Search

Rivaroxaban is an effective and safe alternative to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. We tested the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in high-risk patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome. This is a randomized open-label multicenter noninferiority study with blinded end point adjudication. Rivaroxaban, 20 mg once daily (15 mg once daily based on kidney function) was compared with warfarin (international normalized ratio target 2.5) for the prevention of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and vascular death in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. Only high-risk patients triple positive for lupus anticoagulant, anti-cardiolipin, and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies of the same isotype (triple positivity) were included in the study. The trial was terminated prematurely after the enrollment of 120 patients (59 randomized to rivaroxaban and 61 to warfarin) because of an excess of events among patients in the rivaroxaban arm. Mean follow-up was 569 days. There were 11 (19%) events in the rivaroxaban group, and 2 (3%) events in the warfarin group. Thromboembolic events occurred in 7 (12%) patients randomized to rivaroxaban (4 ischemic stroke and 3 myocardial infarction), whereas no event was recorded in those randomized to warfarin. Major bleeding occurred in 6 patients: 4 (7%) in the rivaroxaban group and 2 (3%) in the warfarin group. No death was reported. The use of rivaroxaban in high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome was associated with an increased rate of events compared with warfarin, thus showing no benefit and excess risk. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02157272., (© 2018 by The American Society of Hematology.)

The study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of laboratory findings in patients with catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) and to report the effects of a well-defined treatment protocol in 14 consecutive cases. Thirteen patients (12 presenting one and one presenting two episodes of CAPS) were consecutively treated and monitored between 1986 and 2017. Antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) characteristics of the patients were compared with those of 64 matched controls (45 antiphospholipid syndrome patients and 19 aPL carriers) who did not develop CAPS during the same mean follow-up period (12 years ± 9.9 SD). Triple aPL positivity (IgG/IgM anticardiolipin + IgG/IgM anti-β2Glycoprotein I + lupus anticoagulants) significantly prevailed in the CAPS patients with respect to the controls (p = 0.003). IgG anticardiolipin and IgG anti-β2Glycoprotein I mean antibody titers of the CAPS patients were significantly higher than those of the controls (p = 0.0018 and p = 0.003, respectively). Triple therapy (anticoagulation + plasma exchange + steroids) was administered to all the CAPS cases except for one. Beginning in 2009, intravenous immunoglobulin infusion has also been included in the triple therapy protocol (six patients). All the patients recovered from CAPS; five showed renal failure and one a I-II class New York Heart Association (NYHA) dilated cardiomyopathy. Long-term outcomes of CAPS included a gradual worsening of renal failure in one patient who required hemodialysis 30 years after the acute episode. Renal function improved in the other four patients. The patient affected with dilated cardiomyopathy worsened to a II class NYHA over a five year period. Currently all the patients are alive. A specific antiphospholipid antibody profile could be considered a risk factor associated to CAPS. Early use of a defined treatment protocol based on triple therapy either or not associated with IVIG was associated with recovery in all CAPS patients., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess the longterm frequency of thrombotic recurrences, obstetrical complications, organ damage, severe comorbidities, and evolution toward connective tissue disease (CTD) in primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS)., Methods: Medical records of patients with PAPS followed in 6 centers for ≥ 15 years were retrospectively reviewed., Results: One hundred fifteen patients were studied: 88% women, followed between 1983 and 2014 with a mean (± SD) age at diagnosis of 33 (± 10) years. During a median followup of 18 years (range 15-30), 50 patients (44%) had at least a thrombotic event for a total of 75 events and an annual incidence of 3.5%. Thromboses were more frequent in patients with previous thrombotic history (p = 0.002). A catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome occurred in 6 patients (5%). The use of oral anticoagulants in patients with thrombotic onset did not appear to be protective against recurrences (p = 0.26). Fifty-two women had 87 pregnancies, successful in 78%. Twenty-nine percent of patients accrued functional damage. Damage was significantly associated with a thrombotic history (p = 0.004) and with arterial events (p < 0.001), especially stroke, but not with demographics, serology, or treatment. Twenty-four major bleeding episodes were recorded in 18 patients, all receiving anticoagulants. Severe infections affected 6 patients (5%), with 1 fatality. A solid cancer was diagnosed in 8 patients (7%). Altogether, 16 patients (14%) developed an autoimmune disease and 13 (11%) a full-blown picture of CTD., Conclusion: Despite therapy, a high proportion of patients experienced new thrombotic events and organ damage, while evolution toward CTD was infrequent.

