Search

Background: This is an updated version of the Cochrane Review previously published in 2017.Epilepsy is a chronic and disabling neurological disorder, affecting approximately 1% of the population. Up to 30% of people with epilepsy have seizures that are resistant to currently available antiepileptic drugs and require treatment with multiple antiepileptic drugs in combination. Felbamate is a second-generation antiepileptic drug that can be used as add-on therapy to standard antiepileptic drugs., Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of felbamate versus placebo when used as an add-on treatment for people with drug-resistant focal-onset epilepsy., Search Methods: For the latest update we searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web), MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), on 18 December 2018. There were no language or time restrictions. We reviewed the reference lists of retrieved studies to search for additional reports of relevant studies. We also contacted the manufacturers of felbamate and experts in the field for information about any unpublished or ongoing studies., Selection Criteria: We searched for randomised placebo-controlled add-on studies of people of any age with drug-resistant focal seizures. The studies could be double-blind, single-blind or unblinded and could be of parallel-group or cross-over design., Data Collection and Analysis: Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted information. In the case of disagreements, the third review author arbitrated. Review authors assessed the following outcomes: 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency; absolute or percentage reduction in seizure frequency; treatment withdrawal; adverse effects; quality of life., Main Results: We included four randomised controlled trials, representing a total of 236 participants, in the review. Two trials had parallel-group design, the third had a two-period cross-over design, and the fourth had a three-period cross-over design. We judged all four studies to be at an unclear risk of bias overall. Bias arose from the incomplete reporting of methodological details, the incomplete and selective reporting of outcome data, and from participants having unstable drug regimens during experimental treatment in one trial. Due to significant methodological heterogeneity, clinical heterogeneity and differences in outcome measures, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis of the extracted data.Only one study reported the outcome, 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, whilst three studies reported percentage reduction in seizure frequency compared to placebo. One study claimed an average seizure reduction of 35.8% with add-on felbamate while another study claimed a more modest reduction of 4.2%. Both studies reported that seizure frequency increased with add-on placebo and that there was a significant difference in seizure reduction between felbamate and placebo (P = 0.0005 and P = 0.018, respectively). The third study reported a 14% reduction in seizure frequency with add-on felbamate but stated that the difference between treatments was not significant. There were conflicting results regarding treatment withdrawal. One study reported a higher treatment withdrawal for placebo-randomised participants, whereas the other three studies reported higher treatment withdrawal rates for felbamate-randomised participants. Notably, the treatment withdrawal rates for felbamate treatment groups across all four studies remained reasonably low (less than 10%), suggesting that felbamate may be well tolerated. Felbamate-randomised participants most commonly withdrew from treatment due to adverse effects. The adverse effects consistently reported by all four studies were: headache, dizziness and nausea. All three adverse effects were reported by 23% to 40% of felbamate-treated participants versus 3% to 15% of placebo-treated participants.We assessed the evidence for all outcomes using GRADE and found it as being very-low certainty, meaning that we have little confidence in the findings reported. We mainly downgraded evidence for imprecision due to the narrative synthesis conducted and the low number of events. We stress that the true effect of felbamate could likely be significantly different from that reported in this current review update., Authors' Conclusions: In view of the methodological deficiencies, the limited number of included studies and the differences in outcome measures, we have found no reliable evidence to support the use of felbamate as an add-on therapy in people with drug-resistant focal-onset epilepsy. A large-scale, randomised controlled trial conducted over a longer period of time is required to inform clinical practice.

Background: This review is an update of a previously published review in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Issue 7, 2014) on 'Felbamate as an add-on therapy for refractory epilepsy'. Epilepsy is a chronic and disabling neurologic disorder, affecting approximately 1% of the population. Up to 30% of people with epilepsy have seizures that are resistant to currently available drugs. Felbamate is one of the second-generation antiepileptic drugs and we have assessed its effects as an add-on therapy to standard drugs in this review., Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of felbamate versus placebo when used as an add-on treatment for people with refractory partial-onset epilepsy., Search Methods: For the latest update we searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, up to 20 October 2016. There were no language and time restrictions. We reviewed the reference lists of retrieved studies to search for additional reports of relevant studies. We also contacted the manufacturers of felbamate and experts in the field for information about any unpublished or ongoing studies., Selection Criteria: Randomised placebo-controlled add-on studies of people of any age with refractory partial-onset seizures. The studies could be double-blind, single-blind or unblinded and could be of parallel or cross-over design., Data Collection and Analysis: Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted information. We resolved disagreements by discussion. If disagreements persisted, the third review author arbitrated. We assessed the following outcomes: 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency; absolute or percentage reduction in seizure frequency; treatment withdrawal; adverse effects; quality of life., Main Results: We included four randomised controlled trials with a total of 236 participants. Two trials were parallel design, the third had a two-period cross-over design, and the fourth had a three-period cross-over design. Two studies were at an unclear risk of bias for random sequence generation and allocation concealment. These two studies did not include any description of their methods for outcome assessment and performance blinding (i.e. participants or doctors). Two studies were at high risk of bias for incomplete outcome data. Due to significant methodological heterogeneity, clinical heterogeneity and differences in outcome measures, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis of the results. Only one study reported 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency. One study reported absolute and percentage reduction in seizure frequency compared to placebo, P values were 0.046 and 0.018, respectively. One study reported percentage reduction in seizure frequency compared to placebo, but there were no P values. Adverse effects rates were higher during the felbamate period than the placebo period, particularly headache, nausea and dizziness., Authors' Conclusions: In view of the methodological deficiencies, limited number of individual studies and differences in outcome measures, we have found no reliable evidence to support the use of felbamate as an add-on therapy in people with refractory partial-onset epilepsy. A large-scale, randomised controlled trial conducted over a longer period of time is required to inform clinical practice.

