Search

Cetuximab, a chimeric mouse-human IgG1 monoclonal antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor, has proven effective in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. However, a high incidence of immediate hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) to cetuximab after the first infusion has been observed. We have developed a test for identification of patients likely to show treatment-related HSR to cetuximab. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting anti-cetuximab IgEs was developed and tested on serum samples collected from cancer patients before start of cetuximab treatment, and from healthy blood donors. Similar levels of anti-cetuximab IgE were detected in pre-treatment patient sera (24/92, 26.1%) and sera from healthy blood donors (33/117, 28.2%). HSR were observed in 14 out of the 92 patients (15.2%), and 8 of these (57.1%) were grade 3-4. Anti-cetuximab IgEs were detected in 7/8 of the patients (87.5%) with severe HSRs as compared with 14/78 patients (17.9%) with no HSR (p=0.0002). Predictive value of the anti-cetuximab IgE test for HSR events of grades 3-4 was calculated using Receiver Operating Characteristics analysis. With a cut-off value of 29 arbitrary units for the anti-cetuximab IgE, the ELISA test showed a sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity of 82.1%, positive predictive value of 33.3% and negative predictive value of 98.5%. Anti-cetuximab IgE ELISA detection could be a valuable tool to help the physician anticipate an anaphylaxis episode following cetuximab infusion and opt for a suitable alternative treatment.

Although clinical trials using anti-CD40L mAb have been halted, blockade of CD40-CD40L interactions has given promising results in rodent and nonhuman primate models. Recently, new insights into the consequences of blocking CD40-CD40L interactions have led to the possibility of overcoming the thromboembolic complications previously associated with this strategy and may pave the way for successful tolerance induction. This mini review will address the issues relating to CD40-CD40L blockade in allotransplantation.

B-F5, a mouse IgG1 anti-CD4 MoAb, was used in recipients of a first cadaveric kidney allograft. Eighteen patients received 30 mg/day MoAb with a quadruple sequential therapy. All but one kidney were functioning at 6 months, with a mean serum creatinine of 153 micromol/L. However, 50% of the patients had an acute rejection episode within the first three months, and most of the early episodes (i.e., < 1 month) occurred in patients with low levels of circulating MoAb. The biological analysis showed a strong depleting effect on the CD4+ cell counts, a saturation by the MoAb of the remaining circulating CD4+ cells, and no detectable immunization against B-F5. Although the biological parameters indicate an action of B-F5 in vivo, the clinical data associated with poor MoAb bioavailability suggest the need for an improved pharmacokinetic behavior of the MoAb to determine its use for prophylaxis of early rejection.

25.3, a mouse IgG1 monoclonal antibody (MoAb), directed at the alpha chain of the LFA1 molecule (CD11a) has been used in prophylaxis of rejection in recipients of cadaveric kidney graft. Promising clinical results have been obtained for both tolerance and efficacy [1]. The aim of this trial was to determine the optimal dosage, base on a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of the data obtained from the 15 patients included in this dose-searching study. Biological parameters, such as circulating levels and functional inhibition (as detected in an adhesion assay of patient lymphocytes), were measured during and after treatment. A Hill relation was calculated between the effect and the concentration measured and led us to select a 15 mg/day dose for further clinical trials, with a loading dose of 30 mg. An additional group receiving this protocol was submitted to the same calculation, and the results from this last group were in agreement with this previous analysis.

A prospective, randomized trial was conducted to evaluate the short-term and long-term effects of induction immunosuppression with the rat IgG 2a monoclonal antibody 33B3.1, directed against the human alpha chain of the interleukin 2-receptor, following primary, cadaveric, combined pancreas and kidney transplantation. Forty patients were randomly assigned to receive 10 mg/day of 33B3.1 (n = 20) or 1.5 mg/kg/day of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (n = 20) for the first 10 postoperative days. Azathioprine, low-dose corticosteroids, and cyclosporine were given in association with either 33B3.1 or ATG. All 40 patients received the entire 10-day bioreagent course and no episode of rejection was observed during this period. Although the incidence of rejection did not significantly differ within the first, second, and third postoperative months (ten 33B3.1 and 6 ATG patients experienced, respectively, 10 and 6 rejection episodes within the first 3 months), the total number of 33B3.1 patients experiencing rejection throughout the follow-up was significantly higher than that of ATG (13 versus 6; P < 0.02). Immunological graft failure accounted for 2 pancreas and 2 kidney losses in the 33B3.1 group versus 1 in the ATG one (P = ns). The total number of infectious episodes was similar in both groups (21 versus 23). Two malignancies were observed in the ATG group (1 responsible for patient's death). One 33B3.1 patient died because of infectious pneumonia and 3 ATG patients died because of 2 cardiovascular diseases and 1 cancer. All patients had functioning grafts at the time of death. The 3-month and 36-month patient, pancreas, and kidney actuarial survival rates were, respectively, 100, 65, and 100%, and 95, 50, and 82% in the 33B3.1 group and 95, 80, and 90%, and 80, 70, and 80% in the ATG one (P = ns). These data suggest that, although a significantly higher rejection episode incidence was observed in patients treated with 33B3.1 monoclonal antibody as compared with ATG, similar long-term results can be obtained following primary cadaveric combined pancreas/kidney transplantation.

