Search

Simple Summary: Human epidermal receptor (HER) 2-positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is one of the major subtypes of gastric cancer, accounting for ~20% of all cases. After the success of a ToGA trial, the development of treatment for HER2-positive AGC had been at a standstill for a long time. Recently, trastuzumab deruxtecan in later-line therapy and the combination therapy of chemotherapy plus trastuzumab with immune checkpoint inhibitor has demonstrated significant survival benefit in first-line treatment. Currently, several clinical trials of new types of anti-HER2 agents are ongoing. Human epidermal receptor (HER) 2-positive advanced gastric cancer is one of the major subtypes of gastric cancer, accounting for ~20% of all cases. Although combination therapy with trastuzumab and chemotherapy provides meaningful survival benefit, clinical trials targeting HER2 have failed to demonstrate clinical benefits in first- or subsequent-line treatment. Trastuzumab deruxtecan, an antibody–drug conjugate, has shown positive results even in later-line treatment and has become new standard treatment. In first-line therapy, combination therapy with pembrolizumab and trastuzumab plus chemotherapy demonstrated a dramatic response rate. Therefore, the FDA rapidly approved it without waiting for the results of survival time. The emergence of combination therapy including immunotherapy with HER2-targeting agents and the development of HER2 targeting agents with or without immunotherapy have been advancing for treating HER2-positive gastric cancer. In this review, we will discuss the current status of treatment development and future perspectives for HER2-positive gastric cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Novel therapeutics are urgently needed for high-risk and refractory solid tumors. Clinical studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of PV-10 (10% rose bengal sodium) by intralesional injection in skin cancer. However, this agent has not yet been evaluated for the treatment of various adult solid tumors. The aim of our study was to test PV-10 in breast, colorectal, head and neck, and testicular cancers. Using a combination of in vitro and in vivo experiments, we found that PV-10 exhibits anti-cancer activity against a panel of human cell lines derived from these tumors. Our results support further clinical development of PV-10 for the treatment of solid tumors in adults. PV-10 is a 10% formulation of rose bengal sodium that has potent immunotherapeutic and anti-cancer activity against various tumors, including metastatic melanoma and refractory neuroblastoma. Currently, PV-10 is undergoing clinical testing for refractory metastatic neuroendocrine cancer and melanomas. However, preclinical investigation of PV-10 activity and its mechanisms against phenotypically and molecularly diverse adult solid tumors had not been conducted. In a panel of human cell lines derived from breast, colorectal, head and neck, and testicular cancers, we demonstrated that PV-10 induces cytotoxicity by apoptotic and autophagic pathways involving caspase-mediated PARP cleavage, downregulation of SQSTM1/p62, and upregulation of beclin-1. Treatment with PV-10 also consistently reduced phosphorylation of WNK1, which has been implicated in cancer cell migration and autophagy inhibition. By wound healing assay, PV-10 treatment inhibited the migration of cancer cells. Finally, significant inhibition of tumor growth was also noted in tumor-bearing mice treated with PV-10 by intralesional or systemic administration. In addition to known PV-10-mediated tumor-specific cytotoxic effects, we identified the mechanisms of PV-10 and provide new insights into its effect on autophagy and metastasis. Our data provide essential mechanism-based evidence and biomarkers of activity to formulate clinical studies of PV-10 in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In contemporary exploratory phase of oncology drug development, there has been an increasing interest in evaluating investigational drug or drug combination in multiple tumor indications in a single basket trial to expedite drug development. There has been extensive research on more efficiently borrowing information across tumor indications in early phase drug development including Bayesian hierarchical modeling and the pruning-and-pooling methods. Despite the fact that the Go/No-Go decision for subsequent Phase 2 or Phase 3 trial initiation is almost always a multi-facet consideration, the statistical literature of basket trial design and analysis has largely been limited to a single binary endpoint. In this paper we explore the application of considering clinical priorities of multiple endpoints based on matched win ratio to the basket trial design and analysis. The control arm data will be simulated for each tumor indication based on the corresponding null assumptions that could be heterogeneous across tumor indications. The matched win ratio matching on the tumor indication can be performed for individual tumor indication, pooled data, or the pooled data after pruning depending on whether an individual evaluation or a simple pooling or a pruning-and-pooling method is used. We conduct the simulation studies to evaluate the performance of proposed win ratio-based framework and the results suggest the proposed framework could provide desirable operating characteristics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Belzutifan, a hypoxia-inducible factor-2 alpha (HIF-2α) inhibitor, has emerged as an exciting new treatment option not only for patients with Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL)-related renal cell carcinoma (RCC) but also for sporadic RCC. While initial clinical data are promising, potential resistance with HIF-2α inhibitors may occur with increased understanding of this class of therapy. Potential ways to further increase the antitumor activity of HIF-2α targeting include combination strategies with immune checkpoint inhibitors and other targeted agents as well as newer generation HIF-2α inhibitors that are currently under development. Germline inactivation of the Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor is the defining hallmark in hereditary VHL disease and VHL-associated renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, somatic VHL mutations are also observed in patients with sporadic RCC. Loss of function VHL mutations result in constitutive activation of hypoxia-inducible factor-2 alpha (HIF-2α), which leads to increased expression of HIF target genes that promote angiogenesis and tumor growth. As of 2023, belzutifan is currently the only approved HIF-2α inhibitor for both VHL-associated and sporadic metastatic RCC (mRCC). However, there is potential for resistance with HIF-2α inhibitors which warrants novel HIF-2α-targeting strategies. In this review, we discuss the potential resistance mechanisms with belzutifan and current clinical trials evaluating novel combinations of belzutifan with other targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors which may enhance the efficacy of HIF-2α targeting. Lastly, we also discuss newer generation HIF-2α inhibitors that are currently under early investigation and outline future directions and challenges with HIF-2α inhibitors for mRCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose. Hypertension (HTN) is one of the most common adverse drug reactions to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), but little is known about its clinical risk factors. The aim of this study was to elucidate the association between baseline clinical characteristics and the occurrence of HTN in advanced gastric cancer (GC) patients prescribed apatinib, a commonly used VEGF-TKI in China, in a real-world setting. Patients and Methods. Fifty-five GC patients treated with apatinib from December 1st, 2016, to December 1st, 2020, were retrospectively included in electronic medical records. Adverse drug reactions were defined according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to investigate potential clinical risk factors for apatinib-related HTN. Results. The incidence of apatinib-related HTN of all grades was 45.45%, and grade 3 HTN occurred in 16.36% of patients. The median maximal systolic blood pressure (SBP) during apatinib treatment was 153 mm·Hg, and the median time to event was 25 days. New-onset HTN occurred in 10/33 (30.30%) patients. Preexisting HTN (odds ratio [OR]: 4.155; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.252, 13.787; p = 0.020) was the key independent risk factor associated with apatinib-related HTN. Conclusion. The incidence of HTN was high in patients treated with apatinib, and preexisting HTN was an independent risk factor. It is important to provide thorough and close monitoring of patients during treatment with apatinib, especially for those with preexisting HTN. This trial is registered with ChiCTR1900024531. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Anticancer drugs can determine alterations in the ocular surface system as side effects that can be referred to by patients as ocular discomfort symptoms and, sometimes, as reduced visual acuity. For this reason, it becomes essential to spread knowledge of the entire spectrum of ocular side effects of these drugs, especially for newer and more recent drugs. This review aims at analyzing the adverse effects on the ocular surface of these innovative anticancer drugs, trying to highlight the physiopathogenetic mechanisms underlying these complications and providing useful indications to clinicians for their proper management. Surgery, anticancer drugs (chemotherapy, hormonal medicines, and targeted treatments), and/or radiation are common treatment strategies for neoplastic diseases. Anticancer drugs eliminate malignant cells through the inhibition of specific pathways that contribute to the formation and development of cancer. Given the ability of such pharmacological medications to combat cancerous cells, their role in the management of neoplastic diseases has become essential. However, these drugs may also lead to undesirable systemic and ocular adverse effects due to cyto/neuro-toxicity and inflammatory reactions. Ocular surface side effects are recognized to significantly impact patient's quality of life and quality of vision. Blepharoconjunctivitis is known to be a common side effect caused by oxaliplatin, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, and docetaxel, while anastrozole, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil can all determine dry eye disease. However, the potential processes involved in the development of these alterations are yet not fully understood, especially for novel drugs currently available for cancer treatment. This review aims at analyzing the potential ocular surface and adnexal side effects of novel anticancer medications, trying to provide a better understanding of