Introduction: Felbamate was approved in 1993 to treat partial seizures with and without secondary generalization in adults and in Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome in children. Its use was later restricted when rare but fatal cases of aplastic anemia and hepatic failure were identified., Methods: This single center analysis retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of felbamate in a cohort of children, adolescents, and adults with epilepsy., Results: A chart review identified 103 patients taking felbamate. The range of felbamate dose was 300-4500 mg (mean: 1800 ± 900 mg). The duration of therapy ranged from 1 month to 20 years (mean duration: 35 ± 45 months). Eighteen (17.5%) subjects experienced adverse events including insomnia, nausea, vomiting, decreased appetite, weight loss, gastric discomfort, diarrhea, mood and behavioral problems, high blood pressure, headache, and elevated liver enzymes. Out of these, 6 (5.9%) patients discontinued the therapy. No hepatic failure or agranulocytosis was observed. Fifty-nine (57.72%) patients achieved ≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency, and 30 (29.12%) patients achieved seizure freedom., Conclusions: These findings suggest that felbamate is safe, well tolerated, and effective in treatment of various types of epilepsy syndromes., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite the introduction of multiple new antiepileptic drugs in the past two decades, many patients with epilepsy continue to experience uncontrolled seizures or significant side effects., Aim: To present our experience with felbamate therapy in children with drug-resistant epilepsy., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts and video-EEG recordings of all patients receiving felbamate until May 2012. Efficacy was determined according to seizure frequency during the week prior to treatment initiation and the week after the maximal dosage of felbamate was reached., Results: Fifty patients (34 boys) aged 4 months to 17 years (mean--5.5 years) were identified. Nearly third of the patients had Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Mean epilepsy duration was 3.4 years (range--1 month to 13 years). The mean number of previous antiepileptic drugs was 7.5. The mean duration of follow-up was 1.1 years. Seizure frequency decreased by at least 50% in 29 (58%) patients. Side effects were reported in 22 (44%) patients, none of them included aplastic anemia or liver failure. In the responder group, the maximal dose of felbamate was lower and the patients were older compared to non-responders., Conclusions: Despite current recommendations, felbamate is initiated following multiple AEDs. Based on its efficacy and safety data, earlier initiation of felbamate is recommended in children with refractory epilepsy., (Copyright © 2014 European Paediatric Neurology Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: This review is an update of a previously published review in The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Issue 1, 2011) on 'Felbamate as an add-on therapy for refractory epilepsy'. Epilepsy is a chronic and disabling neurologic disorder, affecting approximately 1% of the population. Up to 30% of people with epilepsy have seizures that are resistant to currently available drugs. Felbamate is one of the second-generation antiepileptic drugs and its effects as an add-on therapy to standard drugs are assessed in this review., Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of felbamate versus placebo when used as an add-on treatment for people with refractory partial-onset epilepsy., Search Methods: We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register (24 July 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2013, Issue 6), and PubMed (24 July 2013). This search was run for the original review on 20 May 2010. There were no language and time restrictions. We reviewed the reference lists of retrieved studies to search for additional reports of relevant studies. We also contacted the manufacturers of felbamate and experts in the field for information about any unpublished or ongoing studies., Selection Criteria: Randomized placebo-controlled add-on studies of people of any age with refractory partial-onset seizures. The studies could be double-blind, single-blind or unblinded and could be of parallel or crossover design., Data Collection and Analysis: Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted information. We resolved disagreements by discussion. If disagreements persisted, the third review author arbitrated. We assessed the following outcomes: 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency; absolute or percentage reduction in seizure frequency; treatment withdrawal; adverse effects; quality of life., Main Results: Three randomised controlled trials with a total of 153 participants were included. The first was a parallel design, the second had a two-period crossover design, and the third had a three-period crossover design. One study was at unclear risk of bias for random sequence generation and allocation concealment. And in the same study, there was no description of how to blind outcome assessment, performance blinding was for participants, might not be for doctors. Two studies were at high risk of bias for incomplete outcome data. Due to significant methodological heterogeneity, clinical heterogeneity and differences in outcome measures, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis of the results. None of the three studies reported 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency. Only one study reported absolute and percentage reduction in seizure frequency compared to placebo, P values were 0.046 and 0.018, respectively. Adverse effects rates were higher during the felbamate period than the placebo period, particularly headache, nausea and dizziness., Authors' Conclusions: In view of the methodological deficiencies, limited number of individual studies and differences in outcome measure, we have found no reliable evidence to support the use of felbamate as an add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial-onset epilepsy. A large-scale, randomised controlled trial conducted over a longer period of time is required to inform clinical practice.Since the last version of this review no new studies have been found.

Background: Epilepsy is a chronic and disabling neurologic disorder, affecting approximately one per cent of the population. Up to 30% of people with epilepsy have seizures that are resistant to currently available drugs. Felbamate is one of the second generation antiepileptic drugs and its effects as an add-on therapy to standard drugs are assessed in this review., Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of felbamate versus placebo when used as an add-on treatment for people with refractory partial-onset epilepsy., Search Strategy: We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register (6 December 2010), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, 6 December 2010), and PubMed (6 December 2010). There were no language restrictions. We reviewed the reference lists of retrieved studies to search for additional reports of relevant studies. We also contacted the manufacturers of felbamate and experts in the field for information about any unpublished or ongoing studies., Selection Criteria: Randomized placebo-controlled add-on studies of people of any age with refractory partial-onset seizures. The studies could be double-blind, single-blind or unblinded and could be of parallel or crossover design., Data Collection and Analysis: Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted information. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. If disagreements persisted, the third review author arbitrated. The following outcomes were assessed: 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency; absolute or percentage reduction in seizure frequency; treatment withdrawal; adverse effects; quality of life., Main Results: Three randomized controlled trials were included. The first was a parallel design, the second was a two-period crossover design, and the third was a three-period crossover design. Due to significant methodological heterogeneity, clinical heterogeneity and differences in outcome measures, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis of the results. None of the three studies reported 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency. Only one study reported absolute and percentage reduction in seizure frequency compared to placebo, P values were 0.046 and 0.018, respectively. Adverse effects rates were higher during the felbamate period than the placebo period, particularly headache, nausea and dizziness., Authors' Conclusions: In view of the methodological deficiencies, limited number of individual studies and differences in outcome measure, we have found no reliable evidence to support the use of felbamate as an add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial-onset epilepsy. A large scale, randomized controlled trial conducted over a greater period of time is required to inform clinical practice.

Experimental evidence indicates that bupropion hydrochloride, an antidepressant and a first-line smoking cessation aid, exerts dose-dependently anticonvulsant and convulsant effects. In this study, chronic bupropion pretreatment intraperitoneally (i.p.) for 14 days in a dose of 5 mg/kg reduced the ED(50) (i.e. the dose protecting 50% of mice against electroconvulsions) of lamotrigine, topiramate, and felbamate from 4.58, 60.95, and 48.79 (antiepileptic+vehicle) to 3.01, 41.68, and 37.28 mg/kg (antiepileptic+bupropion), respectively, against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice. Bupropion significantly increased the plasma and brain concentrations of lamotrigine. Plasma concentration of topiramate was elevated, however, the brain concentration of the drug was not affected. Neither plasma nor brain concentrations of felbamate were elevated by bupropion administration. Bupropion did not exacerbate motor coordination impairment caused by the antiepileptic drugs in the rotarod test. Chronic administration of bupropion significantly potentiates the protective activity of lamotrigine, topiramate, and felbamate against maximal electroshock-induced seizures. A pharmacokinetic interaction is responsible for the effect of bupropion co-administered with lamotrigine., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Felbamate is a derivative of meprobamate used in second-line partial epilepsy and in the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Felbamate is well absorbed and has linear kinetics: C(max) and AUC increasing linearly with dose. The metabolism takes place in the liver. Metabolites represent 40 to 60% of excretion and are eliminated via the urine. The half-life is between 15 and 23 hours. Clearance is dependent on renal function. There is a concentration - efficacy and concentration - toxicity relationship. These arguments are in favour of a TDM but the therapeutic range is not clearly established. Potentially fatal side effects can be caused by felbamate (aplastic anemia, acute liver failure), which limits its use because they are dose-independant.

