Search

Objective: A post hoc analysis of two phase III trials was carried out to explore the influence of age and treatment factors on the effect of bortezomib consolidation on progression-free survival (PFS) post autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT)., Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were assigned to one of two trials (ClinicalTrials.gov IDs: NCT00416273, NCT00416208), which were conducted in parallel, based on age (18-60 or 61-75 years, respectively). Following induction and ASCT, patients were randomized 1:1 to four 35-day cycles of bortezomib consolidation (1.6 mg/m 2 IV on days 1, 8, 15, 22) or observation only., Results: Median PFS with bortezomib consolidation vs observation was 33.6 vs 29.0 months (P = 0.3599) in patients aged 18-60 years (n = 202), and 33.4 vs 26.4 months (P = 0.0073) in patients aged 61-75 years (n = 155), respectively. Bortezomib consolidation post-ASCT appeared to equalize outcomes between older and younger patients who received prior treatment of differing intensity. This suggests that the effect of consolidation may be relative and may depend on the composition and intensity of induction and high-dose therapy., Conclusion: Older patients receiving less intensive prior treatment could experience a larger PFS benefit from bortezomib consolidation., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Vistusertib is an orally bioavailable dual target of rapamycin complex (TORC) 1/2 kinase inhibitor currently under clinical investigation in various solid tumour and haematological malignancy settings. The pharmacokinetic, metabolic and excretion profiles of 14 Carbon-isotope ( 14 C)-labelled vistusertib were characterised in this open-label phase I patient study., Methods: Four patients with advanced solid malignancies received a single oral solution dose of 14 C-labelled vistusertib. Blood, urine, faeces, and saliva samples were collected at various time points during the 8-day in-patient period of the study. Safety and preliminary efficacy were also assessed., Results: 14 C-labelled vistusertib was rapidly absorbed following administration (time to maximum concentration (T max ) < 1.2 h in all subjects). Overall, > 90% of radioactivity was recovered with the majority recovered as metabolites in faeces (on average 80% vs. 12% recovered in urine). The majority of circulating radioactivity (~ 78%) is unchanged vistusertib. Various morpholine-ring oxidation metabolites and an N-methylamide circulate at low concentrations [each < 10% area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC 0-∞ )]. No new or unexpected safety findings were observed; the most common adverse events were nausea and stomatitis., Conclusions: The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of vistusertib is similar to previous studies using the same dosing regimen in solid malignancy patients. The majority of vistusertib elimination occurred via hepatic metabolic routes.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are widely used in non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring activating EGFR mutations. However, resistance mechanisms, particularly the T790 M mutation, hamper longer-term therapeutic success of first and second generation EGFR-TKIs. To address this unmet medical need, EGFR-TKIs of the third generation are under clinical development. Relevant clinical efficacy with mainly mild to moderate class-specific side effects has been shown for third-generation EGFR-TKIs. Molecular testing is of major importance in deciding for treatment with third generation EGFR-TKIs. This article elucidates the developmental state of third generation EGFR-TKIs with its focus on Osimertinib, the first and currently the only compound in this class which is approved in Germany. Additionally, the medical importance of molecular diagnosis using tumor tissue and circulating tumor DNA is discussed., Competing Interests: Beratungs- bzw. Gutachtertätigkeit übte F. Griesinger für Ariad, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, BMS, Celgene, Clovis, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer und Roche aus. Reisekostenzuschüsse erhielt F. G. von Ariad, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer und Roche. Honorare erhielt F. G. von Ariad, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, BMS, Celgene, Clovis, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer und Roche. Unterstützung für wissenschaftliche Projekte erhielt F. G. von AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, BMS, Celgene, Clovis, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer und Roche. B. Deschler-Baier erhielt Referentenhonorare von BMS. M. Kimmich erhielt Beraterhonorare bzw. finanzielle Zuwendungen bei Kongressbesuchen von AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim und Novartis. M. Sebastian erhielt Beratung und Honorare von AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim und Roche. C. Schulz erhielt Vortrags- und Beraterhonorare von AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche. W. Brugger ist Mitarbeiter von AstraZeneca und hält Aktien. Davor erhielt er Referentenhonorare von