Search

Background: Ceritinib is a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, which has shown robust anti-tumour efficacy, along with intracranial activity, in patients with ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer. In phase 1 and 2 studies, ceritinib has been shown to be highly active in both ALK inhibitor-naive and ALK inhibitor-pretreated patients who had progressed after chemotherapy (mostly multiple lines). In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety of ceritinib versus single-agent chemotherapy in patients with advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer who had previously progressed following crizotinib and platinum-based doublet chemotherapy., Methods: In this randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients aged at least 18 years with ALK-rearranged stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer (with at least one measurable lesion) who had received previous chemotherapy (one or two lines, including a platinum doublet) and crizotinib and had subsequent disease progression, from 99 centres across 20 countries. Other inclusion criteria were a WHO performance status of 0-2, adequate organ function and laboratory test results, a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks, and having recovered from previous anticancer treatment-related toxicities. We randomly allocated patients (1:1; with blocking [block size of four]; stratified by WHO performance status [0 vs 1-2] and presence or absence of brain metastases) to oral ceritinib 750 mg per day fasted (in 21 day treatment cycles) or chemotherapy (intravenous pemetrexed 500 mg/m 2 or docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 [investigator choice], every 21 days). Patients who discontinued chemotherapy because of progressive disease could cross over to the ceritinib group. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, assessed by a masked independent review committee using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 in the intention-to-treat population, assessed every 6 weeks until month 18 and every 9 weeks thereafter. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01828112, and is ongoing but no longer recruiting patients., Findings: Between June 28, 2013, and Nov 2, 2015, we randomly allocated 231 patients; 115 (50%) to ceritinib and 116 (50%) to chemotherapy (40 [34%] to pemetrexed, 73 [63%] to docetaxel, and three [3%] discontinued before receiving treatment). Median follow-up was 16·5 months (IQR 11·5-21·4). Ceritinib showed a significant improvement in median progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy (5·4 months [95% CI 4·1-6·9] for ceritinib vs 1·6 months [1·4-2·8] for chemotherapy; hazard ratio 0·49 [0·36-0·67]; p<0·0001). Serious adverse events were reported in 49 (43%) of 115 patients in the ceritinib group and 36 (32%) of 113 in the chemotherapy group. Treatment-related serious adverse events were similar between groups (13 [11%] in the ceritinib group vs 12 [11%] in the chemotherapy group). The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events in the ceritinib group were increased alanine aminotransferase concentration (24 [21%] of 115 vs two [2%] of 113 in the chemotherapy group), increased γ glutamyltransferase concentration (24 [21%] vs one [1%]), and increased aspartate aminotransferase concentration (16 [14%] vs one [1%] in the chemotherapy group). Six (5%) of 115 patients in the ceritinib group discontinued because of adverse events compared with eight (7%) of 116 in the chemotherapy group. 15 (13%) of 115 patients in the ceritinib group and five (4%) of 113 in the chemotherapy group died during the treatment period (from the day of the first dose of study treatment to 30 days after the final dose). 13 (87%) of the 15 patients who died in the ceritinib group died because of disease progression and two (13%) died because of an adverse event (one [7%] cerebrovascular accident and one [7%] respiratory failure); neither of these deaths were considered by the investigator to be treatment related. The five (4%) deaths in the chemotherapy group were all due to disease progression., Interpretation: These findings show that patients derive significant clinical benefit from a more potent ALK inhibitor after failure of crizotinib, and establish ceritinib as a more efficacious treatment option compared with chemotherapy in this patient population., Funding: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Thymidylate synthase (TS), one of the key enzymes for thymidine synthesis, is a target of pemetrexed (PEM), a key agent for the systemic therapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) and its overexpression has been correlated to PEM-resistance. In MPM, experimental data report activation of the c-SRC tyrosine kinase suggesting it as a potential target to be further investigated., Results: MPM cell lines showed different sensitivity, being MSTO the most and REN the least sensitive to PEM. REN cells showed high levels of both TS and SRC: dasatinib inhibited SRC activation and suppressed TS protein expression, starting from 100 nM dose, blocking the PEM-induced up regulation of TS protein levels. Dasatinib treatment impaired cells migration, and both sequential and co-administration with PEM significantly increased apoptosis. Dasatinib pretreatment improved sensitivity to PEM, downregulated TS promoter activity and, in association with PEM, modulated the downstream PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling. Cell lines and Methods: In three MPM cell lines (MPP89, REN and MSTO), the effects of c-SRC inhibition, in correlation with TS expression and PEM sensitivity, were evaluated. PEM and dasatinib, a SRC inhibitor, were administered as single agents, in combination or sequentially. Cell viability, apoptosis and migration, as well as TS expression and SRC activation have been assessed., Conclusions: These data indicate that dasatinib sensitizes mesothelioma cells to PEM through TS down-regulation.