Purpose: To determine the effects of long-term use of felbamate (FBM) on weight, complete blood count, liver function tests, and seizure control, and also to determine the effect of age on FBM clearance., Methods: A computerized prospective database was used to identify all subjects who had FBM listed as one of their antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during their most recent clinic visit. Medical records from each patient were then reviewed for inclusion criteria [treatment >2 years, FBM initiated at the study clinic, data for pre-FBM (Time-1; T1), one-year exposure to FBM (Time-2; T2), and the latest visit (Time-3; T3)]. Clinical information was abstracted from clinic charts., Results: Seventy-seven patients (F = 41, M = 36; ages 10-69 years) met entry criteria. Mean treatment time was 7.4 years, with the longest 20.3 years. Significant weight loss (mean 5.1 kg; p < 0.001) occurred from T1 to T2, but weight was regained by T3. No clinically significant changes in laboratory parameters occurred. Older age was associated with a significant decrease in FBM clearance (p = 0.01). Significant reduction in generalized tonic-clonic seizures was seen at both T2 (p < 0.001) and T3 (p < 0.001) compared with seizure frequency at T1., Discussion: Our results suggest that long-term FBM use is associated with persistent decrease of seizures and no clinically significant changes in major laboratory parameters. Older age correlated with reduced apparent clearance of FBM. The patient population described in this study were long-term users of FBM who were continuing to use the drug, and thus this study does not constitute an "intent to treat" study.

Felbamate (FBM) is efficacious in treating patients with refractory epilepsy but was withdrawn due to cases of aplastic anaemia, hepatic failure and five reported deaths. FBM is currently used in specialist centres and is only being used in one Irish centre to date. This papers aim is to review the efficacy and safety experience of FBM in Irish adult patients with refractory epilepsy. A retrospective chart review was done on patients' medical records. Patients were subdivided into responders and non responders based on change in seizure frequency and side effects were recorded for all. Of the 13 patients on FBM nine patients responded to FBM, four patients did not. FBM is a safe and efficacious alternative in an Irish adult population with refractory epilepsy. However close monitoring is still required given the potential fatal side effects that are possible with this anticonvulsant.

New antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), introduced since 1993, provide more diverse options in the treatment of epilepsy. Despite the equivalent efficacy and better tolerability of these drugs, more than 25% of patients remain refractory to treatment. Moreover, the issues for pediatric patients are different from those for adults, and have not been addressed in the development and application of the new AEDs. Recently published evidence-based treatment guidelines have helped physicians to choose the most reasonable AED, although they cannot fully endorse new AEDs because of the lack of well-designed, randomized controlled trials. We review the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetic properties, adverse reactions, efficacy, and tolerability of eight new AEDs (felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide), focusing on currently available treatment guidelines and expert opinions regarding pediatric epilepsy.

Background and Purpose: To review our experience of the efficacy and tolerability of felbamate in children younger than 4 years., Methods: We used a retrospective chart review to identify 53 children with seizures who were younger than 4 years. Efficacy was evaluated based on the occurrence of responsiveness, defined as seizure frequency reduction of more than 50% for a minimum period of 4 months. Tolerability was based on parent-reported side effects., Results: Twenty-two (41%) patients resulted to be responders and 31 (59%) did not. By univariate analysis, those achieving seizure remission were probably much older, to have a shorter history of epilepsy and a lower frequency of seizures before felbamate therapy. The number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) used before felbamate therapy was the only significant predictor of the duration of response to felbamate, with a longer responsiveness to the drug seen in those who were placed under fewer than three AEDs before felbamate compared with those who had taken more than three (median, 16 months vs. 7 months; P < 0.0084). Side effects occurred in 30% of the subjects, but these did not require discontinuation of the drug., Discussion: Felbamate is an effective medication for a wide range of epilepsy syndromes in children younger than 4 years. Although caution is necessary when the drug is used in children, felbamate might represent a possible option for the treatment of epilepsy in this age group.

This article describes a simple isocratic high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method with UV detection for the determination of felbamate in the serum of patients with epilepsy. Sample preparation requires only protein precipitation with a single-step methanol extraction. After centrifugation, the resulting supernatant was injected directly onto the HPLC system. Separation was achieved by reversed-phase HPLC, using a 5-microm Microsorb-MV C(18) column (250 x 4.6 mm) connected to a Silica C(18) guard column (20 x 4.6 mm) and a mobile phase consisting of a mixture of phosphate buffer (pH = 6.9, 0.05 M), methanol, and acetonitrile (64:18:18, v/v/v). The flow rate was at 1.0 mL/min and column temperature was set at 35 degrees C. Quantitation was performed by measurement of the UV absorbance at a wavelength of 210 nm. Calibration curves were linear over a range of 2-200 mg/L, which covered the proposed range of 50-150 mg/L for reference. Both within-run and between-run precision were lower than 5%. Recoveries ranged between 97% and 105% for spiked and pooled samples. No interferences with other common antiepileptic drugs (except zonisamide) were observed. The method requires only 100 microL of serum or less. It is simple and fast (sample preparation and analysis time) and suitable for routine clinical use.

An expert panel convened to evaluate data and review current clinical practices regarding the novel antiepileptic drug (AED) felbamate. Felbamate has demonstrated efficacy against a variety of refractory seizures types, including seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, but postmarketing experience revealed serious idiosyncratic adverse effects that were not observed during clinical trials. Although felbamate is not indicated as first-line antiepileptic therapy, its utility in treating seizures that are refractory to other AEDs is undisputed, as shown by the number of patients who continue to use it. New exposures to felbamate number approximately 3200-4200 patients annually, and it is estimated that over the past 10 years, approximately 35,000 new starts have occurred. Recommendations by the American Academy of Neurology and a review of felbamate literature were evaluated in conjunction with the clinical experience of the expert panel to determine current medical opinion and practice regarding felbamate. The past 10 years of clinical experience have demonstrated that when used in accordance with existing recommendations and close clinical monitoring, felbamate is an effective treatment for some patients with seizures refractory to other AEDs. This review of clinical data and discussion of the current understanding of the risk:benefit of felbamate therapy supports its use as an important therapeutic option for some patients with refractory epilepsy.

Lamotrigine and felbamate are 2 newer anticonvulsant medications used to control refractory partial and generalized seizures. Although several cases of lamotrigine toxicity secondary to acute intentional or unintentional overdose have been described, there is little published information related to potential side-effects associated with the therapeutic use of these agents. Described is a case of a 22-year-old woman who presented to the emergency department after experiencing 2 seizure-like episodes. Findings on evaluation included nystagmus, ataxia, widening of the QRS complex and right-axis deviation on ECG. The patient reported only therapeutic use of her medications. The lamotrigine level was 14.8 mg/L. The mechanism of action for lamotrigine is blockade of the sodium channels; therefore, the patient was treated with intravenous sodium bicarbonate with resultant QRS narrowing following administration.

Although neuroprotection is effective only against certain aspects of a complex cascade of pathological events during the development and course of epilepsy, it might be a promising option in the treatment of this disease. Some new data on the pathophysiology of epilepsy raised some hopes that the epileptogenesis process can be prevented. A question arises whether it is possible to make the epilepsy develop in a milder, easier to treat and non-progressive way without cognitive decline and drug-resistance. Moreover, once the epilepsy has already been triggered, there is as yet no conclusive evidence that the harmful effects of seizures on the brain can be reduced. So a great deal of further evaluation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is required. Many similarities exist between cerebral ischemia and epilepsy regarding brain-damaging and autoprotective mechanisms that are activated following the injurious insult. Therefore, drugs that are effective in minimizing seizure-induced brain damage may also be useful in minimizing ischemic injury. Most AEDs have been tested in animal models of focal or global ischemia and some were already tested in humans for a possible neuroprotective effect. The existing data are rather scanty and insufficient but it appears that only drugs that have multiple mechanisms of action have some potential in conferring a degree of neuroprotection that could be clinically applicable to stroke patients. In this review, we focus on evidence of neuroprotective properties of novel and potential AEDs, based on animal experimental models of neurodegeneration. In conclusion, some of the newer AEDs show promise as possible neuroprotectants in epilepsy and acute ischemia but more studies are needed before clinical trials in humans could be undertaken.

