Search

This review summarizes the results of placebo-controlled trials of propafenone, a class IC antiarrhythmic drug, in patients with supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation (AF), and atrial flutter. Success rates for cardioversion from AF or flutter to sinus rhythm of 9-93% have been obtained with intravenous propafenone. The duration of arrhythmia is an important factor in the degree of success. The use of a single oral dose has also been reported to be effective in a number of studies. Several placebo-controlled studies have confirmed the effectiveness of propafenone in the long-term suppression of both suproventricular tachycardia and AF and flutter. These reported trials have shown consistent benefit with propafenone compared with placebo in preventing arrhythmia recurrence. The adverse side effect profile for propafenone has also been reviewed with particular reference to the potential for proarrhythmia. The rate of side effects is dose-dependent and tends to be higher in patients with underlying structural heart disease. Overall propafenone has been shown to be an effective antiarrhythmic drug with an acceptable side effect profile for the acute and long-term treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias.

The class III antiarrhythmic drug dofetilide is known to prolong action potential duration by specific blockade of the delayed rectifier potassium channel Ik. As dofetilide is likely to be used in the treatment of atrial arrhythmias it is important to determine the relative sensitivity of the atrium and ventricle in man. Twelve male patients underwent monophasic action potential and refractory period recordings from the high right atrium and right ventricular septum. The patients received either 8 micrograms.kg-1 dofetilide or placebo intravenously. The mean QTc was prolonged by 11% (SD 5%, P < 0.00001) in the active group; the mean monophasic action potential increased by 31% (SD 15%, P < 0.0005) in the atrium and 27% (SD 9%, P < 0.00005) in the ventricle; the mean effective refractory period increased by 30% (SD 16%, P < 0.0005) in the atrium and 20% (SD 6%, P < 0.0001) in the ventricle. No significant change occurred in the placebo group. There was no significant difference in effect between the two chambers. The change in QTc did not accurately reflect acute changes in refractory period or monophasic action potential duration. This has important implications for the use of QT prolongation to assess the acute effect of class III drugs.

We studied the effects of two active dose levels of dofetilide (8 and 12 micrograms/kg) and placebo in 16 patients with recent onset atrial fibrillation. The study was of a crossover design such that all patients received a therapeutic agent, 15 patients completed the study. Cardioversion was achieved in 2/6 patients receiving 8 micrograms/kg dofetilide and in 2/9 patients receiving 12 micrograms/kg. No patients cardioverted as a result of the placebo infusion. Two patients who cardioverted suffered episodes of torsades de pointes following the active drug. Electrical cardioversion was attempted in eight patients who remained in atrial fibrillation and was successful in six. The average duration of atrial fibrillation was 35 days in those who cardioverted and 83 days in those who did not. The compound appears to have only limited effect in cardioversion of atrial fibrillation of moderate duration.

To determine whether failure of procainamide to prevent initiation of ventricular tachyarrhythmias during electrophysiologic testing predicted failure of other antiarrhythmic regimens, 81 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease whose ventricular tachyarrhythmias remained inducible during procainamide administration were studied. Overall, 26 (12%) of 216 subsequent drug studies were successful and at least one effective drug regimen was identified in 22 (27%) of the 81 patients. Drug success was significantly related to the arrhythmia induced at baseline study; 7% of drug studies were successful in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia, 24% in patients with ventricular fibrillation, and 29% in patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. An effective drug regimen was found in 11 (19%) of 59 patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia, 4 (50%) of 8 patients with ventricular fibrillation and 7 (50%) of 14 patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. In patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia, failure of procainamide to suppress the arrhythmia correlated with failure of other agents used singly but not in combination. This study supports the view that when procainamide fails to prevent initiation of the arrhythmia in patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia it is unlikely that other individual standard agents will be effective. However, combination regimens may suppress the arrhythmia and should be evaluated. In patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, all agents should be evaluated because failure to respond to procainamide does not predict subsequent responses to other agents either alone or in combination.

