Search

Introduction: Onapristone is a type I progesterone receptor (PR) antagonist, which prevents PR- mediated DNA transcription. Onapristone is active in multiple preclinical models and two prior studies demonstrated promising activity in patients with breast cancer. We conducted a study of extended release (ER) Onapristone to determine a recommended dose and explore the role of transcriptionally-activated PR (APR), detected as an aggregated subnuclear distribution pattern, as a predictive biomarker., Methods: An open-label, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, phase 1 study (target n = 60; NCT02052128) included female patients ≥18 years with PRpos tumors. APR analysis was performed on archival tumor tissue. Patients were randomized to five cohorts of extended release (ER) onapristone tablets 10, 20, 30, 40 or 50 mg BID, or immediate release 100 mg QD until progressive disease or intolerability. Primary endpoint was to identify the recommended phase 2 dose. Secondary endpoints included safety, clinical benefit and pharmacokinetics., Results: The phase 1 dose escalation component of the study is complete (n = 52). Tumor diagnosis included: endometrial carcinoma 12; breast cancer 20; ovarian cancer 13; other 7. Median age was 64 (36-84). No dose limiting toxicity was observed with reported liver function test elevation related only to liver metastases. The RP2D was 50 mg ER BID. Median therapy duration was 8 weeks (range 2-44), and 9 patients had clinical benefit ≥24 weeks, including 2 patients with APRpos endometrial carcinoma., Conclusion: Clinical benefit with excellent tolerance was seen in heavily pretreated patients with endometrial, ovarian and breast cancer. The data support the development of Onapristone in endometrial endometrioid cancer. Onapristone should also be evaluated in ovarian and breast cancers along with APR immunohistochemistry validation., Competing Interests: Jacques Bonneterre is a consultant to Arno Therapeutics and Invivis Pharmaceuticals. Keyvan Rezai, François Lokiec, Jacques Bosq, and Alice S Bexon are consultants to Arno Therapeutics. Erard M Gilles is an employee of Invivis Pharmaceuticals and consultant to Arno Therapeutics. Stefan Proniuk and David M. Jackson are employees and stock owners of Arno Therapeutics. Alexander Zukiwski is CEO and stock owner of Arno Therapeutics. Paul H Cottu, Andrea Varga, Mario Campone, Alexandra Leary, Anne Floquet, Dominique Berton-Rigaud, Marie-Paule Sablin, Anne Lesoin, Catherine Lhomme, Veronique Dieras, and Antoine Italiano have no relevant conflicts of interest to declare. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

An increase in the incidence of breast cancer patients with brain metastases has been observed over the last years, mainly because the recent development of new drugs including therapies targeting HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) resulted in an increased survival of these patients. With HER2+ patients living longer and the well-known neurotropism of HER2+ tumour cells, the resulting high incidence of brain metastases is not really surprising. Moreover, brain metastases more often occur within a context of existing extracranial metastases. These need to be treated at the same time in order to favourably impact patients' survival. Consequently, the management of breast cancer patients with brain metastases clearly relies on a multidisciplinary approach, including systemic treatment. A working group including neuro-oncologists, neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists and oncologists was created in order to provide French national guidelines for the management of brain metastases within the "Association des neuro-oncologues d'expression française" (ANOCEF). The recommendations regarding the systemic treatment in breast cancer patients are reported here including key features of their management., (Copyright © 2015 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: For decades, determination of the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) was based on the toxicity (especially the maximum tolerated dose or MTD) experienced by patients enrolled in dose-escalating Phase 1 trials investigating anti-cancer agents. Recent studies suggest that this toxicity-based strategy is not suitable for modern anti-cancer agents. We conducted a retrospective study to identify the risk factor(s) for failing to determine the RP2D according to the MTD., Material and Methods: We analyzed 320 recently published (1997-2008) Phase 1 trials using the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) to define the P2RD. We analyzed the current definitions of RP2D and then identified the risk factors for not establishing the RP2D using the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals. Interactions between these risk factors were explored using the logistic regression model and CHAID algorithm., Results: 18% of contemporary dose-seeking Phase 1 trials did not identify a RP2D. The logistic regression analysis showed that the risk factors for not identifying the RP2D were: investigation of molecular targeted therapies (RR = 3.0, p = 0.0017), lack of justification of the starting dose (RR = 5.9, p = 0.0121) and lack of definition of the MTD (RR = 8.4, p = 0.0006). The CHAID algorithm confirmed the importance of the methodological parameters., Discussion: This study confirms the difficulty of determining the RP2D of molecular targeted therapy using conventional methods. However, it underlines the major importance of two methodological points: definition of the MTD and justification of the starting dose.

Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) remains the preferred metric in dose-finding phase 1 trials. Nevertheless, this primary endpoint appears unsuitable for investigating non-cytotoxic drugs. We reviewed 201 recent dose-finding phase 1 trials and compared the DLT defined with cytotoxic (119 trials) and non-cytotoxic drugs (molecular-targeted therapies and immune-stimulant agents; 82 trials). DLT was less frequently identified with non-cytotoxic drugs (52 vs. 89%, p = 0.00005). Myelotoxicity remains the most frequent DLT in studies investigating cytotoxic agents (51%). Myelotoxicity was significantly less frequent in studies investigating non-cytotoxic drugs (14%, p = 0.00003). Skin toxicities (p = 0.038), coagulation perturbation (p = 0.025) and fever (p = 0.025) were the most frequent DLTs in studies investigating non-cytotoxic drugs. Moreover, DLTs identified with non-cytotoxic drugs were less frequently objectively measurable as they were based on biological anomalies (30 vs. 63%, p = 0.0026). Approximately 50% of dose-finding phase 1 trials investigating non-cytotoxic drugs led to DLT and then the maximum tolerated dose being found. However, the nature of these DLTs is different from those described with cytotoxic drugs and less objectively measurable in many cases.

The treatment of leptomeningeal metastasis is based on protocols linking systemic chemotherapies and intrathecal injections of antineoplastic agents. Since the late 1960s, cases of accidental intrathecal injections of vinca-alkaloids, which have almost always proved fatal, have been documented. The most concerned countries, supported by the WHO, have published numerous recommendations aimed at reducing this type of risk. The aim of our work was to improve safety procedures for the intrathecal administration of antineoplastic drugs in an oncology hospital: the Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France. To this end, we compiled and analyzed a total of eight international recommendations. Our method was to meet the requirements of the AFSSAPS (French agency for the safety of health products), then to adopt recommended procedures in other countries, where appropriate. We considered the whole drugs circuit from prescription to administration. Improvements basically focused on the computerization of prescription, the dilution in mini-bags of vinca-alkaloids, and the additional labeling of intrathecally administered preparations as well as those with some vinca-alkaloids. This multidisciplinary approach to improve our practices complements the precautions taken by healthcare teams.

Introduction: New drug development is a time- and resource-consuming process. Phase 1 trials constitute a major key-step of this development. Shortening the accrual time is of major importance., Methods: 292 published phase-1-trials were retrospectively reviewed to establish the determinants of accrual time using Log-rank test and then Cox Model., Results: Out of 292 trials (1997-2008), only 107 reports (36%) described the accrual time (median: 20 months, 5-72). Phase-2-recommended dose was established in 87 studies (81%). Most studies investigated regimens including cytotoxic drugs (77%) or molecular targeted therapies (29%). Under univariate analysis, two parameters shortened the accrual time: studies conducted in USA vs. other places (19 vs. 21 months p = 0.03) and regimen with more than 2 dose-escalated drugs (13 vs. 21 months, p = 0.003). One parameter was significantly associated with longer accrual time: starting dose justified by animal toxicology data vs. previous clinical trials (22 vs. 19 months, p = 0.03). Most of parameters did not significantly affect the accrual time: nature of investigated drugs, duration of treatment cycle, phase 1 dedicated to specific tumoral subtypes, number of centers, method of drug escalation (classical 3+3 vs. accelerated titration design), type of increment (modified Fibonacci method vs. others) and presence of expansion of cohort at the phase-II-recommended dose. Cox model analysis retained one determinant: starting dose justified by animal toxicology data: HR = 2.00 [1.45-5.20], p = 0.047., Conclusion: Few parameters influence the accrual time of dose-escalation phase-1 trials. Real first-in-man phase 1 studies based on starting dose estimated from animal toxicological data require longer accrual time.

