Search

Background: Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic sterm and progenitor cells (HPC) is the reference point for undertaking apheresis and evaluation of adequacy for PBSC engraftment. An external quality assurance (EQA) scheme for CD34+ HPC enumeration has been operational in Belgium, Netherlands and Luxemburg (Benelux) since 1995. Within this group, a multicenter survey was held to validate the state-of-the-art methodology, i.e., multiparametric definition of HPC based on light scatter, expression of CD34 and CD45, and counting beads (i.e., 'single platform ISHAGE' method)., Methods: 'Real-time' EQA was used to monitor the application of the single-platform ISHAGE method by 36 participants. Three send-outs of stabilized blood with CD34+ cell counts 35-60 cells/microl were distributed to 36 participants, who were required to assay the samples on three occasions using the standard assay and their local techniques. These results were compared with thosed obtained by 111-116 UK NEQAS participants testing the same specimens., Results: Using the single platform ISHAGE methods, between-laboratory coefficients of variations (CVs) as low as 10% were achieved. Intra-laboratory CVs were < 5% for approximately 50% of the participants. Local single-platform techniques yielded between-laboratory CVs as low as 9% in both Benelux and UK NEQAS cohorts. In contrast, the lowest between-laboratory CVs using dual-platform techniques were 17% (Benelux) and 21% (UK NEQAS), respectively., Conclusion: The single-platform ISHAGE method for CD34+ cell enumeration has been validated by an international group of 36 laboratories. The observed varation between laboratories allows a meaningful comparison of CD34+ cell enumeration.

The European Working Group on Clinical Cell Analysis (EWGCCA) has, in preparation for a multicentre peripheral blood stem cell clinical trial, developed a single-platform flow cytometric protocol for the enumeration of CD34+ stem cells. Using this protocol, stabilized blood and targeted training, the EWGCCA have attempted to standardize CD34+ stem cell enumeration across 24 clinical sites. Results were directly compared with participants in the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (NEQAS) for CD34+ Stem Cell Quantification that analysed the same specimens using non-standardized methods. Two bead-counting systems, Flow-Count and TruCount, were also evaluated by the EWGCCA participants during trials 2 and 3. Using Flow-Count, the intralaboratory coefficient of variation (CV) was

To determine the potential advantage of single-platform technology in the enumeration of CD4+ T lymphocyte and CD34+ stem cells, data has been analysed from the UK NEQAS for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping schemes. The inter-laboratory CVs for CD4+ T lymphocyte counts were consistently lower for single-platform (mean 13.7%, range 10-18.3%) compared to dual-platform methodology (mean 23.4%, range 14.5-43.7%). Subgroup analysis of single-platform users demonstrated mean overall inter-laboratory CVs of 17.2%, 13% and 7.1% for the FlowCount, TruCount and volumetric approach respectively. The lowest inter-laboratory CVs obtained for a single sample by each single platform approach were 4% (TruCount), 4.4% (volumetric), 4.6% (FACSCount) and 12.7% (FlowCount). Similarly, the mean inter-laboratory CV for CD34+ stem cell enumeration using non-standardized single-platform approaches was 18.6% (range 3.1-36.9%) compared to 28.6% (range 19-44.2%) for the dual-platform technology. Our results suggest absolute cell subset enumeration should be performed by single-platform technology and that such an approach should improve the quality control of multi-centre clinical trial data for CD4+ T lymphocyte and CD34+ stem cells.

CD34+ peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization and harvesting has rapidly replaced autologous bone marrow as a source of stem cells for transplantation. Timing and adequacy of harvests rely upon the accurate enumeration of circulating CD34+ cells. However, previous EQA programmes have reported interlaboratory CVs as high as 284%, suggesting the need for greater standardization. In addition the routine use of fresh and/or frozen cells as analytes also introduces antigen instability as a variable factor. To circumvent this problem and achieve a true reflection of interlaboratory variation, we have used a novel whole blood preparation in which the antigenic profiles of PBSCs, as determined by flow cytometry, are retained for > 200 d. This international scheme, currently the largest in the world, distributes aliquots of stabilized whole blood bi-monthly to 91 laboratories in 20 countries (44 U.K., 47 overseas). Participants are required to determine the percentage and absolute values for CD34+ PBSCs using in-house techniques. Adopting such a preparation, a more accurate determination of interlaboratory variation has been possible when compared to previous EQA studies, with CVs as low as 22% and 24% for percentage and absolute counts. In addition the programme has established that a wide range of methods are in routine use, emphasizing the urgent requirement for national/international consensus guidelines.