Search

Background: Metastatic urothelial cancer (UC) is the eighth most common cause of cancer death in the UK. Standard first-line treatment, for most patients, is cytotoxic chemotherapy. Although UC is initially sensitive to chemotherapy, relapse is almost inevitable and outcomes are poor; median overall survival is 8 months. Therefore, there is an urgent need for novel therapies to improve outcomes for this patient group., Methods: ATLANTIS is a randomised phase II umbrella-design screening trial of maintenance therapy in biomarker-defined subgroups of patients with advanced UC. The primary end point is progression-free survival, and the study involves over 30 UK cancer centres., Discussion: ATLANTIS is the first study in the UK to employ a precision-medicine approach to patients with UC for maintenance treatment. Agents with a positive efficacy signal will proceed to randomised phase III trials to confirm the activity of novel, biologically stratified therapies in UC., Registration: ATLANTIS trial EudraCT number 2015-003249-25. ISRCTN25859465.

Background: Patients with exclusive bone metastatic spread from urothelial carcinoma (UC) throughout their disease course represent a rare subgroup with unique clinical features. These patients deserved special consideration in a retrospective multicenter study., Patients and Methods: Analyses were made from a pool of 1911 patients with a diagnosis of metastatic UC, from 23 centers. Baseline characteristics, access to treatment, and outcomes were analyzed according to metastatic spread. Univariable and multivariable Cox analyses were performed., Results: A total of 128 evaluable patients (6.7%), diagnosed between February 1997 and April 2013, were identified. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) was ≥ 2 in 33.3% versus 17.7% of the remaining patients. Seventy-three (57%) received first-line chemotherapy, that was platinum-based in 50 patients (69%). Twenty-eight (21.9%) received second-line chemotherapy (vs. 75.9% and 32.2%, respectively, of the remaining patients). In multivariable analyses, no clinical factor was significantly associated with overall survival (OS). Among platinum chemotherapy-treated patients (total evaluable n = 972), significantly different relapse-free survival (RFS) and OS were observed according to bone metastases status (no bone metastases vs. bone metastases only vs. bone and other sites, P < .001). In these groups, 2-year RFS was 37.4%, 28.8%, and 25.9%, respectively. Two-year OS was 35.5%, 15.8%, and 23%, respectively., Conclusion: Patients with metastatic UC and bone-only metastases are less likely to receive systemic therapy than those with other metastases, likely because of their lower PS. The prognostic effect of having exclusive bone metastases or additional sites seems to be equally poor. These patients deserve new effective and tolerable agents, and improvements in the knowledge of their disease., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Following inguinal orchidectomy, management options for patients with stage I seminoma include initial surveillance or treatment with adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy. The anticipated relapse rate for patients followed by surveillance alone is ∼15%, with adjuvant treatment this risk is reduced to ∼4%-5% at 5 years. After carboplatin treatment, follow-up strategies vary and there are no validated, predictive markers of relapse., Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients presenting with stage I seminoma who received a single cycle of adjuvant carboplatin in South Central England between 1996 and 2013. We report on outcome and the results of univariate and multivariate analysis evaluating possible risk factors for post carboplatin relapse., Results: A total of 517 eligible patients were identified. All underwent nuclear medicine estimation of glomerular filtration rate before treatment with carboplatin (dosed at area under the curve × 7). With a median follow-up of 47.2 months (range 0.4-214 months), 21/517 patients have relapsed resulting in a 5-year estimated relapse-free survival of 95.0% (95% confidence interval 92.8% to 97.3%). Median time to relapse was 22.7 months (range 12.5-109.5 months). Relapse beyond 3 years was rare (4/517; 0.8%). Twenty of 21 (95%) relapsed patients had retroperitoneal lymph node metastases. The majority (16/21; 76%) of patients had elevated tumour markers at relapse. Twenty of 517 (3.9%) patients developed a new contralateral testicular germ-cell cancer. There were no seminoma-related deaths. Tumour size was the only variable significantly associated with an increased risk of relapse., Conclusions: Overall results for this large cohort of patients confirm an excellent prognosis for these patients with outcomes equivalent to those seen in prospective clinical trials. Increasing tumour size alone appears to be associated with an increased risk of post chemotherapy relapse., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Bladder cancer is a disease of the elderly. Older patients might potentially be undertreated due to assumptions about benefit versus risk. Our objective was to determine outcomes in older patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). We hypothesised that appropriately selected elderly patients (≥70 years) with MIBC could have similar clinical outcomes, and be safely treated, with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to definitive cystectomy or radiotherapy. We utilised a single institution case series analysis of patients with T2-4a N0 M0 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder treated with cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2005 and 2011. Eighty-three patients were eligible. Median age was 68 (range 48-80), 33 patients (40%) were ≥70 years. Overall survival at 3 years was 65.8% (≥70) and 63.2% (<70) (P = 0.653), relapse-free survival at 3 years was 61.6% and 54.8% respectively (P = 0.471). The rates going forward to definitive local therapy (87.9% ≥ 70 and 84.0% < 70) and the pathological complete response rate (31.3% ≥ 70 and 40% < 70) were similar. Disease relapse rate was also similar (63.6% ≥ 70 vs. 60% < 70, P = 0.906). Elderly patients with good functional status and limited comorbidities diagnosed with MIBC receiving standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by cystectomy or radiotherapy can have similar clinical outcomes as their younger counterparts. Prospective studies evaluating the optimum curative management in this elderly population are warranted., (© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Histone proteins are subject to a diverse range of post-translational modifications which, along with DNA methylation, play a major role in controlling gene expression, cell division, survival and differentiation. Alterations in these chromatin modifications are thought to contribute to important human diseases including cancer. Inhibition of the enzymes that introduce and remove these chromatin modifications is proving an effective approach to cancer therapy and inhibitors of histone deacetylases and DNA methyltransferases have been approved for use in haematological malignancies. Here we provide a background to the biology of chromatin modifications and review some of the evidence validating histone deacetylases and DNA methyltransferases as targets for anti-cancer drug discovery. We then focus on two of the key issues in this field; the identification of novel inhibitors to overcome shortcomings of first generation agents and the potential role of histone deacetylase and DNA methyltransferase inhibitors in combination therapies for oncology. Finally, we highlight some of the challenges that will need to addressed to further progress the development of epigenetic-based therapies for cancer.