Background: Bevacizumab is an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor approved in association with paclitaxel or docetaxel as first line in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer. Rare cases of nasal septum perforations have been reported. We report our experience of nasal perforation in breast cancer pts receiving bevacizumab and chemotherapy either in the adjuvant or in the metastatic settings., Methods: Between 1 January and 31 December 2009, 70 pts received bevacizumab together with chemotherapy. All the pts who had received bevacizumab were referred to the ENT specialist. Symptoms potentially related were looked for. Side effects were graded according to CTCAE., Results: Five nasal septum perforations were diagnosed (5 out of 70; 7.14%). Bevacizumab dose was 15 mg kg(-1) 3 weekly. Three pts were metastatic. Bevacizumab was associated with docetaxel (100 mg m(-2) every 3 weeks) in two pts and with weekly paclitaxel in one. The last two pts received bevacizumab in combination with anthracyclin and then taxanes in the adjuvant setting. In these two cases, nasal septum perforation occurred at the time of docetaxel treatment., Conclusion: A high incidence of nasal septum perforation has been shown in pts with breast cancer receiving bevacizumab together with chemotherapy. Several mechanisms could be involved (mucositis, delayed tissue repair, antiangiogenic action of taxanes).

The aim of this study was to compare the complete pathologic response (CPR) rate in 56 nonmetastatic inflammatory breast cancer patients according to the classification used and to look for a correlation between the CPR and overall survival. Initial biopsies and mastectomy specimens were reviewed by the same pathologist. The clinical response rate was 75%. A CPR was observed in 11 cases according to Sataloff, three according to Chevallier and five according to the NSABP. There was no correlation between the clinical and pathologic responses and none of them was predictive of relapse free survival or overall survival. We propose a standardization of the pathologic process of the mastectomy specimens so that a CPR has a clear definition across the institutions, with a good reproducibility whatever the classification used., (© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objective: Selecting patients for phase 1 studies remains challenging. Given the lack of clear and reliable guidance for the estimation of life expectancy, we retrospectively assessed predictive factors of early death (within 90 days following inclusion) among these patients., Methods: Two hundred fifty-seven consecutive cancer patients enrolled in phase I studies investigating cytotoxics at Oscar Lambret Cancer Center and Institut Claudius Regaud were included in the development database. Univariate and multivariate analyses (logistic regression model) were undertaken to determine the prognostic factors. A probability tree described the rate of early death in the different prognostic subgroups. This prognostic model was then evaluated on a second independent cohort of 128 patients treated at Léon Bérard Cancer Center., Results: The median overall survival was 8.4 months in the dataset population, and the rate of early death was 15%. In multivariate analysis, the two prognostic factors for early death were albumin <38 g/l (OR = 5.21) and lymphocytes <700/mm(3) (OR = 3.88). According to these two parameters, three prognostic subgroups were defined with early death rates of, respectively, 8/121 (6%), 19/119 (16%) and 13/17 (76%). In the validation dataset, the rates of early death according to three prognostic groups were 13/68 (19%), 20/57 (35%) and 3/3 (100%), respectively., Conclusion: We do not recommend the enrolment of patients with albumin level below 38g/l and lymphocytes count below 700/mm(3), in phase 1 trial investigating cytotoxics. Our model is helpful to discriminate "patients with reasonable life expectancy" as defined in most phase 1 protocols.

The number of patients treated at each dose-level in dose seeking phase I trials is arbitrarily established. The most frequently used design is the "classical 3 + 3 design (3 + 3D)". Recently, Simon et al. had introduced several "accelerated titration designs (ATD)". In the present analysis, we compared the performance of these two types of designs in 270 recently (1997-2008) published phase I trials. ATD had been used in only 10% of the recent studies. ATD had permitted to explore significantly more dose levels (seven versus five, p = 0.0001) and reduced the rate of patients treated at doses below phase-2 recommended dose (46% versus 56%, p = 0.0001). Nevertheless, ATD did not allow a reduction in the number of enrolled patients, shorten the accrual time nor increase the efficacy of phase I trials. These data support that ATD as an effective clinical trial design over a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation design.

