Search

Background: Multiple biologics are now available for severe asthma (SA) treatment and can improve outcomes for patients. However, few available data describe the real-world use and effectiveness of multiple approved biologics, including biologic switching, among subspecialists in the United States., Objective: To evaluate biologic use and associated exacerbation outcomes in a large cohort of subspecialist-treated US adults with SA., Methods: CHRONICLE is an ongoing, noninterventional study of subspecialist-treated US adults with SA receiving biologics, maintenance systemic corticosteroids, or those persistently uncontrolled by high-dose inhaled corticosteroids with additional controllers. For enrolled patients, sites report asthma exacerbations and medication use starting 12 months before enrollment. For patients enrolled between February 2018 and February 2021, biologic use and exacerbation outcomes before and after biologic initiation are described., Results: Among 2793 enrolled patients, 66% (n = 1832) were receiving biologics. The most used biologic (> 1 biologic use per patient allowed) was omalizumab (47%), followed by benralizumab (27%), mepolizumab (26%), dupilumab (18%), and reslizumab (3%). Overall, 16% of patients had biologic switches, 13% had stops, and 89% had ongoing biologic use. Patients starting and switching biologics experienced a 58% (1.80 vs 0.76 per patient-year) and 49% (1.47 vs 0.75 per patient-year) reduction in exacerbations, respectively (both P < .001), with a numerically greater reduction observed among those starting non-anti-immunoglobulin E biologics compared with anti-immunoglobulin E., Conclusion: Real-world starting and switching of biologic therapies for SA were associated with meaningful reductions in exacerbations. With increasing biologic options available, individualized approaches to therapy may improve patient outcomes., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03373045., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with severe asthma (SA) have a heightened risk of exacerbations including hospitalization. The real-world, specialist-verified incidence and characteristics of exacerbations among patients with SA in the United States have not been described., Objective: To describe the real-world incidence, characteristics, and predictors of exacerbations among patients with SA in the United States., Methods: The CHRONICLE study is an ongoing observational study of specialist-treated adults with SA in the United States receiving biologic treatment or maintenance systemic corticosteroids or uncontrolled by high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids with additional controllers. For patients enrolled from February 2018 to February 2020, annualized rates and characteristics of exacerbation-related events were summarized by treatment category for 12 months before enrollment and after enrollment through the latest data collection. Results were further analyzed for subgroups of interest., Results: Among 1884 enrolled patients, 53.5% and 12.3% experienced an exacerbation and asthma hospitalization, respectively (0.81 and 0.14 per person-year). Of all exacerbations, 36%, 9%, and 15% required an unscheduled health care provider visit, emergency department visit without hospitalization, and hospitalization, respectively. Among patients not receiving biologics or systemic corticosteroids, higher blood eosinophil count, higher fractional exhaled nitric oxide, and lower total immunoglobulin E level were associated with higher exacerbation rates. Exacerbation rates decreased after starting or switching biologics (n = 1299). Multivariate analyses of enrolled patients revealed previous-year exacerbations or hospitalizations, lack of asthma control, and the geographic region also predicted event risk., Conclusion: In this real-world cohort of specialist-treated adults with SA in the United States, there was a substantial burden of exacerbations and associated health care resource utilization. Patients receiving biologics had a lower exacerbation burden., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03373045., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Severe asthma (SA) often requires subspecialist management and treatment with biologic therapies or maintenance systemic corticosteroids (mSCS)., Objective: To describe contemporary, real-world biologic and mSCS use among US subspecialist-treated patients with SA., Methods: CHRONICLE is an ongoing, noninterventional study of US adults with SA treated by allergists/immunologists or pulmonologists. Eligible patients are receiving biologics or mSCS or are uncontrolled on high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids with additional controllers. Biologic and mSCS use patterns and patient characteristics were summarized for patients enrolled between February 2018 and February 2019., Results: Among protocol-eligible patients, 58% and 12% were receiving biologics and mSCS, respectively, with 7% receiving both. Among 796 enrolled, most were women (67%), non-Hispanic white (71%), of suburban residence (50%), and had elevated body mass index (median: 31). Respiratory and nonrespiratory comorbidities were highly prevalent. With biologics (n = 557), 51% were anti-immunoglobulin E and 48% were anti-interleukin (IL)-5/IL-5Rα; from May 2018, 76% of initiations were anti-IL-5/IL-5Rα. In patients receiving mSCS, median prednisone-equivalent daily dose was 10 mg. Multivariate logistic regression found that patients of hospital clinics, sites with fewer nonphysician staff, and with a recorded concurrent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis were less likely to receive biologics and more likely to receive mSCS., Conclusion: In this real-world sample of US subspecialist-treated patients with SA not controlled by high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids with additional controllers, mSCS use was infrequent and biologic use was common, with similar prevalence of anti-immunoglobulin E and anti-IL-5/IL-5Rα biologics. Treatment differences associated with patient and site characteristics should be investigated to ensure equitable access to biologics and minimize mSCS use., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03373045., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