the underlying pharmacological processes and useful insights on the choice of proper management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The discovery of the involvement of the kynurenine pathway in carcinogenesis has prompted significant changes in pharmacotherapy strategies. One such approach involves the simultaneous targeting of an ongoing process in cancer cells and inhibiting the abovementioned pathway. Based on this approach, we investigated the anticancer effect of combining a 1,2,4-triazine derivative, MM-129, together with an inhibitor of the kynurenine pathway, indoximod, in a colon cancer model. The obtained results support the efficacy of this strategy, providing a basis for future in-depth analyses. (1) Background: The purpose of the given study was to examine the antitumor activity of the simultaneous administration of MM-129, a 1,2,4-triazine derivative, and indoximod (IND), the kynurenine pathway inhibitor, toward colon cancer. (2) Methods: The efficiency of the co-administration of the studied compounds was assessed in xenografted zebrafish embryos. Then, the effects of the combined administration of compounds on cellular processes such as cell viability, apoptosis, and intracellular signaling pathways were evaluated. In vitro studies were performed using two colorectal cancer cell lines, namely, DLD-1 and HT-29. (3) Results: The results indicated that the simultaneous application of MM-129 and indoximod induced a stronger inhibition of tumor growth in zebrafish xenografts. The combination of these compounds intensified the process of apoptosis by lowering the mitochondrial potential, enhancing the externalization of phosphatidylserine (PS) and activation of caspases. Additionally, the expression of protein kinase B (AKT) and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-(1IDO1) was disrupted under the applied compound combination. (4) Conclusions: Simultaneous targeting of ongoing cell signaling that promotes tumor progression, along with inhibition of the kynurenine pathway enzyme IDO1, results in the enhancement of the antitumor effect of the tested compounds against the colon cancer cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The use of suboptimal controls in randomized trials of new cancer drugs can produce potentially unreliable clinical efficacy results over the current standard of care and expose patients to substandard therapy. We aim to investigate the proportion of randomized trials of investigational cancer drugs that used a suboptimal control arm and the number of trial participants at risk of exposure to suboptimal treatments in China. The association between the use of a suboptimal control and concluding statistical significance on the primary endpoint was also examined. Methods and findings: This observational study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of cancer drugs that were authorized by specific Chinese institutional review boards between 2016 and 2021, supporting investigational new drug applications of these drugs in China. The proportion of trials that used a suboptimal control arm and the total number of trial participants at risk of exposure to suboptimal treatments were calculated. In a randomized trial for a specific condition, a comparator was deemed suboptimal if it was not recommended by clinical guidelines published in priori or if there existed a regimen with a higher level of recommendation for the indication. The final sample included 453 Phase II/III and Phase III randomized oncology trials. Overall, 60 trials (13.2%) adopted a suboptimal control arm. Among them, 58.3% (35/60) used comparators that were not recommended by a prior guideline for the indication. The cumulative number of trial participants at risk of exposure to suboptimal treatments totaled 18,610 by the end of 2021, contributing 15.1% to the total number of enrollees of all sampled RCTs in this study. After adjusting for the year of ethical approval, region of participant recruitment, line of therapy, and cancer site, second-line therapies (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.7, 95%CI [1.2, 5.9]), adjuvant therapies (aOR = 8.9, 95% CI [3.4, 23.1]), maintenance therapies (aOR = 5.2, 95% CI [1.6, 17.0]), and trials recruiting participants in China only (aOR = 4.1, 95% CI [2.1, 8.0]) were more likely to adopt a suboptimal control. For the 105 trials with publicly available results, no statistically significant difference was observed between the use of a suboptimal control and concluding positive on the primary endpoint (100.0% [12/12] versus 83.9% [78/93], p = 0.208). The main limitation of this study is its reliance on clinical guidelines that could vary across cancer types and time in assessing the quality of the control groups. Conclusions: In this study, over one-eighth of randomized trials of cancer drugs registered to apply for regulatory approval in China used a suboptimal comparator. Our results highlight the necessity to refine the design of randomized trials to generate optimal clinical evidence for new cancer therapies. In this observational study, Yichen Zhang and colleagues explore how comparator arms are used in randomized oncology trials registered in China. Author summary: Why was this study done?: ■ Using inappropriate controls in randomized trials of new cancer drugs can expose patients to harm and produce potentially unreliable results of clinical efficacy. ■ In November 2021, China's Center for Drug Evaluation issued the Guidance on Clinical Value-Oriented Oncology Drug Research and Development. It stated that an active control arm should be selected with consideration of whether it reflects the optimal treatment in current clinical practices. ■ Previous descriptive analysis showed that oncology trials are expanding in China; however, no literature evaluated the quality of their control arms. What did the researchers do and find?: ■ This observational study reports the annual trend and proportion of 453 Phase II/III and Phase III randomized oncology trials registered in China between 2016 and 2021 that adopted a suboptimal control arm. We also calculated the cumulative number of trial participants at risk of exposure to suboptimal treatments. ■ We observed a fluctuating yet overall upward trend in the number of trials and participants that used a suboptimal comparator during our observation period. Overall, 60 trials adopted a suboptimal control arm and the cumulative number of trial participants at risk of exposure to suboptimal treatments totaled 18,610 by the end of 2021. ■ Trials with a suboptimal control reported higher but statistically non-significant proportions of positive results than those using an optimal control. What do these findings mean?: ■ Trial sponsors, ethical review boards, and oncologists should make collaborative efforts to protect patients from unnecessary harm and drugs with uncertain clinical benefits over the existing standard of care. ■ Regulatory agencies should be cautious when reviewing investigational new drug applications whose supporting trial used a suboptimal control and when making subsequent market authorization decisions. ■ A limitation of this study is the reliance on clinical guidelines that could vary across cancer types and time in assessing the quality of the control groups. Hence, though oncologists and clinical pharmacists were consulted when assessing the sample trials, our results may have inherent subjectivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antibody-based cancer drugs that target the checkpoint proteins CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1 provide marked improvement in some patients with deadly diseases such as lung cancer and melanoma. However, most patients are either unresponsive or relapse following an initial response, underscoring the need for further improvement in immunotherapy. Certain drugs induce immunogenic cell death (ICD) in tumor cells in which the dying cells promote immunologic responses in the host that may enhance the in vivo activity of checkpoint antibodies. Sphingolipid metabolism is a key pathway in cancer biology, in which ceramides and sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) regulate tumor cell death, proliferation and drug resistance, as well as host inflammation and immunity. In particular, sphingosine kinases are key sites for manipulation of the ceramide/S1P balance that regulates tumor cell proliferation and sensitivity to radiation and chemotherapy. We and others have demonstrated that inhibition of sphingosine kinase-2 by the small-molecule investigational drug opaganib (formerly ABC294640) kills tumor cells and increases their sensitivities to other drugs and radiation. Because sphingolipids have been shown to regulate ICD, opaganib may induce ICD and improve the efficacy of checkpoint antibodies for cancer therapy. This was demonstrated by showing that in vitro treatment with opaganib increases the surface expression of the ICD marker calreticulin on a variety of tumor cell types. In vivo confirmation was achieved using the gold standard immunization assay in which B16 melanoma, Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) or Neuro-2a neuroblastoma cells were treated with opaganib in vitro and then injected subcutaneously into syngeneic mice, followed by implantation of untreated tumor cells 7 days later. In all cases, immunization with opaganib-treated cells strongly suppressed the growth of subsequently injected tumor cells. Interestingly, opaganib treatment induced crossover immunity in that opaganib-treated B16 cells suppressed the growth of both untreated B16 and LLC cells and opaganib-treated LLC cells inhibited the growth of both untreated LLC and B16 cells. Next, the effects of opaganib in combination with a checkpoint antibody on tumor growth in vivo were assessed. Opaganib and anti-PD-1 antibody each slowed the growth of B16 tumors and improved mouse survival, while the combination of opaganib plus anti-PD-1 strongly suppressed tumor growth and improved survival (p < 0.0001). Individually, opaganib and anti-CTLA-4 antibody had modest effects on the growth of LLC tumors and mouse survival, whereas the combination of opaganib with anti-CTLA-4 substantially inhibited tumor growth and increased survival (p < 0.001). Finally, the survival of mice bearing B16 tumors was only marginally improved by opaganib or anti-PD-L1 antibody alone but was nearly doubled by the drugs in combination (p < 0.005). Overall, these studies demonstrate the ability of opaganib to induce ICD in tumor cells, which improves the antitumor activity of checkpoint antibodies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Hematological neoplasms afflict millions of children and adults yearly and are often uncurable due to refractory illness and recurrence. Therefore, new treatment approaches are required. The proto-oncogene c-MYC has been linked to carcinogenesis, particularly