Search

Fibrosis is a severe health problem characterized by progressive stiffening of tissues which causes organ malfunction and failure. A major bottleneck in developing new anti-fibrosis therapies is the lack of in vitro models that recapitulate dynamic changes in tissue mechanics during fibrogenesis. Here we create membranous human lung microtissues to model key biomechanical events occurred during lung fibrogenesis including progressive stiffening and contraction of alveolar tissue, decline in alveolar tissue compliance and traction force-induced bronchial dilation. With these capabilities, we provide proof of principle for using this fibrotic tissue array for multi-parameter, phenotypic analysis of the therapeutic efficacy of two anti-fibrosis drugs recently approved by the FDA. Preventative treatments with Pirfenidone and Nintedanib reduce tissue contractility and prevent tissue stiffening and decline in tissue compliance. In a therapeutic treatment regimen, both drugs restore tissue compliance. These results highlight the pathophysiologically relevant modeling capability of our novel fibrotic microtissue system.

Background and Aim: Diclofenac is a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug with potent analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties. An immediate-release formulation containing a low dose of 12.5 mg diclofenac-potassium (-K) is marketed as over the counter (OTC) medication in most European countries. An immediate-release formulation containing 25 mg diclofenac-K has now also been approved for OTC use. This study assessed the bioequivalence of two immediate-release diclofenac formulations when administered at the same dose., Subjects and Methods: A randomized, crossover, open-label study was conducted in 29 healthy volunteers to assess the bioequivalence of single 25 mg dose of diclofenac-K in two formulations: 2 x 12.5 mg as film-coated tablets and 1 x 25 mg as sugar-coated tablet. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analyses were obtained over 10 hours post administration., Results: Plasma time courses of diclofenac were similar for the tested formulations. Mean AUC yen was 798 +/- 281 ng x h/ml (mean +/- SD) for the film-coated and 776 +/- 249 ng x h/ml for the sugar-coated formulation, respectively. The 2-sided 90% confidence interval for the mean test/reference ratio of AUCinfinity (95.5 - 107.5) fell within the predetermined equivalence range of 80 - 125%. Both formulations were rapidly absorbed; median time to maximal plasma concentration was 35 min in each group. Adverse events (peripheral erythema on the hand, headache, hypoesthesia) reported during the study were of mild severity and were considered as unlikely to be drug-related., Conclusion: The two diclofenac-K immediate release formulations were pharmacokinetically similar. It can be concluded that the new sugar-coated tablet formulation is equivalent to the available film-coated tablet formulation with respect to the extent of diclofenac absorption.

Traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs block cyclooxygenase (COX). They are the most widely used drugs for pain relief. They are indispensable for their effects but are condemned for their adverse drug reactions. Two COX inhibitors, acetaminophen and aspirin, are the most widely used over-the-counter drugs. They have low (but useful) therapeutic activity, but they are endowed with specific risks that are not seen with most other COX inhibitors. Both are lethal if taken in overdose. Each is stigmatized by severe adverse effects. Aspirin results in prolonged inhibition of blood coagulation, and acetaminophen can result in liver toxicity at normal dose and liver failure at higher dose. Both drugs cause many deaths every year. We recommend that the status of both drugs be changed to prescription only. Their continued availability over the counter poses an unacceptable risk to the general population.

Within the past 20 years many cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors were removed for unwanted drug effects shortly after entering the drug market (e.g. benoxaprofen and isoxicam), whereas others (e.g. diclofenac and ibuprofen) were not. This has continued with the suspension of the sale of the COX-2 inhibitors rofecoxib, valdecoxib and lumiracoxib, whereas others (e.g. celecoxib and etoricoxib) are still available. All these compounds share the same molecular mode of action but differ considerably in their pharmacokinetics. Determination of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships should help to pinpoint deficits, answer pending questions and lead to a safer drug use. Here, we provide evidence that applying the ex vivo human whole-blood assay could provide a valuable tool for defining the lowest effective dose and the adequate dosing interval of COX inhibitors. In our opinion, such an approach could reduce unwanted drug effects and obviate drug removals.

