Search

Background: Antimicrobial stewardship (AS) programs are required by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and should ideally have infectious diseases (ID) physician involvement; however, only 50% of ID fellowship programs have formal AS curricula. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) formed a workgroup to develop a core AS curriculum for ID fellows. Here we study its impact., Methods: ID program directors and fellows in 56 fellowship programs were surveyed regarding the content and effectiveness of their AS training before and after implementation of the IDSA curriculum. Fellows' knowledge was assessed using multiple-choice questions. Fellows completing their first year of fellowship were surveyed before curriculum implementation ("pre-curriculum") and compared to first-year fellows who complete the curriculum the following year ("post-curriculum")., Results: Forty-nine (88%) program directors and 105 (67%) fellows completed the pre-curriculum surveys; 35 (64%) program directors and 79 (50%) fellows completed the post-curriculum surveys. Prior to IDSA curriculum implementation, only 51% of programs had a "formal" curriculum. After implementation, satisfaction with AS training increased among program directors (16% to 68%) and fellows (51% to 68%). Fellows' confidence increased in 7/10 AS content areas. Knowledge scores improved from a mean of 4.6 to 5.1 correct answers of 9 questions (P = .028). The major hurdle to curriculum implementation was time, both for formal teaching and for e-learning., Conclusions: Effective AS training is a critical component of ID fellowship training. The IDSA Core AS Curriculum can enhance AS training, increase fellow confidence, and improve overall satisfaction of fellows and program directors., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Professional societies serve many functions that benefit constituents; however, few professional societies have undertaken the development and dissemination of formal, national curricula to train the future workforce while simultaneously addressing significant healthcare needs. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) has developed 2 curricula for the specific purpose of training the next generation of clinicians to ensure the future infectious diseases (ID) workforce is optimally trained to lead antimicrobial stewardship programs and equipped to meet the challenges of multidrug resistance, patient safety, and healthcare quality improvement. A core curriculum was developed to provide a foundation in antimicrobial stewardship for all ID fellows, regardless of career path. An advanced curriculum was developed for ID fellows specifically pursuing a career in antimicrobial stewardship. Both curricula will be broadly available in the summer of 2021 through the IDSA website., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) developed the Core Antimicrobial Stewardship (AS) Curriculum to meet the increasing demand for infectious diseases (ID) providers with AS expertise. Notable diversity in implementation approaches has been observed among ID fellowship programs using the curriculum. We sought to describe individual approaches and develop a curriculum implementation roadmap. Methods We surveyed ID fellowship programs that had previously implemented the IDSA Core AS curriculum. The survey included questions regarding program characteristics, curriculum participants and presentation format, resources and barriers, and implementation strategies. Commonly reported program features were summarized in the context of the self-reported implementation strategies. Implementation guides were developed based on the most common characteristics observed. Results Of 159 programs that had purchased the curriculum, 37 responded, and 34 (21%) were included in the analysis. The curriculum was primarily taught by AS physicians (85%) and AS pharmacists (47%). The most common conference structure was a longitudinal conference series (32%), and eLearning was the most common presentation format. Limited AS faculty time (76%) and limited first-year fellow availability (62%) were frequently reported as barriers, and dedicated AS curricular time was a resource available to most programs (67%); implementation guides were created for these 3 program features. Conclusions Programs reported a variety of implementation barriers and resources, with several common themes emerging, allowing for the development of tailored curriculum planners for 3 commonly observed program characteristics. This work will equip fellowship programs with curriculum implementation strategies and guide future enhancements of the IDSA Core and Advanced AS curricula. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) often utilize Infectious Diseases fellows (IDFs) to cover pre-authorization processes during evening and weekend hours. IDFs often provide ASP coverage in addition to their inpatient consult roles. In response to increasing consult volume, we worked with our fellowship program to relieve IDFs of evening and weekend coverage (a decrease in fellow coverage by 26 hours per week) starting in October 2017. Members of the ASP assumed the majority of these evening and weekend hours. Additional post-prescriptive activities and a rotation in Infection Control and Antimicrobial Stewardship were implemented in response. We sought to analyze the impact of this intervention. Methods Intervention and medication data were extracted from the electronic medical record during 1 July 2017 through 30 September of 2017 (IDF Coverage) and the same 3 months of 2018 (ASP Coverage). Comparisons between the two periods were performed using descriptive statistics of the number of interventions, number of weekend interventions, types of interventions, and days of therapy (DOT; per 1000 patient-days). Results Comparing July-September of 2017 and 2018, total ASP interventions increased 16% (1192 to 1391); weekend ASP interventions increased 75% (139 to 243). The most common interventions were "Choice of Therapy" (41% in both years), "De-Escalation" (17% in 2017, 16% in 2018), and "Dose/Interval Optimization" (10% in both years). The most intervened agents were piperacillin–tazobactam, cefepime, vancomycin, meropenem, and ceftazidime. Comparing the same time periods, total antibiotic DOT decreased 4% (714.1 to 684.9). There was a 28% decrease in piperacillin–tazobactam (41.47 to 29.85), 19% decrease in meropenem (28.08 to 22.61), and 7% decrease in vancomycin (125.09 to 116.17) use. Ceftazidime was unchanged (18.13 to 18.08). Cefepime increased by 9% (56.78 to 61.97). Conclusion Relieving IDFs of evening and weekend ASP coverage during busy inpatient consult rotations may help decrease burnout. The assumption of these hours by dedicated members of ASP led to an increase in documented total and weekend ASP interventions. In addition, the change was associated with a relative decrease in piperacillin–tazobactam, meropenem, and vancomycin use. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]