in hematological malignancies. Consequently, to develop new and effective therapies for blood cancers, it is essential to target c-MYC, specifically that c-MYC inhibitors have not yet received clinical approval. In this research, the verification of adapalene as a c-MYC inhibitor may be a glimmer of hope, especially that it is an already Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug, and its toxicity profiles, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics are well established. Our study presents a rationale that the discovery of adapalene as a c-MYC inhibitor may significantly lower the drug development costs of new anticancer medications. It also provides further insights in the future of adapalene-based designs that could result in more effective and targeted innovative therapies for multiple myeloma. The majority of hematopoietic cancers in adults are incurable and exhibit unpredictable remitting-relapsing patterns in response to various therapies. The proto-oncogene c-MYC has been associated with tumorigenesis, especially in hematological neoplasms. Therefore, targeting c-MYC is crucial to find effective, novel treatments for blood malignancies. To date, there are no clinically approved c-MYC inhibitors. In this study, we virtually screened 1578 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs from the ZINC15 database against c-MYC. The top 117 compounds from PyRx-based screening with the best binding affinities to c-MYC were subjected to molecular docking studies with AutoDock 4.2.6. Retinoids consist of synthetic and natural vitamin A derivatives. All-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) were highly effective in hematological malignancies. In this study, adapalene, a third-generation retinoid usually used to treat acne vulgaris, was selected as a potent c-MYC inhibitor as it robustly bound to c-MYC with a lowest binding energy (LBE) of −7.27 kcal/mol, a predicted inhibition constant (pKi) of 4.69 µM, and a dissociation constant (Kd value) of 3.05 µM. Thus, we examined its impact on multiple myeloma (MM) cells in vitro and evaluated its efficiency in vivo using a xenograft tumor zebrafish model. We demonstrated that adapalene exerted substantial cytotoxicity against a panel of nine MM and two leukemic cell lines, with AMO1 cells being the most susceptible one (IC50 = 1.76 ± 0.39 µM) and, hence, the focus of this work. Adapalene (0.5 × IC50, 1 × IC50, 2 × IC50) decreased c-MYC expression and transcriptional activity in AMO1 cells in a dose-dependent manner. An examination of the cell cycle revealed that adapalene halted the cells in the G2/M phase and increased the portion of cells in the sub-G0/G1 phase after 48 and 72 h, indicating that cells failed to initiate mitosis, and consequently, cell death was triggered. Adapalene also increased the number of p-H3(Ser10) positive AMO1 cells, which is a further proof of its ability to prevent mitotic exit. Confocal imaging demonstrated that adapalene destroyed the tubulin network of U2OS cells stably transfected with a cDNA coding for α-tubulin-GFP, refraining the migration of malignant cells. Furthermore, adapalene induced DNA damage in AMO1 cells. It also induced apoptosis and autophagy, as demonstrated by flow cytometry and western blotting. Finally, adapalene impeded tumor growth in a xenograft tumor zebrafish model. In summary, the discovery of the vitamin A derivative adapalene as a c-MYC inhibitor reveals its potential as an avant-garde treatment for MM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Many patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are not surgical candidates, and the survival benefit of chemotherapy is less than 12 months. Several mutations and mutational clusters have recently been identified in CCA, some of which are pharmacologically targetable. The emergence of targeted therapies has significantly altered the treatment landscape of CCA and improved the prognosis for advanced or metastatic CCA. The purpose of this review is to describe past and current treatment strategies of CCA with a focus on FDA-approved targeted therapies. Data sources: A systematic evaluation of all FDA-approved targeted treatments for CCA through October 2022 was conducted. Information related to pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and safety was gathered from the package insert, and clinical trial data. Data summary: As of the writing of this review, four targeted agents are FDA approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic CCA. These agents include the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib and the FGFR2 inhibitors pemigatinib, infigratinib, and futibatinib. Collectively, these agents have provided additional treatment options for select patients with previously treated locally advanced or unresectable CCA. These agents have also contributed to the development of other targeted therapies for the treatment of CCA and have opened the door for the exploration of novel treatment combinations such as chemotherapy and immunotherapy, which have recently become a front-line treatment option. Conclusions: Four targeted small molecule agents have emerged as effective therapies in the second-line setting for CCA, which has immensely changed the treatment landscape and directly led to further investigation of targeted agents and immunotherapy as treatment for CCA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Modifications in the epigenetic landscape have been considered a hallmark of cancer. Histone deacetylation is one of the crucial epigenetic modulations associated with the aggressive progression of various cancer subtypes. Herein, we have repurposed the neprilysin inhibitor sacubitrilat as a potent anticancer agent using in-silico protein–ligand interaction profiler (PLIP) analysis, molecular docking, and in vitro studies. The screening of PLIP profiles between vorinostat/panobinostat and HDACs/LTA4H followed by molecular docking resulted in five (Sacubitrilat, B65, BDS, BIR, and NPV) FDA-approved, experimental and investigational drugs. Sacubitrilat has demonstrated promising anticancer activity against colorectal cancer (SW-480) and triple-negative breast cancer (MDA-MB-231) cells, with IC50 values of 14.07 μg/mL and 23.02 μg/mL, respectively. FACS analysis revealed that sacubitrilat arrests the cell cycle at the G0/G1 phase and induces apoptotic-mediated cell death in SW-480 cells. In addition, sacubitrilat inhibited HDAC isoforms at the transcriptomic level by 0.7–0.9 fold and at the proteomic level by 0.5–0.6 fold as compared to the control. Sacubitrilat increased the protein expression of tumor-suppressor (p53) and pro-apoptotic makers (Bax and Bid) by 0.2–2.5 fold while decreasing the expression of anti-apoptotic Bcl2 and Nrf2 proteins by 0.2–0.5 fold with respect to control. The observed cleaved PARP product indicates that sacubitrilat induces apoptotic-mediated cell death. This study may pave the way to identify the anticancer potential of sacubitrilat and can be explored in human clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite recent advances in treatment approaches, cancer is still one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Restoration of tumor immune surveillance represents a valid strategy to overcome the acquired resistance and cytotoxicity of conventional therapies in oncology and immunotherapeutic drugs, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and immunogenic cell death inducers, and has substantially progressed the treatment of several malignancies and improved the clinical management of advanced disease. Unfortunately, because of tumor-intrinsic and/or -extrinsic mechanisms for escaping immune surveillance, only a fraction of patients clinically respond to and benefit from cancer immunotherapy. Accumulating evidence derived from studies of drug repositioning, that is, the strategy to identify new uses for approved or investigational drugs that are outside the scope of the original medical indication, has suggested that some anthelmintic drugs, in addition to their antineoplastic effects, exert important immunomodulatory actions on specific subsets of immune cell and related pathways. In this review, we report and discuss current knowledge on the impact of anthelmintic drugs on host immunity and their potential implication in cancer immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite advertising imagery portraying cancer medicines as offering substantial improvement or cure, most patients can expect modest or no incremental benefit from most new treatments, according to pre-specified criteria. When improvements in overall survival are demonstrated, they average just 2.1 months. Despite limited benefits, drug prices have risen while median household incomes have remained largely unchanged, and these higher prices are poorly correlated with improved outcomes. Better alignment of perception with demonstrated drug benefit could be achieved by limitations on advertising and improved labeling or other disclosures. Reforms are also needed to remove financial incentives to prescribe costlier drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Trophoblast cell surface antigen-2 (Trop-2) is a widely expressed glycoprotein on a variety of different tumours. Trop-2 is considered as a marker of germ cells and is associated with regenerative ability in several tissues. Some studies demonstrated both oncogenic and tumour suppressor roles for Trop-2. In recent years, the therapeutic value of Trop-2 was identified and various studies with drug–antibody conjugates have been pursued in cancer patients. In this work, we reviewed both the pre-clinical and clinical activities of anti-Trop-2 therapy to highlight the future developments of these therapies. Trophoblast cell surface antigen-2 (Trop-2) is a glycoprotein that was first described as a membrane marker of trophoblast cells and was associated with regenerative abilities. Trop-2 overexpression was also described in several tumour types. Nevertheless, the therapeutic potential of Trop-2 was widely recognized and clinical studies with drug–antibody conjugates have been initiated in various cancer types. Recently, these efforts have been rewarded with the approval of sacituzumab govitecan from both the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA), for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patients. In our work, we briefly summarize the various characteristics of cancer cells overexpressing Trop-2, the pre-clinical activities of specific inhibitors, and the role of anti-Trop-2 therapy in current clinical practice. We also review the ongoing clinical trials to provide a snapshot of the future developments of these therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: CPUL1 exhibits antitumor properties against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), although the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Our