Background: Treatment options for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) include a rapidly expanding repertoire of medical, surgical and supportive care measures., Design: To provide timely and evidence-based recommendations for the diagnostic workup and treatment of patients with MBC, an international expert panel reviewed and discussed the evidence available from clinical trials regarding diagnostic, therapeutic and supportive measures with emphasis on their impact on the quality of life and overall survival of patients with MBC., Results: Evidence-based recommendations for the diagnostic workup, endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, use of targeted therapies and bisphosphonates, surgical treatment and supportive care measures in the management of patients with MBC were formulated., Conclusions: The present consensus manuscript updates evidence-based recommendations for state-of-the-art treatment of MBC depending on disease-associated and biological variables.

Vinorelbine is a semi-synthetic vinca-alkaloid that has been approved in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Two pharmaceutical forms, intravenous and oral, have been developed and the dose equivalence has been demonstrated to be between 30 mg intravenous and 80 mg oral. Efficacy is similar and tolerability is good in both forms, with more frequent nausea and vomiting with oral vinorelbine. Both induce neutropenia. Vinorelbine can be combined with anthracyclines and taxanes - the main toxicity being neutropenia. It can be used alone or in combination, particularly with capecitabine, in patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. A synergistic effect has been observed between vinorelbine and trastuzumab in patients with a hyperexpression of HER2 in their tumours.

The development of molecular targeted therapies requires some specific methodological approaches. Dose-limiting toxicities are rare in phase I studies the maximal tolerated dose is rarely established. On the contrary, the biological active dose is often determined as the dose inducing biological effect on the target without significant clinical toxicity. Several designs of phase II are described (selection phase II, randomized phase II, stratified phase II...). All of them are indicated in specific situations. The discontinuation treatment studies and the validation of biomarkers (as surrogate endpoints or as classifiers) are the two main particularities of phase III studies designed for the assessment of molecular targeted therapies.

Purpose: To compare fotemustine and dacarbazine (DTIC) in terms of overall response rate (ORR) as primary end-point and overall survival, duration of responses, time to progression, time to occurrence of brain metastases (BM), and to assess safety and quality of life in patients with disseminated cutaneous melanoma., Patients and Methods: Patients received either intravenous fotemustine 100 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks or DTIC 250 mg/m2/d for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks (two cycles). Nonprogressive patients received a maintenance treatment every 4 weeks (fotemustine 100 mg/m2 or DTIC 250 mg/m2 for 5 days)., Results: Two hundred twenty-nine patients were randomly assigned to fotemustine or DTIC arms. The best ORR was higher in the fotemustine arm than in the DTIC arm in the intent-to-treat population (n=229; 15.2% v 6.8%; P=.043) and in full analysis set (n=221) (15.5% v 7.2%; P=.053). Similar median durations of responses (5.8 months with fotemustine v 6.9 months with DTIC) and time to progression (1.8 v 1.9 months, respectively) were observed. In patients without BM at inclusion, the median time to BM was 22.7 months with fotemustine versus 7.2 months with DTIC (P=.059). Median survival was 7.3 months with fotemustine versus 5.6 months with DTIC (P=.067). The main toxicity was grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (51% with fotemustine v 5% with DTIC) and thrombocytopenia (43% v 6%, respectively). No significant difference was noted for quality of life between arms., Conclusion: ORR was higher in the fotemustine arm compared to the DTIC arm in first-line treatment of disseminated melanoma. A trend in favor of fotemustine in terms of overall survival and time to BM was evidenced.

