Search

Recently, Zika virus (ZIKV) has become more widespread, thus attracting global attention. The vaccine against Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is currently used in China, being included in planned immunisation regimes. Although ZIKV and JEV are closely related mosquito-borne Flaviviruses, and a complex cross-immune response within flaviviruses has been demonstrated, the effect of JEV vaccination on ZIKV infection has not been well described. Thus, this study aimed to explore the impact of different titres of anti-JEV antibodies (Abs) against ZIKV infection using sera from healthy human donors in Guangzhou and anti-JEV rabbit polyclonal antibodies (pAbs) in vitro and vivo. Human anti-JEV Ab titres were tested at decreasing concentrations as the age increased. A neutralising effect on ZIKV infection was observed when anti-JEV Ab titres in human sera or rabbit pAbs were high (the corresponding age was under 30 years). Even though a lower titre in human sera showed no apparent effect, whereas rabbit pAbs had an antibody-dependent enhancement(ADE)effect, we proved an ADE effect in vivo for the first time. This study suggests that individuals over 60 years of age are at high risk for JEV and ZIKV infection, and screening this age group for infection should strengthen. Furthermore, a deep exploration of the relationship between anti-JEV Abs and ZIKV infection is needed.

The neuraminidase-inhibition (NI) assay is a laboratory procedure for the identification of the neuraminidase (NA) glycoprotein subtype in influenza viruses or the NA subtype specificity of antibodies to influenza virus. A serological procedure for subtyping the NA glycoprotein is critical for the identification and classification of avian influenza (AI) viruses. The macroprocedure was first described in 1961 by Aminoff and was later modified to a microtiter plate procedure (micro-NI) by Van Deusen et al. (Avian Dis 27:745-750, 1983). The micro-NI procedure reduces the quantity of reagents required, permits the antigenic classification of many isolates simultaneously, and eliminates spectrophotometric interpretation of results. Although, the macro-NI has been shown to be more sensitive than the micro-NI, the micro-NI test is very suitable for testing sera for the presence of NA antibodies and has proven to be a practical and rapid method for virus classification. This chapter provides an overview of the USDA validated micro-NI procedure for the identification of subtype-specific NA in AIV and antibodies.

Hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) assay is a classical laboratory procedure for the classification or subtyping of hemagglutinating viruses. For influenza virus, HI assay is used to identify the hemagglutinin (HA) subtype of an unknown isolate or the HA subtype specificity of antibodies to influenza virus. Since the HI assay is quantitative it is frequently applied to evaluate the antigenic relationships between different influenza virus isolates of the same subtype. The basis of the HI test is inhibition of hemagglutination with subtype-specific antibodies. The HI assay is a relatively inexpensive procedure utilizing standard laboratory equipment, is less technical than molecular tests, and is easily completed within several hours. However when working with uncharacterized viruses or antibody subtypes the library of reference reagents required for identifying antigenically distinct influenza viruses and or antibody specificities from multiple lineages of a single hemagglutinin subtype requires extensive laboratory support for the production and optimization of reagents.

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors demonstrate highly efficient gene transfer to hepatocytes in vivo. One of the remaining obstacles to the treatment of hemophilia B patients with AAV vectors is the sensitivity of these vectors to antibody-mediated neutralization following systemic delivery. Testing and implementation of strategies to circumvent pre-existing antibodies requires knowledge of the clearance kinetics of AAV from circulation. In this study, AAV clearance kinetics were established for serotypes 2 and 8 in cell culture and in mice. Administration of pooled neutralizing serum subsequent to administration of the vector was used to define the time period in which the vector is susceptible to antibody-mediated neutralization. These experiments defined the in vivo clearance rates for both AAV2 and AAV8 vectors to be between 2 and 4 hours. In mice, portal vein and tail vein administration of each vector was tested with similar results. Cell culture studies in W162 cells established that cellular attachment and internalization both contribute to the clearance kinetics of AAV vectors. These studies characterize the in vivo clearance rates of AAV vectors for the first time and guide the development of future strategies for the avoidance of antibody-mediated AAV vector neutralization.

Antibody responses are often considered to play only a limited role in controlling viremia during chronic infections with human or simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV). We investigated this by determining the effect of passively infused antibody on plasma viremia in infected rhesus macaques. The emphasis of the study was to understand the mechanism(s) underlying any observed effects. We infused serum immunoglobulins (SIVIG) purified from SIV(mac)251-infected macaques into other SIV(mac)251-infected macaques. The rapid progressor recipients had high viral loads but negligible titers of antibodies to SIV. Thus, we could significantly increase antibody titers with exogenous SIVIG. Despite restoring anti-SIV titers to levels typical of macaques with a normal disease course, SIVIG had only a modest effect on plasma SIV RNA and cell-associated viral load; the maximum, transient, reduction was threefold. The decrease in plasma RNA commenced within 1-2 h of SIVIG infusion, the nadir was at 12 h, and then a rebound occurred. A two- to threefold drop in cell-associated viral RNA was simultaneous with the decrease in plasma RNA. The kinetics of the viremia changes are inconsistent with neutralization of new cycles of infection. More likely, perhaps unexpectedly, is that infused antibodies killed SIV-infected cells, via an effector mechanism such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity., (Copyright 2000 Academic Press.)