The focus of progress in transplantation immunosuppression is to achieve more specific immunosuppression with monoclonal antibodies. We have already shown that the efficacy of 33B3.1, a rat monoclonal Ig2A directed against the human IL-2 receptor, was similar to that of rabbit antithymocyte globulin in the prevention of acute rejection in first kidney transplants. A similar comparative analysis has been made in 40-sec renal transplants. ATG (1 mg/kg/day) or 33B3.1 (10 mg/day) was administered during the first 10 days postgrafting in association with corticosteroids and azathioprine. Cyclosporine was introduced on day 9 and azathioprine/CsA constituted the patient's maintenance treatment after day 45. Rejection treatment consisted of equine antilymphocyte globulin in both cases and of steroid boluses when patients were under Cyclosporine. One patient in each group died. Graft survival was 90%, 85%, and 79% in the ATG group (n = 20) and 100%, 89%, and 89% in the 33B3.1 group (n = 20) at 3, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Of the ATG group patients, 45% and 40% in the 33B3.1 group had at least one rejection episode, half the episodes in the MoAb cohort occurring under 33B3.1, vs. none in the ATG group. Transplant function was similar in both groups. Viral infections appeared to be more frequent with ATG (60%) than with 33B3.1 (12%), with CMV accounting for half of these in the ATG group, and none in the MoAb group. Tolerance of both agents was good. Of the 33B3.1 recipients, 70% developed anti-33B3.1 antibodies. From these data, we conclude that this anti-IL-2 receptor MoAb seems less effective than rabbit ATG as induction treatment in second kidney transplant patients.

A murine IgG1 monoclonal antibody, 25-3 (Immunotech, France), directed against the alpha chain (CD11a) of the human LFA1 molecule was used in the treatment of 7 histologically documented first acute rejection in first kidney transplantations under cyclosporine. Four patients (group I) received 20 mg/day for 2 days and 10 mg/day for 8 days of 25-3 MoAb. One developed Quincke's edema after the first injection of 25-3 and was immediately withdrawn from the study. In 2 patients, whose serum creatinine continued to increase, 25-3 MoAb was replaced by steroids, followed by ALG after 3 and 4 days of treatment, respectively. In the last case, rejection was reversed by 25-3 MoAb alone. As the clinical response of rejection to 25-3 was poor, another group of 3 patients (group II) was treated with 25-3 at a dose of 40 mg/day for 2 days, 20 mg/day for 2 days, and 10 mg/day for 6 days, but 25-3 was still unsuccessful in reversing acute rejection, and rescue treatment was initiated between days 5 and 8 in all cases. MoAb tolerance was excellent in 3 patients. With the exception of the one case of Quincke's edema, only minor side effects were noted in the last 3 recipients. 25-3 MoAb serum trough levels peaked between 1.5-3.5 micrograms/ml at day 3 in group I and between 2-9 micrograms/L at day 2 in group II. Surprisingly, only one patient, in group I, exhibited a borderline IgG immune response against 25-3. These findings suggest that the 25-3 anti-CD11a MoAb is ineffective in controlling the course of acute rejection in kidney transplantation. However as already reported for another anti-LFA1 or with an anti-CD4 MoAb in mouse, 25-3 would be the first example in humans of a MoAb that does not elicit a strong immune response against its own determinants. This property might have important applications if 25-3 can prevent rejection in a prophylactic protocol or block the immune response against other MoAbs.