Introduction LY2603618 is a selective inhibitor of checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) protein kinase, a key regulator of the DNA damage checkpoint, and is predicted to enhance the effects of antimetabolites, such as pemetrexed. This phase II trial assessed the overall response rate, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of LY2603618 and pemetrexed in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods In this open-label, single-arm trial, patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC progressing after a prior first-line treatment regimen (not containing pemetrexed) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2 received pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2), day 1) and LY2603618 (150 mg/m(2), day 2) every 21 days until disease progression. Safety was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. Serial blood samples were collected for PK analysis after LY2603618 and pemetrexed administration. Expression of p53, as measured by immunohistochemistry and genetic variant analysis, was assessed as a predictive biomarker of response. Results Fifty-five patients were enrolled in the study. No patients experienced a complete response; a partial response was observed in 5 patients (9.1 %; 90 % CI, 3.7-18.2) and stable disease in 20 patients (36.4 %). The median progression-free survival was 2.3 months (range, 0-27.1). Safety and PK of LY2603618 in combination with pemetrexed were favorable. No association between p53 status and response was observed. Conclusions There was no significant clinical activity of LY2603618 and pemetrexed combination therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. The results were comparable with historical pemetrexed single-agent data, with similar safety and PK profiles being observed.

Objectives: TAS-102 is an oral combination treatment comprised of an antimetabolite, trifluridine, a thymidine-based nucleoside analog, and tipiracil hydrochloride, at a molar ratio of 1:0.5. This antimetabolite has demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials, including a global phase 3 trial in metastatic colorectal cancer. As this agent has shown activity greater than cisplatin in small cell lung cancer xenograft mouse models, the objective of this study was to evaluate TAS-102 in the second-line treatment of small cell lung cancer., Methods: This was a multicenter, open-label, two-arm, randomized phase 2 study designed to compare oral TAS-102 (35mg/m(2)/dose twice daily) versus control (topotecan or amrubicin). Patients requiring second-line chemotherapy for treatment of small cell lung cancer, either refractory or sensitive to frontline platinum-based chemotherapy, were enrolled., Results: Eighteen patients were enrolled. Eight of nine patients receiving TAS-102 discontinued treatment due to progressive disease and one patient died due to clinical progression during the safety follow-up. Unplanned interim futility considerations were made, and the study was terminated early because it was unlikely that superiority of TAS-102 versus comparator could be demonstrated. Six control patients discontinued therapy due to progressive disease and one due to an adverse event. Median progression-free survival was 1.4 months (range 0.9-1.8) versus 2.7 months (range 1.0-6.8) for TAS-102 and control, respectively, with a hazard ratio of 3.76 (80% CI, 1.68-8.40) favoring control. The most common adverse events with TAS-102 were neutropenia, diarrhea, anemia, anorexia, and fatigue, each in three patients., Conclusion: TAS-102 showed no evidence of activity in second-line small cell lung cancer., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Mitotane is the most broadly used systemic therapy for adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), but its mechanism of action and possible predictors of treatment response are currently poorly defined. Our aim was to evaluate the gene expression of ribonucleotide reductase large subunit 1 (RRM1) and excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) in ACC as potential biomarkers for clinical outcome and response to mitotane., Experimental Design: Forty-five and 47 tissue samples from two cohorts (Orbassano, Italy; Wuerzburg, Germany) of completely resected ACC were centrally analyzed using real-time PCR for RRM1 and ERCC1 expression. Fifty-four patients received surgery alone and 38 received adjuvant mitotane after surgery. Clinical and pathologic features were highly comparable in the two series. H295R and SW-13 ACC cell lines were also used for pharmacologic tests., Results: ERCC1 gene expression was not associated to clinical outcome. In contrast, high RRM1 gene expression was associated to shorter disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival at both univariate and multivariate analysis. In patients with low RRM1 gene expression, adjuvant mitotane was associated with improved DFS, whereas this effect was lost in cases with high RMM1 expression. In vitro mitotane induced strong up regulation of RRM1 transcription (up to 25-fold increase) in mitotane-insensitive SW-13 but not in mitotane-sensitive H295R cells. Furthermore, RRM1 silencing in SW-13 cells induced sensitivity to mitotane., Conclusion: Our in vitro and in vivo data indicate that RRM1 gene expression is functionally associated to mitotane sensitivity and support a possible role of RRM1 determination as a novel molecular biomarker predicting response to adjuvant mitotane in ACC., (©2012 AACR.)