Lupus anticoagulant (LAC) is an in vitro phenomenon determining a phospholipid-dependent elongation of clotting times. The presence of LAC associated with anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2 glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) antibodies is strongly associated with thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) targeting thrombin and factor Xa are currently widely use to prevent and treat venous and arterial thromboembolism. Some concern has, however, been expressed about the possibility of false laboratory results during LAC assessment in patients taking these drugs. Several in vitro studies, spiking DOACs into normal plasma as well as ex vivo at peak levels in treated patients, led in false-positive LAC. The dilute Russell Viper Venom time is the assay that is most influenced by rivaroxaban, edoxaban, dabigatran and less by apixaban. Both screening and confirmatory tests have resulted equally prolonged for activated partial thromboplastin time and have not led to false-positive results, but this may depend on the type of reagent used for the test. Taipan/Ecarin snake venoms ratios, has been recommend by some investigators as they do not seem to be affected by rivaroxaban or edoxaban, but these tests are neither standardized nor generally available in clinical practice. In conclusion, for the time being it does not seem advisable to carry out LAC testing during anti-factor Xa and anti-factor IIa treatment because of the risk of false-positive results. Whenever needed in deciding the suspension of DOACs or in case of recurrent thrombosis, LAC determination should be carried out at trough better if DOAC concentration is known., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex (aPS/PT) antibodies are emerging as an important marker for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). We aimed to compare their performance with that of conventional antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) such as lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL), and anti-β2-glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) in APS and to assess their frequency in APSnegative (APS-ne) patients. Methods: We considered 160 APS patients and 128 APS-ne patients with clinical criteria for APS but tested negative for conventional aPL. Immunoglobulin (Ig)G/IgM aPS/PT, IgG/IgM aCL, and IgG/IgM anti-β2GPI were detected using ELISA assay and LA with a series of coagulation tests. Results: IgG aPS/PT were significantly associated with IgG aCL, IgG anti-β2GPI, and LA (p < 0.0001 for all). IgM aPS/ PT were significantly associated only with LA (p < 0.0001) instead. There was a significant correlation between IgG aPS/PT and both IgG aCL and IgG anti-β2GPI levels (ρ = 0.42 and ρ = 0.40, respectively). Both IgG aPS/PT and IgM aPS/ PT positivity significantly correlated with LA (ρ = 0.44 and ρ = 0.5, respectively). IgG and IgM aPS/PT were significantly more frequent in triple than in double and in single positivity (p < 0.0001). According to multivariate analysis, IgG and/or IgM aPS/PT were independent risk factors for LA. APS/PT antibodies were found in 9.4% of the APS-ne patients vs. 2% of healthy control (p = 0.043); those antibodies were significantly more frequent in the thrombosis with respect to the pregnancy morbidity subset (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Our data attribute a clinical relevance to both IgG and IgM aPS/PT antibodies. In particular, the significant prevalence of aPS/PT in APS-ne patients suggests including them as additional laboratory criterion for APS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Antiphospholipid syndrome is an autoimmune, hypercoagulable state that is caused by antiphospholipid antibodies. Anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-β2 glycoprotein-I, and lupus anticoagulant are the main autoantibodies found in antiphospholipid syndrome. Despite the amassed body of clinical knowledge, the risk of obstetric complications that are associated with specific antibody profile has not been well-established.Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the risk of obstetric complications in women with primary antiphospholipid syndrome that is associated with specific antibody profile.Study Design: The Pregnancy In Women With Antiphospholipid Syndrome study is a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study. Diagnosis and classification of antiphospholipid syndrome were based on the 2006 International revised criteria. All women included in the study had at least 1 clinical criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome, were positive for at least 1 antiphospholipid antibody (anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-β2 glycoprotein-I, and/or lupus anticoagulant), and were treated with low-dose aspirin and prophylactic low molecular weight heparin from the first trimester. Only singleton