Purpose: Despite possibility of idiosyncratic reaction development, felbamate (FBM) is recommended in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and partial refractory epilepsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the profile of interactions between FBM and four conventional antiepileptic drugs (AEDs): clonazepam (CZP), ethosuximide (ESM), phenobarbital (PB), and valproate (VPA), in pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced convulsions in mice, a model of myoclonic seizures in humans., Methods: Data obtained from PTZ-evoked seizures were compared by use of two basic procedures, the subthreshold method and isobolographic analysis. Results of the chimney test (evaluating motor coordination) also were elaborated isobolographically. Thus it was possible to determine both median toxic dose (TD50) and protective index (PI) for each drug combination., Results: FBM reduced the clonic seizure activity [with an ED50 of 9.7 mg/kg; TD50, 439.1 mg/kg; and PI, 45.3]. FBM at the dose of 10 mg/kg, but not 7.5 mg/kg, significantly reduced PTZ-induced convulsions in mice. In the subthreshold method, FBM (7.5 mg/kg) did not affect the protective activity of conventional AEDs used in the study. However, when applied at 10 mg/kg, it enhanced the protective activity of PB and ESM, but not that of VPA or CZP. The nature of these interactions could not be precisely estimated with this method. The exact profile of drug interactions was determined with the use of isobolography. In terms of seizure inhibition, antagonism was found between FBM and VPA applied at the fixed-dose ratio of 3:1. Synergy was detected between FBM and PB (1:3). Combinations of FBM with VPA (1:3, 1:1), PB (1:1, 3:1), and ESM or CZP (1:3, 1:1, 3:1) led to additive interactions. As regards motor impairment, the combinations of FBM with VPA (1:3) or CZP (1:1, 3:1) were synergistic. Remaining combinations exhibited pure additivity. Pharmacokinetic events may influence FBM/ESM and FBM/CZP interactions, because FBM lowered the brain concentration of ESM and increased that of CZP., Conclusions: The profitable benefit index was found only for the combination of FBM with PB (1:3). Conversely, the combinations of FBM with either VPA (1:3) or CZP (1:1, 3:1) do not seem promising for the therapy of refractory myoclonic convulsions. Isobolographic analysis provides more reliable clues to be considered by the clinicians willing to introduce AED combinations for the therapy of epilepsy.

Purpose: The need for an efficacious treatment of patients with intractable seizures is urgent and pressing, because approximately 30% of epilepsy patients worldwide are still inadequately medicated with current frontline antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). This study sought to determine the interactions among some newer AEDs [topiramate (TPM), felbamate (FBM), oxcarbazepine (OXC), and lamotrigine (LTG)] in the maximal electroshock-induced seizures (MES) and chimney test (motor performance) in mice, by using the isobolographic analysis., Methods: Evaluation of the anticonvulsant and acute adverse (neurotoxic) effects in mice produced by the AEDs in combinations at the fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1 allowed the assessment of their preclinical profile and the determination of benefit indices (BIs) for all individual combinations., Results: Combinations of TPM+FBM at the fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1 offered supraadditive (synergistic) interactions against electroconvulsions and subadditivity (antagonism) in terms of acute neurotoxic effects in the chimney test (BIs ranged between 1.90 and 2.59, the best combinations from a preclinical point of view). The examined combinations of TPM+OXC also were advantageous due to synergistic interactions in the MES, and additivity in terms of acute neurotoxic effects produced by the AEDs (BIs ranged between 1.35 and 1.71). In contrast, OXC+FBM exerted subadditive (antagonistic) interactions in the MES test and additive interactions in terms of acute motor impairment of animals (BIs ranged between 0.53 and 0.71). The worst combination was observed for OXC+LTG, at the fixed ratio of 1:1, displaying subadditivity (antagonism) against electroconvulsions and supraadditivity (synergy) with respect to neurotoxicity (BIs, 0.43). The remaining combinations of OXC+LTG tested (i.e., 1:3 and 3:1) exerted additivity in the MES test and supraadditivity in the chimney test (BIs 0.54 and 0.49, respectively). None of the studied AEDs affected the brain concentrations of other AEDs, so the existence of any pharmacokinetic interactions to be responsible for the observed effects is improbable., Conclusions: Based on the current preclinical data, the pharmacological profile of combinations of TPM+FBM and TPM+OXC evaluated with isobolography was beneficial and might be worth recommendation to further clinical practice. In contrast, utmost caution is required during the use of OXC+FBM or OXC+LTG in clinical practice, because of the high risk of neurotoxic adverse effect appearance.

Felbamate (2-phenyl-1,3-propanediol dicarbamate), a representative of novel antiepileptic drugs (AESs), proved to have broad-spectrum anticonvulsive activity. Particularly beneficial efficacy was found against partial seizures and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Therefore, felbamate started to be indicated not only as an adjunctive antiepileptic drug but also in monotherapy. Unfortunately, it was also evidenced that the drug may induce aplastic anemia or hepatic failure. The former complication was frequently described in patients with previously diagnosed hematopoetic disturbances. Thirty-four cases of well-documented bone marrow suppression, occurred fatal in thirteen cases. Subsequently, felbamate's usage was essentially restricted and at present felbamate is not a first-line AED. However, excluding anemia-prone individuals, new possibilities may open for felbamate position in add-on therapy of drug-resistant epilepsy. Experimental studies provide a good theoretical basis for this kind of treatment.

We investigated the effect of felbamate, administered singly and in combination with carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin or clonazepam, on various behavioral and electrographic correlates of seizures in amygdala-kindled rats. Felbamate (5 or 10 mg/kg) significantly increased afterdischarge threshold, shortened seizure and afterdischarge durations but remained without effect on seizure severity. Furthermore, the combination of felbamate (2.5 mg/kg) with carbamazepine (7.5 mg/kg; both drugs at their subeffective doses), was associated with the reduction in seizure severity and afterdischarge duration. In relation to the afterdischarge duration, the antiseizure potency of felbamate and carbamazepine, in combination, was comparable with that of carbamazepine (10 mg/kg) administered alone. Neither carbamazepine (7.5 and 10 mg/kg) nor felbamate (2.5-10 mg/kg) affected seizure severity, whereas the combined administration of felbamate (2.5 mg/kg) with carbamazepine (7.5 mg/kg) led to significant reduction in seizure severity from the fifth to the third stage of Racine's scale. Among the conventional antiepileptic drugs evaluated in this study, only valproate (100 mg/kg) and clonazepam (0.1 mg/kg) exerted similar action on seizure severity. However, the combinations of felbamate (2.5 mg/kg), with subeffective doses of valproate, phenobarbital, phenytoin or clonazepam, were not associated with any protective action. As blood and brain felbamate and carbamazepine concentrations were unaffected, a pharmacokinetic interaction can be excluded and a pharmacodynamic interaction concluded. These data suggest that felbamate and carbamazepine, administered in combination, may be useful in patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy.