study provides a comprehensive overview of the properties and molecular mechanisms of CPUL1 anti-HCC using transcriptomics and metabolomics and highlights the significance of progressive metabolic failure. This may be partially attributable to autophagy blockage, which is presumed to contribute to nutrient deprivation and increased cell susceptibility to stress. Therefore, the attractive properties of CPUL1 may endow this compound with the potential of becoming a promising anti-HCC agent. Background: CPUL1, a phenazine analog, has demonstrated potent antitumor properties against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and indicates a promising prospect in pharmaceutical development. However, the underlying mechanisms remain largely obscure. Methods: Multiple HCC cell lines were used to investigate the in vitro effects of CPUL1. The antineoplastic properties of CPUL1 were assessed in vivo by establishing a xenograft nude mice model. After that, metabolomics, transcriptomics, and bioinformatics were integrated to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the therapeutic efficacy of CPUL1, highlighting an unanticipated involvement of autophagy dysregulation. Results: CPUL1 suppressed HCC cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo, thereby endorsing the potential as a leading agent for HCC therapy. Integrative omics characterized a deteriorating scenario of metabolic debilitation with CPUL1, presenting an issue in the autophagy contribution of autophagy. Subsequent observations indicated that CPUL1 treatment could impede autophagic flow by suppressing autophagosome degradation rather than its formation, which supposedly exacerbated cellular damage triggered by metabolic impairment. Moreover, the observed late autophagosome degradation may be attributed to lysosome dysfunction, which is essential for the final stage of autophagy and cargo disposal. Conclusions: Our study comprehensively profiled the anti-hepatoma characteristics and molecular mechanisms of CPUL1, highlighting the implications of progressive metabolic failure. This could partially be ascribed to autophagy blockage, which supposedly conveyed nutritional deprivation and intensified cellular vulnerability to stress. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Mutations in the tumor suppressor p53 (p53) occur in ~50% of human cancers, the majority of which are missense mutations. Mutations in p53 not only impair the tumor suppressive function, but also confer missense mutant p53 (mutp53) with oncogenic activities independent of wild-type p53 (wtp53). Since p53 mutations are cancer-specific, several approaches targeting them have been taken to develop novel cancer therapies, including restoration or stabilization of wtp53 conformation from mutp53, rescue of p53 nonsense mutations, depletion of mutp53 proteins, and induction of p53 synthetic lethality or targeting of vulnerabilities imposed by p53 deficiencies (activated retrotransposons) or mutations (enhanced YAP/TAZ). Here, we summarize clinically available investigational and FDA-approved drugs that target p53 mutations for their mechanisms of action and activities to suppress cancer progression. Mutations in the tumor suppressor p53 (p53) promote cancer progression. This is mainly due to loss of function (LOS) as a tumor suppressor, dominant-negative (DN) activities of missense mutant p53 (mutp53) over wild-type p53 (wtp53), and wtp53-independent oncogenic activities of missense mutp53 by interacting with other tumor suppressors or oncogenes (gain of function: GOF). Since p53 mutations occur in ~50% of human cancers and rarely occur in normal tissues, p53 mutations are cancer-specific and ideal therapeutic targets. Approaches to target p53 mutations include (1) restoration or stabilization of wtp53 conformation from missense mutp53, (2) rescue of p53 nonsense mutations, (3) depletion or degradation of mutp53 proteins, and (4) induction of p53 synthetic lethality or targeting of vulnerabilities imposed by p53 mutations (enhanced YAP/TAZ activities) or deletions (hyperactivated retrotransposons). This review article focuses on clinically available FDA-approved drugs and drugs in clinical trials that target p53 mutations and summarizes their mechanisms of action and activities to suppress cancer progression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

SCR430, a sorafenib derivative, is an investigational drug exhibiting anti-tumor action. This study aimed to have a mechanistic understanding of SCR430's time-dependent pharmacokinetics (TDPK) through an ex vivo study combined with an in vitro–in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. A non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed after intravenous SCR430 administration in female Sprague-Dawley rats for a control group (no treatment), a vehicle group (vehicle only, 14 days, PO), and a repeated-dosing group (SCR430, 30 mg/kg/day, 14 days, PO). In addition, hepatic uptake and metabolism modulation were investigated using isolated hepatocytes from each group of rats. The minimal PBPK model based on IVIVE was constructed to explain SCR430's TDPK. Repeated SCR430 administration decreased the systemic exposure by 4.4-fold, which was explained by increased hepatic clearance (4.7-fold). The ex vivo study using isolated hepatocytes from each group suggested that the increased hepatic uptake (9.4-fold), not the metabolic activity, contributes to the increased hepatic clearance. The minimal PBPK modeling based on an ex vivo study could explain the decreased plasma levels after the repeated doses. The current study demonstrates the TDPK after repeated dosing by hepatic uptake induction, not hepatic metabolism, as well as the effectiveness of an ex vivo approach combined with IVIVE and PBPK modeling to investigate the TDPK. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Several novel therapies are being developed to improve the management of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. They include drugs aimed at improving hematopoiesis and differentiation of myeloid precursors, hypomethylating agents, several compounds that target intracellular molecular pathways, and immunotherapies. In this review article, we discuss how the novel drugs may address the several unmet needs of lower- and higher-risk patients. Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a very heterogeneous disease, with extremely variable clinical features and outcomes. Current management relies on risk stratification based on IPSS and IPSS-R, which categorizes patients into low (LR-) and high-risk (HR-) MDS. Therapeutic strategies in LR-MDS patients mainly consist of erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs), transfusion support, and luspatercept or lenalidomide for selected patients. Current unmet needs include the limited options available after treatment failure, and the consequent transfusion burden with several hospital admissions and poor quality of life. Therapeutic approaches in HR-MDS patients are aimed at changing the natural course of the disease and hypometylating agents (HMA) are the first choice. The only potentially curative treatment is allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT), restricted to a minority of young and fit candidates. Patients unfit for or those that relapse after the abovementioned options harbor an adverse prognosis, with limited overall survival and frequent leukemic evolution. Recent advances in genetic mutations and intracellular pathways that are relevant for MDS pathogenesis are improving disease risk stratification and highlighting therapeutic targets addressed by novel agents. Several drugs are under evaluation for LR and HR patients, which differ by their mechanism of action, reported efficacy, and phase of development. This review analyzes the current unmet clinical needs for MDS patients and provides a critical overview of the novel agents under development in this setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Food and Drug Administration uses expedited approval of drugs to speed the development and assessment of drugs that address unmet needs related to serious or life-threatening conditions. Drugs approved via this route rely on surrogate endpoints or other clinical indicators that are not direct measures of benefits to patients, such as survival or quality of life. Companies are required to conduct a clinical trial confirming that a drug provides long-term benefits that are clinically meaningful, but prompt completion of these trials frequently does not occur. Theory suggests that because confirmatory trials reduce uncertainty, they should provide an economic reward in the form of higher prices for a positive finding. We used a sample of physician-administered cancer drugs and data on average sales price to test this hypothesis. We found no significant relationship between confirmatory trial completion with a positive outcome and elevated prices. This represents a failure of the market to reward reduced uncertainty about a cancer drug's true benefits. This inefficiency would be mitigated if major payers such as Medicare built price schedules that directly rewarded completion of confirmatory trials. More completed trials would ensure that patients are receiving truly effective chemotherapies and not suffering the adverse effects of drugs that are ultimately not effective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: PT-112 is a novel pyrophosphate–platinum conjugate under Phase 1/2 clinical development for the treatment of several tumor types. In this study, using mouse tumor cells with well-characterized mitochondrial and metabolic status, we investigated the mechanisms underlying PT-112's cancer cell death effects. Our results showed that cells with defective mitochondria were more sensitive to PT-112 when compared to cells with normal mitochondrial function. Moreover, PT-112 induced tumor cell death in those sensitive cells through non-conventional mechanisms, including increased mitochondrial stress, free radical generation and immunogenic cell death, a form of cell death that elicits an immune response. Taken together, the present findings suggest the potential for predictors of PT-112 sensitivity in the clinical setting on the basis of metabolic function. PT-112 is a novel pyrophosphate–platinum conjugate, with clinical activity reported in advanced pretreated solid tumors. While PT-112 has been shown to induce robust immunogenic cell death (ICD) in vivo but only minimally bind DNA, the molecular mechanism underlying PT-112 target disruption in cancer cells is still under elucidation. The murine L929 in vitro system was used to test whether differential metabolic status alters PT-112's effects, including cell cytotoxicity. The results showed that tumor cells presenting mutations in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) (L929dt and L929dt cybrid cells) and