Search

Mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer, for which no curative oncological treatment currently exists. This article outlines the options for managing malignant pleural effusions, describes the developments in chemotherapy over the past 10 years and summarizes the evidence for prophylactic and palliative radiotherapy.

Background: The optimum endocrine treatment for postmenopausal women with advanced hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer that has progressed on non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAIs) is unclear. The aim of the SoFEA trial was to assess a maximum double endocrine targeting approach with the steroidal anti-oestrogen fulvestrant in combination with continued oestrogen deprivation., Methods: In a composite, multicentre, phase 3 randomised controlled trial done in the UK and South Korea, postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer (oestrogen receptor [ER] positive, progesterone receptor [PR] positive, or both) were eligible if they had relapsed or progressed with locally advanced or metastatic disease on an NSAI (given as adjuvant for at least 12 months or as first-line treatment for at least 6 months). Additionally, patients had to have adequate organ function and a WHO performance status of 0-2. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive fulvestrant (500 mg intramuscular injection on day 1, followed by 250 mg doses on days 15 and 29, and then every 28 days) plus daily oral anastrozole (1 mg); fulvestrant plus anastrozole-matched placebo; or daily oral exemestane (25 mg). Randomisation was done with computer-generated permuted blocks, and stratification was by centre and previous use of an NSAI as adjuvant treatment or for locally advanced or metastatic disease. Participants and investigators were aware of assignment to fulvestrant or exemestane, but not of assignment to anastrozole or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00253422 (UK) and NCT00944918 (South Korea)., Findings: Between March 26, 2004, and Aug 6, 2010, 723 patients underwent randomisation: 243 were assigned to receive fulvestrant plus anastrozole, 231 to fulvestrant plus placebo, and 249 to exemestane. Median PFS was 4·4 months (95% CI 3·4-5·4) in patients assigned to fulvestrant plus anastrozole, 4·8 months (3·6-5·5) in those assigned to fulvestrant plus placebo, and 3·4 months (3·0-4·6) in those assigned to exemestane. No difference was recorded between the patients assigned to fulvestrant plus anastrozole and fulvestrant plus placebo (hazard ratio 1·00, 95% CI 0·83-1·21; log-rank p=0·98), or between those assigned to fulvestrant plus placebo and exemestane (0·95, 0·79-1·14; log-rank p=0·56). 87 serious adverse events were reported: 36 in patients assigned to fulvestrant plus anastrozole, 22 in those assigned to fulvestrant plus placebo, and 29 in those assigned to exemestane. Grade 3-4 adverse events were rare; the most frequent were arthralgia (three in the group assigned to fulvestrant plus anastrozole; seven in that assigned to fulvestrant plus placebo; eight in that assigned to exemestane), lethargy (three; 11; 11), and nausea or vomiting (five; two; eight)., Interpretation: After loss of response to NSAIs in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer, maximum double endocrine treatment with 250 mg fulvestrant combined with oestrogen deprivation is no better than either fulvestrant alone or exemestane., (Copyright © 2013 Johnston et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC-SA. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: There is substantial interpatient variability in etoposide pharmacokinetics. Pharmacokinetic adjustment to specific plasma concentrations may make it possible to define a therapeutic plasma concentration and relate drug target expression in the tumor to response. This study evaluated the combination of cisplatin with a prolonged infusion of etoposide phosphate (EP) in advanced breast cancer and correlated response to topoisomerase II expression., Experimental Design: Eligible patients, previously treated with an anthracycline, received 60 mg/m(2) cisplatin, followed by a 5-day infusion of EP. Plasma etoposide levels were measured on days 2 and 4 of each cycle with adjustment of the infusion rate to achieve an initial target etoposide concentration of 2 micro g/ml or 1.5 micro g/ml. Primary tumor blocks were stained by immunohistochemistry for topoisomerase IIalpha and beta., Results: Thirty-six patients, treated in three consecutive cohorts, received 145 cycles of chemotherapy. Targeting plasma etoposide concentration reduced interpatient pharmacokinetic variability (32% and 62% of patients, respectively, within 10% of target concentration on days 2 and 4; cycle 1). Significant hematological toxicity (89% of patients with at least one episode of grade III/IV neutropenia, 64% of patients with at least one episode of grade III/IV thrombocytopenia) was observed. Thirty-nine percent of patients achieved a partial response, and 19% had stable disease for at least 3 months. The median time to tumor progression was 4 months, with a median survival of 11 months. Topoisomerase IIalpha expression was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in responding patients compared with those with stable or progressive disease. There was no difference in topoisomerase IIbeta expression between groups., Conclusion: Cisplatin and infusional EP is an active, but intensive, schedule in heavily pretreated patients with breast cancer. Clinical response correlates with tumor topoisomerase IIalpha expression.