Histone deacetylase inhibitors have progressed rapidly from the laboratory to clinical testing. This review highlights the promising data for their combination with a wide range of established and novel anticancer agents and discusses the mechanisms that underpin these interactions.

Background: Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy is the standard treatment of advanced urinary tract cancer (aUTC), but 50% of patients are ineligible for cisplatin according to recently published criteria. We used a multinational database to study patterns of chemotherapy utilization in patients with aUTC and determine their impact on survival. Patients and methods: This was a retrospective study of patients with: UTC (bladder, renal pelvis, ureter or urethra); advanced disease (stages T4b and/or N+ and/or M+); urothelial, squamous or adenocarcinoma histology. Primary objective was overall survival (OS). Eligibility-for-cisplatin was defined by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status≤1, creatinine clearance≥60 ml/min, no hearing loss, no neuropathy and no heart failure. Cox regression multivariate analyses were used to establish independent associations of cisplatin versus noncisplatin-based chemotherapy on OS. Results: About 1794 patients treated between 2000 and 2013 at 29 centers were analyzed. Median follow-up was 29.1 months. About 1333 patients (74%) received first-line chemotherapy: the use of first-line chemotherapy was associated with longer OS: [hazard ratio (HR): 1.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.67-2.20]. Type of first-line chemotherapy received was: cisplatin-based 669 (50%), carboplatin-based 399 (30%) and other 265 (20%). Cisplatin use was an independent favorable prognostic factor (HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.35-1.77). This benefit was independent of baseline characteristics or comorbidities but was associated with eligibility-for-cisplatin: eligible patients treated with cisplatin lived longer than those who were not (HR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.36-2.21), while such benefit was not observed among ineligible patients. About 26% of patients who did not receive cisplatin were eligible for this agent. Median OS of ineligible patients was poor irrespective of the chemotherapy used. Conclusions: The importance of applying published criteria of eligibility-for-cisplatin was confirmed in a multinational, realworld setting in aUTC. The reasons for deviations from these criteria set targets to improve adherence. Effective therapies for cisplatin-ineligible patients are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]