Purpose: The main objective of this prospective multicenter randomised phase III study was to compare a combined regimen of fotemustine plus whole brain irradiation versus fotemustine alone in terms of cerebral response and time to cerebral progression in patients with melanoma brain metastases., Patients and Methods: Seventy-six patients (instead of the 106 planned patients; study was stopped after the interim analysis) were randomised receiving either fotemustine (arm A, n = 39) or fotemustine and whole brain irradiation (arm B, n = 37). Fotemustine was administered intravenously at 100 mg m(-2) on day 1, 8 and 15, followed by a 5-week rest period, then every 3 weeks in non-progressive patients. In arm B, a concomitant whole brain irradiation was performed at the total dose of 37.5 Gy (2.5 Gy/d(-1), days 1-5, 3 consecutive weeks)., Results: Although patients who received fotemustine alone had worse prognostic factors, there was no significant difference in brain response (arm A: 7.4%, B: 10.0%) or control rates (objective response plus stable disease) after seven weeks (arm A: 30%, B: 47%) and overall survival (arm A: 86d, B: 105d). However, there was a significant difference in favour of arm B for the time to brain progression (p = 0.028, Wilcoxon test)., Conclusion: Fotemustine plus whole brain irradiation delayed the time to brain progression of melanoma cerebral metastases compared to fotemustine alone but without a significant improvement in terms of objective control or overall survival.

ZD9331 is a potent thymidylate synthase inhibitor. Renal and hepatic clearances were found to be important routes of elimination. The objectives of this pharmacologic trial were to investigate the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of ZD9331, to study the toxicity profile and to document any antitumor effects of ZD9331 when administered i.v. to patients with different degrees of renal impairment. Patients were treated with ZD9331 130 mg/m2 given as an i.v. infusion on day 1 of a 4-week cycle to allow full pharmacokinetic assessment. Subsequent cycles involved the administration of ZD9331 on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified according to their renal function assessed by the creatinine clearance: normal renal function (creatinine clearance > or =60 ml/min), mildly impaired renal function (creatinine clearance > or =40 to <60 ml/min) and moderately impaired renal function (creatinine clearance >25 to <40 ml/min). For pharmacokinetic analysis plasma sampling was performed during the first course and assayed using a validated liquid chromatographic tandem mass spectrometry assay. Twenty-three patients were entered on the study, of whom 21 received 130 mg/m2 ZD9331 in the first treatment cycle. No relationship was seen between renal impairment and plasma clearance nor with the area under the concentration-time curve of free ZD9331. Increasing renal impairment was associated with a greater incidence of myelosuppression. No predictive relationship between the clearance of free ZD9331 and the degree of renal impairment as determined by creatinine clearance could be assessed. However, data from this trial indicate that increased renal impairment may be associated with greater ZD9331-induced toxicity, particularly myelosuppression, although this cannot be attributed to any alteration in the plasma pharmacokinetics of ZD9331. Therefore, it may be necessary to administer a reduced dose of ZD9331 to patients with impaired renal function.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with unresectable metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma and to further characterise the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of docetaxel. 43 patients were enrolled into this phase II study. Treatment consisted of a 1-h infusion of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks without premedication with corticosteroids until progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Dose modifications were planned for adverse events. Patients were observed for 1 month after the last docetaxel infusion, to document any late adverse events, with a follow-up every 3 months until death. Response rate and duration were the major efficacy endpoints. Response status was reviewed by an external independent panel. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed during the first treatment cycle. 40 patients were evaluable for response, and all were evaluable for safety. After independent review, partial response was recorded in 6 patients (overall response rate, 15%; 95% confidence limit (CI), 7.7-29.8%) and stable disease was recorded in 15 patients (38%). The median duration of response was 5.1 months (range: 3.1-7.2). The median pain control time was 4.5 months (range: 0-8) and the median time to performance status worsening was 2.3 months (range: 0-4.5). Most patients 40 (93.0%) received a relative dose intensity of more than 70% of the planned dose. The incidence and severity of adverse events reflected the known safety profile for docetaxel. Docetaxel clearance was reduced in patients with elevated concentrations of hepatic enzymes or bilirubin. Docetaxel is an active agent for unresectable metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Aromatase inhibitors used in breast cancer, are drugs that inhibit the transformation of androstenedione and testosterone, respectively in estradiol and estrone. Two classes have been described: steroidal inhibitors which act competitively and irreversibly and non steroidal inhibitors which block the P 450 cytochrome. The first one is aminoglutethimide which has an adrenal effect on 11, 18 and 21 hydroxylase. Rogletimide, less powerful and less specific is a aminoglutethimide analogue. The response rates obtained with formestane is not different. The clinical development has been stopped due to a lack of specificity. Letrozole, vorozole, exemestane and anastrozole are more powerful and more specific. Letrozole and vorozole are at least as efficient and better tolerated than aminoglutéthimide. Anastrozole, letrozole and vorozole are at least as efficient as megestrol acetate and better tolerated in advanced breast cancer patients receiving a second line hormone therapy.