With novel therapies in development, there is an opportunity to consider asthma remission as a treatment goal. In this Rostrum, we present a generalized framework for clinical and complete remission in asthma, on and off treatment, developed on the basis of medical literature and expert consensus. A modified Delphi survey approach was used to ascertain expert consensus on core components of asthma remission as a treatment target. Phase 1 identified other chronic inflammatory diseases with remission definitions. Phase 2 evaluated components of those definitions as well as published definitions of spontaneous asthma remission. Phase 3 evaluated a remission framework created using consensus findings. Clinical remission comprised 12 or more months with (1) absence of significant symptoms by validated instrument, (2) lung function optimization/stabilization, (3) patient/provider agreement regarding remission, and (4) no use of systemic corticosteroids. Complete remission was defined as clinical remission plus objective resolution of asthma-related inflammation and, if appropriate, negative bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Remission off treatment required no asthma treatment for 12 or more months. The proposed framework is a first step toward developing asthma remission as a treatment target and should be refined through future research, patient input, and clinical study., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Fixed airflow obstruction (FAO) is associated with severe eosinophilic asthma. Benralizumab is an interleukin-5 receptor alpha-directed cytolytic monoclonal antibody for patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma., Objective: We evaluated FAO influence on benralizumab treatment response., Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of pooled phase III SIROCCO (NCT01928771) and CALIMA (NCT01914757) data for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma with baseline blood eosinophil counts of 300 or more cells/μL who received benralizumab 30 mg every 8 weeks or placebo. Demographics, baseline clinical characteristics, and treatment responses were evaluated by FAO status. FAO+ and FAO- were defined as ratios of postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ) to forced vital capacity of less than 70% and 70% or more, respectively, at baseline., Results: FAO+ prevalence was 63% (935/1493). With benralizumab, similar annual asthma exacerbation rate (AER) reductions vs placebo were achieved for FAO+ and FAO- patients (rate ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.56 [0.44-0.71] and 0.58 [0.41-0.83], respectively), whereas annual AER reductions associated with emergency department visits or hospitalizations were greater for FAO+ vs FAO- patients (rate ratio [95% CI] = 0.55 [0.33-0.91] and 0.70 [0.33-1.48], respectively). Prebronchodilator FEV 1 (95% CI) increase from baseline to end of treatment was greater for FAO+ vs FAO- patients receiving benralizumab compared with placebo (0.159 L [0.082-0.236] vs 0.103 L [-0.008 to 0.215]). Other lung function measures, patient-reported outcomes, and symptom improvements were also numerically greater for FAO+ vs FAO- patients., Conclusion: Benralizumab improved asthma control across several measures for patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma and FAO., Trial Registration: SIROCCO trial: NCT01928771 (URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01928771) CALIMA trial: NCT01914757 (URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01914757)., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Benralizumab is a unique eosinophil-depleting monoclonal antibody that significantly reduces asthma exacerbations, improves lung function and asthma symptoms, and permits the reduction of maintenance oral corticosteroid dosage for patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma., Objective: To assess benralizumab's onset of action and efficacy by examining change in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) after initiation of treatment in the phase 3 clinical trials SIROCCO, CALIMA, and ZONDA., Methods: Mixed-model repeated-measures analysis was used to calculate PEF using daily least squares mean changes from baseline in morning PEF as well as differences between the benralizumab every 8 weeks (first 3 doses every 4 weeks) and placebo groups. A Bayesian nonlinear mixed-effects approach with an exponential relationship was used to model trial data to determine time to clinically meaningful improvement in morning PEF (defined as ≥25 L/min)., Results: Least squares mean morning PEF improvement from baseline was numerically greater by Day 2 after initiation of benralizumab therapy in all 3 trials. The Bayesian nonlinear mixed-effects model indicated that PEF improvement reached the clinically meaningful threshold within 3 weeks in SIROCCO and CALIMA and 2 weeks in ZONDA., Conclusion: In 3 phase 3 randomized clinical trials, benralizumab provided notable improvement in morning PEF 2 days after initiation and clinically meaningful improvements within 3 weeks for patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma. The rapid improvement in PEF demonstrated in these trials suggests that benralizumab's unique mechanism of action rapidly improves lung function for patients with severe, eosinophilic asthma., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01928771 (SIROCCO), NCT01914757 (CALIMA), and NCT02075255 (ZONDA)., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Benralizumab is a humanized, afucosylated, monoclonal antibody that targets interleukin-5 receptor alpha and induces direct, rapid, and nearly complete depletion of eosinophils via enhanced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. In the United States, benralizumab is indicated for add-on maintenance treatment of patients ≥12 years old with severe asthma and an eosinophilic phenotype., Objective: This study evaluated the effect of benralizumab treatment on seasonal asthma exacerbation rates for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma., Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of pooled data from the phase III SIROCCO (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01928771) and CALIMA (NCT01914757) trials. The primary analysis population was patients ages 12-75 years treated with high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-2 agonists who had baseline blood eosinophil counts of ≥300 cells/μL. Patients received benralizumab 30 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks (the first three doses every 4 weeks) or placebo every 4 weeks. Crude exacerbation rates (asthma exacerbations per patient-year) were determined for each month and season. Marginal asthma exacerbation rates and exacerbation rate ratios were estimated by season or month by using a negative binomial model that included covariates for study code, treatment, region, use of maintenance oral corticosteroids, and number of exacerbations in the previous year. Hemispheric seasons were accounted for by normalizing the study site locations., Results: Observed crude exacerbation rates were higher in the fall and winter than in the spring and summer for all the patients. For the patients who received placebo, benralizumab every 4 weeks, and benralizumab every 8 weeks, crude exacerbation rates were the following: fall, 1.52, 0.86, and 0.81, respectively; winter, 1.44, 0.91, and 0.82, respectively; spring, 1.11, 0.66, and 0.52, respectively; and summer, 1.02, 0.55, and 0.51, respectively. Rate reductions in seasonal marginal annual exacerbation rates were 37-50% versus placebo at each season (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Benralizumab significantly and consistently reduced asthma exacerbations across all seasons versus placebo for patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma.

