Search

Objectives: Ceftaroline could be suitable to treat early-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) because of its antibacterial spectrum. However, augmented renal clearance (ARC) is frequent in ICU patients and may affect ceftaroline pharmacokinetics and efficacy. The objective of the study was to explore the impact of ARC on ceftaroline pharmacokinetics and evaluate whether the currently recommended dosing regimen (600 mg every 12 h) is appropriate to treat VAP in ICU patients.Methods: A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using pharmacokinetic data from 18 patients with measured creatinine clearance (CLCR) ranging between 83 and 309 mL/min. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to determine the PTA and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) against Streptococcus pneumoniae and MRSA for five dosing regimens. Study registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03025841).Results: Ceftaroline clearance increased non-linearly with CLCR, with lower concentrations and lower probability of reaching pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets when CLCR increases. For the currently recommended dosing regimen, the probability of having unbound ceftaroline concentrations above the MIC over the entire dose range is greater than 90% for MICs below 0.125 mg/L. Considering the distribution of MICs, this regimen would not be effective against MRSA infections (CFR between 21% and 67% depending on CLCR), but would be effective against S. pneumoniae infections (CFR >86%).Conclusions: The recommended dosing regimen of ceftaroline seems sufficient for covering S. pneumoniae in ICU patients with ARC, but not for MRSA. Among the dosing regimens tested it appears that a constant infusion (50 mg/h) after a loading dose of 600 mg could be more appropriate for MRSA infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Global emergence of multidrug-resistant and extensive drug-resistant gram-negative bacteria has increased the risk of treatment failure, especially for healthcare- or ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP). Nebulization of antibiotics, by providing high intrapulmonary antibiotic concentrations, represents a promising approach to optimize the treatment of HAP/VAP due to multidrug-resistant and extensive drug-resistant gram-negative bacteria, while limiting systemic antibiotic exposure. Aminoglycosides and colistin methanesulfonate are the most common nebulized antibiotics. Although optimal nebulized drug dosing regimen is not clearly established, high antibiotic doses should be administered using vibrating-mesh nebulizer with optimized ventilator settings to ensure safe and effective intrapulmonary concentrations. When used preventively, nebulized antibiotics reduced the incidence of VAP without any effect on mortality. This approach is not yet recommended and large randomized controlled trials should be conducted to confirm its benefit and explore the impact on antibiotic selection pressure. Compared with high-dose intravenous administration, high-dose nebulized colistin methanesulfonate seems to be more effective and safer in the treatment of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and VAP caused by multidrug resistant and extensive-drug resistant gram-negative bacteria. Adjunctive nebulized aminoglycosides could increase the clinical cure rate and bacteriological eradication in patients suffering from HAP/VAP due to multidrug-resistant and extensive drug-resistant gram-negative bacteria. As nebulized aminoglycosides broadly diffuse in the systemic circulation of patients with extensive bronchopneumonia, monitoring of plasma trough concentrations is recommended during the period of nebulization. Large randomized controlled trials comparing high dose of nebulized colistin methanesulfonate to high dose of intravenous colistin methanesulfonate or to intravenous new β-lactams in HAP/VAP due to multidrug-resistant and extensive drug-resistant gram-negative bacteria are urgently needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Optimal dosing for nebulized gentamicin is unknown. We compared the pulmonary and systemic pharmacokinetics (PK) of gentamicin following intravenous and nebulized administration in mechanically ventilated patients.Methods: Twelve critically ill male patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia received a 30 min intravenous infusion of 8 mg/kg gentamicin , followed 48 h afterwards by the same dose nebulized. Blood samples were collected immediately before and until 24 h after intravenous and nebulized administration; mini-bronchoalveolar lavages (mini-BALs) were performed at 3 and 7 h or 5 and 10 h (six patients each) after each intravenous and nebulized administration. The PK analysis was conducted using a population approach.Results: After intravenous administration, concentrations of gentamicin measured in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) were very variable, and overall in the same range of magnitude (from 0.3 to 28 mg/L) as in plasma. After nebulization, gentamicin concentrations were much higher (∼3800-fold) in ELF than in plasma. The average systemic bioavailability of nebulized gentamicin was estimated to be 5%, with considerable inter-individual variability. Compared with intravenous administration, after nebulization the exposure (expressed as AUC) to gentamicin was 276-fold greater in ELF and 18-fold lower in plasma.Conclusions: Compared with intravenous administration, nebulization of gentamicin in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia provides higher pulmonary concentrations and lower systemic concentrations but the inter-individual variability is large. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Optimal dosing for nebulized colistin methanesulfonate (CMS), the prodrug of colistin, is unknown. We describe the pulmonary and systemic pharmacokinetics of CMS and colistin following nebulization of 0.5 million IU (MIU) of CMS in ventilated patients.Methods: Twelve critically ill patients received 0.5 MIU of CMS administered every 8 h as 30 min nebulizations. Blood samples were collected immediately before and until 8 h after first nebulization; mini-bronchoalveolar lavage (mini-BAL) was performed at 1 and 5 h or 3 and 8 h (six patients each) post-dose. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed for CMS and colistin plasma concentrations using a non-compartmental method. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01060891.Results: After nebulization, CMS concentrations in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) were much higher (100- to 1000-fold) than those in plasma. Concentrations of colistin in ELF should be considered with caution because when <6 mg/L in BAL, colistin bound to mini-BAL devices. Nevertheless, CMS and colistin concentrations in ELF were much lower than expected from previous results with a 2 MIU dose. From CMS plasma pharmacokinetics it was shown that CMS systemic bioavailability was only slightly decreased for the 0.5 MIU dose compared with 2 MIU.Conclusions: This study shows that CMS concentrations were much higher (100- to 1000-fold) in ELF than in plasma after a 0.5 MIU aerosol of CMS, but much lower (10-fold) than expected from previous results with a 2 MIU dose. Therefore, until new pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments of the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia with nebulized CMS are performed, the 2 MIU dose should be preferred to the 0.5 MIU dose. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]