reliant on glycolysis for survival were more sensitive to cell death induced by PT-112 compared to the parental and cybrid cells with an intact oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) pathway (L929 and dtL929 cybrid cells). The type of cell death induced by PT-112 did not follow the classical apoptotic pathway: the general caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-fmk did not inhibit PT-112-induced cell death, alone or in combination with the necroptosis inhibitor necrostatin-1. Interestingly, PT-112 initiated autophagy in all cell lines, though this process was not complete. Autophagy is known to be associated with an integrated stress response in cancer cells and with subsequent ICD. PT-112 also induced a massive accumulation of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species, as well as changes in mitochondrial polarization—only in the sensitive cells harboring mitochondrial dysfunction—along with calreticulin cell-surface exposure consistent with ICD. PT-112 substantially reduced the amount of mitochondrial CoQ10 in L929 cells, while the basal CoQ10 levels were below our detection limits in L929dt cells, suggesting a potential relationship between a low basal level of CoQ10 and PT-112 sensitivity. Finally, the expression of HIF-1α was much higher in cells sensitive to PT-112 compared to cells with an intact OXPHOS pathway, suggesting potential clinical applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The low expectation of clinical benefit from phase 1 cancer therapeutics trials might negatively affect patient and physician participation, study reimbursement, and slow the progress of oncology research. Advances in cancer drug development, meanwhile, might have favourably improved treatment responses; however, little comprehensive data exist describing the response and toxicity associated with phase 1 trials across solid tumours. The aim of the study is to evaluate the trend of toxicity and response in phase 1 trials for solid tumours over time.Methods: We analysed patient-level data from the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored investigator-initiated phase 1 trials for solid tumours, from Jan 1, 2000, to May 31, 2019. We assessed risks of treatment-related death (grade 5 toxicity ratings possibly, probably, or definitely attributable to treatment), all on-treatment deaths (deaths during protocol treatment regardless of attribution), grade 3-4 toxicity, and proportion of overall response (complete response and partial response) and complete response rate in the study periods of 2000-05, 2006-12, and 2013-2019, and evaluated their trends over time. We also analysed cancer type-specific and investigational agent-specific response, and analysed the trend of response in each cancer type over time. Univariate associations of overall response rates with patients' baseline characteristics (age, sex, performance status, BMI, albumin concentration, and haemoglobin concentration), enrolment period, investigational agents, and trial design were assessed using risk ratio based on the modified Poisson regression model.Findings: We analysed 465 protocols that enrolled 13 847 patients using 261 agents. 144 (31%) trials used a monotherapy and 321 (69%) used combination therapies. The overall treatment-related death rate was 0·7% (95% CI 0·5-0·8) across all periods. Risks of treatment-related deaths did not change over time (p=0·52). All on-treatment death risk during the study period was 8·0% (95% CI 7·6-8·5). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were haematological; grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 2336 (16·9%) of 13 847 patients, lymphopenia in 1230 (8·9%), anaemia in 894 (6·5%), and thrombocytopenia in 979 (7·1%). The overall response rate for all trials during the study period was 12·2% (95% CI 11·5-12·8; 1133 of 9325 patients) and complete response rate was 2·7% (2·4-3·0; 249 of 9325). Overall response increased from 9·6% (95% CI 8·7-10·6) in 2000-05 to 18·0% (15·7-20·5) in 2013-19, and complete response rates from 2·5% (2·0-3·0) to 4·3% (3·2-5·7). Overall response rates for combination therapy were substantially higher than for monotherapy (15·8% [15·0-16·8] vs 3·5% [2·8-4·2]). The overall response by class of agents differed across diseases. Anti-angiogenesis agents were associated with higher overall response rate for bladder, colon, kidney and ovarian cancer. DNA repair inhibitors were associated with higher overall response rate in ovarian and pancreatic cancer. The rates of overall response over time differed markedly by disease; there were notable improvements in bladder, breast, and kidney cancer and melanoma, but no change in the low response of pancreatic and colon cancer.Interpretation: During the past 20 years, the response rate in phase 1 trials nearly doubled without an increase in the treatment-related death rate. However, there is significant heterogeneity in overall response by various factors such as cancer type, investigational agent, and trial design. Therefore, informed decision making is crucial for patients before participating in phase 1 trials. This study provides updated encouraging outcomes of modern phase 1 trials in solid tumours.Funding: National Cancer Institute. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose To report historical patterns of pharmaceutical expenditures, to identify factors that may influence future spending, and to predict growth in drug spending in 2022 in the United States, with a focus on the nonfederal hospital and clinic sectors. Methods Historical patterns were assessed by examining data on drug purchases from manufacturers using the IQVIA National Sales Perspectives database. Factors that may influence drug spending in hospitals and clinics in 2022 were reviewed—including new drug approvals, patent expirations, and potential new policies or legislation. Focused analyses were conducted for biosimilars, cancer drugs, generics, COVID-19 pandemic influence, and specialty drugs. For nonfederal hospitals, clinics, and overall (all sectors), estimates of growth of pharmaceutical expenditures in 2022 were based on a combination of quantitative analyses and expert opinion. Results In 2021, overall pharmaceutical expenditures in the US grew 7.7% compared to 2020, for a total of $576.9 billion. Utilization (a 4.8% increase), price (a 1.9% increase) and new drugs (a 1.1% increase) drove this increase. Adalimumab was the top drug in terms of overall expenditures in 2021, followed by apixaban and dulaglutide. Drug expenditures were $39.6 billion (a 8.4% increase) and $105.0 billion (a 7.7% increase) in nonfederal hospitals and in clinics, respectively. In clinics and hospitals, new products and increased utilization growth drove growth, with decreasing prices for both sectors acting as an expense restraint. Several new drugs that are likely to influence spending are expected to be approved in 2022. Specialty and cancer drugs will continue to drive expenditures along with the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion For 2022, we expect overall prescription drug spending to rise by 4.0% to 6.0%, whereas in clinics and hospitals we anticipate increases of 7.0% to 9.0% and 3.0% to 5.0%, respectively, compared to 2021. These national estimates of future pharmaceutical expenditure growth may not be representative of any particular health system because of the myriad of local factors that influence actual spending. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Lung cancer is the main cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, mainly due to treatment resistance. For that reason, it is necessary to develop novel therapeutic strategies to overcome this phenomenon. The aim of our study was to design and characterize a synthetic anionophore, LAI-1, that would be able to efficiently disrupt lysosomal activity, leading to autophagy blockage, one of the most important resistance mechanisms in cancer cells. We confirmed that LAI-1 selectively localized in lysosomes, deacidifying them. This effect produced a blockage of autophagy, characterized by an abrogation of autophagosomes and lysosomes fusion. Moreover, LAI-1 produced cell death in lung cancer cells from different histological subtypes, inducing cytotoxicity more efficiently than other known autophagy inhibitors. Finally, LAI-1 was evaluated in combination therapy, showing sensitization to the first-line chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin. Altogether, LAI-1 is a novel late-stage autophagy inhibitor with potential therapeutic applications in tumors with cytoprotective autophagy. Overcoming resistance is one of the most challenging features in current anticancer therapy. Autophagy is a cellular process that confers resistance in some advanced tumors, since it enables cancer cells to adapt to stressful situations, such as anticancer treatments. Hence, the inhibition of this cytoprotective autophagy leads to tumor cells sensitization and death. In this regard, we designed a novel potent anionophore compound that specifically targets lysosomes, called LAI-1 (late-stage autophagy inhibitor-1), and evaluated its role in blocking autophagy and its potential anticancer effects in three lung cancer cell lines from different histological subtypes. Compared to other autophagy inhibitors, such as chloroquine and 3-Methyladenine, the LAI-1 treatment induced more potent anticancer effects in all tested cancer cells. LAI-1 was able to efficiently target and deacidify lysosomes, while acidifying cytoplasmic pH. Consequently, LAI-1 efficiently blocked autophagy, indicated by the increased LC3-II/I ratio and p62/SQSTM1 levels. Moreover, no colocalization was observed between autophagosomes, marked with LC3 or p62/SQSTM1, and lysosomes, stained with LAMP-1, after the LAI-1 treatment, indicating the blockage of autophagolysosome formation. Furthermore, LAI-1 induced cell death by activating apoptosis (enhancing the cleavage of caspase-3 and PARP) or necrosis, depending on the cancer cell line. Finally, LAI-1 sensitized cancer cells to the first-line chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin. Altogether, LAI-1 is a new late-stage autophagy inhibitor that causes lysosomal dysfunction and the blockage of autophagolysosome formation, as well as potently induces cancer cell death and sensitization to conventional treatments at lower concentrations than other known autophagy inhibitors, appearing as a potential new therapeutic approach to overcome cancer resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Targeting the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/Akt/mTOR) signalling pathway is a promising strategy for the treatment of various cancers, including bladder cancer (BC). PF-04691502 is a relatively novel dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor that exerts inhibitory effects against various cancer cells. However, the effects