Background: Patients with severe asthma can have eosinophilic inflammation and/or allergen sensitization. Benralizumab is an anti-eosinophilic monoclonal antibody indicated for add-on maintenance treatment of patients with severe asthma aged 12 years and older, and with an eosinophilic phenotype., Objective: To investigate the efficacy of benralizumab by atopic status and serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) concentrations., Methods: We analyzed pooled results from the SIROCCO (NCT01928771) and CALIMA (NCT01914757) phase III studies. Patients 12 to 75 years old with severe, uncontrolled asthma on high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting β 2 -agonists received 30 mg of subcutaneous benralizumab every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks (first 3 doses every 4 weeks) or placebo every 4 weeks. The analysis stratified patients who did and did not meet similar omalizumab-qualifying criteria of atopy and serum IgE levels 30 to 700 kU/L. Patients also categorized as having high serum IgE (≥150 kU/L) or low serum IgE (<150 kU/L) and as having atopy or no atopy. Efficacy outcomes were for all patients and by blood eosinophil counts and included annual exacerbation rate ratio and pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second change at treatment end vs placebo., Results: Benralizumab every 8 weeks decreased exacerbations by 46% (95% confidence interval 26-61, P = .0002) and increased forced expiratory volume in 1 second by 0.125 L (95% confidence interval 0.018-0.232, P = .0218) vs placebo for patients with at least 300 eosinophils/μL who met the atopy and IgE criteria. For patients with eosinophilia and high or low IgE, treatment with benralizumab every 8 weeks resulted in 42% and 43% decreases in exacerbation rate (P ≤ .0004) and 0.123- and 0.138-L increases in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (P ≤ .0041) vs placebo, respectively., Conclusion: Benralizumab treatment decreased exacerbations and improved lung function for patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma regardless of serum IgE concentrations and atopy status., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The consistency of fixed airflow limitation status during treatment in patients with asthma is unknown., Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the consistency of fixed airflow obstruction (FAO) status during treatment and effects on treatment response., Methods: This post hoc analysis from a 12-week study (NCT00652002) assessed patients aged 12 years or more with moderate-to-severe asthma randomized to twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FM) via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) 320/9 μg, BUD pMDI 320 μg, FM 9 μg via dry-powder inhaler, or placebo. FAO status was assessed postbronchodilator at screening and after study drug administration at weeks 2, 6, and 12 via the forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) ratio < lower limit of normal (LLN) (FAO+) or ≥ LLN (FAO-). Patients with persistent FAO- and FAO+ retained their screening FAO status at all visits. Patients with inconsistent FAO changed categories at least once during the study. Assessments included early withdrawal due to predefined worsening asthma events (PAEs), lung function, and symptoms., Results: Of 386 patients, 29% had persistent FAO+, 31% inconsistent FAO, and 40% persistent FAO-. PAEs were lowest in the FAO- group overall and with BUD/FM treatment in patients with FAO+ and inconsistent FAO. Baseline demographics and treatment responses of the inconsistent FAO group were most similar to the FAO+ group. The greatest improvements in asthma control days and use of rescue medications were seen with BUD/FM treatment, regardless of FAO status., Conclusions: Approximately one third of patients with moderate-to-severe asthma in this study had inconsistent FAO, and their treatment responses were most similar to patients with FAO+. Regardless of FAO status, patients treated with BUD/FM experienced the most improved treatment responses and fewest withdrawals due to PAEs., (Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)