The efficacy of combination therapy using a type IA agent (quinidine or procainamide) and a type IB agent (mexiletine) in suppressing inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias was studied in 23 patients undergoing serial drug testing with programmed stimulation. All patients had coronary artery disease (CAD) with previous myocardial infarction and abnormal left ventricular function (mean ejection fraction 35%). Fifty-five percent of the patients presented with syncope or cardiac arrest. In 19 patients therapy had failed during empiric trials of 1 to 3 antiarrhythmic agents. All 23 patients had inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (18 had uniform morphology sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and 5 had ventricular fibrillation [VF]) during control electrophysiologic study, and therapy had failed with a type IA agent and mexiletine alone. The combination therapy of mexiletine and the type IA agent prevented induction of any ventricular tachyarrhythmias in 8 of 23 patients. In 15 patients, the combination significantly prolonged the tachycardia cycle length and reduced the symptoms associated with the induced arrhythmia. Patients more likely to respond to the combination had shorter cycle lengths and polymorphic configuration of the control-induced arrhythmia. The increased efficacy of the combination therapy could not be attributed to higher plasma drug levels for the combination, as there was no significant difference in plasma levels for each drug when given alone or in combination. Thus, the increased efficacy most likely reflects a synergistic electropharmacologic effect of the 2 agents.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The provocation or worsening of arrhythmias by antiarrhythmic regimens was evaluated in patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias undergoing electrophysiologic studies. In 314 patients with sustained or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, 801 drug studies were performed using a standard protocol of programmed electrical stimulation. The criteria for proarrhythmia were: 1) initiation of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia in a patient in whom only nonsustained tachycardia was induced at baseline; 2) conversion of a sustained tachycardia that could be terminated by programmed electrical stimulation at baseline to one that required cardioversion for termination during drug therapy; 3) initiation of a sustained tachyarrhythmia by a less aggressive mode of stimulation than was required at baseline; and 4) development of spontaneous or incessant ventricular tachycardia. Proarrhythmia criterion 1 occurred during 20 (18%) of 118 studies and at least once in 15 (28%) of 54 patients. Criterion 2 was met during 39 (7%) of 578 studies and at least once in 29 (13%) of 220 patients. Criterion 3 was achieved during 135 (20%) of 687 studies in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias at baseline. Criterion 4 occurred during 9 (1%) of 801 drug studies. In 40 patients in whom well tolerated ventricular tachycardia was initiated with fewer extrastimuli during drug study than at baseline, the drug was continued and the patients were followed up. The recurrence rate of tachycardia was the same in these patients as in 73 patients followed up on regimens on which the number of extrastimuli required for initiation was not reduced.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

To determine the benefit of serial electrophysiologic drug testing in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias related to dilated cardiomyopathy, programmed ventricular stimulation was performed in 38 patients. In the baseline study, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) was induced in 18 patients, ventricular fibrillation in 7 and nonsustained VT in 13. The patients underwent a total of 84 trials of drug therapy (mean 2.3 +/- 1.4 trials/patient). Complete success (induction of fewer than 6 repetitive responses) was recorded in 19 trials and partial success (induction of at least 6 but no more than 15 repetitive responses) in 7. Potential proarrhythmic effects were observed in 9 trials. Overall, at least 1 successful regimen was identified for 20 patients (53%). During a mean follow-up of 21 +/- 13 months, there were no arrhythmia recurrences or episodes of sudden death among patients discharged with a drug regimen determined to be effective by serial drug testing. In comparison, among patients taking regimens that failed to prevent arrhythmia induction, there were 3 arrhythmia recurrences and 2 sudden deaths (p less than 0.05). Serial electrophysiologic drug testing provides an effective method of identifying successful medical therapy for patients with ventricular arrhythmia related to dilated cardiomyopathy.

