Search

Objective: The time in therapeutic range (TTR) of international normalized ratio (INR) is essential for the safety and efficacy of warfarin treatment. In this study, we aimed to determine TTR and the factors that affect TTR in patients using warfarin., Methods: Patients taking warfarin for valvular and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) or prosthetic heart valves who were admitted to our cardiology outpatient clinic were enrolled. TTR was calculated using the linear interpolation method. The patients were analyzed according to warfarin indications and TTR efficiency (TTR ≥60%). Weekly warfarin dose, the duration of warfarin use, the frequency of INR visits per year, and the awareness of patients regarding target INR were noted., Results: The TTR of 248 patients (aged 57.21±12.45 years, 33.1% male) was 55.92±27.84%, and 48.0% patients exhibited efficient TTR. Clinical and demographic characteristics (age, sex, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities) exerted no effect on TTR and TTR efficiency. The frequency of INR visits per year was 10.02±3.80. TTR was related to the frequency of annual INR visits (r=0.131, p=0.039). Only one-third (30.2%) of patients were aware of their target INR. The literacy of the patients and duration of warfarin use exerted a positive effect on awareness (p=0.011 and p=0.024, respectively)., Conclusion: The findings of our study demonstrated that TTR and TTR efficiency were low and not associated with the characteristics of patients or indications. Unfortunately, in patients with valvular AF and prosthetic valves, warfarin is the sole drug that can be used. Thus, awareness and knowledge regarding target INR are essential to overcome poor anticoagulation monitoring with frequent INR visits.

Aim: We aimed to evaluate the effect of echocardiographically demonstrated right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) on time in therapeutic range (TTR) in heart failure (HF) patients receiving warfarin therapy., Methods: A total of 893 consecutive HF patients were included and classified into 4 different subgroups: HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) without RVD (n = 373), HF with reduced EF (HFrEF) without RVD (n = 215), HFpEF with RVD (n = 106) and HFrEF with RVD (n = 199). Groups were compared according to baseline, demographic and clinical data and the characteristics of warfarin therapy., Results: Presence of RVD yielded lower median TTR values both in HFpEF and HFrEF patients. RVD, current smoking, New York Heart Association functional class III/IV, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, pulmonary disease, prior transient ischemic attack or stroke, chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 4/5 and CKD stage 3 were found to be independent predictors of poor anticoagulation control in multivariate logistic regression analysis., Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that presence of RVD in HF increases the risk for poor anticoagulation., (© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objectives: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common causes of preventable ischemic stroke and is related to increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. There is a lack of data in Turkey on the use of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs), and time in therapeutic INR range (TTR) in vitamin K antagonist users and AF management modality. In this multi-center trial, we aimed to analyze, follow and evaluate the epidemiological data in non-valvular AF patients., Study Design: Four thousand one hundred consecutive adult patients from 42 centers with at least one AF attack identified on electrocardiography will be included in the study. Patients with rheumatic mitral valve stenosis and prosthetic valve disease will be excluded from the study. At the end of one year, the patients will be evaluated in terms of major cardiac end points (death, transient ischemic attack, stroke, systemic thromboembolism, major bleeding and hospitalization)., Results: First results are expected in June 2015. Data about major cardiovascular end-points will be available in January 2016., Conclusion: The rates and kind of oral anticoagulant use, TTR in vitamin K antagonist users and main management modality applied in non-valvular AF patients will be determined by AFTER-2 study. In addition, the rate of major adverse events (MACEs) and the independent predictors of these MACEs will be detected (AFTER-2 Study ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02354456.).