Advances in our understanding of tumour biology have encouraged reassessment of tumour classification by the site of origin in favour of molecular characteristics and/or oncogenic drivers amenable to treatment. The identification of EML4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) as an oncogenic driver in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) early in the clinical development of crizotinib and the observation of promising clinical responses in patients with NSCLC harbouring ALK translocations accelerated its clinical development in ALK-positive NSCLC. Phase I and II trials of crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC reported notably high response rates that tended to be rapid and of prolonged duration. Crizotinib was well tolerated; treatment-related adverse events were typically gastrointestinal (grade 1/2) and visual disorders (almost exclusively grade 1). Crizotinib provided NSCLC symptom relief and maintained quality of life. Based on the phase I and II trial data, the US Food and Drug Administration granted approval of crizotinib in August 2011. The consistency of the crizotinib data to date suggests accurate selection of the target population for crizotinib treatment. The ability to molecularly select patients likely to respond to an investigational agent argues that future clinical development of targeted agents should be re-evaluated. Updated trial designs incorporating molecular testing, early use of enrichment biomarkers and intermediary endpoints may accelerate and optimise clinical evaluation of targeted agents. Such trial designs should allow rapid clinical evaluation, minimise exposure of patients to therapies unlikely to be of benefit and, potentially, allow accelerated drug approval in molecularly specified populations., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Brain metastases frequently cause significant morbidity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sunitinib is a multitargeted inhibitor of tyrosine kinase receptors, including vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and platelet-derived growth factor receptors, which has single-agent antitumor activity in refractory NSCLC. This phase II study evaluated the antitumor activity and safety of sunitinib in patients with pretreated NSCLC and irradiated brain metastases., Methods: Patients received sunitinib 37.5 mg on a continuous daily dosing schedule. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, patient-reported outcomes, and safety, including risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) associated with focal neurological deficit., Results: Sixty-four patients received sunitinib (median age 61 years), most (83%) had received prior systemic therapy, 63% had adenocarcinoma, and 19% had squamous cell carcinoma; most (55%) were never-smokers. Median progression-free survival was 9.4 weeks (90% confidence interval [CI]: 7.5-13.1), and median overall survival was 25.1 weeks (95% CI: 13.4-35.5). The most common treatment-emergent (all-causality) nonhematologic toxicities (any grade) were fatigue (38%) and decreased appetite and constipation (both 25%). The most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were dyspnea (9%) and fatigue (8%). Lymphopenia (20%) and neutropenia (13%) were the most common grade 3/4 hematologic abnormalities. Serious neurologic adverse events occurred in six patients (9%), and none were treatment-related. No cases of ICH were reported., Conclusions: Sunitinib administration on a continuous daily dosing schedule in patients with NSCLC and brain metastases was safe and manageable, with no increased risk of ICH.

Platinum-based therapy remains the standard of care for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). When combined with a third-generation agent, platinum-based doublets improve survival compared with the third-generation agent given alone. Controversy remains, however, regarding the relative risks and benefits of the third-generation agents. Four large phase III trials have addressed this question, with only one trial finding a survival benefit in one of the treatment arms. TAX 326 compared docetaxel-based therapy with vinorelbine/cisplatin, and found that survival, response, and quality of life outcomes all favoured the docetaxel/cisplatin regimen. Consistent benefits have been reported with this regimen in other studies. The non-platinum-based docetaxel/gemcitabine combination is an alternative for patients who are not suitable candidates for platinum-based therapy. Other results have shown that single-agent docetaxel is an appropriate option for elderly patients and those with poor performance status. Overall, the wealth of data with docetaxel in advanced NSCLC suggests that it plays an important role in first-line treatment and, as a single agent, can be considered a reasonable approach in elderly and frail patients.

Background: In spite of the growing list of genetic abnormalities identified as being involved in DNA repair pathways that alter chemosensitivity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, translational assays have not yet been developed for use in individualized chemotherapy., Methods: In metastatic NSCLC, no single cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimen has been shown to be superior to any other. Although these studies show a small survival tail at 3 years, the majority of patients had a median survival of 8 to 10 months. We review the principal mechanisms of cisplatin resistance, particularly those involved in the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathways (transcription-coupled repair and global genomic repair)., Results: ERCC1 is a single-stranded DNA endonuclease that forms a tight heterodimer with xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group F. It incises DNA on the 5' side of a lesion such as cisplatin-DNA adduct. Therefore, overexpression of ERCC1 and other NER enzymes during ovarian cancer chemotherapy with cisplatin appears to be implicated in the formation of cellular and clinical drug resistance. Recently, baseline ERCC1 mRNA overexpression has been related to poor response and survival in cisplatin-treated NSCLC patients., Conclusions: The level of evidence for many assays is limited, and only ERCC1 mRNA levels have been analyzed extensively. The impact of ERCC1 should be fully validated in prospective clinical trials.

In this review, we deal with six groups of cytotoxic drugs commonly used in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although there are many reviews of thymidylate synthase (TS) and antifolate inhibitors, in this article, we have tried to highlight aspects that are more important for medical oncologists to consider when treating NSCLC patients. There is compelling evidence that TS gene transcripts and TS polymorphisms could be used to decide which patients can best benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy approaches, especially in colorectal cancer, and not less importantly, to tailor chemotherapy in metastatic NSCLC when using drugs akin to fluorouracil, such as pemetrexed. Secondly, cisplatin is central to chemotherapy combinations and evidence indicates that DNA repair capacity influences response to cisplatin-based regimens. ERCC1 gene transcript stands out as a predictive marker of cisplatin sensitivity. Thirdly, preliminary studies indicate that upregulation of beta-tubulin III correlates with response to paclitaxel and vinorelbine. Fourthly, overexpression of ribonucleotide reductase can influence response to gemcitabine. Fifthly, we describe mechanisms of resistance to topoisomerase I inhibitors, although this subject has not yet been completely elucidated. Finally, to understand the mechanisms of resistance to EGF-R inhibitors, which have been shown to be useful in many different types of cancer, the Src-STAT signaling pathways are described here in detail. Hopefully, the assessment of Src and of STAT-3 can be implemented as predictive markers.