Search

The antibacterial effects of a selection of volatile fatty acids (acetic, propionic, butyric, valeric, and caproic acids) relevant to anaerobic digestion were investigated at 1, 2 and 4 g/L. The antibacterial effects were characterised by the dynamics of Enterococcus faecalis NCTC 00775, Escherichia coli JCM 1649 and Klebsiella pneumoniae A17. Mesophilic anaerobic incubation to determine the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) and median lethal concentration of the VFAs was carried out in Luria Bertani broth at 37 °C for 48 h. Samples collected at times 0, 3, 6, 24 and 48 h were used to monitor bacterial kinetics and pH. VFAs at 4 g/L demonstrated the highest bactericidal effect ( p < 0.05), while 1 g/L supported bacterial growth. The VFA cocktail was the most effective, while propionic acid was the least effective. Enterococcus faecalis NCTC 00775 was the most resistant strain with the VFAs MBC of 4 g/L, while Klebsiella pneumoniae A17 was the least resistant with the VFAs MBC of 2 g/L. Allowing a 48 h incubation period led to more log decline in the bacterial numbers compared to earlier times. The VFA cocktail, valeric, and caproic acids at 4 g/L achieved elimination of the three bacteria strains, with over 7 log 10 decrease within 48 h.

The incidence of antibiotic resistance was determined in over 2000 bacteria which were divided into the following groups: faecal streptococci, coliforms (excluding Escherichia coli), E. coli, Pseudomonas spp. and aquatic bacteria (i.e. bacteria predominant in the lake water which were excluded from the previous four categories). The isolates were obtained from the water of Windermere (English Lake District) and from a sewage effluent which entered the lake. With the exception of the faecal streptococci, the incidence of antibiotic resistance was higher in the bacteria isolated from the lake water than in those from the effluent, and ranked according to groups Pseudomonas spp. greater than E. coli greater than aquatic bacteria greater than coliforms greater than faecal streptococci. The highest incidence of multiple resistance was found among the pseudomonads. When corrected for the relative size of each population the pool of antibiotic resistance in the aquatic bacteria was by far the largest. The incidence of antibiotic resistance in aquatic bacteria isolated from Windermere was, however, lower than in those isolated from two remote upland tarns. This finding may have been due to differences in the species composition of the three sites except that the same results were obtained when only fluorescent pseudomonads were tested. The upland tarns were not totally isolated from man and other animals but did not receive any sewage or other effluents and therefore the results were surprising. Possible explanations include a lack of susceptibility in aquatic bacteria and increased resistance associated with growth in nutrient poor environments.

It is more difficult to obtain a reliable assessment of antibiotic resistance in populations of aquatic bacteria than in those populations which are well characterized (e.g. bacteria of medical and veterinary significance). Factors which influence the results include the bacterial taxa involved, their site of origin and the methods and media used to isolate and subculture the bacteria, and to perform the sensitivity tests. Examples of these effects are provided. The resistance profiles obtained with populations of aquatic pseudomonads depend on the species composition of the population. Resistance patterns in aquatic bacteria varied with the site from which they were isolated; a higher incidence of resistance was recorded along shorelines and in sheltered bays than in the open water. The inclusion of antibiotics in the media employed for primary isolation increased the number of individual and multiple resistances recorded. A similar effect was observed with increased inoculum size in the sensitivity disc method but this could be reversed by raising the incubation temperature. The medium used to conduct the test also affected the results and many aquatic bacteria failed to grow on media such as Iso-Sensitest Agar. It is recommended that the sensitivity disc method is adopted for aquatic bacteria because it permits interpretation of a wider range of response. Comparison of the incidence of antibiotic resistance in different habitats will remain meaningless, however, until comprehensive methods for the identification of bacteria are developed and the techniques used for sensitivity testing are standardized.