Context: The past decade has brought many advances to the treatment of epilepsy, including many new pharmacological agents. Primary care physicians often care for patients with epilepsy and therefore should be familiar with the new options available., Objective: To review data regarding the efficacy and tolerability of antiepileptic drugs introduced in the past decade., Data Sources: A search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed to identify all published human and English-language randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of the antiepileptic drugs that have been approved for use in the United States since 1990. Additional reports evaluating pharmacokinetic properties were identified through a MEDLINE search as well as review of article bibliographies., Study Selection and Data Extraction: Search terms included felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, tiagabine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and zonisamide. Studies were selected if efficacy and tolerability were reported as major outcome measures. Included studies (n = 55) enrolled a minimum of 20 adult subjects and had a treatment period of at least 6 weeks., Data Synthesis: Eight new antiepileptic drugs have been approved for use in the United States in the past decade. Each new antiepileptic drug is well tolerated and demonstrates statistically significant reductions in seizure frequency over baseline. No randomized controlled trials have compared the new antiepileptic drugs with each other or against the traditional antiepileptic drugs. Although there is no evidence to suggest that the newer medications are more efficacious, several studies have demonstrated broader spectrum of activity, fewer drug interactions, and overall better tolerability of the new agents., Conclusions: New antiepileptic drugs offer many options in the treatment of epilepsy, each with unique mechanisms of action as well as adverse effect profiles. The new antiepileptic drugs are well tolerated with few adverse effects, minimal drug interactions, and a broad spectrum of activity.

The pharmacokinetic properties of a drug are the primary deter-minant of the extent and duration of drug action, and influence susceptibility to clinically important drug interactions. Most of the older-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are far from ideal in terms of pharmacokinetics and interaction potential. For example, phenytoin, carbamazepine, and valproic acid exhibit non-linear kinetics; carbamazepine and valproic acid have relatively short half-lives; and most of these drugs cause either enzyme induction (phenytoin, phenobarbital, primidone, carbamazepine) or enzyme inhibition (valproic acid). Compared with older agents, certain new-generation AEDs offer a num-ber of pharmacokinetic advantages, particularly in terms of reduced inter-patient variability in drug clearance and a lower interaction potential. One of the most recently developed of these drugs, levetiracetam, comes especially close to fulfilling the desirable pharmacokinetic characteristics for an AED: (1) it has a high oral bioavailability, which is unaffected by food; (2) it is not significantly bound to plasma proteins; (3) it is eliminated partly in unchanged form by the kidneys and partly by hydrolysis to an inactive metabolite, without involvement of oxidative and conjugative enzymes; (4) it has linear kinetics; and (5) it is not vulnerable to important drug interactions, nor does it cause clinically significant alterations in the kinetics of concomitantly administered drugs. Although its half-life is relatively short (6 to 8 hours), its duration of action is longer than anticipated from its pharmacokinetics in plasma, and a twice-daily dosing regimen is adequate to produce the desired response.

Although antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are commonly used to control and prevent seizures, their long-term use carries a considerable risk of morbidity. The decision to start AEDs is made once the risks of further seizures outweigh the risks of treatment. Despite a large body of literature on the subject, this common clinical issue perplexes many practitioners because of its neurologic, psychological, and, at times, legal implications. Adding to the confusion is the recent approval of several new AEDs. This article summarizes the current evidence to support individual clinical decisions regarding initiation of AEDs in adults and considers the use of AEDs as seizure prophylaxis. Recently approved AEDs are discussed to help the practitioner understand when to initiate and how to choose the appropriate AED for the patient with seizures.

The introduction of these new antiepileptic drugs, from felbamate to levetiracetam, raised hope of control of epilepsy with fewer adverse effects and improved quality of life. Unfortunately, many patients continue to experience refractory epilepsy despite the use of these new agents, and dose-related adverse effects and idiosyncratic reactions continue to be problematic. A recent report describes six new compounds in preclinical development, and five in clinical trials [131]. As the number of available, effective, but imperfect antiepileptic drugs increases, many challenges remain. These include: choosing the drug appropriate for the epileptic syndrome, assessing accurately the range of a drug's adverse effects in an individual patient, and considering carefully the drug's interactions in combination drug therapy. In considering drug combinations, differing mechanisms of drug action and favorable pharmacodynamic interactions (an area requiring additional studies) are of importance. Clinicians caring for children who have epilepsy anticipate further advances in the pharmacogenetics and molecular pathophysiology of epilepsy, leading to individually tailored, effective, and safe therapy.

Purpose: To examine the seizure-protective properties of fluorofelbamate, a felbamate analog, on acute and chronic seizures in an experimental model of self-sustaining status epilepticus (SSSE)., Methods: SSSE was induced by stimulation of the perforant path for 30 min (PPS) through chronically implanted electrodes in free-running adult male Wistar rats. Fluorofelbamate was injected intravenously (i.v.) either 10 min, or 40 min after SSSE induction. Seizure and spike profiles were analyzed off-line., Results: Fluorofelbamate injected during the early stages of SSSE (10 min after the end of PPS), shortened the duration of seizures in a dose-dependent manner. While a dose of 50 mg kg(-1) was ineffective, 100 and 200 mg kg(-1) reduced cumulative seizure time from 393 +/- 10 min to 15 +/- 8 min and 2.4 +/- 0.5 min respectively. Administration of fluorofelbamate (200 and 300 mg kg (-1)) at a late stage of SSSE, which is refractory to treatment with conventional anticonvulsants, also significantly attenuated seizures. Acute fluorofelbamate treatment (200 mg kg(-1) 10 min after PPS) significantly decreased the frequency of spontaneous seizures which follow SSSE after a 'latent' interval. Moreover, in contrast to control animals, fluorofelbamate-treated rats showed regression of spontaneous seizures, and an apparent remission of epilepsy within 2 months after SSSE., Conclusions: Acute treatment of SSSE with fluorofelbamate showed strong anticonvulsant effects even during the late stages of SSSE. In this model, it also displayed antiepileptogenic properties: it reduced the severity of chronic epilepsy after SSSE and lead to apparent remissions of that epilepsy.

Six dogs with partial seizures or partial seizure-like activity were treated with the antiepileptic drug felbamate between 1993 and 1998. All dogs had a history and results of diagnostic testing suggestive of either primary (idiopathic) or occult secondary epilepsy. Dogs ranged between four months and eight years of age at the onset of seizure activity. The median time period between onset of the first seizure and the start of felbamate therapy was 3.8 months (range 0.75 to 36 months). Median duration of therapy was nine months (range two to 22 months). All dogs experienced a reduction in seizure frequency after felbamate administration. Median total number of seizures post-treatment was two (range 0 to 9). Two dogs had an immediate and prolonged cessation of seizure activity. Steady-state trough serum felbamate concentrations measured at two weeks, and one, 12 and 22 months after the commencement of therapy in four dogs ranged between 13 and 55 mg/litre (median 35 mg/litre). Reversible haematological adverse effects were detected in two dogs, with one dog developing concurrent keratoconjunctivitis sicca. These results suggest that felbamate can be an effective antiepileptic drug without life-threatening complications when used as monotherapy for partial seizures in the dog.