The aims of this study were to identify prognostic variables for toxicity and survival in patients with cancer participating in phase I clinical trials and compare characteristics of those treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy (CT) and non-cytotoxic drugs (non-CT). Data were collected from 420 (114 CT, 306 non-CT) patients enrolled in 16 phase I trials (five CT and 11 non-CT trials) in one cancer centre. Analyses of all patients were used to compare treatment groups, identify predictive variables for toxicity and to estimate prognostic factors in overall survival (OS). These were used to develop a prognostic index (PI). Multivariate analysis found those patients with better performance status, fewer sites of metastases, baseline Hb>12 g dl(-1) and WBC or LDH in the normal range had significantly better OS. Male gender, platelet count <450 x 10(9) l(-1), high WBC or treatment with a non-CT phase I agent significantly reduced the chance of grade 3/4 toxicity. Overall survival was not significantly different between the CT and non-CT groups (260 vs 192 days, P=0.47) except for those with liver metastases (228 vs 137 days, P=0.02). Overall tumour response was 4.9% (95% CI: 2.7-7.0%). The PI identified three distinct patient groups with median survival of 321, 257 and 117 days. In conclusion, entry into a phase I trial of a non-CT drug is a safe option for heavily pretreated patients with cancer. The PI generated from these data can estimate the survival probability for patients entering phase I studies.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an angiogenic tumor resistant to standard cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. Although often responsive to immunomodulatory agents including interleukin 2 and IFN-alpha, the overall results in randomized Phase III studies are disappointing with only modest improvements in overall survival. This Phase II study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of razoxane, an antiangiogenic topoisomerase II inhibitor, in 40 patients (32 men, 8 women; age: range, 31-76 years; median, 58 years) with inoperable RCC. Twenty patients received razoxane 125 mg p.o., twice a day for 5 days each week for 8 weeks (one cycle). This was repeated in patients with stable disease (StD), but was discontinued after 16 weeks if there was no evidence of an objective response. Because minimal toxicity was seen, subsequent patients (n = 20) were treated until progressive disease (PD) was documented. Of 38 evaluable patients, 11 (29%) had StD for a minimum of 4 months, and the remainder had PD. Median overall survival was 7.3 months. Duration of survival was significantly better in patients with StD compared with those with PD (P = 0.003). The effect of treatment on six potential surrogate serum/plasma (vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), urokinase plasminogen activator soluble receptor (uPAsr), E-selectin, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and von Willebrand's factor (vWF) and two urinary (VEGF and bFGF) markers of angiogenesis was evaluated before and after 1 cycle of treatment. Pretreatment serum VEGF and E-selectin levels above the median value were associated with a poor prognosis. Serum VCAM-1 levels and urinary VEGF levels rose significantly after one cycle in patients with PD but not in those with StD. Serum VEGF, bFGF, VCAM-1 and vWF, plasma uPAsr and urinary bFGF levels were significantly higher in PD patients compared with StD patients before and/or after 1 cycle of treatment. In conclusion, razoxane is an antiangiogenic agent that has minimal toxicity and that requires further evaluation in combination with other active agents in the treatment of RCC. Surrogate serum and urinary markers of angiogenesis may have a role to play in predicting disease response and overall survival in RCC.

Background: MKT077 is a rhodacyanine dye analogue which preferentially accumulates in tumour cell mitochondria. It is cytotoxic to a range of tumours. In this phase I study, MKT077 was administered as a five-day infusion once every three weeks., Patients and Methods: Ten patients, median age 59 (38-70) years, with advanced solid cancers were treated at three dose levels: 30, 40 and 50 mg/m2/day for a total of 18 cycles. 31Phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) was used to evaluate the effect of MKT077 on skeletal muscle mitochondrial function., Results: The predominant toxicity was recurrent reversible functional renal impairment (grade 2, two patients). One patient with renal cancer attained stable disease and the remainder progressive disease. There were no MRS changes in the first or second treatment cycles but one patient received 11 treatment cycles and developed changes consistent with a mitochondrial myopathy. Mean values for all pharmacokinetic parameters were at sub micromolar levels and did not exceed IC50 values (> or = 1 microM)., Conclusions: Because of the renal toxicity, and animal studies showing MKT077 causes eventual irreversible renal toxicity, further recruitment was halted. The study shows, however, that it is feasible to target mitochondria with rhodacyanine analogues, if drugs with higher therapeutic indices could be developed.

The cyclic AMP (cAMP)-dependent protein kinase regulatory subunit RI is overexpressed in cancer cells. 8-Chloro-cAMP (8-Cl-cAMP) is an RII site-specific analogue that down-regulates RI and inhibits the growth of a wide range of cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. We performed a Phase I trial of 8-Cl-cAMP in 32 patients with malignancies that were refractory to standard treatments. 8-Cl-cAMP was initially given in a 1-month cycle by constant infusion at 0.005 mg/kg/h for 21 days, followed by 1 week of rest. The dose was escalated to 0.045 mg/kg/h, but hypercalcemia became the dose-limiting toxicity. The length of drug administration was, therefore, reduced to 5 days per week for the first 3 weeks of the cycle, but it was not possible to increase the drug dose without producing hypercalcemia. Hence, the length of drug administration was reduced to 3 days per week for the first 3 weeks of the cycle. The maximum tolerated dose for this regimen was 0.15 mg/kg/h, and the dose-limiting toxicities were reversible hypercalcemia and hepatotoxicity. Stable disease for > or =4 months was observed in two patients treated at > or =0.045 mg/kg. cAMP-dependent protein kinase is involved in hormone- and cytokine-mediated signaling, and so representative hormone, cytokine, and peripheral lymphocyte subsets were measured. The drug had a parathyroid hormone-like effect on calcium homeostasis and significantly increased circulating luteinizing hormone and 17-hydoxyprogesterone levels (P < 0.02 and P < 0.0006, respectively). We conclude that 8-Cl-cAMP is well tolerated without attendant myelotoxicity, and in this study, it was associated with biological effects. In Phase II studies, a dose of 0.11 mg/kg/h for 3 days per week would be appropriate.