AstraZeneca, Roche, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim und Pfizer. R. Wiewrodt erhielt Vortrags- und Beraterhonorare von AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, CSL, GSK, Hoffmann-La Roche, Lilly, MSD, Novartis und Pfizer. R. Pirker erhielt Referenten und/oder Honorare für Advisory Boards von AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim und Clovis. M. Früh erhielt von BMS und AstraZeneca Zuwendungen für Forschungszwecke, die in keinem Zusammenhang mit diesem Artikel stehen. O. Gautschi war Advisory Board Mitglied für AstraZeneca. J. Wolf erhielt Referenten- bzw. Advisory Board Honorare von AstraZeneca, Amgen, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Clovis, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer und Roche. Zudem erhielt er von BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer und Roche Zuwendungen für Forschungszwecke.S. Radke und A. Lüers geben an, dass kein Interessenskonflikt besteht., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate patient preference and satisfaction for the subcutaneous (s.c.) versus intravenous (i.v.) formulation of rituximab given with chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or follicular lymphoma (FL)., Patients and Methods: Patients received eight cycles of rituximab according to 2 schedules: Arm A received 1 cycle rituximab i.v. (375 mg/m2) and 3 cycles rituximab s.c. (1400 mg) then 4 cycles rituximab i.v.; Arm B received 4 cycles rituximab i.v. (375 mg/m2) then 4 cycles rituximab s.c. (1400 mg). Alongside rituximab, both arms received 6-8 cycles of chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP), cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone (CVP), or bendamustine as per standard local practice). Preference for s.c. or i.v. administration was evaluated using the Patient Preference Questionnaire (PPQ) at cycles 6 and 8. Patient satisfaction and convenience were assessed using the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ), and Rituximab Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (RASQ) at cycles 4 and 8., Results: At the primary data cut-off (19 January 2015), the intent-to-treat population comprised 743 patients. The majority had DLBCL (63%) and baseline characteristics were balanced between arms. At cycle 8, 81% of patients completing the PPQ preferred rituximab s.c. Preference was not impacted by treatment sequence or disease type. Patient satisfaction as measured by RASQ was higher for s.c. versus i.v. CTSQ scores were similar between arms. Adverse events were generally balanced between administration routes and no new safety signals were detected., Conclusion: Most previously untreated patients with CD20+ DLBCL or FL preferred s.c. to i.v. rituximab administration. Patient satisfaction with rituximab treatment was generally greater with s.c. administration., Registered Clinical Trial Number: NCT01724021 (ClinicalTrials.gov)., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Exon 19 deletions and the exon 21 L858R mutation of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) predict activity of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including erlotinib; however, the ability of less common EGFR mutations to predict efficacy of erlotinib is unclear., Methods: The efficacy of erlotinib in individual patients with rare EGFR mutations from the MERIT, SATURN, TITAN, TRUST, ATLAS, BeTa, and FASTACT-2 trials was analyzed and compared with data from the literature., Results: In the patients tested for biomarkers, the frequency of rare mutations identified here ranged from 1.7% (eight of 467) in the SATURN study to 7.4% (27 of 364) in ATLAS. Some rare mutations were associated with greater clinical benefit from EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy or improved prognosis independent of treatment, whereas others appeared to have a poorer prognosis. In particular, exon 18 G719 mutations, exon 19 K757R and E746G mutations, the exon 20 S768I mutation, and the exon 21 G836S mutation appeared to confer a good outcome with erlotinib treatment, whereas exon 18 S720I showed a particularly poor outcome. Owing to the small number of patients with each mutation, however, it is difficult to confirm whether these rare mutations do indeed confer sensitivity or resistance to erlotinib., Conclusions: Erlotinib can have different efficacy depending on the specific EGFR mutation. More research is needed to create a central database such as the My Cancer Genome database of rare mutations to definitively confirm whether these mutations are activating, resistant, or neutral., (Copyright © 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia who are older than 60 years has remained poor because of unfavorable disease characteristics and patient-related factors. The randomized German-Austrian AML Study Group 06-04 protocol was designed on the basis of in vitro synergistic effects of valproic acid (VPA) and all-trans retinoic acid with chemotherapy. Between 2004 and 2006, 186 patients were randomly assigned to receive 2 induction cycles with idarubicin, cytarabine, and all-trans retinoic acid either with VPA or without (STANDARD). In all