For many years, epileptologists had few choices for treating seizures. Within the past 20 years several "new generation" antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were introduced. The most recent additions include oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, and zonisamide. New agents have been shown in clinical trials to offer similar efficacy compared with older, more established AEDs, but the new agents offer important improvements in safety. Although clinical trials to specifically measure the efficacy of the new AEDs in treating idiopathic generalized epilepsy are rare, the new agents have demonstrated efficacy in treating generalized tonic-clonic convulsions. Data for treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome indicate a clear effect with lamotrigine or topiramate and possibly some effect with zonisamide and levetiracetam. Studies of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy and absence seizures suggest that zonisamide, lamotrigine, topiramate, and levetiracetam may be effective. Each of the new AEDs is effective in controlling partial seizures. These agents may also be appropriate choices for newly diagnosed patients or those whose conditions are refractory to treatment. In clinical trials, patients who are refractory to treatment are often given escalated doses to gain effect, but higher doses also result in more adverse events and higher withdrawal rates. Generally, the higher the dose, the greater the odds of withdrawal, with the exception of levetiracetam, which is not associated with increased withdrawal rates at high doses. Newly diagnosed patients are likely to be controlled with the first therapy given to them. It is therefore important to select an agent with the best safety, efficacy, and tolerability profile possible.

Purpose: To report a case of felbamate (FBM) urolithiasis., Methods: Urographic imaging [sonography, abdominal computed tomography (CT), intravenous pyelogram, voiding cystourethrogram] and urologic procedures (cystoscopy with lithotripsy, ureteral stent) to define and capture the stones. Stone identification was by infrared spectroscopy and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry., Results: A 15-year-old boy had painful hematuria, bilateral ureteral obstruction, and urinary retention. Kidney, bladder, and ureteral stones were found, and ureteral stent placement was required to relieve obstruction. The stone material was identified as FBM by chemical analysis. Stone formation ceased with discontinuation of FBM., Conclusions: FBM urolithiasis can occur, and possible contributory factors include high felbamate dosage, drug polypharmacy, and risk factors for forming stones of other types. FBM urolithiasis may be heralded by crystalluria.

Introduction: This article is a bibliographic review of the part currently played by antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of neuropathic pain, and knowledge of their specific actions according to the different physiopathogenic mechanisms suspected of being involved in this type of pain., Development: Neuropathic pain, the result of neurological damage in part of the nerve transmission system for pain, is one of the commonest painful syndromes in clinical practice and is a challenge for both neurologists and pain specialists. In recent years there has been increasing interest in the antiepileptic drugs, which were already used in this context in the sixties. Interest has increased with new drugs and better understanding of the physiopathogenic mechanisms of pain. The poor, variable response of these conditions to different treatments and the complex relationship between aetiologies, mechanisms and symptoms make it advisable to modify the traditional approach to the treatment of these conditions, passing form the aetiology and topographical distribution to the probable mechanisms involved in each individual patient, adapting the treatment to the individual concerned., Conclusions: The antiepileptic drugs are one of the most promising approaches to the drug treatment of neuropathic pain. Their use as the sole treatment, or in combination with other treatment, in individual patients depends on better understanding of the mechanisms involved in the genesis and maintenance of neuropathic pain and how antiepileptic drugs act on these mechanisms.

Newly diagnosed epileptic patients start their medication with monotherapy. Around 30% of epileptic patients require more than one antiepileptic drug. Results from experimental studies provide evidence that administration of two antiepileptic drugs may result in antagonistic, additive, or supra-additive (synergistic) anticonvulsant effects. If adverse effects of a synergistic combination also show supra-additive summation then the protective index may not change. In this context, drug combinations, possessing synergistic anticonvulsant effects and additive (or infra-additive) toxicity, are of clinical interest. Recent experimental data indicate that topiramate and gabapentin generally potentiate the protective activity of conventional antiepileptic drugs against maximal electroshock-induced convulsions in mice. The anticonvulsant action of carbamazepine, diphenylhydantoin, phenobarbital, and valproate was not modified in this test by felbamate at subprotective doses against threshold electroconvulsions. Interestingly, conventional antiepileptics (at subeffective doses) enhanced the protection offered by felbamate. It may indicate that beneficial effects of a drug combination may be observed at only some drug ratios.

Epilepsy affects 1.2% to 4.4% of the general population. Given the clinical profile of the newer antiepileptic agents, it is likely their usage will increase in the coming years, thus increasing the emergency physician's exposure to these medications and their side effects. Several of these side effects can have high morbidity, such as the aplastic anemia and hepatotoxicity caused by felbamate, and the Stevens-Johnson syndrome associated with lamotrigine. Overdoses of these medications also could increase, as will our knowledge of recognizing and managing them. The clinical spectrum of the newer medications is the treatment of partial seizures. None of the newer medications can be orally loaded nor are they available in an i.v. preparation. Serum drug levels are not available in most institutions and are not routinely measured in the ED. The new preparations of phenytoin, diazepam, and valporic acid add increased efficiency in drug administration, providing a new method for prehospital treatment of seizures and a more tolerable means of administration in the ED.

Purpose: To examine the putative seizure-protective properties of felbamate in an animal model of self-sustaining status epilepticus (SSSE)., Methods: SSSE was induced by 30-min stimulation of the perforant path (PPS) through permanently implanted electrodes in free-running male adult Wistar rats. Felbamate (FBM; 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg), dizepam (DZP; 10 mg/kg), or phenytoin (PHT; 50 mg/kg) were injected i.v. 10 min after SSSE induction. Electrographic manifestations of SSSE and the severity of SSSE-induced neuronal injury were analyzed., Results: Felbamate injected during the early stages of SSSE (10 min after the end of PPS), shortened the duration of seizures in a dose-dependent manner. Total time spent in seizures after FBM and 290 +/- 251 min (50 mg/kg), 15.3 +/- 9 min (100 mg/kg), and 7 +/- 1 min (200 mg/kg), whereas control animals spent 410 +/- 133 min seizing. This effect of FBM was stronger than that of DZP (10 mg/kg, 95 +/- 22 min) and comparable to that of PHT (50 mg/kg, 6.3 +/- 2.5 min). In the applied doses, FBM (200 mg/kg) was more effective than PHT (50 mg/kg) or DZP (10 mg/kg) in shortening seizure duration and decreasing spike frequency, when administered on the pleateau of SSSE (injection 40 min after the end of PPS). Anticonvulsant action of FBM was confirmed by milder neuronal injury compared with control animals., Conclusions: Felbamate, a clinically available AED with a moderate affinity for the glycine site of the NMDA receptor, displayed a potent seizure-protective effect in an animal model of SSSE. These results suggest that FBM might be useful when standard AEDs fail in the treatment of refractory cases of SE.

