1. Comparison of two methods for presurgical disinfection of the equine hoof.
- Author
-
Hennig GE, Kraus BH, Fister R, King VL, Steckel RR, and Kirker-Head CA
- Subjects
- Animals, Anti-Infective Agents, Local administration & dosage, Colony Count, Microbial, Gram-Negative Bacteria drug effects, Gram-Negative Bacteria isolation & purification, Gram-Positive Bacteria drug effects, Gram-Positive Bacteria isolation & purification, Povidone-Iodine administration & dosage, Anti-Infective Agents, Local pharmacology, Disinfection methods, Hoof and Claw microbiology, Horses microbiology, Horses surgery, Povidone-Iodine pharmacology, Preoperative Care veterinary
- Abstract
Objectives: To determine for equine hooves the normal resident aerobic bacterial population and the efficacy of 2 methods of disinfection. Study Design-Measurement of total bacterial, gram-positive bacterial, and gram-negative bacterial surface populations from the frog, sole, and hoof wall after each step of 2 different preoperative surgical disinfection techniques., Animals: Six adult horses., Methods: Hoof wall, sole, and frog samples were collected for quantitative bacteriology before, during, and after 2 multistep antiseptic preparation techniques: Method A-6-minute scrub with povidone-iodine soap, followed by 24-hour submersion in povidone-iodine solution-soaked cotton; and Method B-initial removal of superficial layer of hoof capsule before completing Method A disinfection procedures., Results: Removal of the superficial hoof layer, application of the povidone iodine scrub, and completion of the povidone-iodine soak all significantly (P < .0008) decreased total bacterial numbers. Method B had significantly lower bacterial counts than method A at each consecutive step. Final total bacterial counts remained greater than 10(5) bacteria per gram of tissue regardless of preparation method., Conclusions: The hoof surface hosts a broad spectrum of aerobic gram-positive and -negative bacteria, many of which are potential pathogens. Bacterial numbers can be significantly reduced by removal of the superficial hoof surface, by application of a povidone-iodine scrub, and by use of a 24-hour povidone-iodine soak. However, bacterial populations >10(5) g per tissue persist after these disinfection procedures., Clinical Relevance: Regardless of the preparation methods used in this study, bacterial populations capable of inducing wound infection remain on the hoof capsule., (Copyright 2001 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons)
- Published
- 2001
- Full Text
- View/download PDF