The combined use of some beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents with calcium channel blockers may cause adverse pharmacodynamic drug interactions: hypotension, heart block or even asystole may be precipitated. The electrophysiological effects of combined administration of intravenous metoprolol 10mg and the vasodilating calcium antagonist felodipine (0.1 mg/kg/bodyweight) were assessed in an open study by invasive methods. Following metoprolol, the heart rate was reduced from 69 +/- 24 to 60 +/- 16 beats/min (mean +/- SD, p less than 0.05) with a minor prolongation of the sinus node recovery time. The A-H interval was increased from 94 +/- 25 to 109 +/- 16 msec (p less than 0.005) and the H-V interval was unchanged. The effective refractory period of the atrioventricular node was prolonged from 327 +/- 54 to 361 +/- 62 msec (p less than 0.01) with a minor prolongation of the effective refractory period of the ventricular Purkinje fibres. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures showed a mean reduction of 11 (p less than 0.001) and 6mm Hg (p less than 0.05), respectively. Following felodipine, the changes in heart rate and effective refractory periods of the atrioventricular node and ventricular Purkinje fibres returned towards control values. No further prolongation of the A-H interval resulted and further blood pressure changes were minor. The absence of adverse haemodynamic or electrophysiological effects suggests that this combination of agents may be safely used.

The efficacy and proarrhythmic potential of antiarrhythmic agents were evaluated. Programmed ventricular stimulation was performed in 160 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease during a baseline study and 432 subsequent drug studies. The tachyarrhythmias induced during baseline studies were sustained ventricular tachycardia (121 patients), ventricular fibrillation (16 patients), and symptomatic nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (23 patients). Regimens were completely successful if fewer than 6 repetitive ventricular responses were inducible during therapy and partially successful if no more than 15 repetitive ventricular responses were inducible. Procainamide and quinidine were the most successful single agents, with overall success rates of 24% and 35%, respectively. Either procainamide or quinidine combined with mexiletine was the most successful combination (overall success of 23%). Each anti-arrhythmic regimen showed a proarrhythmic potential. The incidence of proarrhythmic effects ranged from 4 to 13%, with no significant difference between regimens. In 13% of patients at least 1 regimen produced a proarrhythmic effect. Patients treated with an antiarrhythmic regimen that prevented induction of arrhythmia had significantly fewer arrhythmia recurrences than patients treated with a regimen that failed to prevent it. In conclusion, identification of an effective drug regimen is possible in 38% of patients with lethal ventricular arrhythmias, proarrhythmic effects occur in a significant number of patients during electrophysiologic testing of antiarrhythmic regimens, and the clinical outcome in patients in whom ventricular arrhythmias are not inducible with ventricular stimulation have a better prognosis than those in whom arrhythmias continue to be inducible on therapy.

Proarrhythmia is a potentially lethal adverse effect of antiarrhythmic drugs. Underlying mechanisms and the approaches to identification are discussed. The applicability of electrophysiologic testing is considered, with particular reference to the validity of the different responses to programmed stimulation considered to be manifestations of proarrhythmia. The incidence of proarrhythmia in relation to individual antiarrhythmic agents is also reviewed.

Antiarrhythmic drugs may worsen ventricular arrhythmias in certain patients. This effect, termed proarrhythmia, aggravation or provocation of arrhythmia, can be investigated with either noninvasive or invasive techniques. Using electrophysiologic study, 160 patients with ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation were evaluated during treatment with 432 different antiarrhythmic regimens. Proarrhythmic responses were noted in 68 drug trials (16%), and at least 1 event was observed in 51 patients (32%). Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was converted to sustained ventricular tachycardia in 17% of these studies. Hemodynamically stable ventricular tachycardia was converted to an arrhythmia that required cardioversion for termination in 5% of the studies. Ventricular tachyrhythmia was more easily induced in 12% of trials. These proarrhythmic responses were not related to changes in QRS duration, QT interval or JT interval measured at baseline or to changes produced by antiarrhythmic drugs.