Following the withdrawal of rofecoxib and valdecoxib, the discussion concerning selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors was often characterized more by emotions than scientific evidence. In fact, the original rationale of these substances is still valid, in that selective COX2 inhibitors cause significantly fewer severe side effects in the gastrointestinal tract than traditional NSAIDs. Off-label long-term use of COX2 inhibitors in patients with a history of colorectal adenomas in well-designed, placebo-controlled trials showed that treatment with these agents is associated with an increased rate of cardiovascular adverse effects. Other studies have shown that both COX2 inhibitors and NSAIDs are associated with a similar cardiovascular risk, suggesting that there is presently no rationale for a further differentiation of these groups of drugs in terms of cardiovascular toxicity. Referring to the current debate, potential mechanisms underlying cardiovascular adverse effects associated with the long-term use of COX2 inhibitors and NSAIDs are discussed. Moreover, this Review summarizes the pharmacology of COX2 inhibitors with emphasis on their different pharmacokinetic characteristics.

Antipyretic analgesics are a group of heterogeneous substances including acidic (nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, NSAIDs) and nonacidic (paracetamol, pyrazolinones) drugs. Moreover, various selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors with improved gastrointestinal tolerability as compared with conventional NSAIDs have been established for symptomatic pain treatment in recent years. The present review summarizes the pharmacology of all of these drugs with particular emphasis on their rational use based on the diverse pharmacokinetic characteristics and adverse drug reaction profiles. Referring to the current debate, potential mechanisms underlying cardiovascular side effects associated with long-term use of COX inhibitors are discussed.

Objective: We reported recently that celecoxib inhibits the metabolism of the cytochrome P450 (CYP)2D6 substrate metoprolol in volunteers. Valdecoxib, the active metabolite of parecoxib, has also been claimed to interfere with the metabolism of CYP2D6 substrates. However, little support for this contention is available despite the intensive use of parecoxib in the perioperative setting. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the effect of valdecoxib on the pharmacokinetics of the clinically relevant CYP2D6 substrate metoprolol., Methods: An open, randomized, 3-period crossover study was performed in 15 healthy male volunteers. Metoprolol (50 mg) was given in all 3 periods without, or following a 7-day pre-treatment with valdecoxib (20 mg, o.d.) or rofecoxib (25 mg, o.d.), to achieve steady state conditions of COX-2 inhibitors in Periods 2 and 3. In a small group of extensive metabolizers (EM/EM), short-term application of twice the dose was investigated., Results: No effect of valdecoxib (20 mg/d) or rofecoxib (25 mg/d) were detected on the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of metoprolol (323 +/- 333 to 324 +/- 296 or 309 +/- 256 microg x h/l) or at a higher dose. No significant changes of pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic parameters of metoprolol were apparent., Conclusion: We conclude that, at therapeutic doses, valdecoxib and rofecoxib do not influence the CYP2D6 substrate metoprolol.

Aim: Diclofenac-K has been recently launched at low oral doses in different countries for over-the-counter use. However, given the considerable first-pass metabolism of diclofenac, the degree of absorption of diclofenac-K at low doses remained to be determined. The aim of this study was to determine the bioavailability of low-dose diclofenac-K., Methods: A randomized, three-way, cross-over study was performed in 10 subjects. Each received diclofenac-K, 22.5 mg via short-term i.v. infusion and orally at single doses of 12.5 mg and 25 mg., Results: Mean (+/- SD) times to maximal plasma concentration (t(max)) of diclofenac were 0.48 +/- 0.28 h (12.5 mg) and 0.93 +/- 0.96 h (25 mg). The absolute bioavailability of diclofenac-K after oral administration did not differ significantly in the 12.5-mg and 25-mg dose group (63.1 +/- 12.6%vs. 65.1 +/- 19.4%, respectively). The 90% confidence intervals for the AUC(infinity) and AUC(t) ratios for the two oral regimes were 82.6, 103.4% (point estimate 92.4%) and 86.2, 112.9% (point estimate 98.6%), respectively. These values were within the acceptance criteria for bioequivalence (80-125%)., Conclusions: Our data indicate that diclofenac-K is rapidly and well absorbed at low dose, and are consistent with a rapid onset of action of the drug. Abbreviations AUC, area under plasma concentration-time curve; C(max), peak plasma concentration; CI, confidence interval; COX, cyclooxygenase; D, dose; F, absolute bioavailability; t(max), time to reach C(max).

