Search

The MUC1 epithelial mucin is a transmembrane glycoprotein that is frequently but variably over-expressed by adenocarcinomas. It is used as a diagnostic serum tumour marker and is a candidate target for tumour immunotherapy. Peritoneal fluid (PF) samples from ovarian cancer patients were investigated for their ability to modulate MUC1 expression in 6 ovarian cancer cell lines which showed a range from very low to high endogenous MUC1 expression. Cell lines were cultured in 20% PF for 4 days, fixed in situ and MUC1 assayed by ELISA. MUC1 expression was stimulated by some PF samples in 5 of 6 lines tested. MUC1 expression in the PE04 cell line (very low endogenous expression) was increased by 35 of 36 PFs tested (p < 0.05); stimulation varied between PFs but was greater than with 100 IU/mL hu-r-gamma-interferon. Western blotting confirmed the stimulation of MUC1 in PE04 cells and FACS showed an increase in the proportion of cells expressing MUC1. The active factor was partially purified by gel filtration and was shown to stimulate PE04 cells in a dose-dependent manner. Concentrations of IL1beta, IL4, IL6, IL8, IL10, TNF-alpha, TGF-beta and GM-CSF were often very high in PF and varied substantially between different PF samples but did not correlate with the degree of MUC1 stimulatory activity.

This is the first comparison of the three mucin based tests CA15-3, CASA, and MSA, and the cytokeratin-related TPS assay in breast cancer. The mucin markers were superior to TPS in receiver-operator analysis, though no marker was of use in the diagnosis of malignancy due to low sensitivity. Using cutpoints that gave 95% specificity in benign disease (n = 83), corresponding sensitivities in pre-treatment breast cancer (n = 123: 13 in situ, 54 stage I, 45 stage II, 4 stage III, 7 stage IV) were 17% (CA15-3), 16% (CASA), 13% (MSA), and 8% (TPS), with a strong relationship between marker levels and disease stage. These assays did not always detect the same patients, and the use of CA15-3 combined with CASA gave the highest sensitivity (23%), though this was not significantly better than the use of CA15-3 alone. Despite detecting similar antigens, these assays can show markedly different responses in some patients, indicating that one mucin-based test cannot be substituted for another.