for outcomes according to immunophenotype and era. A total of 22,252 patients with DLBCL and 2222 with TCL were included. In both eras, patients with TCL were more likely to die from their disease than those with DLBCL. Death from NHL decreased significantly from era 1 to era 2 for all DLBCL patients grouped by age and stage but in none of the TCL groups. Improved outcomes for DLBCL after the introduction of rituximab-based therapies in 1997 have no counterpart in patients with TCL, pointing to the need for new therapies to treat TCL.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are aggressive tumors in which the current therapy based on multiagent chemotherapy is not successful. Since cytochrome P450 3A subfamily (CYP3A) enzymes are involved in the inactivation of chemotherapy drugs, we hypothesized that CYP3A and P-glycoprotein (MDR1) expression in these lymphomas could result in a poor clinical response. We measured tumoral CYP3A and MDR1 mRNA content in 44 T-cell lymphomas, finding a large variation in CYP3A expression. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis showed genomic gains affecting CYP3A and MDR1 genes in T-cell lines and primary tumors, suggesting that this could be the mechanism underlying the tumoral expression variation. To test whether the tumoral expression of CYP3A and/or MDR1 could influence PTCL treatment outcome, their expression levels were compared with the clinical response and survival of the patients, finding that a high tumoral expression of CYP3A4 was significantly associated with a lower complete remission rate. This was further investigated with cell lines stably expressing CYP3A4 that exhibited an increased resistance to doxorubicin and etoposide. In conclusion, a high CYP3A4 tumoral expression could be useful to predict poor response to the standard PTCL chemotherapy; in these cases alternative chemotherapy combinations or doses should be explored.