of PF-04691502 in BC cells have not been clarified thus far. This study aimed to evaluate the antitumour effects of PF-04691502 and the mechanisms underlying these antitumour effects in BC cells. The effects of PF-04691502 on the viabilities of BC cells were examined using the cell counting kit 8 (CCK-8) assay. Cell migration and invasion were measured using the wound healing assay and transwell assay, respectively. Cellular apoptosis was determined using flow cytometry. The change in the cellular protein levels was measured using western blotting. siRNA was used to study the role of PTEN in the antitumour effects of PF-04691502. PF-04691502 inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion of BC cells. Additionally, PF-04691502 induced apoptosis of BC cells via the intrinsic pathway. PF-04691502 inhibited the expression of Mcl-1 and the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in BC cells. In addition, PF-04691502 increased the apoptosis induced by various chemotherapeutic agents in BC cells. Taken together, PF-04691502 could be used alone or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of BC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a common type of cancer originating from the pancreatic glands and is characterized by a rapidly progressive course and a dismal prognosis. Currently, chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment that has modest efficacy. Targeted treatment options are rapidly evolving with the growing understanding of pathobiological underpinnings of tumorigenesis, progression, and treatment resistance mechanisms. Combination strategies targeting multiple signaling pathways supporting tumor growth and propagation are active areas of contemporary research that will likely transform the treatment paradigm of pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy characterized by nonspecific presenting symptoms, lack of a screening test, rapidly progressive clinical course, and presentation with an advanced-stage disease in the majority of patients. PDAC is essentially a systemic disease irrespective of the initial stage, as most patients with non-metastatic PDAC undergoing curative-intent treatment eventually experience metastatic relapse. Currently, cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment in patients with advanced disease. However, the current standard treatment with multiagent chemotherapy has modest efficacy and results in median overall survival (OS) of less than a year and a 5-year OS of about 10%. The pathobiology of PDAC poses many challenges, including a unique tumor microenvironment interfering with drug delivery, intratumoral heterogeneity, and a strongly immunosuppressive microenvironment that supports cancer growth. Recent research is exploring a wide range of novel therapeutic targets, including genomic alterations, tumor microenvironment, and tumor metabolism. The rapid evolution of tumor genome sequencing technologies paves the way for personalized, targeted therapies. The present review summarizes the current chemotherapeutic treatment paradigm of advanced PDAC and discusses the evolving novel targets that are being investigated in a myriad of clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. Examine the use of priority and provisional approval pathways by the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) for evaluating new medicines. Methods. This observational study assessed all new medicines approved by the TGA between 1 January 2018 and 18 October 2021. It examined how frequently priority and provisional approval pathways are being used, the conditions which the medicines are being approved to treat, how long medicines are spending in the approval pathways, the additional therapeutic value of the medicines being approved through these pathways and how the use of the pathways compares with similar regulatory pathways used by Health Canada. Results. The TGA approved 138 new medicines in the time period under study, of which 33 were approved through either the priority or provisional approval pathways. Sixteen were approved to treat cancer. It took the TGA a mean of 130 (95% CI 118, 143) and 144 (95% 101, 188) working days for priority and provisional pathways, respectively. Therapeutic evaluations were available for 16 of these medicines and 11 offered little to no therapeutic gain over existing medicines. There was moderate agreement between the TGA and Health Canada in their use of these pathways (Kappa = 0.5458, 95% CI 0.3900, 0.7016). Conclusions. The priority and provisional approval pathways are now being used by the TGA for about one-third of all new medicine approvals. Although the medicines approved in these ways are moving through the review process more quickly than those approved through the standard approval pathway, the majority of these medicines, for which an evaluation of therapeutic value is available, do not offer any substantial additional therapeutic value over existing medicines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article reports that initial release of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP) Standards for the Safe Handling of Cytotoxic Drugs in has evolved in oncology pharmacy. Topics include Safe handling practices have been refined and new hazardous agents developed for treatment to pose new challenges for workers caring for patients; and the ISOPP Standards task force was appointed by society to undertake a comprehensive and evidence-based review of practice.

Ipatasertib is a selective AKT kinase inhibitor currently in development for the treatment of several solid tumors, including breast and prostate cancers. This study was undertaken to characterize pharmacokinetic profiles of ipatasertib and its metabolite M1 (G‐037720) and to understand the sources of variability. Population pharmacokinetic models of ipatasertib and M1 were developed separately using data from 342 individuals with cancer from 5 phase 1 and 2 studies. The final population pharmacokinetic models for ipatasertib and M1 were 3‐compartmental, with first‐order elimination and sequential zero‐ and first‐order absorption. Ipatasertib bioavailability and M1 formation increased after multiple dosing, resulting in an increase in exposure beyond that expected from accumulation alone. Covariate effects of ipatasertib include decreased oral clearance with increasing age and with coadministration of abiraterone, as well as decreased bioavailability with increasing weight. For ages 37 and 80 years, steady‐state area under the curve (AUCss) was predicted to be 81% and 109%, respectively, of the typical population value (64 years). For body weight of 49 and 111 kg, AUCss was predicted to be 132% and 78%, respectively, of the typical population value (75 kg). The small magnitude of change in ipatasertib exposure is not likely to be clinically relevant. For M1, the peripheral distribution volume and intercompartmental clearance increased with increasing weight. Coadministration of abiraterone was estimated to increase M1 exposure by 61% at steady state. Mild and moderate renal impairment, mild hepatic impairment, and race were not identified as significant covariates in the final models for ipatasertib and M1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Novel therapeutics are needed for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL). Everolimus is an mTOR pathway inhibitor with synergistic anti-tumor activity when combined with histone deacetylase inhibitors, such as panobinostat, in preclinical lymphoma models. In this Phase II study, we evaluated overall response rate to single and combination everolimus and panobinostat in R/R DLBCL. Fifteen patients were enrolled to single-agent and 18 to combination. One patient responded to everolimus, while none responded to panobinostat. Though 25% of patients responded to combination therapy, responses were not durable with significant toxicity. We demonstrated minimal single-agent activity and prohibitive toxicity with combination therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Two new dammarane-type triterpenoids, notoginsenoside SY3 (1) and notoginsenoside SY4 (2), were isolated from the steamed roots of Panax notoginseng. Their structures were determined to be 3β, 12β, 20(S)-trihydroxy-27-anordammar-23(24)(E)-ene-3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→2)-β-D-glucopyranoside (1) and 3β, 12β, 20(S)-trihydroxy-25-methoxyldammar-23(24)(E)-ene-3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→2)-β-D-glucopyranoside (2) by IR, HRESIMS and NMR experiments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To examine stage-specific trends in the incidence and survival of cutaneous melanoma in the Netherlands between 2003 and 2018, as well as the uptake of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and novel drugs during that period. Data were obtained from the nationwide population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry for all patients diagnosed with invasive primary cutaneous melanoma (n = 60,267). We presented age-standardized incidence rates, the proportion of patients with an SLNB, the proportion of patients who received a novel drug (for their primary diagnosis) and one- and five-year relative survival rates. Between 2003 and 2018, the incidence rate increased from 10.9 to 23.9 for men and from 15.6 to 27.3 for women. This increase reflected the increasing incidence rate of patients with stage I and III. The proportion of patients with an SLNB increased from 23% to 64%. A reasonable increase was observed in the proportion of patients with a positive outcome (from 2% to 11%). For patients with stage IV, there was a shift from chemotherapy towards novel drugs as from 2013. The five-year relative survival rate increased from 81% to 92% for men and from 88% to 96% for women. This increase reflected the increasing five-year relative survival rate of patients with stage II, III, and IV. We observed an increase in incidence for patients with stage I and III and an improvement in survival for patients with stage II, III and IV. These trends can be partly explained by the introduction of the SLNB and the novel drugs. • Between 2003 and 2018, 60,267 Dutch patients were diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma. • Incidence rates increased from 10.9 to 23.9 for men and from 15.6 to 27.3 for women. • There was an increase in incidence for patients with stage I and III. • Five-year survival rates increased from 81% to 92% for men and from 88% to 96% for women. • There was an improvement in survival for patients with stage II, III and IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Indanocine, a potent anticancer investigational drug of National Cancer Institute‐USA, has been much discussed in recent years. Present communication aimed at total synthesis of indanocine and its close analogues. Total synthesis was improved by double yields than previously