Search

Purpose: Sunitinib offers improved efficacy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). To provide better disease management in the Middle East, we studied its use in mRCC in real-life practice in this region., Material and Methods: Patients diagnosed with mRCC and started on sunitinib between 2006 and 2016 from 10 centers in Africa and the Middle East region were studied in this regional, multicenter, observational, retrospective trial to obtain routine clinical practice data on the usage patterns and outcomes of sunitinib in mRCC in real-life practice., Results: A total of 289 patients were enrolled. Median age at diagnosis was 58.7 years. The patient characteristics were as follows: 73.6% of patients were males; 85.8% had clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC); 97.5% had unilateral RCC; 66.3% had metastatic disease at initial diagnosis; 56.3% received previous treatment for RCC, among which 98.7% had undergone surgery; and 15.2% and 31.4% were classified in the favorable and poor-risk groups (expanded Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center criteria), respectively. On treatment initiation, the mean total sunitinib dose was 48.1 mg, and 87.6% of patients were started on a sunitinib dose of 50 mg. The mean duration of sunitinib treatment was 9.6 months. Overall response rate was 20.8%, with a median duration of 8.2 months. Median time to progression was 5.7 months. Median follow-up time was 7.8 months. By months 12 and 24, 34.3% and 11.4% of patients, respectively, were still alive. Seventy-six patients (60.9%) experienced 314 adverse events. Twenty-three patients (8.0%) experienced 28 serious adverse events. Overall, 83 patients (28.7%) discontinued their sunitinib treatment., Conclusion: The results are indicative of the general treatment outcomes of patients with mRCC in the Middle East using sunitinib in routine clinical practice. Reported adverse events are similar to those described in the literature but at lower frequencies.

Background: Taxanes are drugs used in various chemotherapeutical protocols to treat solid tumors. They have multiple systemic adverse effects, such as bone marrow suppression, alopecia, nausea, and vomiting, and may rarely cause ocular symptoms. In the past decade, a few reported cases have shown the occurrence of a cystoid macular edema with significant visual loss after the use of a taxane-based chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to compare the central macular thickness (CMT) before and after the initiation of a taxane-based therapy in visually asymptomatic patients and to elucidate the possible impact of these drugs on the vision of cancer patients., Methods: Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of a solid tumor were screened for any ophthalmic disease before inclusion and had a baseline macular spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT; RTVue-100; Optovue Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) before the initiation of a taxane-based chemotherapy according to different protocols, such as 4EC-4T, 3FEC/3T, or 4TC. OCT was repeated after 4 cycles (or 3 months) of treatment, and CMT was compared to baseline. Patients presenting diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration or any condition that causes macular edema confirmed by ophthalmic examination were excluded., Results: Fifty eyes of 25 patients were included; 92% of the subjects were female with a mean age of 48.52 years, 88% were diagnosed with breast cancer, 8% with esophageal cancer, and 4% with ovarian cancer. Docetaxel was the taxane administered to 92% of the patients. The received dose of docetaxel ranged between 110 and 160 mg. The other patients had paclitaxel in their protocols. No significant macular edema or drop in visual acuity were noted in any patient. Nevertheless, the mean CMT was found to be increased, particularly in the parafoveal and perifoveal areas (mean difference of +2.22 μm; p = 0.001)., Conclusion: Taxane-based chemotherapy regimens seem to increase macular thickness, with a relative sparing of the fovea, in patients without significant macular edema. Further research is required to better explain the pathophysiology and possible impact of this phenomenon., (© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Advances in medical oncology has led cancer patients to live longer. Moreover, the field of molecular oncology is rapidly evolving, new therapies emerge, and drugs are approved quickly. This has led nephrologists to encounter new and partially unrecognized treatments of the targeted therapy agents with kidney adverse effects. These agents fall mainly into 2 categories affecting the vascular endothelial growth factor and endothelial growth factor pathways. This review covers the incidence of kidney disease induced by these agents, pathophysiologic mechanisms, and clinical presentation, and is the first to recommend an adequate management for each pathophysiology.

Purpose: The use of chemotherapy in the last month of life (CLML) of cancer patients is considered an aggressive approach to be avoided. We examined the practice of CLML in Lebanese cancer patients, and we investigated patient and tumor characteristics that justify this practice. To our knowledge, this is the first study describing CLML of Middle Eastern patients with advanced cancer., Methods: We conducted this study at Hotel-Dieu de France University Hospital (HDF), Lebanon. Cases eligible for this study were all individuals diagnosed with cancer who died at HDF between the 1st of January and the 31st of December 2014. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were obtained from the hospital registration records. Data concerning the management plan, primary malignancy and stage, chemo-sensitivity, line, type, and timing of chemotherapy in the last month of life were also obtained., Results: Among the 130 cancer patients who were enrolled, CLML was administered to a total of 55 patients (42.3 %), of whom 26 patients (50 %) received more than one cytotoxic drug. Oral drug was only given to 9 patients (16.4 %). Interestingly, CLML increased the risk of death in the last month of life (p = 0.02), yet progression of disease constituted the major cause of death in this subgroup (54.6 %). The only variable to have statistical significant correlation with CLML was performance status (p = 0.03). The type of tumor and recent diagnosis of less than 2 months were also correlated to CLML (p = 0.03 and 0.024, respectively)., Conclusion: The high percentage of patients receiving CLML underlines the difficulty of end-of-life discussions in patients from Middle Eastern societies. This is true in the context of a country with little availability of palliative care resources, where health policies should be more focused on incorporating palliative medicine in all medical strategies.

Vemurafenib has shown significant activity in V600 mutant melanoma; however the role of this agent in Lung adenocarcinoma with an activating BRAF mutation is still evolving. One of our patients had a rare activating BRAF mutation detected through tumor exome sequencing, which led to a switch from her successful therapy to Vemurafenib and ultimately tumor progression. The lack of adequate response was disappointing both in terms of lost disease free survival and heavy financial burden to the patient who had to cover the charges of her unsuccessful off-label therapy. This experience, despite its highlight of treatment failure, puts into question the use of next generation sequencing and the trend for using off-label agents in pursuit of an optimal response without the support of strong clinical evidence.