patients, consolidation therapy was intended. Complete remission rates after induction tended to be lower in VPA compared with STANDARD (40% vs 52%; P = .14) as a result of a higher early death rate (26% vs 14%; P = .06). The main toxicities attributed to VPA were delayed hematologic recovery and grade 3/4 infections, observed predominantly during the second induction cycle. After restricting VPA to the first induction cycle and reducing the dose of idarubicin, these toxicities dropped to rates observed in STANDARD. After a median follow-up time of 84 months, event-free and overall survival were not different between the 2 groups (P = .95 and P = .57, respectively). However, relapse-free-survival was significantly superior in VPA compared with STANDARD (24.4% vs 6.4% at 5 years; P = .02). Explorative subset analyses revealed that AML with mutated Nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) may particularly benefit from VPA. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00151255., (© 2014 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Preliminary evidence suggests that the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib has clinical activity in FLT3-ITD-positive (FLT3-ITD) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the quality and sustainability of achievable remissions and clinical variables that influence the outcome of sorafenib monotherapy are largely undefined. To address these questions, we evaluated sorafenib monotherapy in 65 FLT3-ITD AML patients treated at 23 centers. All but two patients had relapsed or were chemotherapy-refractory after a median of three prior chemotherapy cycles. Twenty-nine patients (45%) had undergone prior allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). The documented best responses were: hematological remission in 24 patients (37%), bone marrow remission in 5 patients (8%), complete remission (with and without normalization of peripheral blood counts) in 15 patients (23%) and molecular remission with undetectable FLT3-ITD mRNA in 10 patients (15%), respectively. Seventeen of the patients without prior allo-SCT (47%) developed sorafenib resistance after a median treatment duration of 136 days (range, 56-270 days). In contrast, allo-SCT patients developed sorafenib resistance less frequently (38%) and significantly later (197 days, range 38-225 days; P=0.03). Sustained remissions were seen exclusively in the allo-SCT cohort. Thus, sorafenib monotherapy has significant activity in FLT3-ITD AML and may synergize with allogeneic immune effects to induce durable remissions.

Treatment with receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has improved progression-free and overall survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). One major target for treatment with TKI is the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), particularly in patients harboring activating mutations. However, despite initial responses and long lasting remissions, the development of secondary resistance inevitably leads to treatment failure. Analyzing recent data from various phase II/III trials it seems obvious that the single mode of action of gefitinib or erlotinib can provide temporary success only. Both preclinical and clinical evidence suggest that irreversible TKIs such as afatinib or PF00299804, or combined approaches using multiple kinase inhibition (e.g. EGFR and MET) and vertical inhibition by combination of small molecules and antibodies, seem to be more promising and will be the prevailing concepts to overcome secondary EGFR-TKI resistance for the near future., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the placebo-controlled phase III SATURN study, maintenance erlotinib after first-line chemotherapy demonstrated significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the overall study population of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: After four cycles of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, patients without progressive disease (PD) were randomised to erlotinib (150 mg/day) or placebo until PD or unacceptable toxicity. In this pre-planned analysis, data are assessed according to response to first-line chemotherapy (complete/partial response [CR/PR] or stable disease [SD])., Results: Following first-line chemotherapy, 889 non-PD patients were included in the intention-to-treat population (55% SD; 44% CR/PR; <1% unknown response). Erlotinib maintenance therapy significantly prolonged PFS in both the SD (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.68; P < 0.0001) and CR/PR (HR = 0.74; P = 0.0059) groups, while OS was significantly prolonged in the SD group only (HR = 0.72; P = 0.0019). The erlotinib-related OS benefit in the SD group remained significant across subgroups, irrespective of tumour histology and/or EGFR mutation status. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the SD group and the overall population, and erlotinib treatment did not negatively impact quality of life., Conclusions: Patients with advanced NSCLC and SD following first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy derive a significant OS benefit from maintenance erlotinib therapy.