Purpose of Review: This review discusses the recent literature on drugs used for symptomatic pain relief in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) as well as potential mechanisms underlying their pharmacologic action., Recent Findings: Recent research has shed light on the molecular mechanisms underlying the contribution of prostaglandins to pain sensation. Moreover, the role of the enzymes cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX) in inflammation and subsequent structural changes of joints has been clarified. Based on the COX-1/COX-2 hypothesis, various selective COX-2 inhibitors with improved gastrointestinal tolerability as compared with conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been established for the symptomatic treatment of OA in recent years. Rational therapy with these compounds should be based on their diverse pharmacokinetic characteristics. Among the traditional NSAIDs, the mode of action of aceclofenac has been recently clarified in that the compound was shown to elicit preferential inhibition of COX-2 as a result of limited but sustained biotransformation to diclofenac. Novel mechanisms have also been proposed to account for the action of acetaminophen. Finally, there is evidence from animal models to suggest that the dual LOX/COX inhibitor licofelone may stop disease progression in OA. Clinical studies are under way to establish this compound for treatment of OA., Summary: It is anticipated that new insights into the pathophysiology of OA as well as novel therapeutics will improve the pharmacologic options in OA., (Copyright 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins)

Objective: The mechanism of action of aceclofenac is currently unclear. This study investigated whether biotransformation to metabolites (4'-hydroxy-aceclofenac, diclofenac, 4'-hydroxy-diclofenac) contributes to inhibitory effects on the cyclooxygenase (COX) isozymes in vitro and ex vivo., Methods: In vitro investigations were performed with human whole blood and human blood monocytes. A randomized crossover study was performed in volunteers receiving 100 mg aceclofenac or a sustained-release resinate formulation of 75 mg diclofenac to assess the pharmacokinetics and the ex vivo inhibition of COX-1., Results: In short-term in vitro assays, neither aceclofenac nor 4'-hydroxy-aceclofenac affected COX-1 or COX-2, whereas diclofenac and 4'-hydroxy-diclofenac inhibited both isoforms. In long-term in vitro assays, aceclofenac and 4'-hydroxy-aceclofenac suppressed both COX isoforms. However, this inhibition was paralleled by a conversion to diclofenac and 4'-hydroxy-diclofenac, respectively. Maximal plasma concentrations of diclofenac after oral administration of aceclofenac (0.39 micromol/L) or diclofenac (1.28 micromol/L) were sufficient for a greater than 97% inhibition of COX-2 (50% inhibitory concentration, 0.024 micromol/L) and a 46% (aceclofenac treatment) or 82% inhibition (diclofenac treatment) of COX-1 (50% inhibitory concentration, 0.43 micromol/L). Moreover, ex vivo COX-1-dependent thromboxane B(2) synthesis was inhibited significantly less by aceclofenac than by diclofenac., Conclusions: Inhibition of COX isozymes by aceclofenac requires conversion into diclofenac. Although 100 mg aceclofenac yielded diclofenac concentrations substantially lower than 75 mg diclofenac, these were sufficient for a sustained block of COX-2 but caused a minor and shorter inhibition of COX-1 than 75 mg diclofenac. In conclusion, both COX-1-sparing and COX-2-inhibitory actions of aceclofenac may rest in its limited but sustained biotransformation to diclofenac.