reported yields. Some of the benzylidene and 2‐benzyl derivatives with free rotation at C2 position exhibited potential cytotoxicities against various human cancer cell lines. Five such analogues exhibited potential antiproliferative effect against HCT‐116 and MIA PACA‐2 cell lines. Benzylindanocine 12i induced microtubule destabilization by occupying colchicine binding pocket of β‐tubulin. It also exhibited anti‐inflammatory activity by down‐regulating IL‐6 and TNF‐α. In Ehrlich ascites carcinoma model, 12i reduced 78.4% of EAC tumour in Swiss albino mice at 90 mg/kg (i.p.) dose. Further, in in vivo safety studies, 12i was found to be safe to rodents up to 1,000 mg/kg dose. Concomitant anticancer and anti‐inflammatory activity of benzylindanocine is distinctive, which suggests its further optimization for better efficacy and druggability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There are many differences between Asian regions in terms of the regulatory requirements and operational procedures in conducting international academic clinical trials for the approval of new drugs. The National Cancer Center Hospital in Japan has launched an international investigator‐initiated registration‐directed trial (IIRDT) in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore, aiming at obtaining pharmaceutical approval in participating regions. Differences in regulatory and operational procedures were identified while coordinating the trial. In Japan, regulatory authority reviews should be performed after approval by institutional review boards for IIRDT, whereas in other regions these can be done in parallel. There were disparities in Good Manufacturing Practice‐related documents between regions. Several differences were found regarding investigational product (IP) management, specifically concerning labeling, import/export procedures, and customs clearance costs. On the other hand, safety reporting procedures were relatively well‐harmonized in accordance with International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, Clinical Safety Data Management: Definitions and Standards for Expedited Reporting (ICH‐E2A). Regions also differed in per‐patient costs, due to varying regulations for academic registration‐directed trials. In conclusion, the observed differences among Asian regions should be harmonized to facilitate international academic trials in Asia and thus resolve unmet patient needs worldwide. Study HighlightsWHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?International clinical trials have become common because they make it possible to accrue patients faster and obtain new drug approval in wider areas. However, pharmaceutical regulatory differences hinder the efficient conduct of international clinical trials, especially in academia. WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?We conducted an academic international clinical trial on new drug applications in four Asian countries and clarified pharmaceutical regulatory differences and operational difficulties. WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?The study identified differences between countries in terms of regulatory affairs, institutional review board (IRB) review processes, investigational new drug (IND) dossiers, investigational product (IP) management procedures, and clinical trial costs, while safety reporting procedures were relatively harmonized. Japan utilizes investigator‐initiated registration‐directed trials, an advanced regulatory system for new drug application by academia, but the other countries do not. HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?Harmonization of pharmaceutical regulations and trial initiation procedures, and regulatory reform of clinical trial costs are important to accelerate academic international clinical trials for new drug applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Knowledge of the underpinnings of cancer initiation, progression and metastasis has increased exponentially in recent years. Advanced "omics" coupled with machine learning and artificial intelligence (deep learning) methods have helped elucidate targets and pathways critical to those processes that may be amenable to pharmacologic modulation. However, the current anti-cancer therapeutic armamentarium continues to lag behind. As the cost of developing a new drug remains prohibitively expensive, repurposing of existing approved and investigational drugs is sought after given known safety profiles and reduction in the cost barrier. Notably, successes in oncologic drug repurposing have been infrequent. Computational in-silico strategies have been developed to aid in modeling biological processes to find new disease-relevant targets and discovering novel drug-target and drug-phenotype associations. Machine and deep learning methods have especially enabled leaps in those successes. This review will discuss these methods as they pertain to cancer biology as well as immunomodulation for drug repurposing opportunities in oncologic diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Effective therapies for anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) are still limited due to its dedifferentiated phenotype and high invasiveness. Xiaoying Sanjie Decoction (XYSJD), a clinically empirical Chinese medicine compound, has shown positive effects for ATC treatment and recovery. However, the pharmacological mechanisms of effective active compound in XYSJD remain unclear. In this study, we aimed at elucidating the antitumor mechanism of the active compound and identifying the kernel molecular mechanisms of XYSJD against ATC. Firstly, the main chemical constituents of XYSJD were identified by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-QTOF-MS). Then we used network pharmacology and ClusterONE algorithm to analyze the possible targets and pathways of the prescription and active compound Saikosaponin A (SSA). Seven core targets, including P2RY12, PDK1, PPP1CC, PPP2CA, TBK1, ITGB1 and ITGB6, which may be involved in the anti-tumor activity of XYSJD were screened. Finally, using cell biology, molecular biology and experimental zoology techniques, we investigated the mechanism of active compound SSA in the treatment of ATC. The results of qRT-PCR indicated that these seven nuclear targets might play an important role in SSA, the active compound of XYSJD. The combined data provide preliminary study of the pharmacological mechanisms of SSA in XYSJD. SSA may be a promising potential therapeutic and chemopreventive candidate for ATC. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Brain tumor is the leading cause of cancer related death in children. Clinically relevant animals are critical for new therapy development. To address the potential impact of animal gender on tumorigenicity rate, xenograft growth and in vivo drug responses, we retrospectively analyzed 99 of our established patient derived orthotopic xenograft mouse models (orthotopic PDX or PDOX). From 27 patient tumors, including 5 glioblastomas (GBMs), 11 medulloblastomas (MBs), 4 ependymomas (EPNs), 4 atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (ATRTs) and 3 diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs), that were directly implanted into matching locations in the brains of approximately equal numbers of male and female animals (n = 310) in age-matched (within 2-week age-difference) SCID mice, the tumor formation rate was 50.6 ± 21.5% in male and 52.7 ± 23.5% in female mice with animal survival times of 192.6 ± 31.7 days in male and 173.9 ± 34.5 days in female mice (P = 0.46) regardless of pathological diagnosis. Once established, PDOX tumors were serially subtransplanted for up to VII passage. Analysis of 1,595 mice from 59 PDOX models (18 GBMs, 18 MBs, 5 ATRTs, 6 EPNs, 7 DIPGs and 5 PENTs) during passage II and VII revealed similar tumor take rates of the 6 different tumor types between male (85.4 ± 15.5%) and female mice (84.7 ± 15.2%) (P = 0.74), and animal survival times were 96.7 ± 23.3 days in male mice and 99.7 ± 20 days in female (P = 0.25). A total of 284 mice from 7 GBM, 2 MB, 1 ATRT, 1 EPN, 2 DIPG and 1 PNET were treated with a series of standard and investigational drugs/compounds. The overall survival times were 106.9 ± 25.7 days in male mice, and 110.9 ± 31.8 days in female mice (P = 0.41), similar results were observed when different types/models were analyzed separately. In conclusion, our data demonstrated that the gender of SCID mice did not have a major impact on animal model development nor drug responses in vivo, and SCID mice of both genders are appropriate for use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Phase I oncology trials are often regarded as a therapeutic option for patients. However, such claims have relied on surrogate measures of benefit, such as objective response.Methods: Using a systematic search of publications, we assessed the therapeutic value of phase I cancer trial participation by determining the probability that patients will receive active doses of treatments that eventually receive FDA approval or a National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline recommendation for their indication. ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, American Society of Clinical Oncology reports, NCCN guidelines, and Drugs@FDA were searched between May 1, 2018, and July 31, 2018. All statistical tests were 2-sided.Results: A total of 1000 phase I oncology trials initiated between 2005 and 2010 and enrolling 32 582 patients were randomly sampled from 3229 eligible trials on ClinicalTrials.gov. A total of 386 (1.2%) patients received a treatment that was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for their malignancy at a dose delivered in the trial; including NCCN guideline recommendations, the number and proportion are 1168 (3.6%). Meta-regression showed a statistically significantly greater proportion of patients receiving a drug that was ultimately FDA approved in biomarker trials (rate ratio = 4.