Purpose: The phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled Sequential Tarceva in Unresectable NSCLC (SATURN; BO18192) study found that erlotinib maintenance therapy extended progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had nonprogressive disease following first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy. This study included prospective analysis of the prognostic and predictive value of several biomarkers., Patients and Methods: Mandatory diagnostic tumor specimens were collected before initiating first-line chemotherapy and were tested for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) protein expression by using immunohistochemistry (IHC), EGFR gene copy number by using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), and EGFR and KRAS mutations by using DNA sequencing. An EGFR CA simple sequence repeat in intron 1 (CA-SSR1) polymorphism was evaluated in blood., Results: All 889 randomly assigned patients provided tumor samples. EGFR IHC, EGFR FISH, KRAS mutation, and EGFR CA-SSR1 repeat length status were not predictive for erlotinib efficacy. A profound predictive effect on PFS of erlotinib relative to placebo was observed in the EGFR mutation-positive subgroup (hazard ratio [HR], 0.10; P < .001). Significant PFS benefits were also observed with erlotinib in the wild-type EGFR subgroup (HR, 0.78; P = .0185). KRAS mutation status was a significant negative prognostic factor for PFS., Conclusion: This large prospective biomarker study found that patients with activating EGFR mutations derive the greatest PFS benefit from erlotinib maintenance therapy. No other biomarkers were predictive for outcomes with erlotinib, although the study was not powered for clinical outcomes in biomarker subgroups other than EGFR IHC-positive [corrected]. KRAS mutations were prognostic for reduced PFS. The study demonstrated the feasibility of prospective tissue collection for biomarker analyses in NSCLC.

Background: First-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is usually limited to four to six cycles. Maintenance therapy can delay progression and prolong survival. The oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitor erlotinib has proven efficacy and tolerability in second-line NSCLC. We designed the phase 3, placebo-controlled Sequential Tarceva in Unresectable NSCLC (SATURN; BO18192) study to assess use of erlotinib as maintenance therapy in patients with non-progressive disease following first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy., Methods: Between December, 2005, and May, 2008, 1949 patients were included in the run-in phase (four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy). At the end of the run-in phase, 889 patients who did not have progressive disease were entered into the main study, and were randomly allocated using a 1:1 adaptive randomisation method through a third-party interactive voice response system to receive erlotinib (150 mg/day; n=438) or placebo (n=451) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were stratified by EGFR immunohistochemistry status, stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, chemotherapy regimen, smoking history, and region. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) in all analysable patients irrespective of EGFR status, and PFS in patients whose tumours had EGFR protein overexpression, as determined by immunohistochemistry. This study is registered with www.ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00556712., Findings: 884 patients were analysable for PFS; 437 in the erlotinib group and 447 in the placebo group. After a median follow-up of 11.4 months for the erlotinib group and 11.5 months for the placebo group, median PFS was significantly longer with erlotinib than with placebo: 12.3 weeks for patients in the erlotinib group versus 11.1 weeks for those in the placebo group (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62-0.82; p<0.0001). PFS was also significantly longer in patients with EGFR-positive immunohistochemistry who were treated with erlotinib (n=307) compared with EGFR-positive patients given placebo (n=311; median PFS 12.3 weeks in the erlotinib group vs 11.1 weeks in the placebo group; HR 0.69, 0.58-0.82; p<0.0001). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were rash (37 [9%] of 443 patients in the erlotinib group vs none of 445 in the placebo group) and diarrhoea (seven [2%] of 443 patients vs none of 445). Serious adverse events were reported in 47 patients (11%) on erlotinib compared with 34 patients (8%) on placebo. The most common serious adverse event was pneumonia (seven cases [2%] with erlotinib and four [<1%] with placebo)., Interpretation: Maintenance therapy with erlotinib for patients with NSCLC is well tolerated and significantly prolongs PFS compared with placebo. First-line maintenance with erlotinib could be considered in patients who do not progress after four cycles of chemotherapy., Funding: F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aims and Background: There are only limited data on the safety and efficacy of panitumumab in patients who experienced severe infusion reactions during cetuximab antibody therapy., Case Report: We report the case of a 69-year-old woman with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer who received single-agent cetuximab treatment but experienced a severe reaction during the first infusion, despite premedication with corticosteroids/antihistamines. Cetuximab was discontinued and treatment with panitumumab initiated approximately 14 days later (without premedication); no infusion reactions occurred and there was a rapid improvement in her general condition. She experienced a partial response that was sustained for 7 months before progression., Conclusions: This case supports the use of panitumumab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer and suggests that panitumumab may be used in some patients with prior infusion reactions to cetuximab.

