Search

Hetero-steroids, hybrid anticancer agents, have received much interest in view of their numerous and promising biological activities. In this study, a novel class of hetero-steroids were synthesized, analytical and spectral data proved the validity of the novel synthesized steroid derivatives. The cytotoxicity of the synthesized compounds 2, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17 were evaluated using human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines (HepG2 and Huh-7) and non-small cell lung cancer (A549) cell lines. The synthesized compounds reported a remarkable gradual decrease in the cell viability of the three tested cancer cell lines. It was observed that compounds 2 and 12 had the lowest IC 50s and the highest cytotoxic effects against all tested cell lines. As attempt to explain the cytotoxic activity achieved by the tested compounds in the in vitro study, molecular simulation was done to reveal the activity of the tested compounds against four different proteins (CDK2, CYP19, JAK2, and BCL2) which are highly implicated in cancer regulation and progression. We found that compound 2, and 12 were the best docked compounds against all tested receptors, which was indicated by lowest binding energy compared to reference ligand. Interestingly enough, our molecular study was in agreement with the cytotoxic activity. As future prospective, we are recommending further study on compounds 2, and 12 against the four different proteins to prove their mode of action., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Modification of steroid molecules by introducing heterocyclic ring into the core structure of steroids has been utilized as an attractive approach for either cancer prognosis or diagnosis. Several new cholestanoheterocyclic steroids were synthesized, and analytical and spectral data proved the validity of the novel synthesized steroid derivatives. The cytotoxicity of synthesized compounds 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 13, 15b, and 16b was evaluated using human colorectal cancer HCT 116 and Caco-2, cervical cancer HeLa, hepatoma HepG2, and breast cancer MCF7 cell lines. Intriguingly, compound 13 has the highest cytotoxic effect when applied on the majority of cancer cells. In conclusion, compound 13 may be considered as a promising anticancer candidate against all cancer cell lines, because it recorded the lowest IC 50 of the majority of the cancer cell lines used. Furthermore, a molecular docking study was employed to determine the binding modes against aromatase cytochrome P450 (CYP19), cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2), and B-cell lymphoma (BCL-2) proteins, which are major proteins involved in the pathogenesis of cancer. Molecular docking analyses revealed that compounds 13, 3, and 5 (free energy of binding = - 9.2, - 9.1, and - 9.0 kcal/mol, respectively) were the best docked ligand against aromatase CYP19; compounds 16b, 3, 9, and 10 (free energy of binding = - 9.6, - 9.3, and - 9.2 kcal/mol, respectively) were the best docked ligand against CDK2, while compounds 15b, 16b, and 13 (free energy of binding = - 9.1, - 9.0, and- 8.7 kcal/mol, respectively) were the best docked ligand against BCL2. In conclusion, compounds 3, 13, and 16b were the most promising compounds with the lowest IC 50 s against most of the tested cancer cell lines, and they displayed the lowest binding energies, critical hydrogen bonds, and hydrophobic interactions with the three molecular targets compared to other tested compounds.

epi-Androsterone 1 was converted into its hydrazone derivative through the reaction with hydrazine hydrate 80%. Hydrazonoandrostane derivative 2b reacted with hydrazonoyl halides in the presence of K(2)CO(3) forming the corresponding hydrazopyridazinoandrostane derivatives 6a-d. The 3β-acetyl-17-hydrazonoandrostane derivative 2b reacted with a halogen reagent, benzoyl chloride, to form the non-cyclic 16-benzoylated hydrazone 9. On the other hand, compound 2b produced the corresponding pyridazinoandrostane derivatives 11 and 12 via its reaction with phenacyl bromide and chloroacetone respectively. Reaction of the hydrazono derivative 2b with benzaldehyde in the presence of acetic acid drops led to the formation of the benzylidenehydrazonoandrostane derivative 13. The product 14, phosphinom-ethylenehydrazonoandrostane was obtained by the reaction of the derivative 13 with trisdimethylaminophosphine in the presence of dry benzene. The reaction of compound 2b with phenyl isothiocyanate followed by boiling in chloroacetic acid or thioglycolic acid produced the pyrazoloandrostane derivatives 17 and 18 respectively. The biological activity of compounds 6a, 6d, 11, 12, and 15 was evaluated as inhibitor of growth in a human liver carcinoma cell line and doxorubicine was used for comparison. Compounds 15 and 12 showed a higher potency than the other tested compounds., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)