One of the most important achievement of contemporary epileptology has been a concept of epileptic syndromes. According to the Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy there are many epileptic syndromes which differ from each other not only by prognosis but also by reaction to pharmacotherapy. Nevertheless the differentation between the some of epileptic syndromes may be difficult in spite of quite precise clinical and electrophysiological criteria. Good example of this problem may be the course of disease of the boy who is now eleven years old. His refractory epilepsy which started 7 years ago shares symptoms and signs of both epilepsy with myoclonic-astatic seizures (Doose Syndrome) and Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome. Felbamate therapy was consider to be the turning-point in both therapeutic and diagnostic meaning.

Influence Felbamate on the cerebral bioelectric activity (EEG) in the group of 31 children (18 with syndrome Lennox-Gastaut, 13 with partial epilepsy) with refractory epilepsy was investigated. In the waking EEG was visually analysed: 1. Abnormalities distribution and morphology with special consideration of slow waves, sharp elements and paroxysmal character of discharges. 2. Influence of Felbamate on the duration time of discharges. 3. Range dominant frequency and length of segments (with non-disturbed topographic differentiation) of background activity EEG. During therapy the results showed more often EEG improvement among children with syndrome Lennox-Gastaut (near 70%) than in children with partial refractory epilepsy (near 30%). The EEG results correlated positively with the clinical improvement. In the both group of epilepsy background activity improvement had a statistical significance. In sleep EEG any influence of Felbamate on the sleep spindles was observed. No observation about increase beta activity in waking and sleep EEG records was noted.

The authors report preliminary findings on the effect of the new generation antiepileptic drug (AED) felbamate (FBM) on steady state plasma concentrations of clobazam (CLB), a benzodiazepine (frequently used as add-on therapy in patients with refractory epilepsy) and its active metabolite n-desmethyl-clobazam (N-CLB). The authors prospectively collected plasma samples from 66 children and adults with epilepsy receiving chronic CLB therapy. On the basis of concomitant AEDs, patients were divided into three subgroups otherwise comparable for age and weight-adjusted daily dose of CLB: group A (n = 22), receiving CLB monotherapy or CLB plus AEDs without inducing properties of cytochrome P450 (CYP) metabolism, namely valproic acid (VPA) or lamotrigine (LTG); group B (n = 28), receiving CLB plus AED inducer polytherapy (carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin), even associated with VPA (n = 9) or LTG (n = 12); group C (n = 16), receiving CLB plus FBM, associated with AED inducers, VPA or LTG. Level to weight-adjusted dose ratio (L/D) of CLB in groups B and C was twofold lower compared to group A (p < 0.001). L/D of N-CLB was twofold higher in group B and fivefold in group C compared to group A (p < 0.00 1). The metabolite-to-parent drug ratio shifted from a median value of 2.8 in group A to 13 in group B, and up to 29 in patients receiving polytherapy with FBM (p < 0.001). These data confirm previous reports of a significant increase in CLB clearance in patients receiving AED inducers, leading to an accumulation of its main metabolite. They also provide novel evidence of a further marked increase in N-CLB plasma concentrations in patients receiving FBM cotherapy. From a clinical point of view, this finding should be kept in mind in explaining possible toxicity in patients on complex AED polytherapy. Furthermore, knowledge of the in vivo interaction between CLB and FBM could help in identifying the CYP isoforms involved in the metabolism of both CLB and N-CLB.

The management of epilepsy in the pediatric patient requires careful evaluation, classification, and pharmacologic treatment. Despite best efforts on the part of clinicians, approximately 25% of children remain refractory to appropriate medical therapies. The development of an improved classification system and the emergence of several new antiepileptic drugs have enabled some progress in this area, specifically in children with disorders such as Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and infantile spasms, which are notoriously difficult to control. However, limited data are available that define the optimal use of new antiepileptic agents in pediatric patients. To most effectively treat children with epilepsy syndromes, further research must be completed to validate the positive effects described in case reports, open-label clinical trials, and early controlled clinical trials.

Felbamate demonstrates a unique therapeutic profile and often results in seizure control when other agents fail. Its use has been associated with risks for aplastic anaemia and hepatic failure. A number of confounding factors makes the actual incidence rate for each adverse effect difficult to determine. However, certain risk factors are common in reported cases. In order to minimise the risk, at the present time, it is necessary to rely on the clinical profile of the patients reporting these adverse effects. The patient reporting aplastic anaemia is usually female, Caucasian, and an adult. The dose did not appear to be a factor and the time to onset of aplastic anaemia was less than 1 year for all patients. Concomitant medications and diseases may play an important role. Patients with reported aplastic anaemia generally had a history of a serious allergy or toxicity to other anticonvulsants and/or a background of having had a cytopenia due to other anticonvulsants, and a diagnosis or serological evidence of concomitant immune disorder. The demographics associated with hepatic failure are less well defined. Patients were also predominantly female, were equally divided among adult and paediatric patients, and had a broad range of time to presentation of hepatotoxicity following felbamate therapy. Concomitant medications again play an important role with, in this case, valproic acid (sodium valproate), phenytoin and carbamazepine being the most frequent. In 50% of the population, hepatic failure was not felt to be due to felbamate but associated with confounding factors including status epilepticus, paracetamol (acetaminophen) toxicity, hepatitis and shock liver. Initial research has failed to provide a diagnostic indicator. However, work on a potential intermediate felbamate metabolite has suggested the formation of a reactive aldehyde whose end products have been detected in the urine of felbamate treated patients. Until these data are confirmed, the medical history, clinical picture, and laboratory testing, should be used to identify patients at risk. The risks for toxicity with felbamate should be evaluated before starting treatment. In addition, liver function tests and complete blood count (CBC) prior to therapy and at clinically rational intervals should be conducted. Patients must be educated in the likely prodromal symptoms of potential marrow/liver toxicity. Felbamate is too valuable an anticonvulsant to be relegated to the therapeutic scrap heap. With monitoring, patient education, and continued research to further elucidate risk factors, felbamate can be a viable therapeutic agent for patients with epilepsy.

Purpose: This open-label study investigated the pharmacokinetic interaction of phenytoin (PHT) and felbamate (FBM)., Methods: Ten subjects with epilepsy receiving PHT monotherapy were administered increasing doses of FBM (1,200, 1,800, 2,400-3,600 mg/day) at 2-week intervals. PHT doses were reduced by 20% on an individual basis when evidence of clinically significant intolerance was present. With intolerance, the PHT dose was reduced before the next incremental FBM dose. Blood samples were analyzed for FBM, PHT, and PHT metabolite 5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-phenylhydantoin (HPPH)., Results: Total PHT plasma concentrations increased with coadministered FBM. PHT Cmax increased from 15.9 microg/ml at baseline to 20.9 microg/ml after 1,200 mg/day FBM and to 26.8 microg/ml after 1,800 mg/day FBM. Four subjects required a 20% PHT dose reduction after 1,800 mg/day FBM and six after the administration of 2,400 mg/day FBM. All subjects required further 20% PHT reductions before 3,600 mg/day FBM. FBM Cmax and AUCT were reduced, and apparent clearance increased compared with data from FBM monotherapy., Conclusions: With the initiation of FBM therapy in subjects receiving PHT, the PHT dosage should be reduced by 20%. Further PHT dose reductions are likely to be necessary if the FBM dose is increased. The requirements for reductions in dose might be predicted by clinical signs of PHT intolerance.