Shortening duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia may reduce risk of infection and aid subsequent chemotherapy delivery. Cycle 1 neutrophil recovery was evaluated in 59 elderly women with breast cancer receiving adjuvant FEC100 (5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin 100mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2)) and randomized to pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis (PP) from cycle 1, or secondary prophylaxis (SP, i.e., subsequent to a neutropenic event [no G-CSF in cycle 1]). In cycle 1, grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 77% (PP; N=30) and 72% (SP; N=29). Duration of grade 3-4 neutropenia was shorter with pegfilgrastim than without. Mean absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovered above 1.0 x 10(9)/L by day 9 (pegfilgrastim) versus days 16-18 (without). At last observation (> or =day 14+/-2), no PP patient had ANC <1.0 x 10(9)/L versus approximately 25% of those receiving no pegfilgrastim. In conclusion, cycle 1 pegfilgrastim improved recovery from severe neutropenia in elderly breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant FEC100.

Background: Patients with follicular (FL) or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are incurable with conventional therapy. We investigated the safety and efficacy of rituximab consolidation after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in order to prevent relapse by clearance of minimal residual disease (MRD)., Methods: Rituximab was given approximately 8 weeks after CD34+ cell enriched ASCT at 375 mg/m2, weekly for 4 weeks. Monitoring of MRD was performed by repetitive PCR analyses., Results: Thirty-one patients were included; one died early after ASCT before rituximab administration. Thirty patients (20 FL, 10 MCL) were evaluable after rituximab consolidation, and 27 of these were assessable for MRD detection. Rituximab consolidation post-ASCT was safe, the most common toxicity being infection. At a median follow-up of 42 months (range 13-96) after ASCT, 25 patients were censored with an actuarial event-free survival (EFS) of 81% at 4 and 5 years. Four patients (two FL, two MCL) relapsed, and one additional MCL patient died unexpectedly in complete remission. PCR-negativity was observed in 22% of the patients before ASCT, 53% post-ASCT (P=0.0547), 72% after rituximab (P=0.0018) and 100% at 6 months post-transplant (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: One single course of rituximab consolidation given after ASCT is safe, may help to eliminate MRD and may translate into improved EFS in both FL and MCL patients.

Advanced follicular and mantle cell lymphoma are currently incurable using conventional chemotherapy. As such, new and potentially more effective therapeutic approaches such as high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and consolidation using various types of therapy are being increasingly considered. Rituximab has been assessed as an in vivo purge and as consolidation therapy both first-line and in relapsed patients with follicular and mantle cell lymphoma. Data from a number of studies are reviewed, focusing on our recently reported phase II study of patients with follicular or mantle cell lymphoma who received one standard course of rituximab consolidation therapy after ASCT to show that using rituximab in the context of high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT may improve patient outcomes without compromising tolerability. Specifically, purging and consolidation using rituximab can improve clinical and molecular response rates, may eliminate minimal residual disease, and may improve survival. These studies suggest that rituximab may have an important role in improving the outcome of ASCT in patients with follicular or mantle cell lymphoma.