Interleukin-2 is a major growth factor for activated T lymphocytes, and antibodies reacting with the Tac-chain component of the interleukin-2 receptor can prevent allograft rejection in animals. Because Tac chains are expressed only on a small fraction of activated lymphocytes, monoclonal antibodies against the interleukin-2 receptor may offer a more specific means of immunosuppression than polyclonal antilymphocyte globulin in prophylaxis against graft rejection. Therefore, we compared the immunosuppressive effect of 33B3.1, a rat monoclonal antibody against the human Tac chain, with the effect of a rabbit polyclonal antithymocyte globulin in a randomized study of 100 recipients of first renal transplants. Injections of 33B3.1 (10 mg per day) were tolerated well, whereas major side effects in 15 of 47 patients (32 percent) receiving antithymocyte globulin required discontinuation of treatment before day 14. The incidence of rejection episodes was not statistically different in the two groups at days 14, 30, 60, and 90 after transplantation. Patient and graft survival was also equal in the two groups at one year (96 and 85 percent, respectively, in both groups), and graft function was similar. The total number of infectious episodes within the first three months was lower in the 33B3.1 group than in the antithymocyte group (47 vs. 72). The drop in peripheral-blood lymphocyte concentrations was significantly larger in the patients treated with antithymocyte globulin. The level of circulating Tac-chain-bearing lymphocytes remained below 1 percent during 33B3.1 treatment, as compared with 4 to 5 percent during antithymocyte-globulin treatment (P not significant). We conclude that 33B3.1 is as effective as antithymocyte globulin in the prevention of renal-transplant rejection, and its use results in fewer infections and side effects.

Monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) against human interleukin 2 receptor (IL-2-R) have been shown to prevent early kidney rejection in animals and humans. We report here the effect of an anti-IL-2-R MoAb (33B3.1) inhibiting IL-2 binding high-affinity sites on activated lymphocytes in 10 declared acute rejection episodes of first cadaveric kidney grafts. Six patients were under cyclosporine treatment only at the time of diagnosis of the rejection. All rejection episodes but one were biopsy-proved cellular rejections. Treatment consisted of intravenous infusions of 33B3.1 at 20 mg/day x 2 days, followed by 10 mg/day for 8 additional days. In case of MoAb ineffectiveness at day 5, anti-IL-2-R MoAb was discontinued and a rescue treatment of corticosteroid boluses (CSb) was given. If not, in all cases corticosteroids (CS) were given (1 mg/kg) at the end of MoAb treatment (day 10) and tapered off thereafter. Two rejection episodes immediately responded to 33B3.1 treatment. During 33B3.1 treatment four other patients had only a stabilization of their blood creatinine concentration, which nevertheless returned to prerejection levels after day 10 when anti-IL-2-R was discontinued and CS administered at 1 mg/kg (no rescue treatment). The four remaining patients had an increase of their blood creatinin levels at day 5 despite 33B3.1 treatment, and their renal function only improved with CSb rescue treatment. One of these patients lost the graft despite rescue treatment, as well as a 9-day course of antithymocyte globulin. Trough levels of MoAb reached a plateau as early as day 2 (approximately 6 micrograms/ml). All patients developed antibodies (IgM and IgG) after day 14. In no instance could unresponsiveness be related to low circulating 33B3.1 trough levels or to early host anti-MoAb immune response (IgM or IgG). We conclude that 33B3.1, known to be effective in preventing early rejection, has only inconsistent and/or incomplete effects on the ongoing rejection process. Our data suggest that once IL-2-dependent clones are expanded in the rejected graft, interference with IL-2/IL-2-R signals does not block the effector mechanisms sustaining acute rejection.

33B3.1, a rat IgG2a monoclonal antibody (MAb) directed against interleukin 2 receptor, has been given in association with prednisone and azathioprine to prevent rejection in 30 recipients of a primary cadaveric kidney transplant. The MAb 33B3.1 had been administered intravenously (IV) at 10 mg per day for 2 weeks. Clinical and biological tolerance were excellent. Only one patient had a rejection episode (reversible) during the MAb treatment period. These results were significantly better than those recorded from a historical group of patients that received only prednisone and azathioprine, and were similar to those from patients who received antithymocyte globulin instead of 33B3.1. There was no life threatening infectious episode and all patients are alive. Ninety-seven percent of the patients have a functional graft (follow-up, 30 to 210 days). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) of 33B3.1 indicate that circulating trough blood level peaked at day 6 (30 nm). The majority of patients (85%) developed either IgG or IgM antibodies with a maximal response at day 24 for both isotypes. We conclude that this new treatment that targets a functional receptor present on activated lymphocytes only, is well tolerated and highly efficient in preventing early rejection after human renal transplantation.

This report describes the molecular parameters of interaction of a new antibody (33B3.1) with the human membrane RIL2 expressed by ConA-activated T lymphocytes or allogeneic T-cell clones established from a rejected kidney allograft: the 33B3.1 immunoprecipitates a membrane protein of 55000 MW. It inhibits IL2-driven proliferation of activated T cells. This inhibition occurred in the nanomolar range when low concentrations of recombinant IL2 (rec-IL2) were used. The (125I)-33B3.1 binds in a specific way to a single class of receptor sites on activated T cells. The rate constants of association and dissociation at 37 degrees C of the labeled 33B3.1 were k*1 = 12 X 10(5) M-1 s-1 and k*-1 = 7 X 10(-4) s-1, respectively, and its equilibrium dissociation constant was KD = 0.65 nM. Maximal binding capacities were fairly variable among T-cell clones, as high as 300,000 sites/cell for some of them. Competition experiments demonstrate that the 33B3.1 and anti-Tac interact with the RIL2 in a competitive manner, suggesting that they recognize closely associated epitopes on the RIL2. However, the 33B3.1 inhibits the binding of (35S)-recombinant IL2 to its high affinity RIL2 in a noncompetitive way. The 33B3.1 seems therefore to interact with an epitope close but distinct from the IL2 binding site. Our data could suggest either that the 33B3.1 is able to convert high affinity RIL2 towards low affinity conformations or that there is more than one IL2 binding site per molecule of high affinity RIL2.

OX39, a murine IgG1 monoclonal antibody (MoAb) that recognizes the 55 kDa alpha chain of the rat interleukin 2 receptor (R-IL2), was studied in vitro for its ability to interfere with IL2 binding and IL2-induced proliferation on rat concanavalin A (ConA) blasts and in vivo in a model of rat heart allografts. In vitro studies indicated that OX39 MoAb interacts with a single class of sites on the alpha chain of the rat R-IL2 with a high affinity (KD = 0.8 nm) and competes with IL2 binding on this chain (KI = 0.53 nm). In contrast, OX39 MoAb was found to be 10-20 times less efficient in competing with IL2 binding to the high-affinity R-IL2 (KI approximately 10 nm). It is proposed that the epitope recognized by OX39 on the alpha chain (low-affinity R-IL2) is modified on (or buried in) the high-affinity R-IL2 configuration. Accordingly, OX39 was found to be a weak inhibitor in vitro on IL2-induced proliferation and in vivo on allograft rejection. Allograft survival was unaffected by doses of OX39 of 20 and 50 micrograms/rat for 9 days; only a borderline effect was noted when doses as high as 250 micrograms/rat were used. A significant, but restricted, effect of OX39 could be further detected when combined with low doses of cyclosporine A (1.5 mg/kg), which were ineffective by themselves. Together, our data suggest that in order to be efficient in vivo, anti-R-IL2 MoAbs must bind with high affinity to epitopes involved in the high-affinity IL2 binding site.

The effect of 33B3.1, a rat IgG2a monoclonal antibody (MAb) directed against interleukin 2 receptors on activated T lymphocytes, was studied during the first two weeks after transplantation in an attempt to prevent rejection in primary, cadaveric, kidney transplant recipients. 9 patients received 5 mg 33B3.1 daily by intravenous infusion for 14 days (group A) and 18 received 10 mg daily (group B). Both groups also received prednisone and azathioprine. In threatened rejection, rescue treatment consisted of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG). 33B3.1 was well tolerated, with mild fever during the first 2 days being the most common side-effect. 3 patients in group A had a reversible acute rejection episode before day 14, whereas only 1 patient in group B had reversible rejection. 20 of 30 historical control patients (prednisone/azathioprine) and 2 of 55 patients previously treated with ATG had a rejection episode in a similar period after transplantation. Trough levels of 33B3.1 in the blood ranged from undetectable to 1.6 micrograms/ml in group A and from 0.3 to 9 micrograms/ml in group B. Most patients had antibodies against 33B3.1 by the end of treatment.