Purpose: To describe a potential association between male infertility and valproate (VPA) exposure. VPA has been implicated in the development of polycystic ovarian disease and subsequent menstrual and infertility problems in women with epilepsy. Infertility has been well described in population-based studies of persons with epilepsy. The low marital rates for men with epilepsy have previously been thought to play a major contributing role., Methods: We report a case of a 32-year-old man whose wife and he were able to bear a child before the development of his epilepsy. With VPA monotherapy, the family were unable to conceive despite 4 years of unprotected intercourse. An infertility evaluation of the man revealed a very low sperm count of < 50,000/ml, no motile sperm, < 10% viability, and 100% with abnormal structure. Follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and testosterone levels were normal., Results: Felbamate (FBM) was initiated and VPA discontinued for improved seizure control. Within 4 months, the couple conceived their second child. A seminal analysis revealed a sperm count of > 16 million, 50% motility, 78% viability, and 72% with abnormal structure., Conclusions: One must be cautious in extrapolating from a case report, but these findings strongly suggest a direct effect of VPA on spermatic structure and function.

We studied the efficacy of felbamate (FBM) in combination with valproic acid (VPA) in 13 patients with the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and evaluated the contribution of each drug. Following stabilization on VPA monotherapy, FBM or placebo titration was performed for two observation periods lasting 7 weeks with a washout period between them. 6-h video-electroencephalography was recorded following each observation period. In addition to examining the effects of the drugs with parental reports and video-EEG, we compared video-EEG data with families' seizure reports. Based on parental counts for the 7-week observation periods, patients had 40% fewer drop attacks (p < 0.03, Wilcoxon rank sum test) and 60% fewer total seizures (p < 0.02) on VPA and FBM. VPA level rose by 12.7% when FBM was added (p < 0.01). When the effect of FBM was factored out, VPA had a significant effect on drop attack frequency, although not total number of seizures. FBM's therapeutic effect on drop attacks is due in part to increased VPA levels, although the combination may be synergistic for the effect on total seizure number.

This open-label study was performed to evaluate efficacy and safety of Felbamate (FBM) add-on therapy in drug-refractory partial epilepsy. We evaluated 36 patients (12 males) aged 11-68 years (mean 29.8) in which FBM was titrated gradually from 300 mg/day to a mean total maintenance daily dose of 1936 mg. Patients were monitored according to clinical practice and performed regularly laboratory tests. Mean follow-up of FBM therapy was 10 months (range 2-27). In this study, 5% of patients resulted to be seizure-free, 11% showed a seizure reduction more than 75%, 23% decreased their seizure frequency between 50% and 75% (P = 0.0001). The adverse events which were reported more frequently were: nausea, vomiting, anorexia and weight loss. Even if the patients sample is small FBM proves its efficacy in partial epilepsy, showing a relatively well tolerated profile.

Since 1993, several new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been introduced for management of partial seizures. Like the established AEDs, the new drugs are believed to exert their anticonvulsant action through enhancement of inhibitory-mediated neurotransmission, or reduction of excitatory-mediated neurotransmission, or by a combination of both. Among the new drugs, vigabatrin (VGB) and tiagabine (TGB) are unique in that they were derived from mechanistic-based drug discovery programs designed to identify effective AEDs that inhibit the metabolism and reuptake of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA, respectively. For many of the newer AEDs, several molecular mechanisms of action have been identified. For example, felbamate (FBM), lamotrigine (LTG), zonisamide (ZNS), topiramate (TPM), oxcarbazepine (OCBZ), and possibly gabapentin (GBP) share a similar mechanism with that defined for phenytoin (PHT) and carbamazepine (CBZ), i.e., a voltage- and use-dependent block of voltage-sensitive sodium (Na+) channels. In addition to their effects on Na+ currents, TPM, ZNS, and FBM also appear to act as allosteric modulators of the GABA(A) receptor, whereas GBP appears to increase brain GABA levels. GBP, ZNS, FBM, LTG, and OCBZ attenuate voltage-sensitive calcium (Ca2+) channels, albeit through different mechanisms and with different classes of Ca2+ channels. FBM and TPM differ from both the established and newer AEDs in their ability to modulate NMDA- and AMPA/kainate-mediated excitatory neurotransmission, respectively. The multiple mechanisms of action associated with FBM, TPM, ZNS, GBP, and perhaps LTG, and the unique modulation of GABA levels by VGB and TGB, are likely to account for the anticonvulsant efficacy of these newer AEDs in patients with epilepsy. For each of the new drugs, their proposed mechanisms of action are discussed in relationship to their preclinical and clinical anticonvulsant profiles.

Because pharmacokinetics is a major determinant of the magnitude and duration of pharmacologic response, understanding the kinetic properties of the new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is essential for the correct use of these compounds in clinical practice. After oral administration, absorption is rapid and relatively efficient for the new AEDs, the most notable exception being gabapentin, whose bioavailability decreases with increasing dosage. None of the new AEDs is extensively bound to plasma proteins except for tiagabine, which is over 95% protein-bound. The route of elimination differs to an important extent from one compound to another, and elimination half-lives range from over 30 h for zonisamide to 5-7 h for gabapentin. For all drugs that are metabolized, half-life is shortened and clearance is increased when patients receive concomitant enzyme-inducing agents such as barbiturates, phenytoin, and carbamazepine. Lamotrigine metabolism is markedly inhibited by valproic acid, and felbamate may increase the serum levels of most other AEDs. Felbamate, topiramate, and oxcarbazepine may also reduce the efficacy of the contraceptive pill by stimulating its metabolism.

The management of epilepsy in children requires careful evaluation, classification, and pharmacologic treatment. With classic antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), at least 25% of children remain refractory to appropriate therapy. The past decade has allowed the introduction of a number of newer AEDs for treatment of both adults and children with epilepsy. These include felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, tiagabine, and vigabatrin. Emerging information regarding the efficacy of these AEDs in treating childhood epilepsy syndromes suggests advantages for many patients. Limited data are available that define the optimal use of new AEDs in pediatric patients. Further research must be completed to validate the positive effects described in existing clinical trials of the new AEDs in the treatment of childhood epilepsy.

Felbamate (FBM) was the first of the new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) approved in the United States in 1993 with broad-spectrum efficacy against partial and generalized seizures of various types, and indicated for use as adjunctive and monotherapy. The identification of idiosyncratic aplastic anemia and hepatotoxicity, however, drastically curtailed its use. To update information concerning FBM and its idiosyncratic effects, case studies and literature reviews were undertaken. Thirty-four FBM-associated aplastic anemia patients have been reported, with 13 known fatalities. The overall FBM aplastic anemia risk is estimated at between 27 and 209 per million vs. 2 to 2.5 per million in the general population. Prior AED hypersensitivity, cytopenia, and immune disease significantly increase risk. FBM aplastic anemia has not been reported in children below the age of 13 years. Hepatic failure is much less common, occurring with an overall risk similar to that associated with valproate, but children below the age of 5 years have been affected. The recent identification of a reactive metabolite, atropaldehyde, and HLA studies suggest that high-risk patients can be identified. The efficacy profile of FBM should encourage further investigations to allow its better use, but at present FBM is not a first-line AED.