1. Efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate versus controlled-release carbamazepine monotherapy in newly diagnosed epilepsy: A phase III double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study.
- Author
-
Trinka E, Ben-Menachem E, Kowacs PA, Elger C, Keller B, Löffler K, Rocha JF, and Soares-da-Silva P
- Subjects
- Adult, Alanine Transaminase blood, Anticonvulsants therapeutic use, Carbamazepine therapeutic use, Delayed-Action Preparations, Dibenzazepines therapeutic use, Dizziness chemically induced, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Equivalence Trials as Topic, Fatigue chemically induced, Female, Headache chemically induced, Humans, Logistic Models, Male, Middle Aged, Nausea chemically induced, Treatment Outcome, Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers therapeutic use, Young Adult, gamma-Glutamyltransferase blood, Anticonvulsants administration & dosage, Carbamazepine administration & dosage, Dibenzazepines administration & dosage, Epilepsies, Partial drug therapy, Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers administration & dosage
- Abstract
Objective: We assessed the efficacy and safety of once-daily eslicarbazepine acetate in comparison with twice-daily (BID) controlled-release carbamazepine (carbamazepine-CR) monotherapy in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy patients., Methods: This randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial (NCT01162460) utilized a stepwise design with 3 dose levels. Patients who remained seizure-free for the 26-week evaluation period (level A: eslicarbazepine acetate 800 mg/carbamazepine-CR 200 mg BID) entered a 6-month maintenance period. If a seizure occurred during the evaluation period, patients were titrated to the next target level (level B: eslicarbazepine acetate 1200 mg/carbamazepine-CR 400 mg BID, level C: eslicarbazepine acetate 1600 mg/carbamazepine-CR 600 mg BID) and the evaluation period began again. The primary endpoint was the proportion of seizure-free patients for 6 months after stabilization in the per protocol set. The predefined noninferiority criteria were -12% absolute and -20% relative difference between treatment groups., Results: Eight hundred fifteen patients were randomly assigned; 785 (388 in the eslicarbazepine acetate group and 397 in the carbamazepine-CR group) were included in the per protocol set, and 813 (401 in the eslicarbazepine acetate group and 412 in the carbamazepine-CR group) were included in the full analysis set for the primary analysis. Overall, 71.1% of eslicarbazepine acetate-treated patients and 75.6% of carbamazepine-CR-treated patients were seizure-free for ≥6 months at the last evaluated dose (average risk difference = -4.28%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -10.30 to 1.74; relative risk difference = -5.87%, 95% CI = -13.50 to 2.44) in the per protocol set. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between groups for patients in the safety set. Noninferiority was also demonstrated in the full analysis set, as 70.8% of patients with eslicarbazepine acetate and 74.0% with carbamazepine-CR were seizure-free at the last evaluated dose (average risk difference = -3.07, 95% CI = -9.04 to 2.89)., Significance: Treatment with eslicarbazepine acetate was noninferior to BID carbamazepine-CR. With its once-daily formulation, eslicarbazepine acetate provides a useful option for first-line monotherapy for adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy and focal onset seizures., (© 2018 The Authors. Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF