Search

Objective: Discontinuation rates with antihypertensive drugs in real life are high. The present study investigates the relationship between persistence with antihypertensive drugs (AHT) and blood pressure (BP) goal attainment in daily clinical practice., Methods: In the PHARMO Record Linkage System, which includes drug dispensing and hospital records for > 2 million inhabitants in the Netherlands, new users of AHT > or = 18 years were identified for the period 1999-2004. Patients with elevated blood pressure (systolic BP > or = 140 and/or diastolic BP > or = 90 mmHg) within 6 months prior to onset of AHT treatment and a BP measurement within 6-12 months of treatment onset were included in the study cohort. Persistent AHT use was determined by summing the number of days of continuous treatment (gap between dispensings < 30 days) from start of treatment onwards. Patients with a BP below 140/90 mmHg at the first BP measurement within 6-12 months of treatment onset were defined as having attained goal., Results: The study included 1271 patients with a mean systolic BP of 174 +/- 22 mmHg and a mean diastolic BP of 100 +/- 12 mmHg. Persistent AHT use was associated with a 40% increased chance of BP goal attainment (RR(adj) = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.08-1.85) after adjustment for gender, age, systolic blood pressure at start, and time to the BP measurement., Conclusion: Persistent use of AHT leads to increased blood pressure goal attainment in daily clinical practice.

Objective: Adherence to antihypertensive drug treatment is suboptimal. The present study investigates the effect of early treatment discontinuation with antihypertensive drugs on the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or stroke in daily clinical practice., Methods: In the PHARMO Record Linkage System, which includes all records of drug dispensings and hospitalisations for > or = 2 million subjects in the Netherlands, new users of antihypertensive (AHT) drugs > or = 18 years of age were studied during the period 1 January 1993 - 1 October 2002 to determine the risk of AMI or stroke related to persistence with AHT. Patients were initially followed for 2 years to determine persistence with AHT, and then for a further 2 years or until the first hospital admission for AMI or stroke, death, or end of the study period. Patients using AHT for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease were excluded from the study cohort., Results: The study cohort included 77 193 AHT users. The percentage of non-persistent patients was 55% at 2 years, with the lowest non-persistence rates for angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) and ACE-inhibitors (40%) and the highest rates for beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) and diuretics (54-61%). Non-persistent AHT use was associated with a 15% increased risk of AMI (RR 1.15; 95% CI 1.00-1.33) and a 28% increased risk of stroke (RR 1.28; 95% CI 1.15-1.45)., Conclusions: The results of this study show that in daily clinical practice early discontinuation of antihypertensive drug treatment in primary prevention increases the risk of subsequent AMI or stroke.

Objective: To compare persistence with valsartan and enalapril in daily practice., Methods: The PHARMO Record Linkage System includes various data registries including drug dispensing and hospitalizations for > or =2 million subjects in the Netherlands. Patients newly treated with valsartan or enalapril in the period of 1999-2002 were selected. Persistence was calculated by summing up the number of days of continuous treatment. Patients who remained on therapy with valsartan or enalapril for 12 or 24 months were defined as persistent at 1 or 2 years, respectively., Results: 3364 patients received valsartan and 9103 patients received enalapril. About 62% of patients treated with valsartan and 55% of patients treated with enalapril remained on therapy at 12 months after the initial dispensing, while 48% of patients treated with valsartan and 43% of patients treated with enalapril were persistent at 24 months. Patients treated with valsartan were about 20% more likely to stay on treatment than patients treated with enalapril (1 year RR(adj): 1.23, 95% CI: 1.16-1.32; 2 years RR(adj): 1.16, 95% CI: 1.11-1.23)., Conclusions: Real-life persistence is higher with valsartan than with enalapril. The results of this and other studies on persistence in daily practice should be taken into account when deciding upon drug treatment for hypertension.

We pursued an association between hypertension and gliomas by investigating whether antihypertensive drugs (AHD) are associated with an increased glioma risk by a population-based nested case-control study using the PHARMO database; this links dispensing records of prescription drugs to hospital discharge data on an individual basis. Pathological data were derived from the Dutch nationwide registry of histo- and cytopathology. A total of 306 glioma cases incident between 1997 and 2003 were matched to 1108 controls for year of birth, sex, geographical region and duration of follow-up. Exposure was defined as cumulative duration of AHD use and, in an alternative analysis, as cumulative dose. We estimated the magnitude of the association with conditional logistic regression analysis. Cumulative use of any AHD for more than 6 months was associated with an increased risk of glioma (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.03-2.04). After stratification for different groups of AHD, no significantly increased risk of glioma was found for any class of AHD. After excluding a latency period of 3 years before the date of diagnosis, no association was found. In conclusion, the use of AHD seems to be associated with an increased risk of glioma, but this is probably not causal.