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.53 to 13.23; P = .006) and single-indication trials (rate ratio = 3.32, 95% CI = 1.21 to 9.15; P  = .02); proportions were statistically significantly lower for combination vs monotherapy trials (rate ratio = 0.09, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.68; P  = .02).Conclusions: One in 83 patients in phase I cancer trials received a treatment that was approved for their indication at the doses received. Given published estimates of serious adverse event rates of 10%-19%, this represents low therapeutic value for phase I trial participation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Only one class of targeted agents (anti-GD2 antibodies) has been incorporated into front-line therapy for neuroblastoma since the 1980s. The Neuroblastoma New Drug Development Strategy (NDDS) initiative commenced in 2012 to accelerate the development of new drugs for neuroblastoma. Advances have occurred, with eight of nine high-priority targets being evaluated in paediatric trials including anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors being investigated in front-line, but significant challenges remain. This article reports the conclusions of the second NDDS forum, which expanded across the Atlantic to further develop the initiative. Pre-clinical and clinical data for 40 genetic targets and mechanisms of action were prioritised and drugs were identified for early-phase trials. Strategies to develop drugs targeting TERT, telomere maintenance, ATRX, alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT), BRIP1 and RRM2 as well as direct targeting of MYCN are high priority and should be championed for drug discovery. Promising pre-clinical data suggest that targeting of ALT by ATM or PARP inhibition may be potential strategies. Drugs targeting CDK2/9, CDK7, ATR and telomere maintenance should enter paediatric clinical development rapidly. Optimising the response to anti-GD2 by combinations with chemotherapy, targeted agents and other immunological targets are crucial. Delivering this strategy in the face of small patient cohorts, genomically defined subpopulations and a large number of permutations of combination trials, demands even greater international collaboration. In conclusion, the NDDS provides an internationally agreed, biologically driven selection of prioritised genetic targets and drugs. Improvements in the strategy for conducting trials in neuroblastoma will accelerate bringing these new drugs more rapidly to front-line therapy. • The Neuroblastoma New Drug Development Strategy initiative aims to accelerate new drugs development. •Twenty two of 40 targets were identified as high priority for neuroblastoma. •Targeting telomere maintenance, ATRX , BRIP1 , RRM2 are high priority for drug discovery. •Drugs targeting CDK2/9, CDK7, ATR should enter paediatric clinical development rapidly. •Combining targeted therapies with immunological agents is crucial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the translational value of anticancer preclinical models, we retrospectively investigated the relationships between preclinical data and clinical response rate for 42 small-molecule targeted anticancer drugs approved by the US FDA from 2001 to 2018.Methods: For 42 FDA-approved drugs, relevant pre-clinical (IC50, mouse PK/efficacy) and clinical (overall response rates [ORR], PK) data were extracted from the public domain. Relationships were investigated overall and separately by mechanism of action and solid vs liquid tumors. Binomial-normal regression analysis was performed using R.Results: A significant correlation was found between the ratio of free human average plasma concentration (hCave) at the approved clinical dose to biochemical IC50 and ORR for kinase inhibitors with solid tumor indications (KIST). We also identified that, for KIST, the ratios of (i) total and (ii) free human-to-mouse average plasma concentration at efficacious doses were correlated to ORR ((i) R2 = 0.72, n = 10; (ii) R2 = 0.78, n = 10)).Conclusion: Relationships were identified for ratios of efficacious clinical exposures to typical preclinical pharmacology data and ORR for KIST in this retrospective analysis. Although the obtained datasets are limited, the relationships demonstrate that a systemic exposure relative to established pre-clinical pharmacology experiments for an investigational KIST could be used as a reference to assess if desired efficacy could be achieved. This approach may assist selection of the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of an investigational drug. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the modern era of targeted and immune-based therapies, investigator and patient expectations of availability and efficacy in phase I trials have increased. We assessed availability of, and benefit from, early drug development trials, specifically in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. We reviewed computerized referral records of the Early Drug Development Service at our institution to identify patients internally referred from our Gastrointestinal Oncology Service in calendar year 2018. End points were treatment on a trial, 3- and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), and any tumor shrinkage. Of 394 gastrointestinal cancer patients referred in 2018, 54 enrolled on a trial and 53 (13.5%) were treated (1 withdrew before treatment): 34 on immune-based and 19 on targeted (3 to phase II basket) studies. None of the 52 patients who had exhausted standard therapy achieved 6-month PFS, two (3.8%) met 3-month PFS with tumor growth below Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors progression at 3 months, and both came off study for progression at 4 months. One patient who was to receive an irinotecan-based regimen as standard therapy instead received irinotecan plus an investigational targeted agent and remained stable for 8 months. No patients achieved any degree of tumor shrinkage. The most common reasons for nonaccrual were lack of available protocol treatment openings and failure to meet eligibility criteria for specific trials. Thus, availability and benefit from investigational treatment in this treatment-refractory gastrointestinal cancer patient population was extremely modest. Expectations regarding both availability and efficacy of phase I investigational therapy in gastrointestinal cancer patients likely exceed what our experience suggests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AZD8931 has equipotent activity against epidermal growth factor receptor, erbB2, and erbB3. Primary objectives were to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of AZD8931 + chemotherapy, and subsequently assess safety/preliminary clinical activity in patients with operable oesophagogastric cancer (OGC). AZD8931 (20 mg, 40 mg or 60 mg bd) was given with Xelox (oxaliplatin + capecitabine) for eight 21-day cycles, continuously or with intermittent schedule (4 days on/3 off every week; 14 days on/7 off, per cycle) in a rolling-six design. Subsequently, patients with OGC were randomised 2:1 to AZD8931 + Xelox at RP2D or Xelox only for two cycles, followed by radical oesophagogastric surgery. Secondary outcomes were safety, complete resection (R0) rate, six-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. During escalation, four dose-limiting toxicities were observed among 24 patients: skin rash (1) and failure to deliver 100% of Xelox because of treatment-associated grade III-IV adverse events (AEs) (3: diarrhoea and vomiting; vomiting; fatigue). Serious adverse events (SAE) occurred in 15 of 24 (63%) patients. RP2D was 20-mg bd with the 4/3 schedule. In the expansion phase, 2 of 20 (10%) patients in the Xelox + AZD8931 group and 5/10 (50%) patients in the Xelox group had grade III–IV AEs. Six-month PFS was 85% (90% CI: 66%–94%) in Xelox + AZD8931 and 100% in Xelox alone. Seven deaths (35%) occurred with Xelox + AZD8931 and one (10%) with Xelox. R0 rate was 45% (9/20) with Xelox + AZD8931 and 90% (9/10) with Xelox-alone (P = 0.024). Xelox + AZD8931 (20 mg bd 4/3 days) has an acceptable safety profile administered as neoadjuvant therapy in operable patients with OGC. (Trial registration: EudraCT 2011-003169-13, ISRCTN-68093791). • First study to assess safety and tolerability of the novel pan erbB inhibitor AZD8931 in oesophagogastric cancer (OGC). • Recommended phase II dose schedule determined to be 20-mg bd for 4 days on/3 days off, per cycle. • Feasibility of adding novel targeted therapies to standard-of-care for oesophago-gastric cancer is confirmed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article reports on a general handout that details requirements linked with the use of investigational oral chemotherapy medication. Topics mentioned include a paper released by the Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association in 2014 that calls for best practice standards within an investigational drug service, oral chemotherapy education sheets with information to patients with cancer and caregivers, and the increased needs and risks associated with the use of oral investigational medications.

Redox-modulating anticancer drugs allow the exploitation of altered redox biology observed in many cancer cells. We discovered dinuclear RhIII(Cp*) and IrIII(Cp*) complexes that have in vitro anticancer activity superior to cisplatin and the investigational drug IT-139, while being less toxic in haemolysis and in vivo zebrafish models. The mode of action appears to be related to DNA damage and ROS-mediated stress pathways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) is a regulator protein involved in apoptosis. In the past few decades, this protein has been demonstrated to have high efficacy in cancer therapy, and several approaches targeting Bcl-2 have been tested clinically (e.g., oblimersen, ABT-737, ABT-263, obatoclax mesylate, and AT-101). This review reports potential Bcl-2 inhibitors according to current information on their underlying mechanism and the results of clinical trials. In addition, the function and mechanisms of other potentially valuable Bcl-2 inhibitors that did not show efficacy in clinical studies are also discussed. This summary of the development of Bcl-2 inhibitors provides worthwhile viewpoints on the use of biomedical approaches in future cancer therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Our knowledge of the role of innate immunity in protecting against cancers has expanded greatly in recent years. An early focus was on the adoptive transfer of natural killer (NK) cells and, although this approach has demonstrated promising results in many patients, a few limitations including immune escape of tumors from cytotoxic killing by NK cells have caused treatment failures. Downregulation of the expression of activating ligands on the surface of cancer cells and prevention of the activity of soluble factors are among the mechanisms employed by cancer cells to overcome NK-mediated immunity. It has become evident that a class of small membranous structures of endosomal origin known as exosomes play a key role in regulating the local tumor microenvironment. Here we hypothesize that exosome secretion by cancer cells, which is greater than that of normal cells, is an important escape mechanism employed by cancer cells. Interruption of exosome release by various inhibitory agents in combination with the adoptive transfer of NK cells may overcome, at least in part, the treatment failures that occur with adoptive NK cell transfer. In this regard, repositioning of approved drugs with previously shown effects on exosome release may be a good strategy to bypass the safety issues of newly identified agents and will also dramatically reduce the huge costs of drug approval process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]