pregnancies with primary antiphospholipid syndrome were included. The primary outcome was live birth, defined as any delivery of a live infant after 22 weeks gestation. The secondary outcomes were preeclampsia with and without severe features, intrauterine growth restriction, and stillbirth. We planned to assess the outcomes that are associated with the various antibody profile (test result for lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, and anti-β2 glycoprotein-I).Results: There were 750 singleton pregnancies with primary antiphospholipid syndrome in the study cohort: 54 (7.2%) were positive for lupus anticoagulant only; 458 (61.0%) were positive for anticardiolipin antibodies only; 128 (17.1%) were positive for anti-β2 glycoprotein-I only; 90 (12.0%) were double positive and lupus anticoagulant negative, and 20 (2.7%) were triple positive. The incidence of live birth in each of these categories was 79.6%, 56.3%, 47.7%, 43.3%, and 30.0%, respectively. Compared with women with only 1 antibody positive test results, women with multiple antibody positive results had a significantly lower live birth rate (40.9% vs 56.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.90). Also, they were at increased risk of preeclampsia without (54.5% vs 34.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.95) and with severe features (22.7% vs 13.8%, adjusted odds ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-2.49), of intrauterine growth restriction (53.6% vs 40.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.61) and of stillbirth (36.4% vs 21.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-2.94). In women with only 1 positive test result, women with anti-β2 glycoprotein-I positivity present alone had a significantly lower live birth rate (47.7% vs 56.3% vs 79.6%; P<.01) and a significantly higher incidence of preeclampsia without (47.7% vs 34.1% vs 11.1%; P<.01) and with severe features (17.2% vs 14.4% vs 0%; P=.02), intrauterine growth restriction (48.4% vs 40.1% vs 25.9%; P<.01), and stillbirth (29.7% vs 21.2% vs 7.4%; P<.01) compared with women with anticardiolipin antibodies and with women with lupus anticoagulant present alone, respectively. In the group of women with >1 antibody positivity, triple-positive women had a lower live birth rate (30% vs 43.3%; adjusted odds ratio,0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.91) and a higher incidence of intrauterine growth restriction (70.0% vs 50.0%; adjusted odds ratio,2.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-2.99) compared with double positive and lupus anticoagulant negative women.Conclusion: In singleton pregnancies with primary antiphospholipid syndrome, anticardiolipin antibody is the most common sole antiphospholipid antibody present, but anti-β2 glycoprotein-I is the one associated with the lowest live birth rate and highest incidence of preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, and stillbirth, compared with the presence of anticardiolipin antibodies or lupus anticoagulant alone. Women with primary antiphospholipid syndrome have an increased risk of obstetric complications and lower live birth rate when <1 antiphospholipid antibody is present. Despite therapy with low-dose aspirin and prophylactic low molecular weight heparin, the chance of a liveborn neonate is only 30% for triple-positive women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background IgG anti-Domain I (anti-DI) β2 Glycoprotein I (β2GPI) antibodies are associated to thrombotic risk in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), but their detection is technically difficult. In this study, a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) was used to evaluate the clinical significance of IgG anti-DI in a large cohort of patients with primary APS (PAPS). Methods The study population included 88 patients with PAPS, 63 ELISA-negative subjects and 166 controls. IgG anti-DI, IgG anticardiolipin (aCL) and IgG anti-β2GPI antibodies were assayed using CLIA (HemosIL AcuStar®). Results The sensitivity and specificity of IgG anti-DI antibodies were comparable to those of IgG aCL and IgG anti-β2GPI antibodies. There was a significant agreement, association and titre correlation between IgG anti-DI and IgG aCL as well as IgG anti-β2GPI antibodies (p < 0.001 for all). IgG anti-DI antibody showed lesser prevalence and mean titres in the pregnancy morbidity than in thrombotic and PAPS patients with both involvements (p < 0.001). Regarding the conventional aPL antibody profiles, the triple positivity group had higher prevalence and mean titres than single and double positivity ones (p < 0.001). Conclusions This study provides further evidence that anti-DI antibodies can be considered a promising biomarker for risk assessment particularly in patients having vascular thrombosis and triple conventional aPL positivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]