Aceclofenac [[2-(2',6'-dichlorophenyl)amino]phenylacetoxyacetic acid] is a phenylacetic acid derivative with potent analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties and an improved gastro-intestinal tolerance. In the present study, a liquid-liquid extraction-based reversed-phase HPLC method with UV detection was validated and applied for the analysis of aceclofenac and three of its metabolites (4'-hydroxy-aceclofenac, diclofenac, 4'-hydroxy-diclofenac) in human plasma. The analytes were separated using an acetonitrile-phosphate buffer gradient at a flow rate of 1 mL/min, and UV detection at 282 nm. The retention times for aceclofenac, diclofenac, 4'-hydroxy-aceclofenac, 4'-hydroxy-diclofenac and ketoprofen (internal standard) were 69.1, 60.9, 46.9, 28.4 and 21.2 min, respectively. The validated quantitation range of the method was 10-10000 ng/mL for aceclofenac, 4'-hydroxy-aceclofenac and diclofenac, and 25-10000 ng/mL for 4'-hydroxy-diclofenac. The developed procedure was applied to assess the pharmacokinetics of aceclofenac and its metabolites following administration of a single 100 mg oral dose of aceclofenac to three healthy male volunteers., (Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Using human blood monocytes (for determination of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) mRNA by RT-PCR) and human whole blood (for prostanoid determination), the present study investigates the influence of the second messenger cAMP on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced COX-2 expression with particular emphasis on the role of prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) in this process. Elevation of intracellular cAMP with a cell-permeable cAMP analogue (dibutyryl cAMP), an adenylyl cyclase activator (cholera toxin), or a phosphodiesterase inhibitor (3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine) substantially enhanced LPS-induced PGE(2) formation and COX-2 mRNA expression, but did not modify COX-2 enzyme activity. Moreover, up-regulation of LPS-induced COX-2 expression was caused by PGE(2), butaprost (selective agonist of the adenylyl cyclase-coupled EP(2) receptor) and 11-deoxy PGE(1) (EP(2)/EP(4) agonist), whereas sulprostone (EP(3)/EP(1) agonist) left COX-2 expression unaltered. Abrogation of LPS-induced PGE(2) synthesis with the selective COX-2 inhibitor NS-398 caused a decrease in COX-2 mRNA levels that was restored by exogenous PGE(2) and mimicked by S(+)-flurbiprofen and ketoprofen. Overall, these results indicate a modulatory role of cAMP in the regulation of COX-2 expression. PGE(2), a cAMP-elevating final product of the COX-2 pathway, may autoregulate COX-2 expression in human monocytes via a positive feedback mechanism., (Copyright 2000 Academic Press.)

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit cyclooxygenase (COX) activity, thereby suppressing the synthesis of proinflammatory prostaglandins. The identification and molecular-biological characterization of an inducible COX isoform (COX-2) in inflammatory cells led to the hypothesis that a selective inhibition of COX-2 would result in relief of inflammation and pain without causing the COX-1-dependent side effects (gastrointestinal ulceration, platelet dysfunction, kidney damage) of conventional NSAIDs. On the basis of data obtained in several laboratories by means of the "human whole blood assay" there is now convincing evidence that none of the currently available NSAIDs is a selective COX-2 inhibitor. Meanwhile, the specific COX-2 inhibitors celecoxib and rofecoxib are being tested worldwide in phase III clinical trials on patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. However, the simple concept of COX-2 being an exclusively proinflammatory inducible enzyme cannot be upheld any longer. In addition, COX-2 is expressed constitutively in brain, spinal cord and kidney, as well as in numerous other organs. In the present review the perspectives and possible risks of specific COX-2 inhibitors are discussed, as well as additional indications for their implementation (e.g. colon cancer).