Search

Objectives: To compare antihypertensive therapeutic strategies and efficacy whether the physicians were aware or not of the calculated cardiovascular risk at 10 years obtained from the Framingham equation. It was also possible to evaluate the concordance of the general physicians estimation of the cardiovascular risk with the calculated percentage., Methods: The participation of 953 general physicians to the study allowed to achieve an estimation of the absolute cardiovascular risk for 1,243 hypertensives. Patients were randomised in 2 groups according to the knowledge or not by the physicians of the calculated risk. The therapeutic strategy included a monotherapy (Fosinopril 20 mg/days) for a follow up of 8 weeks, with the possibility to increase the treatment after 4 weeks (Fosinopril + hydrochlorotiazide). To be included, patients had to be more than 18 and less than 75 years, and a blood pressure above 140/90 mmHg. Estimated and calculated cardiovascular risk at 10 years, were classified according to the 1999 WHO-ISH guidelines: low risk < 15%, medium risk 15-20%, high risk 20-30%, very high risk > 30%., Results: In this population, aged 60 +/- 10 years, with 54% of men, the concordance between estimated risk and calculated risk was of 35%. This concordance was better for the "low risk" and "very high risk", but remains inferior to 50%. The determinants of concordance were: gender (male), smoking and a low HDL cholesterol. After 8 weeks of treatment, no difference was observed between the 2 groups concerning final blood pressure level, percentage of normalised patients and number of patients with bi-therapy., Conclusions: General physicians estimation of cardiovascular risk at 10 years of hypertensive subjects has a bad concordance with the calculated risk according to Framingham equation. The results of this study indicate that the estimation of cardiovascular risk of hypertensive subjects does not modify the management of hypertension.

Unlabelled: The aim of the 1999 WHO-ISH guidelines is to help the physicians in the management of hypertensive patients. The institution of antihypertensive treatment represents an important stage of this management sometimes at the detriment of lifestyle measures (non pharmacological treatments)., Objectives: To evaluate if the 1999 WHO-ISH guidelines concerning the initiation of antihypertensive treatment are applied in a hypertension clinic., Methods: Seventy hypertensive subjects never treated by antihypertensive drugs, aged 51 +/- 13 years, managed in daily hospitalization, were included in the study. According to their level of cardiovascular risk, we evaluated the concordance between the 1999 WHO-ISH guidelines and the clinical practice in term of institution of treatment., Results: A concordance of 70% between the 1999 WHO-ISH guidelines and the clinical practice was observed (50/70 subjects) and a discordance in 30% of cases (20/70). Among the discordant subjects, the treatment was instituted in 65% of cases although it was not recommended. In contrast, in the remaining 35% of cases, lifestyle measures have been proposed although an antihypertensive treatment was recommended. The principal determinants of the discordance were the grade 2 of hypertension, the presence of 1 or 2 risk factors and an enhanced cardiovascular risk (> or = 3 risk factors). Neither age, nor gender were an explicative parameter of the observed discordance., Conclusions: The 1999 WHO-ISH guidelines concerning the initiation of antihypertensive treatment are more often applied in clinical practice. However, in some cases of grade 2 hypertension drug treatment is more often prescribed than recommended by guidelines, and not enough in the presence of numerous cardiovascular risk factors.