The aim of this investigation was to assess retrospectively docetaxel safety and efficacy in advanced breast cancer patients in a French compassionate use programme. Patients had received > 1 prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced disease, were either anthracycline-resistant (that is progressed within 6 months after anthracycline-based chemotherapy) or had received the maximum cumulative dose. The recommended docetaxel dose was 100 mg/m2/cycle (75 mg/m2 in case of liver function impairment: transaminases > 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN), alkaline phosphatases > 3 x ULN). Between August 1993 and December 1995, 889 patients were treated in 67 French centres, of whom 870 were evaluable for safety and 825 were evaluable for patient and treatment characteristics and efficacy. 20.5% (of the 825 patients evaluable for baseline characteristics) had poor performance status (PS > or = 2), 49.3% liver metastasis and 9.6% biological liver dysfunction. 98.4% had been previously treated by anthracyclines, 50.8% had resistant disease and 37.1% had received > 2 prior palliative chemotherapy lines. The most frequent severe toxicity, febrile neutropenia (reported in 223/870 (25.6%) patients evaluable for safety), caused 10 deaths, 6 of these being patients with severe liver impairment before inclusion. Fluid retention syndrome and other common non-haematological toxicities were well tolerated. 3.1% (28/889) of all patients and 11.4% of those with liver dysfunction, died from treatment-related causes. The overall response rate in 825 assessable patients was 22.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 20.2-26.2%). Median time to treatment failure was 4 months (95% CI: 3.6-4.3) and median survival was 9.8 months (95% CI: 8.8-10.7). This report on the largest series of unselected advanced breast cancer patients treated with docetaxel, supports previous phase II studies, confirming docetaxel's utility in patients relapsing after failing anthracycline-containing palliative chemotherapy.

The aim of this study was to determine the incremental effectiveness, the incremental health-related quality of life (differences in quality-adjusted progression-free survival between treatments), the incremental cost and the incremental cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios, for docetaxel, paclitaxel and vinorelbine, when these drugs were used as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer. In the absence of comparative direct evidence of the relative efficacy of docetaxel, paclitaxel and vinorelbine in this setting, a model was designed to determine the effects of the 3 interventions on health outcome and cost. A Markov process model, based on 53 disease states, was thus constructed to evaluate the socioeconomics of the 3 treatment regimens. The model allows assessments from the start of second-line chemotherapy until death. Costs were evaluated from the combined view of the healthcare system and the patient. Direct nonmedical and indirect costs were excluded. Consumption per episode of care was estimated by retrospective analysis of 153 medical reports from 5 different hospitals. Hospital costs were allocated values from the national accounting costs by diagnosis-related group (DRG). The content of the health states was based on the multiattribute health states classification system (MASH). Preference values were assigned by application of a standard reference lottery using 20 oncological nurses as proxies for the patients. The health-related quality-of-life score was used as a quality adjustment weighting factor to calculate quality-adjusted progression-free survival associated with the 3 different regimens. Docetaxel reduces the time spent in progression, decreases the number of complications due to progressive disease and thereby provides better quality of life. It provides a benefit of 57 disease- and discomfort-free days compared with vinorelbine and 22 days compared with paclitaxel. Docetaxel may be thought of as self-financing as a result of savings in hospital admissions, providing net savings of 6800 French francs (FF; 1993 values) compared with expenditure associated with vinorelbine treatment and FF700 compared with the equivalent figures for paclitaxel.