Follicular lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma are incurable with standard chemotherapy regimens. One approach to improve outcome in patients with these diseases is high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is specific for the B-cell surface antigen and can be used in autologous stem cell transplantation to eliminate lymphoma cells before the harvest (in vivo purging) or to prevent regrowth of malignant cells following transplant (post-transplant therapy). Preliminary data from an ongoing multicenter study evaluating the safety and efficacy of rituximab as a post-transplant consolidation therapy in patients with follicular lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma are presented. After high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation together with rituximab treatment, 92% of patients are in complete remission at the 18-month study follow-up, suggesting that rituximab is a valuable and potentially curative treatment for patients with follicular lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma. Six months after treatment, all evaluable patients became polymerase chain reaction-negative for the bcl-1 and bcl-2 chromosomal rearrangements and remained so during follow-up, indicating that rituximab is able to eliminate minimal residual disease and bring about high rates of durable remissions in these patients., (Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.)

The rationale for purging of autologous acute myeloid leukemia (AML) grafts is to eradicate contaminating leukemic cells that might contribute to relapse. However, in vitro purging generally delays post-transplant hematopoietic recovery, thus increasing treatment-related complication rates. Theoretically, this prolonged aplasia might be shortened by the additional transplantation of ex vivo-generated progenitor cells. Therefore, we investigated whether nonleukemic progenitors could be expanded ex vivo from AML cell-contaminated CD34(+) peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) preparations. Nonleukemic CD34(+)-selected PBPC and AML cells (Kasumi-1, KG-1, primary AML blasts) were cultured in cytokine-supplemented liquid culture for up to 19 days. Cells were used either unmanipulated or following in vitro purging with mafosfamide (30, 50, 75 microg/ml). Ex vivo-generated cells were assessed by flow cytometry, progenitor cell assays, and polymerase chain reaction. Without prior purging, ex vivo culture markedly amplified AML cells as well as nonleukemic CD34(+) PBPC (day 12: Kasumi-1, 18.5 +/- 0.6-fold; KG-1, 52.2 +/- 2.6-fold; CD34(+), 74.1 +/- 5.6-fold). Co-culture with leukemic cells did not affect CD34(+) cell growth and vice versa. Following in vitro purging, CD34(+) PBPC were expanded even at the highest mafosfamide dose (day 19: 25 +/- 15-fold), whereas leukemic cells were markedly depleted (approx. 1.5 log). Furthermore, normal colony-forming units (CFU) could be effectively recovered (day 19: 10 +/- 3.1% of prepurging input CFU), whereas CFU-L were depleted to undetectable levels in six of seven experiments. Finally, leukemic cells were undetectable following ex vivo co-culture of purged cells (CD34(+) PBPC plus 10% Kasumi-1 cells or primary blasts), but were clearly detectable without purging. Taken together, these data demonstrated that ex vivo expansion of normal progenitors from mafosfamide-purged AML cell-contaminated grafts might be feasible.