Objective: The objective of the study is to investigate factors related to treatment persistence among users of antihypertensive (AHT) drugs in daily practice., Methods: Data for this study were obtained from the PHARMO database including pharmacy records and hospitalizations in the Netherlands (n=950,000). Patients who newly received AHT therapy (n=17,113) between 1997 and 2001 were selected. Of these patients, random samples of 500 patients per drug class were drawn. One-year persistence was defined as (1) the percentage of patients using AHTs at least 270 days and receiving AHT in 3 months after the 1-year follow-up period, and (2) Catalan method (Kaplan-Meier curves). Gender specific persistence rates per drug class were adjusted for significant factors including age, use of antidiabetics and lipid lowering drugs, and prior cardiovascular hospitalizations (OR and 95%CI)., Results: Persistence was highest in users of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) (62.0%), progressively lower in users of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-inhibitors, 59.7%), betablockers (35.0%), calcium channel blockers (34.7%), and diuretics (33.0%), resulting in the highest OR of 3.4 [95%CI: 2.6-4.5] for ARBs compared to diuretics. The persistence of AHT use in women was substantially lower (40.1% vs. 50.2%, OR 0.7 [95%CI: 0.6-0.8]) and differences between drug classes were larger than in men., Conclusions: These results demonstrate marked differences in persistence between AHT classes, with the highest persistence for ARBs and lowest for diuretics. Women were less persistent with their AHT compared to men. This low persistence leads to suboptimal treatment with a potential for substantial clinical consequences. Especially in women, more attention paid to AHT persistence patterns could improve their cardiovascular outcome., (Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Background: Controlled-release dosage forms may enhance persistence with therapy because of reduced dosing frequency and fewer adverse effects., Objective: To assess the differences in persistent use of nifedipine between once-daily nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) and twice-daily nifedipine retard formulations., Methods: Incident nifedipine users were selected from January 1992 to December 2001 from the PHARMO database, including drug-dispensing records and hospital records of more than one million subjects in the Netherlands. Patients with unaltered formulation and dosing frequency of nifedipine in the first year of follow-up with at least 2 prescriptions were included in the cohort. Persistence with different formulations was assessed using Cox's proportional hazard analyses. Covariates included in the analysis were, among others, hospitalizations and comedication for cardiovascular diseases., Results: In total, 5889 incident users of nifedipine were included. The median duration of the first treatment episode was 133 days for nifedipine retard and 262 days for nifedipine GITS. One-year persistence with nifedipine increased from 32% in patients using retard formulations to 44% in patients using nifedipine GITS. Multivariate analyses showed that patients using nifedipine GITS were 1.3 times (RR 1.33; 95% CI 1.22 to 1.46) more persistent than those using retard formulations of nifedipine. Persistent patients more often used other antihypertensive drugs and were more often hospitalized for cardiovascular diseases., Conclusions: Patients using once-daily nifedipine GITS are more persistent with therapy than patients using twice-daily retard formulations.

From 1987 to 1991, over 36,000 men and women aged 20-59 years have been examined in the Monitoring Project on Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in The Netherlands. Classification of the treatment status of hypertensives in this population-based study was based on self-administered questionnaires. In order to assess the accuracy of self-reported antihypertensive drug use we compared the questionnaire information with computerized pharmacy records from a sample of 372 hypertensive subjects. Most antihypertensive drugs that were mentioned in the questionnaire were present in the pharmacy medication history (93%). However, this percentage was less (76%) when a comparison was made with the calculated duration of use based on the number of units prescribed and the directions for use in the pharmacy records. About 94% of the hypertensive subjects who were using an antihypertensive drug according to the pharmacy records, also mentioned at least one antihypertensive drug in the questionnaire. Agreement between self-reported antihypertensive drug use and pharmacy records was consistently high for all classes of antihypertensive drugs. Among 321 (86%) subjects, the number and types of self-reported antihypertensive drugs were exactly the same as in the pharmacy records. In conclusion, the agreement between self-reported antihypertensive drug use and pharmacy records was high, and the self-reported questionnaire information on antihypertensive drug use can be reliably used for the classification of treatment status of hypertensive subjects in this population-based study.