Topoisomerase I inhibitors are a new therapeutic class whose clinical evaluation began a few years ago; Irinotecan (CPT-11) gave interesting results in colon cancer; side effects were neutropenia, diarrhea, vomiting and a cholinergic syndrome. Topotecan was useful in lung and ovarian cancer; side effects were mostly hematologic. Undergoing studies concern dose optimization, mode of administration and therapeutic associations.

Background: Vinorelbine (Navelbine), a new vinca alkaloid, is an effective drug in breast cancer. Our study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and tolerance of Navelbine in refractory advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer (AMBC)., Patients and Methods: One hundred heavily pretreated patients with AMBC entered the study and were scheduled to receive 30 mg/m2 of Navelbine weekly by a 20 min i.v. infusion with dose adjustments according to tolerance. All patients had previously received at least one chemotherapy regimen including an anthracycline for advanced disease., Results: Sixteen of the 100 assessable patients responded (1 complete response and 15 partial responses), for an overall response rate of 16% (IC 95: 8%-23%). The median duration of response was 5 months (3-18). Responses were seen in lymph nodes (13/27), breast (11/34), soft tissue and skin (13/36), lung (3/14) and liver (2/25), but not in bone metastases. The main toxicities (WHO grade > or = 3) were granulocytopenia and anemia in, respectively, 51% and 9% of all 100 eligible patients. Thrombocytopenia and other non-haematological toxicities consisting of peripheral neuropathy, constipation, nausea/vomiting, alopecia and phlebitis were rare and mild., Conclusion: Vinorelbine is an active drug in AMBC, particularly in breast, lymph nodes and skin/soft tissue sites, with an excellent tolerance. Since the mean dose intensity was 19.7 mg/m2/week, a dose of 20 mg/m2/week is recommended for heavily pretreated patients (radiotherapy and chemotherapy).

One hundred sixty-nine patients with histologic evidence of disseminated malignant melanoma, including patients with cerebral metastases, were entered into a Phase II study of the nitrosourea fotemustine. The treatment regimen consisted of a 100 mg/m2 1 hour IV infusion every week for 3 consecutive weeks, followed by a 4- to 5-week rest period (induction therapy). In responding or stabilized patients, maintenance therapy consisted of 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks until the disease progressed. One hundred fifty-three patients were evaluable for response. Three complete responses and 34 partial responses were observed (according to the World Health Organization criteria), leading to an objective response rate of 24.2% (95% confidence interval: 17.4% to 31.0%). Responses were also documented on cerebral (25.0%), visceral (19.2%), or nonvisceral (31.8%) metastatic sites. The median duration of response was 22 weeks (range, 7 to 80 weeks). The objective response rate in previously untreated patients was 30.7% (19 of 62 patients). The main toxicity was hematologic with delayed and reversible leukopenia and/or thrombopenia. The objective response rate observed (especially in untreated patients), the activity on cerebral metastases, and the small amount of extra-hematologic toxicity encountered suggest that fotemustine is an effective drug in disseminated malignant melanoma.

