Search

Crizotinib is a potent small-molecule inhibitor of ALK tyrosine kinase receptor (anaplastic lymphoma kinase; ALK) and hepatocyte growth factor receptor (HGF receptor, proto-oncogene c-Met). A range of tumors, including subsets of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), anaplastic large cell lymphoma and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors harbor an ALK rearrangement that leads to oncogenic activation of ALK. Crizotinib has demonstrated preclinical and clinical activity against such malignancies through inhibition of ALK, and patients harboring ALK- rearranged NSCLC have demonstrated high response rates and prolonged progression-free survival in phase I and II studies. In August 2011, crizotinib was approved for the treatment of advanced ALK-positive NSCLC., (Copyright 2012 Prous Science, S.A.U. or its licensors. All rights reserved.)

Background: New oncology drugs are being developed in conjunction with companion diagnostics with approval restricting their use to certain biomarker-positive subgroups. We examined the impact of different predictive biomarker screening techniques and population enrichment criteria on the cost-effectiveness of targeted drugs in lung cancer, using ALK and crizotinib to build the initial model., Methods: Health economic modeling of cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year was based on literature review and expert opinion. The modeled population represented advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), eligible for predictive biomarker screening with prescribing restricted to biomarker-positive patients., Results: For assays costing $1400 per person, cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for ALK screening all advanced NSCLC, excluding treatment cost, is $106,707. This falls to $4756 when only a highly enriched population is screened (increasing biomarker frequency from 1.6 to 35.9%). However, the same enrichment involves missing 56% patients who segregate within the unscreened group. Cheaper screening tests that miss some true positives can be more cost-effective if proportional reductions in cost exceed proportion of subjects missed. Generic modeling of idealised screening assays, including treatment cost, reveals a dominant effect of screening cost per person at low biomarker frequencies. Cost-effectiveness of <$100,000 per QALY gained is not achievable at biomarker frequencies <5% (with drug costs $1-5000 per month and screening costs $600-1400 per person)., Interpretation: Cost-effectiveness of oncology drugs whose prescribing is restricted to biomarker-positive subgroups should address the cost of detecting marker-positive patients. The cost of screening dominates at low frequencies and strategies to improve cost-effectiveness based on the assay cost, drug cost and the group screened should be considered in these scenarios.

Drug therapies for advanced breast cancer in hormone-receptor-positive disease include both hormonal and chemotherapies. Current UK practice is to minimise toxicity by using sequential hormonal agents for as long as clinically appropriate. A Markov model was developed to investigate the cost effectiveness of different sequences of therapies, particularly exploring the effects of adding an additional hormonal agent, fulvestrant, to the treatment pathway. A systematic review was undertaken and a panel of seven UK oncologists validated assumptions used for treatment efficacy, treatment pathways and resources used. Fulvestrant was found to be a cost-effective treatment option when added to the treatment sequence as a second- or third-line hormonal therapy for advanced disease. For a cohort of 1000 patients, fulvestrant as a second-line hormone therapy provided an additional 47 life years and 41 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), at an additional cost of pound 301 359. This equated to pound 6500 per life years gained and pound 7500 per QALY. When used as a third-line option, the fulvestrant arm was dominant providing an increase in health benefit of 27 QALYs for the whole cohort, at a mean overall cost reduction of pound 430 per patient. Sensitivity analyses showed these results to be robust, demonstrating that fulvestrant is an economically viable additional endocrine option in the United Kingdom for the treatment of hormone responsive advanced breast cancer.

We have demonstrated the feasibility of detecting and quantifying six cell-cycle-related nuclear markers (Ki67, pRb, p27, phospho-p27 (phosphorylated p27), phospho-pRb (phosphorylated pRb), phospho-HH3 (phosphorylated histone H3)) in plucked human scalp and eyebrow hair. Estimates of the proportion of plucked hairs that are lost or damaged during processing plus the intra- and intersubject variability of each nuclear marker with these techniques are provided to inform sizing decisions for intervention studies with drugs potentially impacting on these markers in the future.

Easily accessible normal tissues expressing the same molecular site(s) of drug action as malignant tissue offer an enhanced potential for early proof of anticancer drug mechanism and estimation of the biologically effective dose. Studies were undertaken in healthy male volunteers to assess the tolerability of single and multiple (four in 24 h) 3 mm punch biopsies of the buccal mucosa, and to determine the feasibility of detecting and quantifying a range of proliferation, cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis markers by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for use as potential pharmacodynamic (PD) end points. The biopsy procedure was well tolerated with 100% of volunteers stating that they would undergo single (n = 10) and multiple (n = 12) biopsies again. Total retinoblastoma protein (pRb), phosphorylated pRb (phospho-pRb), total p27, phosphorylated p27 (phospho-p27), phosphorylated-histone H3 (phospho-HH3), p21, p53, Cyclin A, Cyclin E, Ki67 all produced good signal detection, but M30, cleaved caspase 3 and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labelling did not. Total pRb, phospho-pRb, total p27 and phospho-p27 were quantified further in a multiple biopsy study to allow components of variability to be addressed to inform future sizing decisions on intervention studies. Neither site of biopsy within the oral cavity, nor the nominal time of biopsy had any significant impact on any of the four markers expression levels. Inter- and intrasubject coefficients of variation (CVs) that could be used to size future intervention studies for pRb, phospho-pRb, total p27 and phospho-p27 were 14, 19, 18 and 16%; and 18, 29, 25 and 19%, respectively. In conclusion, quantitation of such markers in 3 mm buccal punch biopsies would be suitable to explore as PD end points within intervention studies of drugs acting on these pathways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]