RC-160 (octastatin/vapreotide) is a potent octapeptide analogue of somatostatin with growth inhibitory activity in experimental tumours in vitro and in vivo, including breast cancer. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose RC-160, 3 mg day(-1) on week 1 increased to 4.5 mg day(-1) for weeks 2-4 and subsequently 6 mg day(-1) until the end of treatment, administered by continuous subcutaneous infusion in the management of 14 women with previously treated metastatic breast cancer. The age range was 37-80 years (median 58.5 years) and performance status 0-2. The treatment was well tolerated with no dose reductions being required. No grade 3 or 4 toxicities were seen. Abscess formation developed at the infusion site in eight patients and erythema and discomfort was seen in a further three patients. A significant reduction in IGF-I levels occurred by day 7 and was maintained throughout the treatment. The lowest dose of RC-160 produced the maximal IGF-I response. Although there was no reduction in prolactin levels in patients whose baseline levels were normal, elevated prolactin levels found in three patients fell to within the normal range 7 days after commencing RC-160 treatment. A small but significant rise in fasting blood glucose levels was also recorded, the highest level on treatment being 7.6 mmol l(-1). No objective tumour responses were observed, all patients showing disease progression within 3 months of commencing treatment. These findings demonstrate that high-dose RC-160, administered as a continuous subcutaneous infusion, can reduce serum levels of the breast growth factors IGF-I and prolactin but is ineffective in the management of metastatic breast cancer. Encouraging preclinical anti-tumour activity and the favourable toxicity profile in patients suggest the merit of future studies combining RC-160 with anti-oestrogen, cytotoxic and anti-angiogenic agents.

Tumor cells and associated stromal cells secrete matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), contributing to invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis. Batimastat (BB-94) is a broad-spectrum MMP inhibitor that causes resolution of ascites and/or tumor growth delay in animal models of breast, ovarian, and colorectal cancer. We recruited 18 patients with cytologically positive malignant pleural effusions into a Phase I study of intrapleural BB-94. Three patients received single doses of BB-94 at each dose level: 15, 30, 60, 105, 135, and 300 mg/m2. Two patients were retreated with a second course at 60 and 105 mg/m2. BB-94 was detectable in plasma 1 h after intrapleural administration, and peak levels of 20-200 ng/ml occurred after 4 h to 1 week. BB-94 persisted in the plasma for up to 12 weeks, at levels exceeding the IC50s for target MMPs. Peak values were higher, and persistence in the plasma was longer after higher doses of BB-94. The treatment was well tolerated. Toxic effects included low-grade fever for 24-48 h (6 of 18 patients, 33%) and reversible asymptomatic elevation of liver enzymes (8 patients, 44%). Toxicity seemed unrelated to BB-94 dose or plasma levels. Sixteen patients evaluable for response required significantly fewer pleural aspirations in the 3 months after BB-94 compared with the 3 months before. Seven patients (44%) required no further pleural aspiration until death/last follow-up. After 1 month, patients treated with 60-300 mg/m2 BB-94 had significantly better dyspnea scores, indicating improved exercise tolerance, compared with baseline scores the day after BB-94. The maximum tolerated intrapleural dose remains to be defined, but it is clear that intrapleural BB-94 is well tolerated, with evidence of local activity.

Bryostatin 1 is a protein kinase C partial agonist which has both antineoplastic and immune-stimulatory properties, including the induction of cytokine release and expansion of tumour-specific lymphocyte populations. In phase I studies, tumour responses have been observed in patients with malignant melanoma, lymphoma and ovarian carcinoma. The dose-limiting toxicity is myalgia. Sixteen patients (age 35-76 years, median 57 years) with malignant melanoma were treated. All had received prior chemotherapy. In each cycle of treatment, patients received bryostatin 25 degrees g m(-2) weekly for three courses followed by a rest week. The drug was given in PET diluent (10 microg bryostatin ml(-1) of 60% polyethylene glycol, 30% ethanol, 10% Tween 80) and infused in normal saline over 1 h. The principal toxicities were myalgia (grade 2, eight patients and grade 3, six patients) and grade 2 phlebitis (four patients), fatigue (three patients) and vomiting (one patient). Of 15 patients evaluable for tumour response, 14 developed progressive disease. One patient developed stable disease for 9 months after bryostatin treatment. In conclusion, single-agent bryostatin appears ineffective in the treatment of metastatic melanoma in patients previously treated with chemotherapy. It should, however, be investigated further in previously untreated patients.