A total of 42 patients with cerebral metastases of malignant melanoma were included in this study of the nitrosourea fotemustine. The treatment plan consisted of a l-h i.v. infusion of 100 mg/m2 fotemustine every week for 3-4 weeks, followed by a 4- to 5-week rest period. Responding or stabilised patients then received 100 mg/m2 fotemustine every 3 weeks. Among the 39 evaluable patients, 2 complete responses and 9 partial responses were documented, leading to an overall response rate of 28.2%. Most of the responses were obtained in previously untreated patients and/or those presenting with a single cerebral metastasis. Toxicity was mild and mainly hematological, especially in patients previously treated by polychemotherapeutic regimen. Our study confirms the activity of fotemustine in cerebral metastases of disseminated malignant melanoma.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus epirubicin (ET) and of 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. A total of 142 patients (intent-to-treat (ITT)) with at least one measurable lesion were randomised to receive docetaxel 75 mg m(-2) plus epirubicin 75 mg m(-2) or 5-fluorouracil 500 mg m(-2) plus epirubicin 75 mg m(-2) and cyclophosphamide 500 mg m(-2) intravenously once every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. Prophylactic granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor was only permitted after the first cycle, if required. Per-protocol analysis (n=132) gave an overall response rate for ET of 63.1% (95% confidence interval (CI), 50-78%) and for FEC 34.3% (95% CI, 23-47%) after a median seven and six cycles, respectively. Intent-to-treat population (n=142) gave an overall response rate for ET of 59% (95% CI, 47-70%) and for FEC 32% (95% CI, 21-43%) after a median seven and six cycles, respectively. The median response duration for ET was 8.6 months (95% CI, 7.2-9.6 months) and for FEC 7.8 months (95% CI, 6.5-10.4 months). The median time to progression (ITT) for ET was 7.8 months (95% CI, 5.8-9.6 months) and for FEC 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.6-7.8 months). After a median follow-up of 23.8 months, median survival (ITT) for ET and FEC were 34 and 28 months, respectively. Nonhaematologic grade 3-4 toxicities were infrequent in both arms. Haematologic toxicity was more common with ET and febrile neutropenia was reported in 13 patients (18.6%) in the ET group. Two deaths in the ET group were possibly related to study treatment. In conclusion, both ET and FEC were associated with acceptable toxicity. ET is a highly active first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The pharmacokinetics of ftorafur, 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and uracil were investigated in order to built a population pharmacokinetic model for the anticancer drug UFT, administered with leucovorin and vinorelbine.Methods: A total of 31 patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with escalating oral doses of UFT (300 to 500 mg per day) plus leucovorin (90 mg per day) in combination with intravenous vinorelbine (15 to 25 mg/m(2)). Concentration-time data were obtained on days 1, 8, 15 and 21 of cycle 1.Results: Of the 31 patients treated, 30 were available for the pharmacokinetic analysis. Ftorafur, 5FU and uracil appeared rapidly in plasma and showed large interpatient variations. Ftorafur concentrations were higher than those of 5FU and uracil. AUC significantly increased between day 1, and days 8, 15 and 21. Ftorafur C(max) and AUC values were proportional to UFT dose, whereas C(max) and AUC values of 5FU and uracil were not linearly related to UFT dose. The pharmacokinetics of ftorafur were ascribed to a two-compartment open model in which 5FU was produced from the central compartment. The absorption and exponential distribution rate constants were assumed equal. The effect of uracil on 5FU elimination was straightforward, since no reasonable curve-fitting could be obtained for 5FU data when this covariate was not taken into account. The uracil concentration inducing a 50% reduction in 5FU elimination was 2.67 micro mol.l(-1). This result confirms the important role played by uracil as a competitive inhibitor of 5FU catabolism.Conclusion: A pharmacokinetic model for ftorafur and 5FU was developed and should be useful to further study drug interactions and establish dosing guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A total of 70 patients presenting with a disseminated malignant melanoma were entered into a multicentric study of combination chemotherapy using dacarbazine and fotemustine. In all, 63 patients were evaluable, 31.8% of whom had previously received cytotoxic chemotherapy. The protocol consisted of induction treatment with a weekly infusion of 100 mg/m2 fotemustine on days 1 and 8 and a daily infusion of 250 mg/m2 dacarbazine on days 15/18 followed by a 4- to 5-week rest period. Responding and stabilized patients were given maintenance treatment comprising fotemustine (100 mg/m2, day 1) and dacarbazine (250 mg/m2, days 2/5) every 3 weeks. The response rate was 33.3% (9 complete responses (CRs) and 12 partial responses (PRs)) and was outstanding among pretreated patients (34.9%). Responses were also documented in cerebral (28.6%), visceral (23.1%) and nonvisceral (43.3%) metastatic sites. Toxicity was mainly hematologic (22.2%, grade III/IV leukopenia; 20.3%, grade III/IV thrombocytopenia) and was acceptable. These results are encouraging in terms of the antitumor activity against nonvisceral metastases (43.3%) and the percentage of CRs obtained (23.3%), and they confirm the activity of fotemustine in cerebral metastatic sites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]