Purpose: The current study was initiated to assess the clinical efficacy and side effects of rituximab in patients with relapsed advanced stage follicular lymphoma., Patients and Methods: The study was performed as an open-label non-randomized multicenter phase-II trial and included patients older than 18 years of age with relapsed advanced-stage follicular lymphomas (FL) grades I and II, according to the REAL classification, or with centroblastic/centrocytic (CB/CC lymphomas according to the Kiel classification. Four weekly doses of 375 mg/m2 rituximab were applied., Results: 38 patients from eight centers were included between January 1997 and January 1998 and were evaluable for response and toxicity on an intention to treat basis. The median age was 55 years (range 26-75 years). Thirteen patients (35%) were in first relapse, 11 patients (30%) in second, and 13 patients (35%) in third relapse. The median time between primary diagnosis and study entry was 4.6 years (range 0.9-14.7 years). Twenty-three patients tolerated the application of rituximab without adverse events; in 13 cases the infusion rate had to be reduced because of side effects; in two patients the application was stopped because of pharyngeal edema and anaphylactoid reaction. The most frequent side effects were fever (13 patients) and rigor (13 patients); 65% of the side effects were observed after the first infusion. Twenty grade-III/IV side effects were considered to be related to treatment: lymphocytopenia (3), granalocytopenia (1), thrombocytopenia (2), fever (1), hyperglycermia (1), venous thrombosis (1), syncope (1), plasmatic coagulation disorder (1), shortness of breath (2), photosensitivity (1), cardiac failure (1), chills (1), sepsis (1), tumor lysis (1), anemia (1), and pharyngeal edema (1). Eight patients were not eligible for assessment of response because of non-follicular subtypes of low-grade lymphomas (n =6) or early termination of therapy at the first infusion because of severe side effects (n =2). From the 30 evaluable cases with follicular lymphomas, five patients achieved a complete remission (CR) (17%), nine patients a partial remission (PR) (30%), and two patients a minor response (MR) (7%). The overall response rate was 47%. The median time to treatment progression (TTP) was 201 days (range 64-293 days), with five patients experiencing long-lasting remissions of 214-293 days duration. In three patients, the rituximab-induced remission exceeded the preceding progression-free interval substantially. Bulky disease (P=0.058) and/or bone-mar row involvement (P=0.046) were associated with poor response., Conclusion: This study confirms the moderate treatment-related toxicity and the high antilymphoma activity of rituximab in patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma. Further studies are needed to determine the role of rituximab in the first-line treatment of these disorders and its combination with conventional chemotherapy.

A gene encoding the p53 val135 mutant, which assumes mutant conformation at 38.5 degrees C and wild-type conformation at 32.5 degrees C, was introduced into p53-deficient K562 myeloid leukemia cells. Forced expression of wild-type, but not mutant, p53 resulted in growth arrest, accumulation of p21 and Bax proteins, and delayed cell death. Wild-type p53 enhanced the cytotoxic effects of some drugs and attenuated those of others. Compared with wild-type p53, mutant p53 induced much stronger sensitization to drug cytotoxicity. This occurred in the absence of effects on cell cycle progression or activation of several p53 target genes. Although both mutant and wild-type p53 induced changes of immunophenotype, no specific pattern of differentiation was associated with enhanced chemosensitivity. Thus, (1) induction of growth arrest and activation of p53 target genes such as p21 and bax are linked to the wild-type conformation of p53; (2) p53 induces immunophenotypic changes of myeloid leukemia cells suggestive of multidirectional differentiation in a conformation-dependent manner; and (3) (so-called) mutant p53 induces chemosensitization in the absence of effects on cell cycle progression, activation of bax, p21, gadd45 and mdm-2, or a specific pattern of differentiation; and (4) chemosensitization mediated by wild-type p53 may be masked by transcription-dependent induction of growth arrest.

Abstract: This randomized phase 2 study explored the feasibility of delivering four to six cycles of the dose-intensified regimen FEC-100 (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide) to elderly patients with stage II–III breast cancer, using pegfilgrastim for neutrophil support. Sixty patients aged 65–77 years received single 6mg doses of pegfilgrastim on day 2 of FEC-100, either as primary prophylaxis (all cycles: PP), or as secondary prophylaxis (all cycles following a neutropenic event: SP). Neutropenic events (a composite endpoint that included grade 3 neutropenia+fever, grade 4 neutropenia, infectious complication requiring systemic anti-infectives and chemotherapy dose delay/reduction) occurred in 24/30 (80%) of the PP and 21/29 (72%) of the SP group in the first cycle. Most patients received all chemotherapy cycles at full dose on schedule (26/30 [87%] PP; 20/29 [69%] SP). These data indicate that delivery of FEC-100 is feasible with pegfilgrastim support in elderly breast cancer patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]